Distinguishing between watersheds and ecoregions

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 935-949

  Omernik, James M ^a   Bailey, Robert G ^b  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Basins; Ecoregions; Ecosystem management; Hydrologic units; Watersheds

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; HYDROLOGY; WATER QUALITY;

ECOREGIONS; HYDROLOGIC UNITS;

WATERSHEDS;

ECOREGION; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; RESOURCE ASSESSMENT; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED;

EID: 0031259048     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb04115.x     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Allen, T. F. H., B. L. Bandurski, and A. W. King, 1993. The Ecosystem Approach: Theory and Ecosystem Integrity. International Joint Commission, United States and Canada, ISBN 1-895085-78-0.
2. Armitage, D., 1995. An Integrative Methodological Framework for Sustainable Environmental Planning and Management. Environmental Management 19(4):469-479.
3. Bailey, R. G., 1984. Testing an Ecosystem Regionalization. Journal of Environmental Management 19:239-248.
4. Bailey, R. G., 1987. Mapping Ecoregions to Manage Land. In: 1987 Yearbook of Agriculture. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C., pp 82-85.
5. Bailey, R. G., 1991. Design of Ecological Networks for Monitoring Global Change. Environmental Conservation 18(2):173-175.
6. Bailey, R. G., 1995a. Ecosystem Geography. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.
7. Bailey, R. G., 1995b. Descriptions of the Ecoregions of the United States (2nd Edition). Miscellaneous Publication No. 1391, Map scale 1:7,500,000, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 108 pp.
8. Barnes, B. V., 1993. The Landscape Ecosystem Approach and Conservation of Endangered Spaces. Endangered Species UPDATE 10(3 and 4):13-19.
9. Bazata, K., 1991 Nebraska Stream Classification Study. Nebraska Department of Environmental Control, Lincoln, Nebraska.
10. Biesecker, J. E. and D. K. Leifeste, 1975, Water Quality of Hydrologic Bench Marks - An Indicator of Water Quality in the Natural Environment. Geological Survey Circular 460-E, U.S. Department of Interior, Geological Survey. Reston, Virginia, 21 pp.
11. Black, P. E., 1997. Watershed Functions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33(1):1-11.
12. Born, S. M. and W. C. Sonzogni, 1995. Integrated Environmental Management: Strengthening the Conceptualization. Environmental Management 19(2):167-181.
13. Briggs, J. C., 1978. Nationwide Surface Water Quality Monitoring Networks of the U.S. Geological Survey. In: Establishment of Water Quality Monitoring Programs, L. G. Everett and K. D. Schmidt (Editors). American Water Resources Association, Herndon, Virginia, pp.49-57.
14. Brown, D. D., and T. C. Brown, 1994. An Evaluation of Land Classification Systems for Large-Scale Water Quality Assessments. In: Effects of Human-Induced Changes on Hydrologic Systems. Proceedings of the AWRA 1994 Annual Summer Symposium of the American Water Resources Association. AWRA Technical Publication Series TPS-94-3, Herndon, Virginia, pp.939-948.
15. Callicott, J. B., 1995. A Review of Some Problems with the Concept of Ecosystem Health. Ecosystem Health 1(2):101-112.
16. Cannon, J. Z., 1994. Geographic Approaches to Environmental Management: Bioregionalism Applied. In: Proceedings of Watershed '93, a National Conference on Watershed Management, Alexandria, Virginia, pp. 281-286.
17. Cairns, J., 1994. The Current State of Watersheds in the United States: Ecological and Institutional Concerns. In: Proceedings of Watershed '93, a National Conference on Watershed Management, Alexandria, Virginia, pp.11-17.
18. Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V., 1961. Philosophy and Objectives of Watershed Policy. In: Economics of Watershed Planning, G. Tolley and F. Riggs (Editors). Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 1-12.
19. Coastal America, 1994. Toward a Watershed Approach: A Framework for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Protection, and Management. Coastal America Partnership Project.
20. Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1996. An Ecological Framework of North America. Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
21. Davis, W. S., B. D. Snyder, J. B. Stribling, and C. Stoughton, 1996. Summary of State Biological Assessment Programs for Streams and Wadeable Rivers. EPA 230-R-96-007, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Washington, D.C.
22. Ecological Stratification Working Group, 1995. A National Ecological Framework for Canada. Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, and Environment Canada, State of the Environment Directorate. Ottawa/Hull, Canada, 125 pp.
23. Fitzsimmons, A. K., 1996. Sound Policy or Smoke and Mirrors: Does Ecosystem Management Make Sense? Water Resources Bulletin 32(2): 217-227.
24. Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team (U.S.), 1993. Forest Ecosystem Management: An Ecological, Economic, and Social Assessment: Report of the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team/United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service et al.
25. Franklin, J. F., C. S. Bledsoe, and J. T. Callahan, 1990. Contributions of the Long-Term Ecological Research Program. BioScience 40(7):509-524.
