Building a stakeholder's vision of an offshore wind-farm project: A group modeling approach

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 420, Issue , 2012, Pages 43-53

  Château, Pierre Alexandre ^a   Chang, Yang Chi ^a   Chen, Hsin ^a   Ko, Tsung Ting ^a  

^a NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Group model building; Local stakeholder vision; Offshore wind farm; System dynamics

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS; GREEN ENERGY; GROUP MODEL BUILDING; GROUP MODELING; KEY FACTORS; MODELING PROCESS; OFFSHORE WIND-FARM; POTENTIAL EFFECTS; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; STUDY AREAS; SYSTEM DYNAMICS;

ALTERNATIVE FUELS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; SYSTEM THEORY;

FARMS;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ENERGY PLANNING; OFFSHORE STRUCTURE; PLANNING METHOD; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; STAKEHOLDER; STRATEGIC APPROACH; WIND FARM;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; CONSENSUAL VALIDITY; ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GROUP MODEL BUILDING; NONHUMAN; OFFSHORE WIND FARM PROJECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODEL;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; FISHERIES; FORECASTING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WIND;

LUKANG; TAIWAN;

AVES;

EID: 84862827351     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.01.031     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akkermans H.A., Vennix J.A.M. Clients' opinions on group model-building: an exploratory study. Syst Dyn Rev 1997, 13:3-31.
2. Andersen D.F., Richardson G.P. Scripts for group model building. Syst Dyn Rev 1997, 13:107-129.
3. Brown B.B. Delphi process: a methodology used for the elicitation of opinions of experts 1968, 14. The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.
4. Chang T.-J., Wu Y.-T., Hsu H.-Y., Chu C.-R., Liao C.-M. Assessment of wind characteristics and wind turbine characteristics in Taiwan. Renew Energy 2003, 28:851-871.
5. Chen Z., Blaabjerg F. Wind farm-a power source in future power systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2008, 13:1288-1300.
6. Cicin-Sain B. Sustainable development and integrated coastal management. Ocean Coast Manage 1993, 21:11-43.
7. Costanza R., Ruth M. Using dynamic modeling to scope environmental problems and build consensus. Environ Manage 1998, 22:183-198.
8. Costanza R., Duplisea D., Kautsky U. Modeling ecological and economic systems with STELLA. Ecol Model 1998, 110:1-4.
9. Delbecq A.L., VandeVen A.H. A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J Appl Behav Sci 1971, 7:466-492.
10. Dudley R.G. A basis for understanding fishery management dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 2008, 24:1-29.
11. Fayram A.H., Risi Ad. The potential compatibility of offshore wind power and fisheries: an example using bluefin tuna in the Adriatic Sea. Ocean Coast Manage 2007, 50:597-605.
12. Forrester J.W. Industrial dynamics 1961, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
13. Forrester J.W. System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. Syst Dyn Rev 1994, 10:245-256.
14. Guineberteau T., Meur-Ferec C., Trouillet B. La gestion intégrée des zones cÔtières en France: mirage ou mutation stratégique fondamentale?. Vertigo 2006, 7:14.
15. Haggett C. Understanding public responses to offshore wind power. Energy Policy 2011, 39:503-510.
16. Hines J. The "standard method." Course material - MIT Sloan School of Management 2004, 6.
17. Ho Y.-F., Liu C.-C., Liu Y.-P. A possibility study for public participation of urban design review. J Des 2010, 15:51-70. (in Chinese).
18. Hsu S.-J., Hsu S.-F. The research of environmental impact assessment from the viewpoint of citizen participation. J Taiwan Land Res 2001, 2:101-130. (in Chinese).
19. Kenchington R., Crawford D. On the meaning of integration in coastal zone management. Ocean Coast Manage 1993, 21:109-127.
20. Luna-Reyes L.F., Andersen D., Richardson G. Scripts for interrupted group model building: lessons from modeling the emergence of governance structures for information integration across government agencies. The 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Oxford, England 2004, 12.
21. Luna-Reyes L.F., Martinez-Moyano I.J., Pardo T.A., Cresswell A.M., Andersen D.F., Richardson G.P. Anatomy of a group model-building intervention: building dynamic theory from case study research. Syst Dyn Rev 2006, 22:291-320.
22. Martinez-Moyano I.J., Richardson G.P. An expert view of the system dynamics modeling process: concurrences and divergences searching for best practices in system dynamics modeling. The 20th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Palermo, Italy 2002, 47.
23. Morecroft J. Fish and ships - fishery dynamics with bounded rationality. The 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston, USA 2007, 17.
24. Otto P., Struben J. Gloucester fishery: insights from a group modeling intervention. Syst Dyn Rev 2004, 20:287-302.
25. Richardson G.P., Andersen D.F. Teamwork in group model building. Syst Dyn Rev 1995, 11:113-137.
26. Richardson G.P., Vennix J.A.M., Andersen D.F., Rohrbaugh J., Wallace W.A. Eliciting group knowledge for model-building. The 7th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Stuttgart, Germany 1989, 15.
27. Rouwette E.A.J.A., Vennix J.A.M., Mullekom Tv. Group model building effectiveness: a review of assessment studies. Syst Dyn Rev 2002, 18:5-45.
28. Rowe G., Wright G. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. Int J Forecasting 1999, 15:353-375.
29. Schaefer M. Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of the commercial marine fisheries. Bull Inter-Am Trop Tuna Comm 1954, 1:25-51.
30. Söderholm P. The deliberative approach in environmental valuation. J Econ Issues 2001, 35:487-495.
31. Stave K.A. Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions. Syst Dyn Rev 2002, 18:139-167.
32. Sterman J.D. Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world 2000, Boston.
33. Sterman J.D. All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. Syst Dyn Rev 2002, 18:501-531.
34. Sutton S.G., Bushnell S.L. Socio-economic aspects of artificial reefs: considerations for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Ocean Coast Manage 2007, 50:829-846.
35. Vennix J.A.M. Group model-building: tackling messy problems. Syst Dyn Rev 1999, 15:379-401.
36. Vennix J.A.M., Gubbels J., Verburghand L.D., Post D. Eliciting group knowledge in a computer-based learning environment. The 8th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Chestnut Hill, USA 1990, 12.
37. Vennix J.A.M., Scheper W., Willems R. Group model-building: what does the client think of it?. The 11th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Cancun, Mexico 1993, 10.
38. Vennix J.A.M., Andersen D.F., Richardson G.P. Foreword: group model building, art, and science. Syst Dyn Rev 1997, 13:103-106.
39. Vennix J.A.M., Richardson G.P., Rouwette E.A.J.A. Group model building: problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support. J Oper Res Soc 2007, 58:691-694.
40. Whelan J.G. Building the fish banks model and renewable resource depletion: system dynamics education project. Course material - MIT Sloan School of Management 1994, 70.
41. Winz I., Brierley G., Maani K. Participatory methods in environmental system dynamics projects. The 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston, USA 2007, 21.
42. Zagonel A. Model conceptualization in group model building: a review of the literature exploring the tension between representing reality and negotiating a social order. The 20th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Palermo, Italy 2002, 68.