Enhancing social acceptance in marine governance in Europe

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 117, Issue , 2015, Pages 61-69

  Soma, Katrine ^a   Haggett, Claire ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blue growth; Marine governance; Offshore wind farms; Public engagement; Social acceptance

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC UTILITIES; MARINE ENGINEERING; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; SOCIAL ASPECTS; TIDAL POWER; WIND POWER;

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FUTURE INNOVATIONS; MARINE GOVERNANCE; PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; PUBLIC SUPPORT; RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

OFFSHORE WIND FARMS;

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; ENERGY PLANNING; FUTURE PROSPECT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MARINE POLICY; OFFSHORE APPLICATION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; WIND FARM;

EUROPE;

EID: 84949465039     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Agranoff R., McGuire M. Big questions in public network management research. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2001, 11:295-326. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003504.
2. Aitken M. e-Planning and public participation: addressing or aggravating the challenges of public participation in planning?. Int. J. e-Planning Res. 2014, 10.4018/ijepr.2014040103.
3. Aitken M. Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: a critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy 2010, 38:1834-1841. 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.060.
4. Aitken M. A three-dimensional view of public participation in Scottish land-use planning: empowerment or social control?. Plan. Theory 2010, 9:248-264. 10.1177/1473095210366193.
5. Aitken M., Haggett C., Rudolph D. Wind Farms Community Engagement Good Practice Review 2014.
6. Atkinson A.B., Stiglitz J. Lectures on Public Economics 2015, Princeton University Press, New Jersey. fourth ed.
7. Bates A., Firestone J. A comparative assessment of proposed offshore wind power demonstration projects in the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2015, 10:192-205. 10.1016/j.erss.2015.07.007.
8. Bell D., Gray T., Haggett C. The "Social Gap" in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses. Env. Polit. 2005, 14:460-477. 10.1080/09644010500175833.
9. Blok A. Experts on public trial: on democratizing expertise. Public. Underst. Sci. 2007, 16:163-182. 10.1177/0963662507062469.
10. Børresen T. Blue growth opportunities in sustainable marine and maritime sectors. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2013, 22:217-218. 10.1080/10498850.2013.783748.
11. Bovens M. A comment on Marsh and McConnel: towards a framework fro establishing policy success. Public Adm. 2010, 88:584-585. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01804.x.
12. Boyd D.M., Ellison N.B. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput. Commun. 2008, 13:210-230. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
13. Brack J. Underwater Noise from Offshore Wind Farm Development: Effects on Selected Species and Stakeholders' Opinions 2010, University of Newcastle.
14. Breukers S., Wolsink M. Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: an international comparison. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2737-2750. 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.004.
15. Bromley D.W. Sufficient Reason: Volitional Pragmatism and the Meaning of Economic Institutions 2006, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
16. Château P.-A., Chang Y.-C., Chen H., Ko T.-T. Building a stakeholder's vision of an offshore wind-farm project: a group modeling approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 420:43-53. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.01.031.
17. Covey S.M. The Speed of Trust: the One Thing that Changes Everything 2006, Simon & Schuster, New York.
18. Devine-Wright P. From backyards to places: public engagement and the emplacement of renewable energy technologies. Renewable Energy and the Public: from NIMBY to Participation 2011, 57-70. Earthscan, London. P. Devine-Wright (Ed.).
19. Devine-Wright P. Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. J. Commun. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 19:426-441. 10.1002/casp.
20. Devine-Wright P. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 2005, 8:125-139. 10.1002/we.124.
21. Devine-Wright P., Howes Y. Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: a wind energy case study. J. Environ. Psychol. Place Ident. Environ. Behav. 2010, 30:271-280.
22. Dienel H.-L. Public participation procedures in German innovation policy: an overview. Fostering Innovation to Address Social Challenges - Workshop Proceedings 2011, 75-91. OECD, Paris.
23. Eliasen S.Q., Hegland T.J., Raakjær J. Decentralising: the implementation of regionalisation and co-management under the post-2013 common fisheries Policy. Mar. Policy 2015, 62:224-232. 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.09.022.
24. Ellis G., Barry J., Robinson C. Many Ways to Say "no"- Different Ways to Say "yes": Applying Q-methodology to Understand Public Acceptance of Wind Farms 2007, Queen's University, Belfast.
25. Escobar G., Vargas W., Bischoff S. Wind tides in the Rio de la plata estuary: meteorological conditions. Int. J. Climatol. 2004, 24:1159-1169. 10.1002/joc.1026.
26. European Commission Establishing a Framework for Maritime Spatial Planning and Integrated Coastal Management 2013, (Brussels).
27. European Commission Blue Growth - Opportunities for Marine and Maritime Sustainable Growth 2012, (Brussels).
28. Firestone J., Kempton W., Krueger A. Public acceptance of offshore wind power projects in the USA. Wind Energy 2009, 12:183-202. 10.1002/we.316.
29. Gray T., Haggett C., Bell D. Offshore wind farms and commercial fisheries in the UK: a study in stakeholder consultation. Ethics, Place Environ. 2005, 8:127-140. 10.1080/13668790500237013.
30. Gross C. Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: the application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2727-2736. 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013.
31. Habermas J. Towards a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry 2008, 13:360-375. 10.1080/00201747008601597.
32. Habermas J. New social movements. Telos. 1981, 49:33-37.
33. Haggett C. Understanding public responses to offshore wind power. Energy Policy 2011, 39:503-510. 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.014.
