ACME: Automated Cell Morphology Extractor for Comprehensive Reconstruction of Cell Membranes

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2012, Pages

  Mosaliganti, Kishore R ^a   Noche, Ramil R ^a   Xiong, Fengzhu ^a   Swinburne, Ian A ^a   Megason, Sean G ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLS; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; CYTOLOGY; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MORPHOLOGY; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; OPEN SYSTEMS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SOFTWARE TESTING; TISSUE;

AUTOMATED CELL; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL MORPHOLOGY; CELL SHAPES; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; FLUORESCENT REPORTER; MICROSCOPIC IMAGING; MORPHOGENETIC CHANGES; TRANSGENIC EMBRYOS;

MEMBRANES;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED CELL MORPHOLOGY EXTRACTOR; AUTOMATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SIZE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPITHELIUM CELL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL PROCEDURES; MESENCHYME CELL; MESODERM; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NEUROECTODERM; NONHUMAN; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ZEBRA FISH;

DANIO RERIO;

EID: 84872027943     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002780     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Blanchard GB, Kabla AJ, Schultz NL, Butler LC, Sanson B, et al. (2009) Tissue tectonics: morphogenetic strain rates, cell shape change and intercalation. Nature Methods 6: 458-464.
2. Megason SG, Srinivas S, Dickinson ME, Hadjantonakis AK, (2011) Microscopy to mechanism across the scales of development. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 21: 519-522.
3. Megason SG, Fraser SE, (2003) Digitizing life at the level of the cell: high-performance laserscanning microscopy and image analysis for in toto imaging of development. Mechanisms of Development 120: 1407-1420.
4. Megason SG, Fraser SE, (2007) Imaging in systems biology. Cell 130: 784-795.
5. Keller P, Schmidt A, Wittbrodt J, Stelzer E, (2008) Reconstruction of zebrafish early embryonic development by scanned light sheet microscopy. Science 322: 1065-1069.
6. Olivier N, Luengo-Oroz MA, Duloquin L, Faure E, Savy T, et al. (2010) Cell lineage reconstruction of early zebrafish embryos using label-free nonlinear microscopy. Science 20 329: 967-971.
7. Fernandez R, Das P, Mirabet V, Moscardi E, Traas J, et al. (2010) Imaging plant growth in 4D: robust tissue reconstruction and lineaging at cell resolution. Nature Methods 7: 547-553.
8. Roeder AHK, Tarr PT, Tobin C, Zhang X, Chickarmane V, et al. (2011) Computational morphodynamics of plants: integrating development over space and time. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 12: 265-273.
9. Malpica N, Solorzano C, Vaquero J, Santos A, Vallcorba I, et al. (1997) Applying watershed algorithms to the segmentation of clustered nuclei. Journal of Cytometry 28: 289-297.
10. Adiga U, Chaudhuri B, (2001) An efficient method based on watershed and rule-based merging for segmentation of 3-d histo-pathological images. Pattern Recognition 34: 1449-1458.
11. Lin G, Chawla M, Olson K, Guzowski J, Barnes C, et al. (2007) A multi-model approach to simultaneous segmentation and classification of heterogeneous populations of cell nuclei in 3D confocal microscopy images. Cytometry 71A: 724-736.
12. Sarti A, Malladi R, Sethian JA, (2000) Subjective surfaces: a method for completing missing boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 97: 6258-6263.
13. Sarti A, De Solorzano C, Lockett S, Malladi R, (2000) A geometric model for 3D confocal image analysis. IEEE Transactions in Biomedical Engineering 47: 1600-1609.
14. Dufour A, Shinin V, Tajbakhsh S, Guillon-Aghion N, Olivo-Marin J, et al. (2008) Segmenting and tracking uorescent cells in dynamic 3D microscopy with coupled active surfaces. IEEE Transactions Image Processing 14: 1396-1410.
15. Mikula K, Peyrieras N, Remesikova M, Sarti A (2005) 3D embryogenesis image segmentation by the generalized subjective surface method using the finite volume technique. In: Finite Volumes for Complex Applications V: Problems and Perspectives. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 585-592.
16. Zanella C, Campana M, Rizzi B, Melani C, Sanguinetti G, et al. (2010) Cells segmentation from 3D confocal images of early zebrafish embryogenesis. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 19: 770-781.
17. Li G, Liu T, Tarokh A, Nie J, Guo L, et al. (2007) 3D cell segmentation based on gradient flow tracking. BMC Cell Biology 8: 40.
18. Frangi A, Niessen W, Vincken K, Viergever M (1998) Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). Cambridge, Massachusetts. pp. 130-137.
19. Manniesing R, Niessen W, (2005) Multiscale vessel enhancing diffusion in CT angiography noise filtering. Proceedings of the Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging 19: 138-149.
20. Mosaliganti K, Janoos F, Gelas A, Noche R, Obholzer N, et al. (2010) Anisotropic plate diffusion filtering for detection of cell membranes in 3d microscopy images. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging 2010: 588-591.
21. Guy G, Medioni G, (1996) Inferring global perceptual contours from local features. International Journal of Computer Vision 20: 113-133.
22. Medioni G, Kang SB (2004) Emerging Topics in Computer Vision. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall PTR.
23. Loss L, Bebis G, Nicolescu M, Skurikhin A, (2009) An iterative multi-scale tensor voting scheme for perceptual grouping of natural shapes in cluttered backgrounds. Journal of Computer Vision and Image Understanding (CVIU) 113: 126-149.
24. Parvin B, Yang Q, Han J, Chang H, Rydberg B, et al. (2007) Iterative voting for inference of structural saliency and characteriztion of subcellular events. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 16: 615-623.
25. Rockafellar RT, Wets RJB (1998) Variational Analysis, volume 317. Springer. 764 pp. Available: http://books.google.com/books?id=w-NdOE5fD8AC.
26. Lin G, Chawla M, Guzowski KOJ, Barnes C, Roysam B, (2005) Hierarchical, model-based merging of multiple fragments for improved three-dimensional segmentation of nuclei. Cytometry 63A: 20-33.
27. Dequeant ML, Pourquie O, (2008) Segmental patterning of the vertebrate embryonic axis. Nature Reviews Genetics 9: 370-382.
28. Giudicelli F, Özbudak EM, Wright GJ, Lewis J, (2007) Setting the Tempo in Development: An Investigation of the Zebrafish Somite Clock Mechanism. PLoS Biology 5: e150.
29. Cooke J, Zeeman EC, (1976) A clock and wavefront model for control of the number of repeated structures during animal morphogenesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 58: 455-476.
30. Gibb S, Maroto M, Dale JK, (2010) The segmentation clock mechanism moves up a notch. Trends in Cell Biology 20: 593-600.
31. Kulesa PM, Schnell S, Rudloff S, Baker RE, Maini PK, (2007) From segment to somite: Segmentation to epithelialization analyzed within quantitative frameworks. Developmental Dynamics 236: 1392-1402.
32. Megason SG, (2009) In toto imaging of embryogenesis with confocal time-lapse microscopy. Methods in Molecular Biology 546: 317-332.
33. Vemuri B, Ye J, Chen Y, Leonard C, (2003) Image registration via level-set motion: Applications to atlas-based segmentation. Medical Image Analysis 7: 1-20.