Towards understanding the roles of position and geometry on cell fate decisions during preimplantation development

Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology

Volumn 47-48, Issue , 2015, Pages 74-79

  Biggins, John S ^a   Royer, Christophe ^b   Watanabe, Tomoko ^b   Srinivas, Shankar ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cell geometry; Cell lineage; Computational modelling; Hippo pathway; Mechanical forces; Preimplantation mouse embryos

Indexed keywords

ACTIN;

CELL FATE; CELL LINEAGE; CELL POPULATION; COMPUTER MODEL; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FERTILIZATION; HUMAN; INNER CELL MASS; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; REVIEW; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLASTOCYST; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MOTION; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MOVEMENT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84952637680     PISSN: 10849521     EISSN: 10963634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.09.006     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Rossant J., Tam P.P. Blastocyst lineage formation, early embryonic asymmetries and axis patterning in the mouse. Development 2009, 136:701-713.
2. Schrode N., Xenopoulos P., Piliszek A., Frankenberg S., Plusa B., Hadjantonakis A.K. Anatomy of a blastocyst: cell behaviors driving cell fate choice and morphogenesis in the early mouse embryo. Genesis 2013, 51:219-233.
3. Stephenson R.O., Rossant J., Tam P.P. Intercellular interactions, position, and polarity in establishing blastocyst cell lineages and embryonic axes. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4.
4. Driever W., Nusslein-Volhard C. The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner. Cell 1988, 54:95-104.
5. Driever W., Nusslein-Volhard C. A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell 1988, 54:83-93.
6. Sulston J.E., Schierenberg E., White J.G., Thomson J.N. The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 1983, 100:64-119.
7. Zernicka-Goetz M., Huang S. Stochasticity versus determinism in development: a false dichotomy?. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:743-744.
8. Marikawa Y., Alarcon V.B. Establishment of trophectoderm and inner cell mass lineages in the mouse embryo. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2009, 76:1019-1032.
9. Wennekamp S., Hiiragi T. Stochastic processes in the development of pluripotency in vivo. Biotechnol. J. 2012, 7:737-744.
10. Audoly B., Neukirch S. Fragmentation of rods by cascading cracks: why spaghetti does not break in half. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95:095505.
11. Zernicka-Goetz M. Cleavage pattern and emerging asymmetry of the mouse embryo. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6:919-928.
12. Clayton E., Doupe D.P., Klein A.M., Winton D.J., Simons B.D., Jones P.H. A single type of progenitor cell maintains normal epidermis. Nature 2007, 446:185-189.
13. Doupe D.P., Klein A.M., Simons B.D., Jones P.H. The ordered architecture of murine ear epidermis is maintained by progenitor cells with random fate. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:317-323.
14. Gomes F.L., Zhang G., Carbonell F., Correa J.A., Harris W.A., Simons B.D., et al. Reconstruction of rat retinal progenitor cell lineages in vitro reveals a surprising degree of stochasticity in cell fate decisions. Development 2011, 138:227-235.
15. Klein A.M., Simons B.D. Universal patterns of stem cell fate in cycling adult tissues. Development 2011, 138:3103-3111.
16. Garcia-Ojalvo J., Martinez Arias A. Towards a statistical mechanics of cell fate decisions. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2012, 22:619-626.
17. Watanabe T., Biggins J.S., Tannan N.B., Srinivas S. Limited predictive value of blastomere angle of division in trophectoderm and inner cell mass specification. Development 2014, 141:2279-2288.
18. Tarkowski A.K., Wroblewska J. Development of blastomeres of mouse eggs isolated at the 4- and 8-cell stage. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 1967, 18:155-180.
19. Hirate Y., Hirahara S., Inoue K., Suzuki A., Alarcon V.B., Akimoto K., et al. Polarity-dependent distribution of angiomotin localizes Hippo signaling in preimplantation embryos. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:1181-1194.
20. Leung C.Y., Zernicka-Goetz M. Angiomotin prevents pluripotent lineage differentiation in mouse embryos via Hippo pathway-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:2251.
21. Nishioka N., Inoue K., Adachi K., Kiyonari H., Ota M., Ralston A., et al. The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. Dev. Cell 2009, 16:398-410.
