Making Sense of the Third Dimension Through Topographic Analysis

The SAGE Handbook of Remote Sensing

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 315-327

  Deng, Yongxin ^a  

^a WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949744801     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9780857021052.n22     Document Type: Chapter

References (124)

1. Aguilar, F. J. M. A.Aguilar F.Aguera. Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models using a non-parametric approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21 667-686. 2007. doi:10.1080/13658810601079783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658810601079783
2. Allgöwer, B., J. D.Carlson, and J. W.van Wagtendonk, 2003. Introduction to fire danger rating and remote sensing - Will remote sensing enhance wildland fire danger rating? In E.Chuvieco (ed.), Wildland Fire Danger Estimation and Mapping: The Role of Remote Sensing Data.World Scientific Publishing, Singapore. Chapter 1: 1-19.
3. Armstrong, R. N. L. W.Martz. Topographic parameterization in continental hydrology: A study in scale. Hydrological Processes 17 3763-3781. 2003. doi:10.1002/hyp.1352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1352
4. Baltsavias, E. P. Object extraction and revision by image analysis using existing geodata and knowledge: Current status and steps towards operational systems. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 58 129-151. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.09.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.09.002
5. Band, L. E. I. D.Moore. Scale: Landscape attributes and geographical information systems. Hydrological Processes 9 401-422. 1995. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360090312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090312
6. Band, L. E. C.Tague S. E.Brun D. E.Tenenbaum R. A.Fernandes. Modelling watersheds as spatial object hierarchies: Structure and dynamics. Transactions in GIS 4 181-196. 2000. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9671.00048
7. Beven, K. J. M. J.Kirkby. A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrology Science Bulletin 24 43-69. 1979. doi:10.1080/02626667909491834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02626667909491834
8. Bolstad, P. V. T.Stowe. An evaluation of DEM accuracy: Elevation, slope and aspect. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 23 387-395. 1994.
9. Bruzzone, L. D. F.Prieto. Unsupervised retraining of a maximum likelihood classifier for the analysis of multitemporal remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39 456-460. 2001. doi:10.1109/36.905255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.905255
10. Burrough, P. A., 1986. Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment.Oxford Science Publications, Oxford.
11. Burrough, P. A. and R. A.McDonnell, 1998. Principles of Geographical Information Systems.Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Burrough, P. A. J. P.Wilson P. F. M.van Gaans A. J.Hansen. Fuzzy k-means classification of Digital Elevation Models as an aid to forest mapping in the Greater Yellowstone Area, USA. Landscape Ecology 16 523-546. 2001. doi:10.1023/A:1013167712622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013167712622
13. Butler, J. B. S. N.Lane J. H.Chandler. Assessment of DEM quality: Characterising surface roughness using close range digital photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Record 16 271-291. 1998. doi:10.1111/0031-868X.00126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0031-868X.00126
14. Callow, J. N. K. P.Van Neil G. S.Boggs. How does modifying a DEM to reflect known hydrology affect subsequent terrain analysis? Journal of Hydrology 332 30-39. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.020
15. Carlisle, B. H. Modelling the spatial distribution of DEM error. Transactions in GIS 9 521-540. 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2005.00233.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2005.00233.x
16. Ceccato, P. S.Flasse J.-M.Gregoire. Designing a spectral index to estimate vegetation water content from remote sensing data: Part 2. Validation and applications. Remote Sensing of Environment 82 198-207. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00036-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257%2802%2900036-6
17. Chen, J. M. Spatial scaling of a remotely sensed surface parameter by contexture. Remote Sensing of Environment 69 30-42. 1999. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00006-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257%2899%2900006-1
18. Colombo, R. J. V.Vogt P.Soille M. L.Paracchini A.de Jager. Deriving river networks and catchments at the European scale from medium resolution digital elevation data. Catena 70 296-305. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.10.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.10.001
19. Dehn, M. H.Gärtner R.Dikau. Principles of semantic modeling of landform structures. Computers and Geosciences 27 1005-1010. 2001. doi:10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00138-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004%2800%2900138-2
20. Deng, Y. X. New trends in digital terrain analysis: Land-form definition, representation, and classification. Progress in Physical Geography 31 405-419. 2007. doi:10.1177/0309133307081291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309133307081291
21. Deng, Y. X., In press. Mapping topographical potentials of vegetation greenness and moisture using fuzzy logic. In F.Columbus (ed), Mathematical Logic: New Research.Wova Science Publisher, New York.