26. Funk, J. L., 1970. Warm-Water Streams. In: A Century of Fisheries in North America, N. G. Benson (Editor). American Fisheries Society, Washington, D.C., pp.141-152
27. Government of Canada, 1991. The State of Canada's Environment. Ministry of the Environment, Ottawa, Canada.
28. Grumbine, R. E., 1994. What is Ecosystem Management? Conservation Biology 8(1):27-38.
29. Haeuber, R. and J. Franklin, 1996. Perspectives on Ecosystem Management. Ecological Applications 6(3):692-693.
30. Holling, C.S., 1994. An Ecologist View of the Malthusian Conflict. In: Population, Economic Development, and the Environment, K. Lindahl-Kiessling and H. Landberg (Editors). Oxford University Press, New York, New York, pp 79-104.
31. Hornig, C. E., C.W. Bayer, S. R. Twidwell, J. R. Davis, R. J. Kleinsasser, G. W. Linam, and K. B. Mayes, 1995. Development of Regionally Based Biological Criteria in Texas. In: Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. W. Davis and T. Simon (Editors). Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 145-152.
32. Hughes, R. M., 1995. Defining Acceptable Biological Status by Comparing with Reference Conditions. In: Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, W. Davis and T. Simon (Editors). Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp.31-47.
33. Hughes, R. M., S. A. Heiskary, W. J. Matthews, and C. O Yoder, 1994. Use of Ecoregions in Biological Monitoring. In: Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems, S. L. Loeb and A. Spacie (Editors). Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp.125-151.
34. Hughes, R. M., D. P. Larsen, and J. M. Omernik, 1986. Regional Reference Sites: A Method for Assessing Stream Potentials. Environmental Management 10(5):629-635.
35. Hughes, R. M., E. Rexstad, and C. E. Bond, 1987. The Relationship of Aquatic Ecoregions, River Basins, and Physiographic Provinces to Ichthyogeographic Regions of Oregon. Copeia 1987(2):423-432.
36. Hughes, R. M. and J. M. Omernik, 1981. Use and Misuse of the Terms Watershed and Stream Order. American Fisheries Society, Warmwater Stream Symposium, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 320-326.
37. Inkley, D. B. and S. H. Anderson, 1982. Wildlife Communities and Land Classification Systems. In: Transactions 47th North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference, K. Sabol (Editor). Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C. pp.73-81.
38. Karr, J. R., 1991. Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management. Ecological Applications 1(1):66-84.
39. Kay, J. K. and E. Schneider, 1994. Embracing Complexity: The Challenge of the Ecosystem Approach. Alternatives 20(3):32-39.
40. Langbein, W. B. and W. G. Hoyt, 1959. Water Facts for the Nation's Future: Uses and Benefits of Hydrologic Data Programs. The Ronald Press Company, New York, New York.
41. Larsen, D. P., D. R. Dudley, and R. M. Hughes, 1988. A Regional Approach for Assessing Attainable Surface Water Quality: An Ohio Case Study. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 43(2)171-176.
42. Larsen, D. P., J. M. Omernik, R. M. Hughes, C. M. Rohm, T. R. Whittier, A. J. Kinney, A. L. Gallant, and D. R. Dudley, 1986. The Correspondence Between Spatial Patterns in Fish Assemblages in Ohio Streams and Aquatic Ecoregions. Environmental Management 10: 815-828.
43. Leopold, L. B., 1962a. The Man and the Hill. Geological Survey Circular 460-A. United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
44. Leopold, L. B., 1962b. A National Network of Hydrologic Bench Marks. Geological Survey Circular 460-B. United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
45. Lotspeich, F. B., 1980. Watersheds as the Basic Ecosystem: This Conceptual Framework Provides a Basis for a Natural Classification System. Water Resources Bulletin 16(4):581-586.
46. Lyons, J., 1989. Correspondence Between the Distribution of Fish Assemblages in Wisconsin Streams and Omernik's Ecoregions. American Midland Naturalist 122(1):163-182.
47. Maxwell, J. R., C. J. Edwards, M. E. Jensen, S. J. Paustian, H. Parrot, and D. M. Hill, 1995. A Hierarchical Framework of Aquatic Ecological Units in North America (Nearctic zone). General Technical Report NC-176, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, 72 pp.
48. McDonnell, M. J. and S. A. Pickett (Editors), 1993. Humans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.
49. Montgomery, D. R., G. E. Grant, and K. Sullivan, 1995. Watershed Analysis as a Framework for Implementing Ecosystem Management. Water Resources Bulletin 31(3):369-386.
50. National Research Council, 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
51. Omernik, J. M., 1977. Nonpoint Source - Stream Nutrient Level Relationships: A Nationwide Study. EPA/600/3-77/105, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon.
52. Omernik, J. M., 1995. Ecoregions: A Spatial Framework for Environmental Management. In: Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, W. Davis and T. Simon (Editors). Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp.49-62.
53. Omernik, J. M., A. R. Abernathy, and L. M. Male, 1981. Stream Nutrient Levels and Proximity of Agricultural and Forest Land to Streams: Some Relationships. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 36(4):227-231.
54. Omernik, J. M. and C. F. Powers, 1983. Total Alkalinity of Surface Waters - A National Map. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 73(1):133-136.