22. Piccolo S., Dupont S., Cordenonsi M. The biology of YAP/TAZ: hippo signaling and beyond. Physiol. Rev. 2014, 94:1287-1312.
23. Hansen C.G., Moroishi T., Guan K.L. YAP and TAZ: a nexus for Hippo signaling and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 2015, 25:499-513.
24. Yu F.X., Zhao B., Panupinthu N., Jewell J.L., Lian I., Wang L.H., et al. Regulation of the Hippo-YAP pathway by G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. Cell 2012, 150:780-791.
25. Frum T., Ralston A. Cell signaling and transcription factors regulating cell fate during formation of the mouse blastocyst. Trends Genet. 2015, 31:402-410.
26. Sasaki H. Position- and polarity-dependent Hippo signaling regulates cell fates in preimplantation mouse embryos. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015.
27. Plusa B., Frankenberg S., Chalmers A., Hadjantonakis A.K., Moore C.A., Papalopulu N., et al. Downregulation of Par3 and aPKC function directs cells towards the ICM in the preimplantation mouse embryo. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118:505-515.
28. Cockburn K., Biechele S., Garner J., Rossant J. The Hippo pathway member Nf2 is required for inner cell mass specification. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:1195-1201.
29. Rayon T., Menchero S., Nieto A., Xenopoulos P., Crespo M., Cockburn K., et al. Notch and hippo converge on Cdx2 to specify the trophectoderm lineage in the mouse blastocyst. Dev. Cell 2014, 30:410-422.
30. Aragona M., Panciera T., Manfrin A., Giulitti S., Michielin F., Elvassore N., et al. A mechanical checkpoint controls multicellular growth through YAP/TAZ regulation by actin-processing factors. Cell 2013, 154:1047-1059.
31. Dupont S., Morsut L., Aragona M., Enzo E., Giulitti S., Cordenonsi M., et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 2011, 474:179-183.
32. Wada K., Itoga K., Okano T., Yonemura S., Sasaki H. Hippo pathway regulation by cell morphology and stress fibers. Development 2011, 138:3907-3914.
33. Gaspar P., Tapon N. Sensing the local environment: actin architecture and Hippo signalling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2014, 31:74-83.
34. Liu H., Wu Z., Shi X., Li W., Liu C., Wang D., et al. Atypical PKC, regulated by Rho GTPases and Mek/Erk, phosphorylates Ezrin during eight-cell embryocompaction. Dev. Biol. 2013, 375:13-22.
35. Maitre J.L., Niwayama R., Turlier H., Nedelec F., Hiiragi T. Pulsatile cell-autonomous contractility drives compaction in the mouse embryo. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17:849-855.
36. Samarage C.R., White M.D., Alvarez Y.D., Fierro-Gonzalez J.C., Henon Y., Jesudason E.C., et al. Cortical tension allocates the first inner cells of the mammalian embryo. Dev. Cell 2015, 34:435-447.
37. Anani S., Bhat S., Honma-Yamanaka N., Krawchuk D., Yamanaka Y. Initiation of Hippo signaling is linked to polarity rather than to cell position in the pre-implantation mouse embryo. Development 2014, 141:2813-2824.
38. Fanning A.S., Jameson B.J., Jesaitis L.A., Anderson J.M. The tight junction protein ZO-1 establishes a link between the transmembrane protein occludin and the actin cytoskeleton. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:29745-29753.
39. Eckert J.J., Fleming T.P. Tight junction biogenesis during early development. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1778:717-728.
40. Wang H., Ding T., Brown N., Yamamoto Y., Prince L.S., Reese J., et al. Zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) is involved in morula to blastocyst transformation in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 2008, 318:112-125.
41. Oka T., Remue E., Meerschaert K., Vanloo B., Boucherie C., Gfeller D., et al. Functional complexes between YAP2 and ZO-2 are PDZ domain-dependent, and regulate YAP2 nuclear localization and signalling. Biochem. J. 2010, 432:461-472.
42. Remue E., Meerschaert K., Oka T., Boucherie C., Vandekerckhove J., Sudol M., et al. TAZ interacts with zonula occludens-1 and -2 proteins in a PDZ-1 dependent manner. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584:4175-4180.
43. Bennett F.C., Harvey K.F. Fat cadherin modulates organ size in Drosophila via the Salvador/Warts/Hippo signaling pathway. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:2101-2110.
44. Willecke M., Hamaratoglu F., Kango-Singh M., Udan R., Chen C.L., Tao C., et al. The fat cadherin acts through the hippo tumor-suppressor pathway to regulate tissue size. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:2090-2100.