22. Deng, Y. X. J. P.Wilson. The role of attribute selection in GIS representations of the biophysical environment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 47-63. 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00498.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00498.x
23. Deng, Y. X. J. P.Wilson. Multi-scale delineation of mountain peaks as fuzzy spatial objects. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21DOI: 10.1080/13658810701405623. 2007.doi:10.1080/13658810600894364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658810600894364
24. Deng, Y. X. J. P.Wilson J.Sheng. Effects of variable attribute weights on landform classification. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 31 1452-1462. 2006. doi:10.1002/esp.1401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.1401
25. Deng, Y. X. X. F.Chen E.Chuvieco T. A.Warner J. P.Wilson. Multi-scale linkages between topographic attributes and vegetation indices in a mountainous landscape. Remote Sensing of Environment 111 122-134. 2007a. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.03.016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.03.016
26. Deng, Y. X. J. P.Wilson B. O.Bauer. DEM resolution dependencies of terrain attributes across a landscape. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21 187-213. 2007b. doi:10.1080/13658810600894364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658810600894364
27. Deng, Y. X., J. P.Wilson, and J. C.Gallant, 2007c. Terrain analysis. In: J. P.Wilson and A. S.Fotheringham (eds), Handbook of Geographic Information Science.Blackwell, Oxford. Chapter 23: 417-435. doi:10.1002/9780470690819.ch23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470690819.ch23
28. Desmet, P. J. J. G.Govers. Comparison of routing algorithms for digital elevation models and their implications for predicting ephemeral gullies. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 10 311-331. 1996. doi:10.1080/02693799608902081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02693799608902081
29. Dikau, R., 1989. The application of a digital relief model to landform analysis in geomorphology. In J.Raper (ed.), Three Dimensional Applications in Geographic Information Systems.Taylor and Francis, London: 51-77.
30. Djokic, D. D. R.Maidment. Terrain analysis for urban stormwater modeling. Hydrological Processes 5 115-124. 1991. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050109
31. Evans, I. S., 1972. General geomorphometry, derivatives of altitude, and descriptive statistics. In R. J.Chorley (ed.), Spatial Analysis in Geomorphology.Methuen, London: 17-90.
32. Evans, I. S., 2003. Scale-specific landforms and aspects of the land surface. In I. S.Evans, R.Dikau, E.Tokunaga, H.Ohmori, and M.Hirano (eds), Concepts and Modelling in Geo-morphology: International Perspectives.Terrapub, Tokyo: 61-84.
33. Fenneman, N. M. Physiographic divisions of the United States of America. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 4 261-353. 1928.
34. Fisher, P. F. Algorithm and implementation uncertainty in viewshed analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 7 331-347. 1993. doi:10.1080/02693799308901965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02693799308901965
35. Fisher, P. F. Extending the applicability of viewsheds in landscape planning. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62 1297-1302. 1996.
36. Fisher, P. F. Sorites paradox and vague geographies. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 113 7-18. 2000. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00009-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114%2899%2900009-3
37. Fisher, P. F. N. J.Tate. Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models. Progress in Physical Geography 30 467-489. 2006. doi:10.1191/0309133306pp492ra http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0309133306pp492ra
38. Fisher, P. F. J.Wood C.Cheng. Where is Helvellyn? Fuzziness of multi-scale landscape morphology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29 106-128. 2004. doi:10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00117.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00117.x
39. Florinsky, I.V. Combined analysis of digital terrain models and remotely sensed data in landscape investigations. Progress in Physical Geography 22 33-60. 1998a.
