Multiple interests across European coastal waters: The importance of a common language

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 720-731

  Ramos, Jorge ^a   Soma, Katrine ^b   Bergh, Oivind ^c   Schulze, Torsten ^d   Gimpel, Antje ^d   Stelzenmuller, Vanessa ^d   Makinen, Timo ^e   Fabi, Gianna ^f   Grati, Fabio ^f   Gault, Jeremy ^g  

^a IPMA   (Portugal)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Marine Research Institute   (Norway)

^d TI SF   (Germany)

^e RKTL   (Finland)

^f CNR   (Italy)

^g UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Case studies; coexist; conflict (reduction); European Coastal Zone; marine spatial planning; multi criteria analysis; stakeholders.

Indexed keywords

COASTAL WATER; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; COEXISTENCE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER;

EUROPE;

EID: 84922507905     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: 10959289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu095     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bergh, O., Børsheim, K. Y., Vik Ottesen, M., Soma, K., and Gomez, E. B. 2012. CoExist-sameksistens i kystsonen. In Havforskningsrapporten 2012. Ressurser, miljø og akvakultur pa kysten og i havet, pp. 25-27. Institute of Marine Research (IMR). Fisken og havet 1-2012, Bergen (In Norwegian).
2. Berkenhagen, J., Döring, R., Fock, H. O., Kloppmann, M. H., Pedersen, S. A., and Schulze, T. 2010. Decision bias in marine spatial planning of offshore wind farms: Problems of singular versus cumulative assessments of economic impacts on fisheries. Marine Policy, 34: 733-736.
3. Berkes, F. 2009. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organization sand social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 1692-1702.
4. Brown, K., Tompkins, E. L., and Adger, W. N. 2002. Making Waves: Integrating Coastal Conservation and Development. Earthscan, London, UK.
5. Christie,P. 2011. Creating space for interdisciplinary marine and coastal research: Five dilemmas and suggested resolutions. Environmental Conservation, 38: 172-186.
6. Coetzer, R. L. J., Rossouw, R. F., and Le Roux, N. J. 2012. Efficient maximin distance designs for experiments in mixtures. Journal of Applied Statistics, 39: 1939-1951
7. COEXIST. 2011. Website of EU FP7 research project CoExist. http://www.coexistproject.eu/.
8. COEXIST. 2012. Report: Joint ICES/COEXIST workshop: Best Practice Guidelines for spatial planning to integrate fisheries, aquaculture and other uses in the coastal zone". 73 pp. http://www.coexistproject.eu/index.php/ices-coexist-workshop/.
9. Curtin, D., and Meijer, A. J. 2006. Does transparency strengthen legitimacy Information Polity, 11: 109-122.
10. Dempster, T., and Sanchez-Jerez, P. 2008. Aquaculture and coastal space management in Europe:Anecological perspective. InAquaculture in the Ecosystem, pp. 87-116. Ed. by M. Holmer, K. Black, C. M. Duarte, N. Marbà , and I. Karakassis. Springer, Netherlands. ISBN: 1402068093
11. Deng, H. 1999. Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. In Fuzzy Systems Conference Proceedings, 1999. FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International, Vol. 2: 726-731.
12. Douvere, F. 2008. The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Marine Policy, 32: 762-771.
13. Douvere, F., and Ehler,C.N. 2009. Newperspectives on sea use management: Initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 77-88
14. Ehlers, P., and Lagoni, R. (Eds.) 2006. International Maritime Organisations and their Contribution towards a Sustainable Marine Development, Vol. 12. LIT Verlag,Münster.
15. Foley,M. M., Halpern, B. S., Micheli, F., Armsby,M. H., Caldwell, M. R., Crain, C. M., Prahler, E., et al. 2010. Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 34: 955-966.
16. Graffelman, J., and Camarena, J. M. 2007. Graphical tests for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium based on the ternary plot. Human Heredity, 65: 77-84.
17. Hajkowicz, S., and Collins, K. 2007.Areviewof multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resources Management, 21: 1553-1566.
18. Hajkowicz, S., and Higgins, A. 2008. A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European Journal of Operational Research, 184: 255-265.
19. Hedelin, B. 2007. Criteria for the assessment of sustainable water management. Environmental Management, 39: 151-163.
20. Hentschel, M. L., and Page, N. W. 2003. Selection of descriptors for particle shape characterization. Particle and Particle Systems Characterization, 20: 25-38.
21. Honarkhah, M., and Caers, J. 2010. Stochastic simulation of patterns using distance-based pattern modeling. Mathematical Geosciences, 42: 487-517.
22. Janßen, H., Kidd, S., andKvinge,T. 2013.Aspatial typology for the sea:A contribution from the Baltic. Marine Policy, 42: 190-197.
23. Kickert, W. J. 1978. Fuzzy Theories on Decision Making: A Critical Review. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
24. Kidd, S., and Ellis, G. 2012. From the land to sea and back again Using terrestrial planning to understand the process of marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 14: 49-66.
25. Kidd, S., and Shaw,D. 2013.ReconceptualisingTerritoriality and Spatial Planning: Insights from the Sea. Planning Theory and Practice, 14: 180-197.
26. Klein, C. J., Steinback, C.,Watts, M., Scholz, A. J., and Possingham, H. P. 2009. Spatial marine zoning for fisheries and conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8: 349-353.
27. Koleff, P., Gaston, K. J., and Lennon, J. J. 2003. Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72: 367-382.
28. Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P., and Hokkanen, J. 2000. Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management. Environmental Management, 26: 595-605.
29. Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F. K., Kiker, G., Batchelor, C., Bridges, T., and Ferguson,E. 2006. Fromcomparative risk assessment tomulti-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: Recent developments and applications. Environment International, 32: 1072-1093.
