Group status and individual differentiation

Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 93-115

  Lorenzi Cioldi, Fabio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949545079     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446211946.n6     Document Type: Chapter

References (114)

1. Aharpour, S., & Brown, R. (2002). Functions of group identification: An exploratory analysis. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 15, 157-186.
2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. London: Addison-Wesley.
3. Apfelbaum, E. (1979). Relations of domination and movements for liberation: An analysis of power between groups. In S.Worchel & W.Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 188-204). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
4. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80-114. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
5. Augoustinos, M. (1999). Ideology, false consciousness, and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 9, 295-312. doi:10.1177/0959354399093002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354399093002
6. Beauvois, J. -L. (1994). Traité de la servitude libérale: Analyse de la soumission. Paris: Dunod.
7. Beauvois, J. -L., Gilibert, D., Pansu, P., & Abdelaoui, S. (1998). Internality attribution and intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 123-140. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<123::AID-EJSP855>3.0.CO;2-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0992%28199803/04%2928:2%3C123::AID-EJSP855%3E3.0.CO;2-5
8. Blalock, H. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority group relations. New York: Wiley.
9. Bourdieu, P., & de Saint Martin, M. (1978). Le patronat. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 3-82.
10. Brewer, M. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
11. Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
12. Brewer, M. B., & Weber, J. G. (1994). Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 268-275. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.268
13. Bullock, H. E., & Limbert, W. M. (2003). Scaling the socioeconomic ladder: Low-income women's perceptions of class status and opportunity. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 693-709. doi:10.1046/j.0022-4537.2003.00085.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-4537.2003.00085.x
14. Codol, J. -P. (1984). Social differentiation and non-differentiation. In H.Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (vol. 1, pp. 314-337). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Dahrendorf, R. (1964). The education of an elite: Law faculties and the German upper class. In P.Lazarsfeld & T. H.Marshall (Eds.), Transactions of the Fifth World Congress of Sociology (pp. 259-274). Louvain: ISA.
16. Dasgupta, N., Banaji, M. R., & Abelson, R. P. (1999). Group entitativity and group perception: Associations between physical features and psychological judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 991-1003. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.991
17. DeMott, B. (1990). The imperial middle: Why Americans can't think straight about class. New York: Morrow.
18. Dépret, E., & Fiske, S. (1999). Perceiving the powerful: Intriguing individuals versus threatening groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 461-480.
19. Deschamps, J. -C. (1982). Social identity and relations of power between groups. In H.Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 85-98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Deschamps, J. -C. (1984). Identité sociale et différenciations catégorielles. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 4, 449-474.
21. Deschamps, J. -C., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., & Meyer, G. (1982). L'échec scolaire [Doing badly at school]. Lausanne: Favre.
22. De Tocqueville, A. (1835/1986). De la démocratie en Amérique [Democracy in America]. Paris: Laffont.
23. Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1188. doi:10.1177/0146167200262001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001
24. Doise, W. (1988). Individual and social identities in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 99-111. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180202
25. Dubois, N., & Beauvois, J. L. (1996). Internality, academic status and intergroup attributions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11, 329-341. doi:10.1007/BF03172944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03172944
26. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Elder, G. H. (1971). Intergroup attitudes and social ascent among Negro boys. The American Journal of Sociology, 76, 673-697. doi:10.1086/224977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/224977
28. Ellemers, N. (2001). Individual upward mobility and the perceived legitimacy of inter-group relations. In J. T.Jost & B.Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 205-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Ellyson, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: Basic concepts and issues. In S. L.Ellyson & J. F.Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 1-27). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5106-4_1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5106-4_1
30. Erber, R., & Fiske, S. (1984). Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 709-726. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.709
31. Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689
32. Fiske, A. P., Haslam, N., & Fiske, S. (1991). Confusing one person with another: What errors reveal about the elementary forms of social relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 656-674. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.656
33. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621
34. Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination. In D. T.Gilbert, S. T.Fiske, & G.Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (vol. 2, pp. 357-411). New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influence of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego: Academic.
36. Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-489. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00128
37. Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21
38. Greenwood, J. D. (2004). The disappearance of the social in American social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Guillaumin, C. (1972). L'idéologie raciste: Genèse et langage actuel [The racist ideology]. Paris: Mouton.
40. Guinote, A. (2001). The perception of group variability in a non-minority and a minority context: When adaptation leads to outgroup differentiation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 117-132. doi:10.1348/014466601164722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466601164722
41. Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: some links and lacunae. In D.Abrams & M. A.Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
42. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. London: Harvard University Press.