40. Florinsky, I. V. Accuracy of local topographic variables derived form digital elevation models. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12 47-61. 1998b. doi:10.1080/136588198242003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/136588198242003
41. Florinsky, I. V. G. A.Kuryakova. Determination of grid size for digital terrain modelling in landscape investigations: Exemplified by soil moisture distribution at a micro-scale. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14 815-832. 2000. doi:10.1080/136588100750022804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/136588100750022804
42. Franklin, J. Predictive vegetation mapping: Geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Progress in Physical Geography 19 474-499. 1995. doi:10.1177/030913339501900403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030913339501900403
43. Fraser, C. S. E.Baltsavias A.Gruen. Processing of Ikonos imagery for submetre 3D positioning and building extraction. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 56 177-194. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00045-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716%2802%2900045-X
44. French, J. R. Airborne LIDAR in support of geomorphological and hydraulic modeling. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28 321-335. 2003. doi:10.1002/esp.484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.484
45. Gallant, J. C. T. I.Dowling. A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas. Water Resources Research 39 1347-1359. 2003. doi:10.1029/2002WR001426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001426
46. Gamba, P. B.Houshmand. Digital surface models and building extraction: A comparison of JFSAR and LIDAR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38 1959-1968. 2000. doi:10.1109/36.851777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.851777
47. Geiger, R., 1965. The Climate Near the Ground.Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
48. Gilbert, L. E. Are topographic data sets fractal? Pure and Applied Geophysics 131 241-254. 1989. doi:10.1007/BF00874489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00874489
49. Giles, P. T. S. E.Franklin. Comparison of derivative topographic surfaces of a DEM generated from stereoscopic SPOT images with field measurements. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62 1165-1171. 1996.
50. Goodchild, M. F. D. M.Mark. The fractal nature of geographic phenomena. Annals of the Association of American Geogra phers 77 265-278. 1987. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00158.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00158.x
51. Hargrove, W. W. F. M.Hoffman. The potential of multivariate quantitative methods for delineation and visualization of ecoregions. Environmental Management 34 S39-S60. 2004. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-1084-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-1084-0
52. Heuvelink, G. B. M1998. Error Propagation in Environmental Modelling with GIS.Taylor and Francis, London.
53. Hodgson, M. E. J. R.Jensena L.Schmidtb S.Schillc B.Davis. An evaluation of LIDAR- and IFSAR-derived digital elevation models in leaf-on conditions with USGS Level 1 and Level 2 DEMs. Remote Sensing of Environment 84 295-308. 2003. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00114-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257%2802%2900114-1
54. Huang, J. D. L.Turcotte. Fractal mapping of digitized images: Application to the topography of Arizona and comparisons with synthetic images. Journal of Geophysical Research 94 7491-7495. 1989. doi:10.1029/JB094iB06p07491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB06p07491
55. Hunter, G. J. M. F.Goodchild. Modelling the uncertainty of slope and aspect estimates derived from spatial databases. Geographical Analysis 29 35-49. 1997. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1997.tb00944.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1997.tb00944.x
56. Hutchinson, M. F. A new procedure for gridding elevation and streamline data with automatic removal of spurious pits. Journal of Hydrology 106 211-232. 1989. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(89)90073-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694%2889%2990073-5
57. Hutchinson, M. F., 2006. ANUDEM Version 5.2. http://cres.anu.edu.au/outputs/anudem.php (last accessed: November 16 2007).
58. Hutchinson, M. F., 2007. Adding the Z Dimension. In J. P.Wilson, and A. S.Fotheringham (eds), Handbook of Geographic Information Science.Blackwell, Oxford. Chapter 8: 144-168. doi:10.1002/9780470690819.ch8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470690819.ch8
59. Hutchinson, M. F. and J. C.Gallant, 2000. Digital elevation models and representation of terrain shape. In: J. P.Wilson, and J. C.Gallant (eds), Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications.John Wiley and Sons, New York. Chapter 2: 29-50.
