The Nature of Social Dominance Orientation: Theorizing and Measuring Preferences for Intergroup Inequality Using the New SDO7 Scale

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 109, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1003-1028

  Ho, Arnold K ^a   Sidanius, Jim ^b   Kteily, Nour ^c   Sheehy Skeffington, Jennifer ^d   Pratto, Felicia ^e   Henkel, Kristin E ^f   Foels, Rob ^g   Stewart, Andrew L ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPH   (United States)

^g RICHARD STOCKTON COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^h CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Inequality; SDO dominance; SDO egalitarianism; SDO7 scale; Social dominance orientation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DEVICES; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; STANDARDS;

ADULT; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84949729776     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000033     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: New Press.
2. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Althusser, L. (1984). Essays on ideology. New York, NY: Verso Books.
4. Amiot, C.E., Bourhis, R.Y. (2005). Discrimination between dominant and subordinate groups: The positive-negative asymmetry effect and normative processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 289-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466604X17605.
5. Asbrock, F., Sibley, C.G., Duckitt, J. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324-340.
6. Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., de Vries, R.E. (2014). The HEXACO Honesty- Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868314523838.
7. Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological, 57, 289-300.
8. Benjamini, Y., Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165-1188.
9. Bishop, G.F., Tuchfarber, A.J., Oldendick, R.W. (1978). Change in the structure of American political attitudes: The nagging question of ques- tion wording. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 250-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2110616.
10. Bobo, L., Hutchings, V.L. (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer's theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951-972. http://dx .doi.org/10.2307/2096302.
11. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., Stokes, D.E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: Wiley.
12. Chow, R.M., Lowery, B.S., Hogan, C.M. (2013). Appeasement: Whites' strategic support for affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 332-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0146167212475224.
13. Cohen. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Costello, K., Hodson, G. (2011). Social dominance-based threat reactions to immigrants in need of assistance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 220-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.769.
15. Cotterill, S., Sidanius, J., Bhardwaj, A., Kumar, V. (2014). Ideological Support for the Indian Caste System: Social Dominance Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Karma. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2, 98-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.171.
16. Davis, M.H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514 .44.1.113.
17. DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B.D., Smith, J.C. (2011). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2010 (Current Population Reports, P60-239). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. DeYoung, C.G., Quilty, L.C., Peterson, J.B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880-896. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514 .93.5.880.
19. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75.
20. Ellenbroek, M., Verkuyten, M., Thijs, J., Poppe, E. (2014). The fairness of national decision-making procedures: The views of adolescents in 18 European countries. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 503-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/casp.2189.
21. Federico, C.M., Sidanius, J. (2002). Sophistication and the antecedents of whites' racial policy attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 145-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/339848.
22. Federico, C.M., Weber, C.R., Ergun, D., Hunt, C. (2013). Mapping the connections between politics and morality: The multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuition. Political Psychology, 34, 589-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pops.12006.
23. Ferguson, A. (2015). Mitt Romney: Hillary Clinton politicized Baltimore tragedy to get support from the Black community. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/04/ mitt-romney-hillary-clinton-baltimore_n_7204884.html?ncid tweetlnkushpmg00000016.
24. Fiske, A.P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689.
25. Ghiselli, E.E., Campbell, J.P., Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
26. Graham, J., Haidt, J., Nosek, B.A. (2008). Moral foundations questionnaire, short version [Measurement instrument]. Retrieved from http:// www.moralfoundations.org/sites/default/files/files/MFQ20.doc.
27. Graham, J., Nosek, B.A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Ditto, P.H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021847.
28. Guriev, S., Treisman, D. (2015). The new dictators rule by velvet fist. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/25/ opinion/the-new-dictators-rule-by-velvet-fist.html.
29. Gutiérrez, A.S., Unzueta, M.M. (2013). Are admissions decisions based on family ties fairer than those that consider race? Social dominance orientation and attitudes toward legacy vs. affirmative action policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 554-558. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.011.
30. Haley, H., Sidanius, J. (2005). Person-organization congruence and the maintenance of group-based social hierarchy: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 187-203. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430205051067.
31. Henrich, J., Heine, S.J., Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
32. Henry, P.J. (2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 49-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 10478400802049936.
33. Henry, P.J., Sears, D.O. (2002). The symbolic racism 2000 scale. Political Psychology, 23, 253-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0162- 895X.00281.
