Marine Governance in a European context: Regionalization, integration and cooperation for ecosystem-based management

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 117, Issue , 2015, Pages 4-13

  Soma, Katrine ^a   van Tatenhove, Jan ^a   van Leeuwen, Judith ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Ecosystem based management; Governance principles; Integration; Marine governance; Regionalization

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; INTEGRATION; MARINE ENGINEERING; SEA LEVEL; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

COOPERATION; ECOSYSTEM-BASED MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES; MARINE GOVERNANCE; REGIONALIZATION;

PUBLIC POLICY;

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; MARINE POLICY; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY REFORM; REGIONALIZATION; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; TERRITORIAL PLANNING;

EUROPE;

EID: 84949537051     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Apitz S.E., Elliott M., Fountain M., Galloway T.S. European environmental management: moving to an ecosystem approach. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2006, 2:80-85.
2. Arkema K.K., Abramson S.C., Dewsbury B.M., Frontiers S., Dec N., Arkema K.K., Abramson S.C., Dewsbury B.M. Marine ecosystem-based management: from characterization to implementation published by: ecological society of America. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2006, 4:525-532.
3. Arts B., Tatenhove J.Van Policy and power: a conceptual framework between the "old" and "new" policy idioms. Policy Sci. 2005, 37:339-356.
4. Bosch-Sijtsema P.M., Postma T.J.B.M. Cooperative innovation projects: capabilities and governance mechanisms. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2009, 26:58-70.
5. Bovens M. A comment on marsh and McConnel: towards a framework fro establishing policy success. Public Adm. 2010, 88:584-585.
6. Bowles S., Gintis H. The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2004, 65:17-28.
7. Breeman G., Termeer C.J.A.M., van Lieshout M. Decision making on mega stables: understanding and preventing citizens' distrust. NJAS - Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2013, 66:39-47.
8. Browman H.I., Stergiou K.I. Perspectives on ecosystem-based approaches to the management of marine resources. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2004, 274:269-303.
9. Buijze A. Thee Principle of Transparency in EU Law 2013.
10. Commission of the European Communities The Role of the CFP in Implementing an Ecosystem Approach to Marine Management 2008, (Brussels).
11. Connor M.O. Pathways for Environmental Evaluation: a Walk in the (Hanging) Gardens of Babylon 2000, vol. 34:175-193.
12. De Santo E.M. Environmental justice implications of maritime spatial planning in the European Union. Mar. Policy 2011, 35:34-38.
13. de Vos B.I., van Tatenhove J.P.M. Trust relationships between fishers and government: new challenges for the co-management arrangements in the Dutch flatfish industry. Mar. Policy 2011, 35:218-225.
14. Degnbol D. Slightly Covered All the Time - the Science of Sandbanks on the Dogger Bank 2012, PhD Thesis Aalborg University, Aalborg.
15. Deutsch M. Equity, Equality, and need: what determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?. J. Soc. Issues 1975, 31:137-149.
16. Douvere F. The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Mar. Policy 2008, 32:762-771.
17. Dryzek J.S. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations 2002, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Elgström O., Jönsson C. Negotiation in the European Union: bargaining or problem-solving?. J. Eur. Public Policy 2000, 7:684-704.
19. Elster J. Emotions and economic theory. J. Econ. Theory 1998, 36:47-74.
20. Elzen B., Wieczorek A. Transitions towards sustainability through system innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2005, 72:651-661.
21. Espinosa-Romero M.J., Chan K.M.A., McDaniels T., Dalmer D.M. Structuring decision-making for ecosystem-based management. Mar. Policy 2011, 35:575-583.
22. Etzioni A. I & We: the case for the responsive community. Soc. Justice Res. 1988, 2:81-94.
23. European Commission European governance - a white paper. Off. J. Eur. Communities 2001, 1-29.
24. European Commission A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth 2010, (Brussels).
25. European Commission Blue Growth - Opportunities for Marine and Maritime Sustainable Growth 2012, (Brussels).
26. European Union Establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Off. J. Eur. Communities 2008, 164:1-22.
