Assessment of DEM quality for characterizing surface roughness using close range digital photogrammetry

Photogrammetric Record

Volumn 16, Issue 92, 1998, Pages 271-291

  Butler, J B ^a   Lane, S N ^a   Chandler, J H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Close range photogrammetry; DEM accuracy; Gravel bed river; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000134520     PISSN: 0031868X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0031-868X.00126     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. CHANDLER, J. H. and PADFIELD, C. J., 1996. Automated digital photogrammetry on a shoestring. Photogrammetric Record, 15(88): 545-559.
2. CHANDLER, J. H., COOPER, M. A. R. and ROBSON, S., 1989. Analytical aspects of small format surveys using oblique aerial photographs. Journal of Photographic Science, 37(7): 235-240.
3. CLIFFORD, N. J., ROBERT, A. and RICHARDS, K. S., 1992. Estimation of flow resistance in gravel-bedded rivers: a physical explanation of the multiplier of roughness length. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 17(2): 111-126.
4. COOPER, M. A. R. and CROSS, P.A., 1988. Statistical concepts and their application in photogrammetry and surveying. Photogrammetric Record, 12(71): 637-663.
5. HASSAN, M. A. and REID, I., 1990. The influence of microform bed roughness elements on flow and sediment transport in gravel bed rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 15(8): 739-750.
6. KIRBY, R. P., 1991. Measurement of surface roughness in desert terrain by close range photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Record, 13(78): 855-875.
7. LANE, S. N., 1998. Hydraulic modelling in hydrology and geomorphology. A review of high resolution approaches. Hydrological Processes, 11: 1131-1150.
8. LANE, S. N., CHANDLER, J. H. and RICHARDS, K. S., 1994. Developments in monitoring and modelling small scale river bed topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 19(4): 349-368.
9. LI, Z., 1991. Effects of check points on the reliability of DTM accuracy estimates obtained from experimental tests. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 57(10): 1333-1340.
10. PYLE, C. J., RICHARDS, K. S. and CHANDLER, J. H., 1997. Digital photogrammetric monitoring of river bank erosion. Photogrammetric Record, 15(89): 753-764.
11. THOMSON, G. H., 1988. Evaluating image quality of small format aerial photography systems. Ibid., 12(71): 595-603.
12. TORLEGÅRD, K., ÖSTMAN, A. and LINDGREN, R., 1986. A comparative test of photogrammetrically sampled digital elevation models. Photogrammetria, 41(1): 1-16.
13. VISION INTERNATIONAL, 1995. IMAGINE Orthomax user's guide. Unpublished document. 121 pages.