34. Hindriks, P., Verkuyten, M., Coenders, M. (2014). Dimensions of social dominance orientation: The roles of legitimizing myths and national identification. European Journal of Personality. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.1955.
35. Hittner, J.B., Finger, M.S., Mancuso, J.P., Silver, N.C. (1995). A Microsoft Fortran-77 program for constraining part correlations and related statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 777-784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055005010.
36. Ho, A.K., Sidanius, J., Cuddy, A.C., Banaji, M.R. (2013). Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of Black-White biracials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 940-943. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.010.
37. Ho, A.K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 583-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432765.
38. Hodson, G., Hogg, S.M., MacInnis, C.C. (2009). The role of "dark personalities" (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686-690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp .2009.02.005.
39. Hodson, G., Rush, J., Macinnis, C.C. (2010). A joke is just a joke (except when it isn't): Cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 660-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019627.
40. Hurwitz, J., Peffley, M. (1987). How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Political Science Review, 81, 1099-1120.
41. Jackman, M.R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
42. Jones, D.N.,&Paulhus, D.L. (2010). Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social and Personality Psychology Science, 1, 12-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1948550609347591.
43. Jost, J.T., Thompson, E.P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1403.
44. Kahn, K., Ho, A.K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. (2009). The space between us and them: Perceptions of status differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 591-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1368430209338716.
45. Katz, I., Hass, R.G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.893.
46. Kay, A.C., Jost, J.T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of 'poor but happy' and 'poor but honest' stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0022-3514.85.5.823.
47. Kosterman, R., Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10(2), 257-274. http://dx .doi.org/10.2307/3791647.
48. Krosch, A.R., Berntsen, L., Amodio, D.M., Jost, J.T., Van Bavel, J.J. (2013). On the ideology of hypodescent: Political conservatism predicts categorization of racially ambiguous faces as Black. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1196-1203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .jesp.2013.05.009.
49. Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., Cotterill, S. (in press). The "ascent of man:" A theoretical and empirical case for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
50. Kteily, N., Cotterill, S., Sidanius, J., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Bergh, R. (2014). "Not one of us:" Predictors and consequences of denying ingroup characteristics to ambiguous targets. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1231-1247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0146167214539708.
51. Kteily, N., Ho, A.K., Sidanius, J. (2012). Hierarchy in the mind: The predictive power of social dominance orientation across social contexts and domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 543-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.007.
52. Kteily, N., Sidanius, J., Levin, S. (2011). Social dominance orientation: Cause or "mere effect?" Evidence for SDO as a causal predictor of prejudice and discrimination against ethnic and racial outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 208-214. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/j.jesp.2010.09.009.
53. Kugler, M.B., Cooper, J., Nosek, B.A. (2010). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality correspond to different psychological motives. Social Justice Research, 23, 117-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11211-010-0112-5.
54. Kugler, M., Jost, J.T., Noorbaloochi, S. (2014). Another look at moral foundations theory: Do Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in "moral" intuitions? Social Justice Research, 27, 413-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11211- 014-0223-5.
55. Larsson, M.R., Björklund, F., Bäckström, M. (2012). Right-wing authoritarianism is a risk factor of torture-like abuse, but so is social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 927-929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.015.
56. Lee, I.C., Pratto, F., Johnson, B.T. (2011). Intergroup consensus/ disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: An examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 1029-1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025410.
57. Lee, K., Ashton, M.C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.
58. Lee, K., Ashton, M.C., Ogunfowora, B., Bourdage, J.S., Shin, K. (2010). The personality bases of socio-political attitudes: The role of honesty-humility and openness to experience. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 115-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.007.
59. Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J.L., Federico, C. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies, and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology, 19, 373-404. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1111/0162-895X.00109.
60. Leyens, J., Paladino, P.M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186-197. http://dx.doi .org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06.
61. Martinovic, B., Verkuyten, M. (2013). "We were here first, so we determine the rules of the game:" Autochthony and prejudice towards out-groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 637-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1980.
62. Milojev, P., Osborne, D., Greaves, L.M., Bulbulia, J., Wilson, M.S., Davies, C.L., Sibley, C.G. (2014). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict different moral signatures. Social Justice Research, 27, 149-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014- 0213-7.
63. Oliver, M.L., Shapiro, T.M. (2006). Black wealth, white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
64. Paulhus, D.L., Williams, K.M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092- 6566(02)00505-6.
65. Perry, R., Sibley, C.G., Duckitt, J. (2013). Dangerous and competitive worldviews: A meta-analysis of their associations with social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 116-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.004.
66. Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York, NY: Viking.
67. Pratto, F., çidam, A., Stewart, A.L., Bou Zeineddine, F., Aranda, M., Aiello, A., Henkel, K.E. (2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals: Contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 587-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1948550612473663.
68. Pratto, F., Glasford, D.E. (2008). Ethnocentrism and the value of a human life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1411-1428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012636.
69. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271-320. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/10463280601055772.
70. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., Malle, B.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.
71. Pratto, F. Stewart, A.L., Foels, R., Henkel, K.E., Bou Zeineddine, F., Laham, S.M., Morselli, D. (2015). Beyond me and mine: The socially-inclusive psychology of people low on social dominance orientation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.
72. Reynolds, K.J., Turner, J.C., Haslam, S.A., Ryan, M.K., Bizumic, B., Subasic, E. (2007). Does personality explain in-group identification and discrimination? Evidence from the minimal group paradigm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 517-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/ 014466606X153080.
73. Roets, A., Van Hiel, A. (2011). Allport's prejudiced personality today: Need for closure as the motivated cognitive basis of prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 349-354. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1177/0963721411424894.
74. Sears, D.O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/0022-3514.51.3.515.
75. Sears, D.O., Haley, H., Henry, P.J. (2008). Cultural diversity and sociopolitical attitudes at college entry. In J. Sidanius, S. Levin, C. van Laar, & D.O. Sears (Eds.), The diversity challenge: Social identity and intergroup relations on the college campus (pp. 65-99). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
76. Sibley, C.G., Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A metaanalysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226.
77. Sibley, C.G., Harding, J.F., Perry, R., Asbrock, F., Duckitt, J. (2010). Personality and prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO personality model. European Journal of Personality, 24, 515-534. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1002/per.750.
78. Sibley, C.G., Liu, J.H. (2010). Social dominance orientation: Testing a global individual difference perspective. Political Psychology, 31, 175-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00748.x.
79. Sidanius, J., Cotterill, S., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Kteily, N., Carvacho, H. (2015). Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
80. Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Ho, A.K., Sibley, C., Duriez, B. (2013). You're inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81, 313-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12008.
81. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Federico, C.M., Pratto, F. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology justice and intergroup relations (pp. 307-331). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
82. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Van Laar, C., Sears, D.O. (2008). The diversity challenge: Social identity and intergroup relations on the college campus. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
83. Sidanius, J., Mitchell, M., Haley, H., Navarrete, C.D. (2006). Support for harsh criminal sanctions and criminal justice beliefs: A social dominance perspective. Social Justice Research, 19, 433-449. http://dx.doi .org/10.1007/s11211-006-0026-4.
84. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043.
85. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Mitchell, M. (1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151-167. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/00224545.1994.9711378.
86. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Sinclair, S., Van Laar, C. (1996). Mother Teresa meets Genghis Khan: The dialectics of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating career choices. Social Justice Research, 9, 145-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02198077.
87. Steiger, J.H. (1980). On the empirical equivalence of regression components and common factors. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 33, 200-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317 .1980.tb00608.x.
88. Swami, V., Neofytou, R.V., Jablonska, J., Thirlwell, H., Taylor, D., McCreary, D.R. (2013). Social dominance orientation predicts drive for muscularity among British men. Body Image, 10, 653-656. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.07.007.
89. Thomsen, L. (2009). Seeing social relations (Doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
90. Thomsen, L., Green, E.G.T., Ho, A.K., Levin, S., van Laar, C., Sinclair, S., Sidanius, J. (2010). Wolves in sheep's clothing: SDO asymmetrically predicts perceived ethnic victimization among white and Latino students across three years. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 225-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167209348617.
91. Thomsen, L., Green, E., Sidanius, J. (2008). We will hunt them down: How social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1455-1464. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.06.011.
92. Thomsen, L., Kunst, J.R., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Fiske, A.P., Sidanius, J. (2015). Universal, elementary relational motives applied between groups underpin intergroup relations: The Between-group Relational Orientation Scale (BRO). Manuscript in preparation.
93. Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M., Duriez, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 824-837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0146167204264333.
94. van Laar, C.V., Levin, S., Sinclair, S., Sidanius, J. (2005). The effect of university roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 329-345. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/j.jesp.2004.08.002.
95. Webster, D.M., Kruglanski, A.W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049.