34. Haggett C. Public engagement in planning for renewable energy. Planning for Climate Change: Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation for Spatial Planners 2009, 297-307. Earthscan, London. S. Davoudi, J. Crawford, A. Mehmood (Eds.).
35. Haggett C. Over the sea and far away? a consideration of the planning, politics and public perception of offshore wind farms. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2008, 10:289-306. 10.1080/15239080802242787.
36. Haggett C., Coleman R., Hodges J. A New EIA: the Missing Chapter. Scottish Natural Heritage and Creative Scotland 2014, (Edinburgh).
37. Jobert A., Laborgne P., Mimler S. Local acceptance of wind energy: factors of success identified in french and German case studies. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2751-2760. 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.005.
38. Kempton W., Firestone J., Lilley J., Rouleau T., Whitaker P. The offshore wind power debate: views from cape Cod. Costal Manag. 2005, 33:119-149.
39. Leslie H.M., McLeod K.L. Confronting the challenges of implementing marine ecosystem-based management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5:540-548. 10.1890/060093.
40. Linstone H.A., Turoff M. The Delphi Method - Techniques and Applications 2002.
41. Lockwood M., Davidson J., Curtis A., Stratford E., Griffith R. Governance principles for natural resource management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2010, 23:986-1001. 10.1080/08941920802178214.
42. Mallett A. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovations: the role of technology cooperation in urban Mexico. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2790-2798. 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.008.
43. Meegeren P.Van Blue bags or refuse tourism: social acceptance of closed policymaking. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2001, 14:77-86. 10.1080/08941920118252.
44. Newig J., Fritsch O. Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective?. Environ. Policy Gov. 2009, 19:197-214. 10.1002/eet.509.
45. Newig J., Fritsch O. More input - better output: does citizen involvement improve environmental governance?. In Search of Legitimacy. Policy Making in Europe and the Challenge of Societal Complexity 2009, 205-224. Farmington Hills: Opladen. I. Blühdorn (Ed.).
46. O'Neill J. Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 2001, 19:483-500. 10.1068/c12s.
47. Ramos J., Soma K., Bergh Ø., Schulze T., Gimpel A., Fabi G., Grati F., Gault J., Ma T. Multiple interests across European coastal waters: the important of a common language. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2014, 1-12. 10.1093/icesjms/fsu095.
48. Rauschmayer F., Wittmer H. Evaluating deliberative and analytical methods for the resolution of environmental conflicts. Land Use Policy 2006, 23:108-122. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.011.
49. Renn O. Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy 2006, 25:34-45.
50. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 2000, 25:3-29.
51. Rudolph D. The resurgent conflict between offshore wind farms and tourism: underlying sorylines. Scott. Geogr. J. 2014, 130:168-187. 10.1080/14702541.2014.914239.
52. Smith G. Deliberative Democracy and the Environment 2003, Routledge, London.
53. Soma K., Ramos J., Bergh Ø., Schulze T., Oostenbrugge H., Van Duijn A.P., Van Kopke K., Stelzenmu V., Grati F., Ma T., Stenberg C., Buisman E. The "mapping out" approach: effectiveness of marine spatial management options in European coastal waters. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2013, 29:1-13.
54. Soma K., van Tatenhove J., van Leeuwen J. Marine Governance in a European context: regionalization, integration and cooperation for ecosystem-based management. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2015, 72-74. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.03.010.
55. Soma K., Vatn A. Representing the common goods - stakeholders vs. citizens. Land Use Policy 2014, 41:325-333. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.015.
56. Soma K., Vatn A. Is there anything like a citizen? A descriptive analysis of instituting a citizen's role to represent social values at the municipal level. Environ. Policy Gov. 2010, 20:30-43. 10.1002/eet.529.
57. Soma K., Vatn A. Local democracy implications for coastal zone management-A case study in southern Norway. Land Use policy 2009, 26:755-762. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.002.
58. United Nations Outcome Document Adopted at Rio+20 2012, The Future We Want, Rio de Janeiro.
59. van Asselt M., Rijkens-Klomp N. A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2002, 12:167-184. 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00012-2.
60. van de Kerkhof M., Wieczorek A. Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: methodological considerations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2005, 72:733-747. 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.002.
61. van der Horst D. NIMBY or not? exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy sitting controversies. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2705-2714. 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012.
62. Varjopuro R., Gray T., Hatchard J., Rauschmayer F., Wittmer H. Introduction: Interaction between environment and fisheries-the role of stakeholder participation. Mar. Policy 2008, 32:147-157. 10.1016/j.marpol.2007.09.001.
63. Vatn A. Cooperative behavior and institutions. J. Socio. Econ. 2009, 38:188-196. 10.1016/j.socec.2008.07.011.
64. Walker B.J.A., Wiersma B., Bailey E. Community benefits, framing and the social acceptance of offshore wind farms: an experimental study in England. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2014, 3:46-54. 10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.003.
65. Wolsink M. Undesired reinforcement of harmful "self-evident truths" concerning the implementation of wind power. Energy Policy 2012, 48:83-87. 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.010.
66. Wolsink M. Contested environmental policy infrastructure: socio-political acceptance of renewable energy, water, and waste facilities. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2010, 30:302-311. 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.001.
67. Wolsink M. Planning of renewable schemes: deliberate and fair decision- making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2692-2704.
68. Woolley O. Trouble on the horizon? Addressing place-based values in planning for offshore wind energy. J. Environ. Law 2010, 22:223-250. 10.1093/jel/eqq009.
69. Wüstenhagen R., Wolsink M., Bürer M.J. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2683-2691. 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001.