Airborne LiDAR in support of geomorphological and hydraulic modelling

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 321-335

  French, J R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Estuarine geomorphology; Hydraulic modelling; LiDAR

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; HYDRAULICS; IMAGE PROCESSING; OPTICAL RADAR; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER;

HYDRAULIC MODELLING;

LANDFORMS;

ESTUARY; GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING; HYDRAULICS; LIDAR; TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING;

EID: 0037355817     PISSN: 01979337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/esp.484     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baltsavias EP. 1999. Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 54: 199-214.
2. Bates PD, Anderson MG, Price DA, Hardy RJ, Smith CN. 1996. Analysis and development of hydraulic models for floodplain flows. In Floodplain Processes, Anderson MG, Walling DE, Bates PD (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 215-254.
3. Booker DJ, Sear DA, Payne AJ. 2001. Modelling three-dimensional flow structures patterns of boundary shear stress in a natural pool-riffle sequence. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26: 553-576.
4. Dennis JM, Spearman JR, Dearnaley MP. 2000. The development of a regime model for prediction of the long-term effects of civil engineering activities on estuaries. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 25: 45-50.
5. Franke R, Nielson G. 1980. Smooth interpolation of large sets of scattered data. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 15: 1691-1704.
6. French CE, French JR, Clifford NJ, Watson CJ, 2000. Sedimentation-erosion dynamics of abandoned reclamations: the role of waves and tides. Continental Shelf Research 20: 1711-1733.
7. French JR, Clifford NJ. 2000. Hydrodynamic modelling as a basis for explaining estuarine environmental dynamics: some computational and methodological issues. Hydrological Processes 14: 2089-2108.
8. Gomes Pereira LM, Wicherson RJ. 1999. Suitability of laser data for deriving geographical information. A case study in the context of management of fluvial zones. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 54: 105-114.
9. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. 1992. Digital Image Processing. Addison-Wesley: New York.
10. Gutelius W, Carter W, Shrestha R, Medvedev E, Gutierez R, Gibeaut J. 1998. Engineering applications of airborne scanning lasers: reports from the field. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 64: 246-253.
11. Hervouet J-M. 2000. TELEMAC modelling system: an overview. Hydrological Processes 14: 2209-2210.
12. Hervouet J-M, van Haren L. 1996. Recent advances in numerical methods for fluid flows. In Floodplain Processes, Anderson MG, Walling DE, Bates PD (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 183-214.
13. Lane SN. 1998. The use of digital terrain modelling in the understanding of dynamic river channel systems. In Landform Monitoring. Modelling and Analysis. Lane SN, Richards KS, Chandler JH (eds). Wiley: Chichester: 311-342.
14. Lane SN. 2000. The measurement of river channel morphology using digital photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Record 15: 937-961.
15. Lane SN, Richards KS. 1998. High resolution, two-dimensional spatial modelling of flow processes in a multi-thread channel. Hydrological Processes 12: 1279-1298.
16. Lane SN, James TD, Crowell MD, 2000. Application of digital photogrammetry to complex topography for geomorphological research. Photogrammetric Record 16: 793-821.
17. Lawrence R. 1990. Southwold River: Georgian Life in the Blyth Valley. Moxon: Southwold.
18. Lillycrop WJ, Irish JL, Parson LE. 1997. SHOALS system: three years of operation with airborne lidar bathymetry - experiences, capability and technology advancements. Sea Technology 38: 17-25.
19. Marks K, Bates P. 2000. Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models. Hydrological Processes 14: 2109-2122.
20. Measures RM. 1991. Laser Remote Sensing: Fundamentals and Applications. Krieger Publishing: Melbourne.
21. Nicholas AP, Walling DE. 1997. Modelling flood hydraulics and overbank deposition on river floodplains. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 22: 59-77.
22. Prandle D, Lane A. 2000. Modelling tide and marine sediments in the Mersey with 1-D, 2-D and 3-D models - a critique of their respective capabilities and limitations. In Modelling Estuary Morphology and Process, EMPHASYS Consortium (eds). Estuaries Research Programme. MAFF Project FD1401 Final Report: 27-33.
23. USGS. 1989. Guide for Selecting Manning's Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Floodplains. United States Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2339.