Quantifying Modes of 3D Cell Migration

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 749-759

  Driscoll, Meghan K ^a   Danuser, Gaudenz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

3D cell migration; Image analysis; Image visualization

Indexed keywords

BIOSENSOR; CELL CULTURE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL MOTION; CELL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; MICROENVIRONMENT; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REFERENCE DATABASE; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ANIMAL; CELL SURFACE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL SURFACE EXTENSIONS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84950112063     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.09.010     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Petrie R.J., et al. Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3D matrix. Science 2014, 345:1062-1065.
2. Liu Y.J., et al. Confinement and low adhesion induce fast amoeboid migration of slow mesenchymal cells. Cell 2015, 160:659-672.
3. Charras G., Sahai E. Physical influences of the extracellular environment on cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15:813-824.
4. Machacek M., Danuser G. Morphodynamic profiling of protrusion phenotypes. Biophys. J. 2006, 90:1439-1452.
5. Gao L., et al. Noninvasive imaging beyond the diffraction limit of 3D dynamics in thickly fluorescent specimens. Cell 2012, 151:1370-1385.
6. Chen B.C., et al. Lattice light-sheet microscopy: imaging molecules to embryos at high spatiotemporal resolution. Science 2014, 346:1257998.
7. Dean K.M., et al. Deconvolution-free subcellular imaging with axially swept light sheet microscopy. Biophys. J. 2015, 108:2807-2815.
8. Reynaud E.G., et al. Guide to light-sheet microscopy for adventurous biologists. Nat. Methods 2015, 12:30-34.
9. Pantazis P., Supatto W. Advances in whole-embryo imaging: a quantitative transition is underway. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15:327-339.
10. Pampaloni F., et al. Light sheet-based fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) for the quantitative imaging of cells and tissues. Cell Tissue Res. 2015, 360:129-141.
11. Liu Z., et al. Imaging live-cell dynamics and structure at the single-molecule level. Mol. Cell 2015, 58:644-659.
12. Shamir E.R., Ewald A.J. Three-dimensional organotypic culture: experimental models of mammalian biology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15:647-664.
13. Allan C., et al. OMERO: flexible, model-driven data management for experimental biology. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:245-253.
14. Moore J., et al. OMERO and Bio-Formats 5: flexible access to large bioimaging datasets at scale. SPIE Med. Imag. 2015, 9413:941307.
15. Kvilekval K., et al. Bisque: a platform for bioimage analysis and management. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:544-552.
16. Abercrombie M. Croonian lecture, 1978: the crawling movement of metazoan cells. Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 1980, 207:129-147.
17. Krause M., Gautreau A. Steering cell migration: lamellipodium dynamics and the regulation of directional persistence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15:577-590.
18. Danuser G., et al. Mathematical modeling of eukaryotic cell migration: insights beyond experiments. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2013, 29:501-528.
19. Clark P., et al. Cell guidance by ultrafine topography in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 1991, 99:73-77.
20. Pelham R.J., Wang Y. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:13661-13665.
21. Barnhart E.L., et al. An adhesion-dependent switch between mechanisms that determine motile cell shape. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1001059.
22. Friedl P., Alexander S. Cancer invasion and the microenvironment: plasticity and reciprocity. Cell 2011, 147:992-1009.
23. Paluch E.K., Raz E. The role and regulation of blebs in cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2013, 25:582-590.
24. Barry N.P., Bretscher M.S. Dictyostelium amoebae and neutrophils can swim. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:11376-11380.
25. Driscoll M.K., et al. Cell shape dynamics: from waves to migration. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8:e1002392.
26. Ruprecht V., et al. Cortical contractility triggers a stochastic switch to fast amoeboid cell motility. Cell 2015, 160:673-685.
27. Hawkins R.J., et al. Pushing off the walls: a mechanism of cell motility in confinement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102:058103.
28. Wilson K., et al. Mechanisms of leading edge protrusion in interstitial migration. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:2896.