60. Irvin, B. J. S. J.Ventura B. K.Slater. Fuzzy and iso-data classification of landform elements from digital terrain data in Pleasant Valley, Wisconsin. Geoderma 77 137-154. 1997. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00019-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061%2897%2900019-0
61. Jones, K. H. A comparison of algorithms used to compute hill slope as a property of the DEM. Computers and Geosciences 24 315-323. 1998. doi:10.1016/S0098-3004(98)00032-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004%2898%2900032-6
62. Kidner, D. B. J. M.Ware A. J.Sparks C. B.Jones. Multiscale terrain and topographic modeling with the implicit TIN. Transactions in GIS 4 379-408. 2000. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9671.00062
63. Klinkenberg, B. M. F.Goodchild. The fractal properties of topography - a comparison of methods. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 17 217-234. 1992. doi:10.1002/esp.3290170303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290170303
64. Kumler, M. P. An intensive comparison of Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) and Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 31 1-99. 1994. doi:10.3138/TM56-74K7-QH1T-8575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/TM56-74K7-QH1T-8575
65. Lane, S. N. Roughness - time for a re-evaluation? Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30 251-253. 2005. doi:10.1002/esp.1208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.1208
66. Lane, S. N. J. H.Chandler. Editorial: the generation of high quality topographic data for hydrology and geomorphology: New data sources, new applications and new problems. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28 229-230. 2003. doi:10.1002/esp.479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.479
67. Lee, J. P. K.Snyder P. F.Fisher. Modelling the effect of data errors on feature extraction from digital elevation models. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 58 1461-1467. 1992.
68. Lindsay, J. B. The terrain analysis system: A tool for hydro-geomorphic applications. Hydrological Processes 19 1123-1130. 2005. doi:10.1002/hyp.5818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5818
69. Liu, H. K.Jezek. Investigating DEM error pattern by directional variograms and Fourier analysis. Geographical Analysis 31 249-266. 1999. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1999.tb00981.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1999.tb00981.x
70. Lucieer, A. A.Stein. Texture-based landform segmentation of LiDAR imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 6 261-270. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2004.10.008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2004.10.008
71. MacMillan, R. A. W. W.Pettapiece S. C.Nolan T. W.Goddard. A generic procedure for automatically segmenting landforms into landform elements using DEMs, heuristic rules and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 113 81-109. 2000. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00014-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114%2899%2900014-7
72. MacMillan, R. A. R. K.Jones D. H.McNabb. Defining a hierarchy of spatial entities for environmental analysis and modelling using digital elevation models (DEMs). Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28 175-200. 2004. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(03)00019-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715%2803%2900019-X
73. Marceau, D. J. G. J.Hay. Remote sensing contributions to the scale issue. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 25 357-366. 1999.
74. Mark, D. M. P. B.Aronson. Scale-dependent fractal dimensions of topographic surfaces: An empirical investigation, with applications in geomorphology and computer mapping. Mathematical Geology 16 671-683. 1984. doi:10.1007/BF01033029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01033029
75. Mark, D. M. and B.Smith, 2004. A science of topography: From qualitative ontology to digital representations. In: M. P.Bishop, and J. F.Shroder (eds), Geographic Information Science and Mountain Geomorphology.Springer-Praxis, Chichester: 75-100.
76. Marks, K. P.Bates. Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models. Hydrological Processes 14 2109-2122. 2000. doi:10.1002/1099-1085(20000815/30)14:11/12<2109::AID-HYP58>3.0.CO;2-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085%2820000815/30%2914:11/12%3C2109::AID-HYP58%3E3.0.CO;2-1
77. McClean, C. J. I. S.Evans. Apparent fractal dimensions from continental scale digital elevation models using variogram methods. Transactions in GIS 4 361-378. 2000. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9671.00061
78. Mitasova, H. L. J.Hofierka. Interpolation by regularized spline with tension, II: Application to terrain modeling and surface geometry analysis. Mathematical Geology 25 657-659. 1993. doi:10.1007/BF00893172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00893172
79. Moore, I. D. R. B.Grayson. Terrain-based catchment partitioning and runoff prediction using vector elevation data. Water Resources Research 27 1177-1191. 1991. doi:10.1029/91WR00090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/91WR00090
80. Moore, I. D. J. P.Wilson. Length-slope factors for the revised Universal Soil Loss Equation: Simplified method of estimation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 47 423-428. 1992.