45. Feng Y., Irvine K.D. Fat and expanded act in parallel to regulate growth through warts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:20362-20367.
46. Couzens A.L., Knight J.D., Kean M.J., Teo G., Weiss A., Dunham W.H., et al. Protein interaction network of the mammalian Hippo pathway reveals mechanisms of kinase-phosphatase interactions. Sci. Signal. 2013, 6:rs15.
47. Hauri S., Wepf A., van Drogen A., Varjosalo M., Tapon N., Aebersold R., et al. Interaction proteome of human Hippo signaling: modular control of the co-activator YAP1. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2013, 9:713.
48. Wang W., Li X., Huang J., Feng L., Dolinta K.G., Chen J. Defining the protein-protein interaction network of the human hippo pathway. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2014, 13:119-131.
49. Bard J.B., Ross A.S. The morphogenesis of the ciliary body of the avian eye. I. Lateral cell detachment facilitates epithelial folding. Dev. Biol. 1982, 92:73-86.
50. Savin T., Kurpios N.A., Shyer A.E., Florescu P., Liang H., Mahadevan L., et al. On the growth and form of the gut. Nature 2011, 476:57-62.
51. Taber L.A. Biophysical mechanisms of cardiac looping. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2006, 50:323-332.
52. Tallinen T., Chung J.Y., Biggins J.S., Mahadevan L. Gyrification from constrained cortical expansion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:12667-12672.
53. Shyer A.E., Tallinen T., Nerurkar N.L., Wei Z., Gil E.S., Kaplan D.L., et al. Villification: how the gut gets its villi. Science 2013, 342:212-218.
54. Gent A.N., Lindley P.B. Internal rupture of bonded rubber cylinders in tension. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Sci. 1959, 249:195-205.
55. Gent A.N., Wang C. Fracture mechanics and cavitation in rubber-like solids. J. Math. Sci. 1991, 26:3392-3395.
56. Watson A.J., Barcroft L.C. Regulation of blastocyst formation. Front. Biosci.: J. Virtual Libr. 2001, 6:D708-D730.
57. Borland R.M., Biggers J.D., Lechene C.P. Fluid transport by rabbit preimplantation blastocysts in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1977, 51:131-135.
58. Li M., Zhang C., Wang L., Liu L., Xi N., Wang Y., et al. Investigating the morphology and mechanical properties of blastomeres with atomic force microscopy. Surf. Interf. Anal. 2013, 45:1193-1196.
59. Borland R.M., Biggers J.D., Lechene C.P. Studies on the composition and formation of mouse blastocoele fluid using electron probe microanalysis. Dev. Biol. 1977, 55:1-8.
60. Khalilian M., Navidbakhsh M., Valojerdi M.R., Chizari M., Yazdi P.E. Estimating Young's modulus of zona pellucida by micropipette aspiration in combination with theoretical models of ovum. J. R. Soc. Interf.: R. Soc. 2010, 7:687-694.
61. Maitre J.L., Berthoumieux H., Krens S.F., Salbreux G., Julicher F., Paluch E., et al. Adhesion functions in cell sorting by mechanically coupling the cortices of adhering cells. Science 2012, 338:253-256.
62. Borghi N., Sorokina M., Shcherbakova O.G., Weis W.I., Pruitt B.L., Nelson W.J., et al. E-cadherin is under constitutive actomyosin-generated tension that is increased at cell-cell contacts upon externally applied stretch. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:12568-12573.
63. Grashoff C., Hoffman B.D., Brenner M.D., Zhou R., Parsons M., Yang M.T., et al. Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature 2010, 466:263-266.
64. Meng F., Sachs F. Visualizing dynamic cytoplasmic forces with a compliance-matched FRET sensor. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:261-269.
65. McDole K., Xiong Y., Iglesias P.A., Zheng Y. Lineage mapping the pre-implantation mouse embryo by two-photon microscopy, new insights into the segregation of cell fates. Dev. Biol. 2011, 355:239-249.
66. Riedl J., Flynn K.C., Raducanu A., Gartner F., Beck G., Bosl M., et al. Lifeact mice for studying F-actin dynamics. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:168-169.
67. Bae B.I., Jayaraman D., Walsh C.A. Genetic changes shaping the human brain. Dev. Cell 2015, 32:423-434.
68. Liang J., Cai W., Sun Z. Single-cell sequencing technologies: current and future. J. Genet. Genom. = Yi chuan xue bao 2014, 41:513-528.
69. Krupinski P., Chickarmane V., Peterson C. Simulating the mammalian blastocyst - molecular and mechanical interactions pattern the embryo. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7:e1001128.
70. Krupinski P., Chickarmane V., Peterson C. Computational multiscale modeling of embryo development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2012, 22:613-618.
71. Honda H., Motosugi N., Nagai T., Tanemura M., Hiiragi T. Computer simulation of emerging asymmetry in the mouse blastocyst. Development 2008, 135:1407-1414.