30. Macharis, C. 2007. Multi-criteria analysis as a tool to include stakeholders in project evaluation: The MAMCA method. In Transport Project Evaluation. Extending the Social Cost-Benefit Approach, pp. 115-131. Ed. by E. Haezendonck. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
31. Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., and Verbeke, A. 2004. PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 153: 307-317.
32. Mendoza, G. A., and Martins, H. 2006. Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management, 230: 1-22.
33. Mendoza, G. A., and Prabhu, R. 2005. Combining participatory modeling and multi-criteria analysis for community-based forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 207: 145-156.
34. Molle,F. 2009. River basin planning and management: The social life of a concept. Geoforum, 40: 484-494.
35. Munda, G. 2004. Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Research, 158: 662-677.
36. Nijkamp, P. 1975. A multicriteria analysis for project evaluation: Economic-Ecological Evaluation of a Land Reclamation Project. Papers in Regional Science, 35: 87-111.
37. O'Riordan, T., Watkinson, A., and Milligan, J. 2005. Living with a Changing Coastline: Exploring New Forms of Governance for Sustainable Coastal Futures. Tyndall Centre Technical Report, School of Environmental Sciences,Universityof EastAnglia,Norwich.
38. Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., and Policansky, D. 1999. Sustainability-revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284: 278-282.
39. Palmer, M. C., Wigley, S. E., Hoey, J. J., and Palmer, J. E. 2007. An evaluation of the Northeast Region's study fleet pilot program and electronic logbook system: Phases I and II. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE, 204: 1-22.
40. Peel,D., and Lloyd, M. G. 2004. The social reconstruction of the marine environment: Towards marine spatial planning Town Planning Review, 75: 359-378.
41. Pinho, L. 2007. The role of maritime public domain in the Portuguese coastal management. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 11: 3-12.
42. Pinkse, J., and Dommisse, M. 2008. Overcoming barriers to sustainability: An explanation of residential builders' reluctance to adopt clean technologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18: 515-527.
43. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org.
44. Ramos, J., Santos, M. N., Whitmarsh, D., and Monteiro, C. C. 2007. Stakeholder perceptions regarding the environmental and socioeconomic impacts of the Algarve artificial reefs. Hydrobiologia, 580: 181-191.
45. Ramos, J., Santos, M. N., Whitmarsh, D., and Monteiro, C. C. 2011. Stakeholder analysis in the Portuguese artificial reef context: winners and losers. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 59: 133-143.
46. Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., et al. 2009.Who's in and why A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 1933-1949.
47. Ruiz-Frau, A., Edwards-Jones, G., and Kaiser, M. J. 2011. Mapping stakeholder values for coastal zone management. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 434: 239-249.
48. Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. G. 2013. Criteria for evaluating group decision-making methods. In Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, pp. 295-318 Springer USA.
49. Springer, USA. Seefeld, K., and Linder, E. 2007. Statistics Using R with Biological Examples. University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
50. Schwilch, G., Bachmann, F., and de Graaff, J. 2012. Decision support for selecting SLM technologies with stakeholders. Applied Geography, 34: 86-98.
51. Shakhnov, I. F. 2008. A problem of ranking interval objects in a multicriteria analysis of complex systems. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 47: 33-39.
52. Smith, H. D., Maes, F., Stojanovic, T. A., and Ballinger, R. C. 2011. The integration of land and marine spatial planning. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 15: 291-303.
53. Soma, K. 2003. Howto involve stakeholders in fisheries management-A country case study in Trinidad and Tobago. Marine Policy, 27: 47-58.
54. Soma, K. 2010. Framing participationwith multicriterion evaluations to support the management of complex environmental issues. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20: 89-106.
55. Soma, K., Ramos, J., Bergh, O., Schulze, T., van Oostenbrugge, H., van Duijn, A. P., Kopke, K., et al. 2014. The "mapping out" approach: Effectiveness of marine spatial management options in European coastal waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 71: 2630-2642.
56. Sparrevik, M., Barton, D. N., Oen, A. M., Sehkar, N. U., and Linkov, I. 2011. Use of multicriteria involvement processes to enhance transparency and stakeholder participation at Bergen Harbor, Norway. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 7: 414-425.
57. Stelzenmüller, V., Lee, J., South, A., Foden, J., and Rogers, S. I. 2013. Practical tools to support marine spatial planning: A review and some prototype tools. Marine Policy, 38: 214-227.
58. Stelzenmüller, V., Schulze, T., Fock, H. O., and Berkenhagen, J. 2011. Integrated modelling tools to support risk-based decision-making in marine spatial management. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 441: 197-212.
59. Van Delft, A. 1977. Multi-criteria Analysis and Regional Decision-Making, Vol. 8. Springer, New York.
60. Yan, J., Dagang, T., and Yue, P. 2007. Ranking environmental projects model based on multicriteria decision-making and the weight sensitivity analysis. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 18: 534-539.
61. Zafonte, M., and Sabatier, P. 2004. Short term versus long term coalitions in the policy process: Automotive pollution control, 1963-1989. Policy Studies Journal, 32: 75-107.