How does modifying a DEM to reflect known hydrology affect subsequent terrain analysis?

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 332, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 30-39

  Callow, John Nikolaus ^a   Van Niel, Kimberly P ^a   Boggs, Guy S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b CHARLES DARWIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Digital elevation model; Geographic information system; Hydrological modelling; Hydrology

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CATCHMENTS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL (DEM); HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; TERRAIN ANALYSIS;

HYDROLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; CATCHMENTS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HYDROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CATCHMENT; CORRECTION; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; HYDROLOGY; STREAM; TERRAIN;

EID: 33845562930     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.020     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ackerman, C.T., 2002. HEC-GeoRAS 3.1. US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources. Hydrologic Engineering Centre, Davis, CA.
2. Allen, A. Beeston, B., 1999. The land monitor project: a multi-agency project of the Western Australian Salinity Action Plan supported by the Natural Heritage Trust, WALIS.
3. Beven K., and Kirkby M.J. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin 24 1 (1979) 43-69
4. Caccetta, P.A., Allen, A. Watson, I., 2000. The land monitor project, Land Monitor Project.
5. Callow, J.N., Smettem, K.R.J., in press. Channel response to a new hydrological regime in southwestern Australia. Geomorphology.
6. Croke J.C., Hairsine P., and Fogarty P.J. Runoff generation and re-distribution in logged eucalyptus forests, south-eastern Australia. Journal of Hydrology 216 (1999) 56-77
7. Doan, J.H., 2000. Geospatial Hydrologic Modelling Extension HEC-GeoHMS. US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Hydrologic Engineering Centre, Davis, CA.
8. Doll P., and Lehner B. Validation of a new global 30-min drainage direction map. Journal of Hydrology 258 1-4 (2002) 214-231
9. Duke G.D., Kienzle S.W., Johnson D.L., and Byrne J.M. Improving overland flow routing by incorporating ancillary road data into digital elevation models. Journal of Spatial Hydrology 3 2 (2003) 1-27
10. English, P., Richardson, P., Glover, M., Cresswell, H., Gallant, J., 2004. Interpreting Airborne Geophysics as an adjunct to Hydrogeological Investigations for Salinity Management: Honeysuckle Creek Catchment, Victoria. 18/04, CSIRO Land and Water.
11. Fairfield J., and Leymarie P. Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 27 5 (1991) 709-717
12. Fisher P. Improved modelling of elevation error with geostatistics. GeoInformatica 2 3 (1998) 215-233
13. Gallant J.C., and Dowling T.I. A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas. Water Resources Research 39 12 (2003) 1-4 ESG
14. Gallant J.C., and Hutchinson M.F. Scale dependence in terrain analysis. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 43 3-6 (1997) 313-321
15. Garbrecht J., and Martz L. The assignment of drainage direction over flat surfaces in raster digital elevation models. Journal of Hydrology 193 (1997) 204-213
16. Gyasi-Agyei Y., Willgoose G., and de Troch F.P. Effects of vertical resolution and map scale of digital elevation models on geomorphological parameters used in hydrology. Hydrological Processes 9 (1995) 363-382
17. Hellweger, R., 1996. Agree.aml. Center for Research in Water Resources, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
18. Holmes K.W., Chadwick O.A., and Kyriakidis P.C. Error in a USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modelling. Journal of Hydrology 233 1-4 (2000) 154-173
19. Horn B.K.P. Hillshading and the reflectance map. Proceedings of the IEEE 69 1 (1981) 14-47
20. Hutchinson, M.F., 1988. Calculation of hydrologically sound digital elevation models. In: Third International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. International Geographical Union, Columbus, OH.
21. Hutchinson M.F. A new procedure for gridding elevation and streamline data with automatic removal of spurious pits. Journal of Hydrology 106 (1989) 211-232
22. Hutchinson, M.F., 2003. ANUDEM Version 4.6.3. Australian National University. Centre for Environmental Studies, Canberra.
23. Hutchinson, M.F., 2004. ANUDEM Version 5.1. The Australian National University (ANU), Canberra, Australia.
24. Hutchinson M.F., and Dowling T.I. A continental hydrological assessment of a new grid-based digital elevation model of Australia. Hydrological Processes 5 1 (1994) 45-58