55. Omernik J. M. and G. E. Griffith, 1986. Total Alkalinity of Surface Waters: A Map of the Western Region. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 41(6):374-378.
56. Omernik, J. M., C. M. Rohm, S. E. Clark, and D. P. Larsen, 1988. Summer Total Phosphorus in Lakes: A Map of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan, Environmental Management 12(2):815-825
57. Omernik, J. M. and G. E. Griffith, 1991. Ecological Regions Versus Hydrological Units: Frameworks for Managing Water Quality. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 46(5):334-340.
58. Parsons, J. P., 1985. On "Bioregionalism" and "Watershed Consciousness." The Professional Geographer 37(1):1-6.
59. Pflieger, W. L., 1971. A Distributional Study of Missouri Fishes. University of Kansas Publication, Museum of Natural History 20:225-570.
60. Plotnikoff, R. W., 1992. Timber/Fish/Wildlife Ecoregion Bioassessment Pilot Project. Washington Department of Ecology. Olympia, Washington.
61. Poff, N. L. and J. D Allan, 1995. Functional Organization of Stream Fish Assemblages in Relation to Hydrologic Variability. Ecology 76(2):606-627.
62. Poff, N. L. and J. V. Ward, 1989. Implications of Streamflow Variability and Predictability for Lotic Community Structure: A Regional Analysis of Streamflow Patterns. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46:1805-1818.
63. Risser, P. G., J. Lubchenco, N. L. Christenson, P. J. Dillon, L. D. Gomez, D. J. Jacob, P. L. Johnson, P. Matson, N. A. Moran, and T. Rosswall, 1993. Ten-Year Review of the National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Program. National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia.
64. Rohm, C. M., J. W. Geise, and C. C. Bennett, 1987. Evaluation of an Aquatic Ecoregion Classification of Streams in Arkansas. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 4:127-140.
65. Rohm, C. M., J. M. Omernik, and C. W. Kiilsgaard, 1995. Regional Patterns of Total Phosphorus in Lakes of the Northeastern United States. Lake and Reservoir Management 11(1):1-14.
66. Rowe, J. S., 1990. Home Place: Essays on Ecology. Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society. Henderson Book Series No. 12, NeWest Publishers Ltd., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
67. Rowe, J.S., 1992. Regionalization of Earth Space and its Ethical Implications. Unpublished paper presented at the Landscape Ecology Symposium, Corvallis, Oregon, April 10,1992.
68. Seaber, P. R., F. P. Kapinos, and G. L. Knapp, 1987. Hydrologic Unit Maps. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2294, United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado.
69. Spindler, P., 1996. Using Ecoregions for Explaining Macroinvertebrate Community Distribution Among Reference Sites in Arizona, 1992. Final Report, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, Phoenix, Arizona.
70. U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, 1995. An Ecosystem Approach to Fish and Wildlife Conservation. Conceptual Document. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
71. U. S. Department of Interior, Geological Survey, 1979. Accounting Units for the National Water Data Network. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
72. U. S. Department of Interior, Geological Survey, 1994. Hydrologic Unit Map - 1994: State of Tennessee. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
73. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1995. Watershed Protection: A Statewide Approach. EPA841-R-95-004, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
74. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1996a. Watershed Approach Framework. EPA840-S-96-001, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C., 16 pp.
75. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1996b. The Watershed Approach and Reinvention - "Learn From the Past, Look Toward the Future". In: EPA Watershed Events: A Bulletin on Sustaining Aquatic Ecosystems. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
76. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997. The Index of Watershed Indicators. EPA841-R-97-010, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
77. U. S. General Accounting Office, 1994. Ecosystem Management: Additional Actions Needed to Adequately Test a Promising Approach. GAO/RCED-94-111, U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C., 87 pp.
78. Water Environment Federation, 1992. Water Quality 2000: A National Water Agenda for the 21st Century. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, Virginia.
79. Whittier, T. R., R. M. Hughes, and D. P. Larsen, 1988. The Correspondence Between Ecoregions and Spatial Patterns in Stream Ecosystems in Oregon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45(7):1264-1278.
80. Wiken, E. B. and K. Lawton, 1995. North American Protected Areas: An Ecological Approach to Reporting and Analysis. The George Wright Forum 12(1):25-34.
81. Wilton, T. F., 1996. Final Report: Pilot Study of Biocriteria Data Collection Procedures for Wadeable Streams in Iowa. Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Des Moines, Iowa.
82. Yoder, C.O., 1995. Policy Issues and Management Applications of Biological Criteria. In: Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, W. Davis and T. Simon (Editors). Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 49-62.