Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Predict Different Moral Signatures

Social Justice Research

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 149-174

  Milojev, Petar ^a   Osborne, Danny ^a   Greaves, Lara M ^a   Bulbulia, Joseph ^b   Wilson, Marc S ^b   Davies, Caitlin L ^b   Liu, James H ^b   Sibley, Chris G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Dual process model; Latent profile analysis; Moral foundations theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939885531     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-014-0213-7     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian spectre. London: Harvard University Press.
2. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “Authoritarian Personality”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,30, 47–92.
3. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.
4. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–345.
5. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2013). Auxiliary variables in mixture modelling: 3-Step approaches using Mplus. Mplus Web Notes,15, 1–24.
6. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,33, 44–113.
7. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality,21, 113–130.
8. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry,20, 98–109.
9. Federico, C. M., Weber, C. R., Ergun, D., & Hunt, C. (2013). Mapping the connections between politics and morality: The multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuition. Political Psychology,34(4), 589–610.
10. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe,7, 7–28.
11. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,96(5), 1029–1046.
12. Graham, J. B., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,101(2), 266–285.
13. Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science,316(5827), 998–1002.
14. Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that Liberals may not recognise. Social Justice Research,20, 98–116.
15. Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry,20(2), 110–119.
16. Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Deadulus,133(4), 55–663.
17. Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. The innate Mind,3, 367–392.
18. Hoverd, W. J., Bulbulia, J., Partow, N., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Forecasting religious change: A Bayesian model predicting proportional Christian change in New Zealand. Religion, Brain and Behavior,32, 531–532.
19. Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE,7(8), e42366.
20. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. (2009). Political Ideology: Its structure, function and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology,60, 307–337.
21. Kim, K. R., Kang, J., & Yun, S. (2012). Moral intuitions and political orientation: Similarities and differences between South Korea and the United States. Psychological Reports: Sociocultural Issues in Psychology,111(1), 173–185.
22. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialisation. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
23. Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and het away with it in the study of moral development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 151–235). New York: Academic Press.
24. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., Feldman, M. W., & Kendal, J. (2009). Conceptual barriers to progress within evolutionary biology. Foundations of Science,14(3), 195–216.
25. McHoskey, J. W. (1996). Authoritarianism and ethical ideology. The Journal of Social Psychology,136(6), 709–717.
26. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7. ed.). Los Angeles. CA: Muthén & Muthén.
27. Osborne, D., Wooton, L., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Are liberals agreeable or not? Politeness and compassion differentially predict political conservatism via distinct ideologies. Social Psychology,44(5), 354–360. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000132.
28. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67(4), 741–763.
29. Salmond, C., Crampton, P., & Atkinson, J. (2007). NZDep2006 index of deprivation. Wellington: University of Otago (Department of Public Health). Retrieved from http://www.wnmeds.ac.nz/academic/dph/research/socialindicators.html.
30. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review,12(3), 248–279.
31. Sibley, C. G., Luyten, N., Purnomo, M., Moberly, A., Wootton, L. W., Hammond, M. D., et al. (2011). The Mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the big-six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology,40, 142–159.
32. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchies and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Weber, C. R., & Federico, C. M. (2007). Interpersonal attachment and patterns of ideological belief. Political Psychology,28(4), 389–416.
35. Weber, C. R., & Federico, C. M. (2013). Moral foundations and heterogeneity in ideological preferences. Political Psychology,34(1), 107–126.
36. Wilson, M. S. (2003). Social dominance and ethical ideology: The end justifies the means? The Journal of Social Psychology,143(5), 549–558.
37. Wilson, M. S., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects on political conservatism. Political Psychology,34, 277–284.