81. Moore, I. D. R. B.Grayson A. R.Ladson. Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrological Processes 5 3-30. 1991. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050103
82. Nelson, A. T.Oberthür S.Cook. Multi-scale correlations between topography and vegetation in a hillside catchment of Honduras. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21 145-174. 2007. doi:10.1080/13658810600852263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658810600852263
83. O' Callaghan, J. F. D. M.Mark. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation models. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 28 323-344. 1984.
84. Oliphant, A. J. R. A.Spronken-Smith A. P.Sturman I. F.Owens. Spatial variability of surface radiation fluxes in mountainous terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology 42 113-128. 2003. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0113:SVOSRF>2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450%282003%29042%3C0113:SVOSRF%3E2.0.CO;2
85. Omernik, J. M. R. G.Bailey. Distinguishing between watersheds and ecoregions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33 935-949. 1997. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb04115.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb04115.x
86. Ouchi, S. M.Matsushita. Measurement of self-affinity on surfaces as a trial application of fractal geometry to landform analysis. Geomorphology 5 115-130. 1992. doi:10.1016/0169-555X(92)90060-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X%2892%2990060-2
87. Peucker, T. K. Data structures for digital terrain models: Discussion and comparison. Harvard Papers on Geographic Information Systems.1978.
88. Pike, R. J. The geometric signature: Quantifying landslide-terrain types from digital elevation models. Mathematical Geology 20 491-511. 1988. doi:10.1007/BF00890333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00890333
89. Pike, R. J. Geomorphometry - diversity in quantitative surface analysis. Progress in Physical Geography 24 1-20. 2000.
90. Quattrochi, D. A. and Goodchild, M. F., 1997. Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS.CRC Press, London.
91. Quinn, P. F. K. J.Beven R.Lamb. The ln(α/tan β) index: How to calculate it and how to use it within the TOPMODEL framework. Hydrological Processes 9 162-182. 1995. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360090204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090204
92. Rabus, B. M.Eineder A.Roth R.Bamler. The shuttle radar topography mission - a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 57 241-262. 2003. doi:10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00124-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716%2802%2900124-7
93. Robinson, V. B. A perspective on the fundamentals of fuzzy sets and their use in Geographic Information Systems. Transactions in GIS 7 3-30. 2003. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9671.00127
94. Schmidt, J. R.Andrew. Multi-scale landform characterization. Area 37 341-350. 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00638.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00638.x
95. Schmidt, J. and R.Dikau, 1999. Extracting geomorphometric attributes and objects from digital elevation models-semantics, methods, and future needs. In: R.Dikau, and H.Sourer (eds), GIS for Earth Surface Systems: Analysis and Modelling of the Natural Environment.Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin: 153-173.
96. Schmidt, J. A.Hewitt. Fuzzy land element classification from DTMs based on geometry and terrain position. Geoderma 121 243-256. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.10.008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.10.008
97. Schmidt, J. I. S.Evans J.Brinkmann. Comparison of polynomial models for land surface curvature calculation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 17 797-814. 2003. doi:10.1080/13658810310001596058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658810310001596058
98. Schneider, B. On the uncertainty of local shape of lines and surfaces. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 28 237-247. 2001a. doi:10.1559/152304001782152991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1559/152304001782152991
99. Schneider, B. Phenomenon-based specification of the digital representation of terrain surfaces. Transactions in GIS 5 39-52. 2001b. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9671.00066
100. Shan, J. A.Sampath. Urban DEM generation from raw Lidar data: A labelling algorithm and its performance. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 71 217-226. 2005.
101. Shary, P. A. L. S.Sharaya A. V.Mitusov. Fundamental quantitative methods of land surface analysis. Geoderma 107 1-32. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00136-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061%2801%2900136-7
102. Smith, B. D. M.Mark. Do mountains exist? Ontology of landforms and topography. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30 411-427. 2003. doi:10.1068/b12821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b12821
103. Tate, N. J., P. F.Fisher, and D. J.Martin, 2007. Geographic information systems and surfaces. In: J. P.Wilson and A. S.Fotheringham (eds), Handbook of Geographic Information Science.Blackwell, Oxford. Chapter 13: 239-258. doi:10.1002/9780470690819.ch13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470690819.ch13
104. USGS, 2005. Topographic mapping. http://erg.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/booklets/topo/topo.html (last accessed November 16 2007).