29. Stroka K.M., et al. Water permeation drives tumor cell migration in confined microenvironments. Cell 2014, 157:611-623.
30. Wolf K., et al. Physical limits of cell migration: control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 201:1069-1084.
31. Lammermann T., Sixt M. Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:636-644.
32. Poincloux R., et al. Contractility of the cell rear drives invasion of breast tumor cells in 3D matrigel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:1943-1948.
33. Petrie R.J., et al. Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3D cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 197:439-455.
34. Blaser H., et al. Migration of zebrafish primordial germ cells: a role for myosin contraction and cytoplasmic flow. Dev. Cell 2006, 11:613-627.
35. Kardash E., et al. A role for Rho GTPases and cell-cell adhesion in single-cell motility in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:47-53.
36. Lammermann T., et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 2008, 453:51-55.
37. Wolf K., et al. Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration: mesenchymal-amoeboid transition after blocking of pericellular proteolysis. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160:267-277.
38. Sanz-Moreno V., et al. Rac activation and inactivation control plasticity of tumor cell movement. Cell 2008, 135:510-523.
39. Tozluoglu M., et al. Matrix geometry determines optimal cancer cell migration strategy and modulates response to interventions. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:751-762.
40. Tozluoglu M., et al. Cost-benefit analysis of the mechanisms that enable migrating cells to sustain motility upon changes in matrix environments. J. R. Soc. Interface 2015, Published 15 April 2015. 10.1098/rsif.2014.1355.
41. Zhang E.R., et al. Envisioning migration: mathematics in both experimental analysis and modeling of cell behavior. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2013, 25:538-542.
42. Danuser G. Computer vision in cell biology. Cell 2011, 147:973-978.
43. Plumlee M.D., Ware C. Zooming versus multiple window interfaces: cognitive costs of visual comparisons. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2006, 13:179-209.
44. Telea A.C. Data Visualization: Principles and Practice 2014, CRC Press.
45. Head M.L., et al. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLoS Biol. 2015, 13:e1002106.
46. Hill E. Announcing the JCB DataViewer, a browser-based application for viewing original image files. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183:969-970.
47. Ware C. Information Visualization: Perception for Design 2012, Elsevier.
48. Schindelin J., et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:676-682.
49. Peng H., et al. V3D enables real-time 3D visualization and quantitative analysis of large-scale biological image data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:348-353.
50. Peng H., et al. Extensible visualization and analysis for multidimensional images using Vaa3D. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9:193-208.
51. de Chaumont F., et al. Icy: an open bioimage informatics platform for extended reproducible research. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:690-696.
52. Kankaanpaa P., et al. BioImageXD: an open, general-purpose and high-throughput image-processing platform. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:683-689.
53. Barbier de Reuille P., et al. MorphoGraphX: a platform for quantifying morphogenesis in 4D. Elife 2015, 4:05864.
54. Johnson G.T., Hertig S. A guide to the visual analysis and communication of biomolecular structural data. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15:690-698.
55. Buck T.E., et al. Toward the virtual cell: automated approaches to building models of subcellular organization 'learned' from microscopy images. Bioessays 2012, 34:791-799.
56. Johnson G.T., et al. cellPACK: a virtual mesoscope to model and visualize structural systems biology. Nat. Methods 2015, 12:85-91.
57. Wu P.H., et al. Three-dimensional cell migration does not follow a random walk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:3949-3954.
58. Metzner C., et al. Superstatistical analysis and modelling of heterogeneous random walks. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6:7516.
59. Soll D.R., et al. 'Dynamic Morphology System': a method for quantitating changes in shape, pseudopod formation, and motion in normal and mutant amoebae of Dictyostelium discoideum. J. Cell. Biochem. 1988, 37:177-192.
60. Wessels D., et al. Three-dimensional dynamics of pseudopod formation and the regulation of turning during the motility cycle of Dictyostelium. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 1994, 27:1-12.
