Spatial scaling of a remotely sensed surface parameter by contexture

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 30-42

  Chen, Jing M ^a  

^a CANADA CENTRE FOR REMOTE SENSING   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; EARTH (PLANET); ECOSYSTEMS; MAPPING; SATELLITE OBSERVATORIES; SPATIAL VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; SURFACE STRUCTURE; VEGETATION;

CONTEXTURE; NORMALIZED DIFFERENCE VEGETATION INDEX; SPATIAL SCALING; SURFACE PARAMETER;

REMOTE SENSING;

IMAGE PROCESSING; LAND COVER; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; REMOTE SENSING; SCALE EFFECT;

EID: 0032766863     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00006-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aman A., Randriamanantena H.P., Podaire A., Froutin R. Upscale integration of normalized difference vegetation index. the problem of spatial heterogeneity IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 30:1992;326-338.
2. Bonan G.B., Pollard D., Thompson S.L. Influence of subgrid-scale heterogeneity in leaf area index, stomatal resistance and soil moisture on grid-scale land-atmosphere interactions. J. Clim. 6:1993;1882-1897.
3. Chen J.M. Evaluation of vegetation indices and a Modified Simple Ratio for boreal applications. Can. J. Remote Sens. 22:1996;229-242.
4. Chen J.M., Cihlar J. Retrieving leaf area index of boreal forests using Landsat TM images. Remote Sens. Environ. 55:1996;153-162.
5. Ehleringer J.R., Field C.B. Scaling Physiological Processes. Leaf to Globe:1993;Academic, Boston.
6. Hall F.G., Huemmrich K.F., Goetz S.J., Sellers P.J., Nickeson J.E. Satellite remote sensing of surface energy balance. success, failures, and unresolved issues in FIFE J. Geophys. Res. 97(D17):1992;19,061-19,089.
7. Haralick, R. M. (1979), Statistical and structural approaches to texture. In Proceedings of the IEEE, IEEE, New York, Vol. 67, pp. 786-804.
8. Haralick R.M. Statistical image texture analysis. Yong T.Y., Fu K.S. Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Image Processing. 1986;247-280 Academic, New York.
9. Hu Z., Islam S. A framework for analyzing and designing scale invariant remote sensing algorithms. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 35:1997;747-755.
10. Huete A.R., Liu H.Q. An error and Sensitivity analysis of the atmospheric- and soul-correcting variants of the NDVI for the MODIS-EOS. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 32:1994;897-905.
11. Irons J.R., Peterson G.W. Texture transforms of remote sensing data. Remote Sens. Environ. 11:1981;359-370.
12. Mather P.M. Computer Processing of Remotely Sensed Images. 1987;Wiley, New York.
13. Pielke R.A., Dalu G.A., Snook J.S., Lee T.J., Kittel T.G.F. Nonlinear influence of mesoscale land use on weather and climate. J. Clim. 4:1991;1053-1069.
14. Tanré, D., Deroo, C., Duhaut, P., et al. (1986), Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, Laboratoire d'optique atmosphérique, Université des Sciences et Techniques de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France, 343 pp.
15. Townshend, J. R. C. (1980), The spatial resolving power of earth resources satellites: a review, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center TM 82020, Greenbelt, MD.
16. Townshend J.R.G., Justice C.O. Selecting the spatial resolution of satellite sensors required for global monitoring of land transformations. Int. J. Remote Sens. 9:1988;187-236.
17. Wood E.F., Lakshmi V. Scaling water and energy fluxes in climate systems. three land-atmospheric modeling experiments J. Clim. 6:1993;439-857.
18. Woodcock C.E., Strahler A.H. The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 21:1987;311-332.