105. USGS, 2006. National Elevation Dataset. http://ned.usgs.gov (last accessed November 16 2007).
106. Usery, E. L., 1996. A conceptual framework and fuzzy set implementation for geographic features. In P. A.Burrough, and A. U.Frank (eds), Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries.Taylor and Francis, London: 71-86.
107. Ventura, S. J. and B. J.Irvin, 2000. Automated landform classification for soil-landscape studies. In: J. P.Wilson, and J. C.Gallant (eds), Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications.John Wiley and Sons, New York: 267-294.
108. Wang, Y. M.Jamshidi. Fuzzy logic applied in remote sensing image classification. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 6378-6382 2004.
109. White, A. B. P.Kumar D.Tcheng. A data mining approach for understanding topographic control on climate-induced inter-annual vegetation variability over the United States. Remote Sensing of Environment 98 1-20. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.017
110. Wilson, J. P. and J. C.Gallant, 2000a. Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications.John Wiley and Sons, New York.
111. Wilson, J. P. and J. C.Gallant, 2000b. Digital terrain analysis. In: J. P.Wilson, and J. C.Gallant (eds), Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications.John Wiley and Sons, New York: 1-27.
112. Wilson, J. P. and J. C.Gallant, 2000c. Secondary terrain attributes. In: J. P.Wilson, and J. C.Gallant (eds), Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications.John Wiley and Sons, New York: 87-132.
113. Wilson, J. P. D. J.Spangrud M. A.Landon G. A.Nielsen J. S.Jacobson D. A.Tyler. GPS sampling intensity and pattern effects on computed terrain attributes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62 1410-1417. 1998. doi:10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200050038x http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200050038x
114. Wilson, J. P. C. S.Lam Y. X.Deng. Comparison of flow routing algorithms used in Geographic Information Systems. Hydrological Processes 21 1026-1044. 2007. doi:10.1002/hyp.6277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6277
115. Wilson, J. P., G. R.Aggett, Y. X.Deng, and C. S.Lam, 2008. Water in the landscape: A review of contemporary flow routing algorithms. In Q.Zhou, B. G.Lees, and G. A.Tang (eds), Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, Springer: 213-236. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77800-4_12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77800-4_12
116. Wolock, D. M. G. J.McCabe. Differences in topographic characteristics computed from 100- and 1000-m resolution digital elevation model data. Hydrological Processes 15 2223-2236. 2000.
117. Wolock, D. M. T. C.Winter G.McMahon. Delineation and evaluation of hydrologic-landscape regions in the United States using Geographic Information System tools and multivariate statistical analyses. Environmental Management 34 S71-S88. 2004. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-5077-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-5077-9
118. Wood, J., 2004. A new method for the identification of peaks and summits in surface models. In: Proceedings of GIScience 2004 - The Third International Conference on Geographic Information Science.Adelphi, Maryland: 227-230.
119. Woodcock, C. E. A. H.Strahler. The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 2 311-332. 1987. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(87)90015-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257%2887%2990015-0
120. Yokoya, N. K.Yamamoto N.Funakubo. Fractal-based analysis and interpolation of 3D natural surface shapes and their application to terrain modeling. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 46 284-302. 1989. doi:10.1016/0734-189X(89)90034-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0734-189X%2889%2990034-0
121. Zadeh, L. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8 338-353. 1965. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958%2865%2990241-X
122. Zhang, W. H. D. R.Montgomery. Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations. Water Resources Research 30 1019-1028. 1994. doi:10.1029/93WR03553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/93WR03553
123. Zhang, X. N. A.Drake J.Wainwright M.Mulligan. Comparison of slope estimates from low resolution DEMs: scaling issues and a fractal method for their solution. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24 763-779. 1999. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199908)24:9<763::AID-ESP9>3.0.CO;2-J http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291096-9837%28199908%2924:9%3C763::AID-ESP9%3E3.0.CO;2-J
124. Zhu, A. X. A similarity model for representing soil spatial information. Geoderma 77 217-242. 1997. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00023-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061%2897%2900023-2