43. Hirschman, A. O. (1995). A propensity to self-subversion. Harvard: Harvard College.
44. Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85-111. doi:10.1080/14792779343000031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000031
45. Hoggart, R. (1957). The uses of literacy. London: Chatto & Windus.
46. Hurtig, M. -C., Pichevin, M. -F., & Piolat, M. (1992). Sex and age as factors of asymmetry in the perceived similarity between two persons: A study designed by J. -P. Codol. In L.Arcuri & C.Serino (Eds.), Asymmetry phenomena in interpersonal comparison: Cognitive and social issues (pp. 71-85). Naples: Liguori.
47. Jackman, M. R., & Jackman, R. W. (1973). An interpretation of the relation between objective and subjective social status. American Sociological Review, 38, 569-582. doi:10.2307/2094408 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094408
48. Jackman, M. R., & Senter, M. S. (1980). Images of social groups: Categorical or qualified?Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 341-361. doi:10.1086/268601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268601
49. Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B. J. (2002). "We're all individuals": Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189-207. doi:10.1002/ejsp.65 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.65
50. Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). Diminishing returns: The effects of income on the content of stereotypes of wage earners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1538-1545. doi:10.1177/014616702237581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616702237581
51. Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1988). Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 778-788. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.778
52. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
53. Kitzinger, C. (1992). The individuated self concept: A critical analysis of social-constructionist writing on individualism. In G. M.Breakwell (Ed.), Social psychology of identity and the self-concept (pp. 221-250). London: Surrey University Press.
54. LaFrance, M., & Henley, N. M. (1994). On oppressing hypotheses: Or differences in nonverbal sensitivity revisited. In H. L.Radke & H. J.Stam (Eds.), Power/gender: Social relations in theory and practice (pp. 287-311). London: Sage.
55. Lalonde, R. N., and Silverman, R. A. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 78-85. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.78 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.78
56. Lee, F., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Who's being served? "Self-serving" attributions in social hierarchies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 254-287. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2925
57. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper.
58. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1988). Individus dominants et groupes dominés [Dominant individuals and dominated groups]. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires.
59. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1991). Self-enhancement and self-stereotyping in gender groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 403-417. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420210504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420210504
60. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). They all look alike, but so do we, sometimes … Perception of in-group and out-group homogeneity as a function of gender and context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 111-124. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00990.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00990.x
61. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1994). Les androgynes [The androgynous person]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
62. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1998). Group status and perceptions of homogeneity. In W.Stroebe & M.Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (vol. 9, pp. 31-75). Chichester: Wiley.
63. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2001). The when and the why of how: From mental representations to social representations. In K.Deaux & G.Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 217-227). Oxford: Blackwell.
64. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2002a). Les représentations des groupes dominants et dominés: Collections et agrégats [Social representations of dominants and subordinates: Collections and aggregates]. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires.
65. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2002b). Expériences sur les groupes dominants et dominés: Les perceptions de l'homogénéité des groupes [Experiments on dominants and subordinates: Perceptions of group homogeneity]. Bern: Lang.
66. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2005). Group homogeneity perception in status hierarchies. Submitted for publication.
67. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Deaux, K., & Daffflon, A. (1998). Group homogeneity as a function of relative social status. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 255-273.
68. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., & Doise, W. (1990). Levels of analysis and social identity. In D.Abrams & M. A.Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 71-88). London: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
69. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., & Doise, W. (1994). Identité sociale et identité personnelle. In R. Y.Bourhis & J. -Ph.Leyens (Eds.), Stéréotypes, discrimination et relations entre groupes [Stereotypes, discrimination, and intergroup relations] (pp. 69-96). Liège: Mardaga.
70. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Eagly, A. H., & Stewart, T. (1995). Homogeneity of gender groups in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 193-217. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1010
71. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., & Joye, D. (1988). Représentations de catégories socio-professionnelles: Aspects méthodologiques. Bulletin de Psychologie, 40, 377-390.
72. Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor. American Psychologist, 57, 100-110. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.100
73. Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 251-330). New York: Academic.
74. ème Congrès International de Psychologie Sociale en Langue Française. University of Lausanne, Switzerland, September.
75. McAuliffe, B. J., Jetten, J., Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Differentiation between and within groups: The influence of individualist and collectivist group norms. Submitted for publication.
76. Miller, J. B. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.961
77. Millett, D. (1981). Defining the "dominant group". Canadian Ethnic Studies, 13, 64-80.
78. Moscovici, S., & Paicheler, G. (1978). Social comparison and social recognition: Two complementary processes of identification. In H.Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 251-266). London: Academic.
79. Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753-761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.753
80. Mullen, B., & Hu, L. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1003_3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1003_3
81. Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
82. Palmonari, A., Rubini, M., & Graziani, A. (2003). The perceived importance of group functions in adolescent peer groups. New Review of Social Psychology, 1, 60-67.
83. Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051-1068. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.6.1051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.6.1051
84. Park, B., Ryan, C. S., & Judd, C. M. (1992). Role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for in-groups and out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 553-567. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.553
85. Pichevin, M. -F., & Hurtig, M. -C. (1996). Describing men, describing women: Sex membership salience and numerical distinctiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 513-522. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:4<513::AID-EJSP774>3.0.CO;2-Y http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0992%28199607%2926:4%3C513::AID-EJSP774%3E3.0.CO;2-Y
86. Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484-493. doi:10.1177/0146167294205005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205005
87. Reid, A., & Deaux, K. (1996). Relationship between social and personal identity: Segregation or integration?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1084-1091. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1084
88. Rosenberg, M., & Pearlin, L. I. (1978). Social class and self-esteem among children and adults. The American Journal of Sociology, 84, 53-77. doi:10.1086/226740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226740
89. Rubin, M., Hewstone, M., Crisp, R. J., Voci, A., & Richards, Z. (2004). Gender out-group homogeneity: The roles of differential familiarity, gender differences, and group size. In V.Yzerbyt, C. M.Judd, & O.Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism. New York: Psychology Press.
90. Sekaquaptewa, D., & Espinoza, P. (2004). Biased processing of stereotype-incongruency is greater for low than high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 128-135. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00093-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031%2803%2900093-3
91. Sennett, R., & Cobb, J. (1972). The hidden injuries of class. New York: Norton.
92. Simon, B. (1993). On the asymmetry in the cognitive construal of ingroup and outgroup: A model of egocentric social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 131-147. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420230203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420230203
93. Smith, H. J., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Group membership and everyday social comparison experiences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 297-308. doi:10.1002/ejsp.198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.198
94. Snodgrass, S. E. (1985). Women's intuition: The effect of subordinate role on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 146-155. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.146
95. Stephenson, G. M. (1981). Intergroup bargaining and negotiation. In J. -C.Turner & H.Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behavior (pp. 168-198). Oxford: Blackwell.
96. Tajfel, H. (ed.) (1978). Differentiation between social groups. New York: Academic.
97. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
98. Tajfel, H. (1982). Instrumentality, identity and social comparison. In H.Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 483-507). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Paris: Maison des Sciences l'Homme.
99. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S.Worchel & W. G.Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
100. Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., Moghaddam, F. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target of discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 254-262. doi:10.1177/0146167290162006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167290162006
101. Thibaut, J. (1950). An experimental study of the cohesiveness of underprivileged groups. Human Relations, 3, 251-278. doi:10.1177/001872675000300302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872675000300302
102. Thibaut, J., & Riecken, H. W. (1955). Some determinants and consequences of the perception of social causality. Journal of Personality, 24, 272-302. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1955.tb01178.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1955.tb01178.x
103. Triandis, H. C. (1994). Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of collectivism and individualism. In U.Kim, H. C.Triandis, C.Kâgitçibasi, S. -C.Choi, & G.Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism (pp. 41-51). London: Sage.
104. Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N.Ellemers, R.Spears, & B.Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford: Blackwell.
105. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. Oxford: Blackwell.
106. Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. New York: Viking.
107. Vonk, R. (1999). Effects of outcome dependency on correspondence bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 382-389. doi:10.1177/0146167299025003009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025003009
108. Whitley, B. E., McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1986). Assessing the theoretical models for sex differences in causal attributions of success and failure. In J. S.Hyde & M. C.Lynn (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 102-135). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
109. Wright, S. C. (2001). Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. In R.Brown & S.Gaertner (Eds.), Intergroup processes (pp. 409-430). Oxford: Blackwell.
110. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994
111. Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C. M., & Corneille, O. (Eds.) (2004). The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity and essentialism. New York: Psychology Press.
112. Zàrate, M. A., & Smith, E. R. (1990). Person categorization and stereotyping. Social Cognition, 8, 161-165.
113. Zweigenhaft, R. L. (1970). Signature size: A key to status awareness. Journal of Social Psychology, 81, 49-54. doi:10.1080/00224545.1970.9919908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1970.9919908
114. Zweigenhaft, R. L. (1977). The other side of unusual first names. Journal of Social Psychology, 103, 291-302. doi:10.1080/00224545.1977.9713328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1977.9713328