25. Jenson S.K., and Dominque J.O. Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information systems. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54 11 (1988) 1593-1600
26. Jones K.H. A comparison of algorithms used to compute hill slope as a property of the DEM. Computers and Geosciences 24 4 (1998) 315-323
27. Jones R. Algorithms for using a DEM for mapping catchment areas of stream sediment samples. Computers and Geosciences 28 (2002) 1051-1060
28. Luce C.H. Hydrological processes and pathways affected by forest roads: what do we still need to learn?. Hydrological Processes 16 (2002) 2901-2904
29. Maidment, D., 1996. GIS and hydrological modelling: an assessment of progress. In: Third International Conference on GIS and Environmental Modelling, Santa Fe, NM, 20-25 January, 1996.
30. Martz L., and De Jong E. CATCH: A FORTRAN program for measuring catchment area from digital elevation models. Computers and GeoSciences 14 5 (1998) 627-640
31. McKenzie, N., Gallant, J. Gregory, L., 2003. Estimating water storage capacities in soil at catchment scales. 03/03, CRC Catchment Hydrology.
32. McMaster K.J. Effects of digital elevation model resolution on derived stream network positions. Water Resources Research 38 4 (2002) 13-19
33. Mizgallewicz, P.J. Maidment, D., 1996. Modelling agricultural transport in Midwest Rivers using Geographic Information Systems. Online Report 96-6, Centre for Research Water Resources, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
34. Montgomery D., and Dietrich W. Where do channels begin?. Nature 336 (1988) 232-234
35. Montgomery D., and Dietrich W. Channel initiation and the problem of landscape scale. Science 225 (1992) 826-830
36. Moore I., Grayson R., and Ladson A. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrological Processes 5 (1991) 3-30
37. O'Callaghan J.F., and Mark D.M. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 28 (1984) 323-344
38. O'Loughlin E.M. Prediction of surface saturation zones in natural catchments by topographic analysis. Water Resources Research 22 5 (1986) 794-804
39. Peuker T., and Douglas D. Detection of surface-specific points by local parallel processing of digital terrain elevation data. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 4 (1975) 375-387
40. Quinn P., Beven K., Chevallier P., and Planchon O. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrological Processes 5 (1991) 59-79
41. Renssen H., and Knoop J.M. A global river routing network for use in hydrological modeling. Journal of Hydrology 230 3-4 (2000) 230-243
42. Salama, R.B., Farrington, P., Bartle, G.A., Watson, G.D., Hawkes, G., 1993. Salinity investigations in selected wheatbelt catchments of Western Australia: base data from east Perenjori catchment, Technical Memorandum 93/9. Division of Water Resources, CSIRO.
43. Saunders, W., 1999. Preparation of DEMs for use in environmental modelling analysis, 1999 ESRI User Conference. ESRI Online, San Diego, CA.
44. Soille P., Vogt J.V., and Colombo R. Carving and adaptive drainage enforcement of grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 39 12 (2003) 1366-1379
45. Tarboton D.G. A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 33 2 (1997) 309-319
46. Tarboton, D.G., 2002. Terrain analysis using digital elevation models (TauDEM), Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
47. Tarboton, D.G., Ames, D.P., 2002. Advances in the mapping of flow networks from digital elevation data. World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, Orlando, FL.
48. Tarboton D.G., Bras R.L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe I. On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrological Processes 5 (1991) 81-100
49. Turcotte R., Fortin J.-P., Rousseau A.N., Massicotte S., and Villeneuve J.-P. Determination of the drainage structure of a watershed using a digital elevation model and a digital river and lake network. Journal of Hydrology 240 3-4 (2001) 225-242
50. Van Niel K.P., Laffan S.W., and Lees B.G. Effect of error in the DEM on environmental variables or predictive vegetation modelling. Journal of Vegetation Science 15 6 (2004) 747-756
51. Walker J.P., and Willgoose G.R. On the effect of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrology and geomorphology. Water Resources Research 35 (1999) 2259-2268
52. Wolock D.M., and Price C.V. Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography-based watershed model. Water Resources Research 30 (1994) 3041-3052
53. Zhang W., and Montgomery D. Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation and hydrologic simulations. Water Resources Research 30 (1994) 1019-1028