61. Wessels D., et al. A computer-assisted system for reconstructing and interpreting the dynamic three-dimensional relationships of the outer surface, nucleus and pseudopods of crawling cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 1998, 41:225-246.
62. González G., et al. Delineating trees in noisy 2D images and 3D image-stacks. 2010 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2010, 2799-2806.
63. Peng H., et al. Automatic reconstruction of 3D neuron structures using a graph-augmented deformable model. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:38-46.
64. Megjhani M., et al. Population-scale three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative profiling of microglia arbors. Bioinformatics 2015, 31:2190-2198.
65. Ducroz C., et al. Characterization of cell shape and deformation in 3D using spherical harmonics. 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2012, 848-851.
66. Ducroz C., et al. Automatic detection of 3D cell protrusions using spherical wavelets. 2013 20th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2013, 3499-3502.
67. Du C.J., et al. 3D time series analysis of cell shape using Laplacian approaches. BMC Bioinformatics 2013, 14:296.
68. Tournemenne R., et al. 3D shape analysis using overcomplete spherical wavelets: application to BLEB detection in cell biology. 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2014, 365-368.
69. Elliott H., et al. Myosin II controls cellular branching morphogenesis and migration in three dimensions by minimizing cell-surface curvature. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17:137-147.
70. Xu T., et al. SOAX: a software for quantification of 3D biopolymer networks. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5:9081.
71. Stein A.M., et al. An algorithm for extracting the network geometry of three-dimensional collagen gels. J. Microsc. 2008, 232:463-475.
72. Mickel W., et al. Robust pore size analysis of filamentous networks from three-dimensional confocal microscopy. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:6072-6080.
73. Molteni M., et al. Fast two-dimensional bubble analysis of biopolymer filamentous networks pore size from confocal microscopy thin data stacks. Biophys. J. 2013, 104:1160-1169.
74. Munster S., Fabry B. A simplified implementation of the bubble analysis of biopolymer network pores. Biophys. J. 2013, 104:2774-2775.
75. Molteni M., et al. Response to 'a simplified implementation of the bubble analysis of biopolymer networks pores'. Biophys. J. 2013, 104:2776-2777.
76. Legant W.R., et al. Measurement of mechanical tractions exerted by cells in three-dimensional matrices. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:969-971.
77. Bergert M., et al. Force transmission during adhesion-independent migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17:524-529.
78. Campas O., et al. Quantifying cell-generated mechanical forces within living embryonic tissues Nat. Methods 2014, 11:349.
79. Huisken J., et al. Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy. Science 2004, 305:1007-1009.
80. Keller P.J., et al. Reconstruction of zebrafish early embryonic development by scanned light sheet microscopy. Science 2008, 322:1065-1069.
81. Giurumescu C.A., et al. Quantitative semi-automated analysis of morphogenesis with single-cell resolution in complex embryos. Development 2012, 139:4271-4279.
82. Amat F., et al. Fast, accurate reconstruction of cell lineages from large-scale fluorescence microscopy data. Nat. Methods 2014, 11:951-958.
83. Chittajallu D.R., et al. In vivo cell-cycle profiling in xenograft tumors by quantitative intravital microscopy. Nat. Methods 2015, 12:577-585.
84. Mosaliganti K.R., et al. ACME: automated cell morphology extractor for comprehensive reconstruction of cell membranes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8:e1002780.
85. Khan Z., et al. Quantitative 4D analyses of epithelial folding during Drosophila gastrulation. Development 2014, 141:2895-2900.
86. Rozbicki E., et al. Myosin-II-mediated cell shape changes and cell intercalation contribute to primitive streak formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17:397-408.
87. Fréchet M. Les éléments aléatoires de nature quelconque dans un espace distancié. Ann. l'institut Henri Poincaré 1948, 10:215-310.
88. Surazhsky V., et al. Fast exact and approximate geodesics on meshes. ACM Trans. Graph. 2005, 24:553-560.
89. Crane K., et al. Geodesics in heat: a new approach to computing distance based on heat flow. ACM Trans. Graph. 2013, 32:152.
90. Crane K., et al. Digital geometry processing with discrete exterior calculus. ACM SIGGRAPH 2013 Courses 2013, 7.
91. Harrower M., Brewer C.A. ColorBrewer.org: an online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps. Cartograph. J. 2003, 40:27-37.
92. Borland D., Taylor M.R. Rainbow color map (still) considered harmful. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 2007, 27:14-17.