27. European Union Regulation (EU) on the common fishery policy. Off. J. Eur. Union 2013, L354:1-40.
28. Fanning L., Mahon R., McConney P., Angulo J., Burrows F., Chakalall B., Gil D., Haughton M., Heileman S., Martínez S., Ostine L., Oviedo A., Parsons S., Phillips T., Santizo Arroya C., Simmons B., Toro C. A large marine ecosystem governance framework. Mar. Policy 2007, 31:434-443.
29. Fehr E., Schmidt K.M. Fairness, Incentives, and Contractual Choices 2000, vol. 44:1057-1068.
30. Funtowicz S., Ravetz J.R. Emergent complex systems. Futures 1994, 26:568-582.
31. Garcia S., Cochrane K. Ecosystem approach to fisheries: a review of implementation guidelines. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2005, 62:311-318.
32. Gascuel D., Merino G., Döring R., Druon J.-N., Goti L., Guenette S., Macher C., Soma K., Travers-Trolet M., Mackinson S. Towards the implementation of an integrated ecosystem fleet-based management of European fisheries. Mar. Policy 2012, 36:1022-1032.
33. Giebels D., van Buuren A., Edelenbos J. Ecosystem-based management in the Wadden Sea: principles for the governance of knowledge. J. Sea Res. 2013, 82:176-187.
34. Gintis H. The Human Actor in Ecological-economic Models - beyond Homo Economicus: Evidence from Experimental Economics 2000, vol. 35:311-322.
35. Grant R.W., Keohane R.O. Accountability and abuses of power in World Politics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 2005, 99:29-43.
36. Gualini E. Regionalization as 'Experimental Regionalism': the Rescaling of territorial policy-making in Germany. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 2004, 28:329-353.
37. Habermas J. New social movements. Telos 1981, 49:33-37.
38. Hegland T., Ounanian K., Raakjær J. Why and how to regionalise the Common Fisheries Policy. Marit. Stud. 2012, 11:1-21.
39. IDON Integrated Management Plan North Sea 2015 2011, (The Hague).
40. Janssens J., van Tatenhove J. Green planning: from sectoral to integrative planning arrangements?. Political Modernisation and the Environment: the Renewal of Environmental Political Modernisation and the Environment: the Renewal of Environmental Policy Arrangements 2000, 145-174. Kluwer Acadamic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London. J. van Tatenhove, B. Arts, P. Leroy (Eds.).
41. Juda L. The European Union and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive: continuing the development of european ocean use management. Ocean. Dev. Int. Law 2010, 41:34-54.
42. Katsanevakis S., Stelzenmüller V., South A., Sørensen T.K., Jones P.J.S., Kerr S., Badalamenti F., Anagnostou C., Breen P., Chust G., D'Anna G., Duijn M., Filatova T., Fiorentino F., Hulsman H., Johnson K., Karageorgis A.P., Kröncke I., Mirto S., Pipitone C., Portelli S., Qiu W., Reiss H., Sakellariou D., Salomidi M., van Hoof L., Vassilopoulou V., Vega Fernández T., Vöge S., Weber A., Zenetos A., Hofstede R.Ter Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: review of concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2011, 54:807-820.
43. Kooiman J. Governing as Governance 2003, Sage, London.
44. Leslie H.M., McLeod K.L. Confronting the challenges of implementing marine ecosystem-based management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5:540-548.
45. Levin S.A., Lubchenco J. Resilience, robustness, and marine ecosystem-based management. Bioscience 2008, 58:27-32.
46. Lockwood M., Davidson J., Curtis A., Stratford E., Griffith R. Governance principles for natural resource management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2010, 23:986-1001.
47. Mol A.P.J. Environmental Reform in the Information Age - the Contours of Informational Governance 2008, Cambridge University Press, New York.
48. Munda G. Social multi-criteria evaluation: methodological foundations and operational consequences. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 158:662-677.
49. Munda G. Social Multi-criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy 2008, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
50. O'Hagan A.M. Comprehensive review of law, policy and institutional frameworks that cover the current approaches to interactions between aquaculture, fisheries and other sectors and identifying barriers and opportunities for more efficient management. Cork 2010, 1-94. Report 245178. Coexist EU FP7 project.
51. O'Neill J. Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 2001, 19:483-500.
52. Österblom H., Gårdmark A., Bergström L., Müller-Karulis B., Folke C., Lindegren M., Casini M., Olsson P., Diekmann R., Blenckner T., Humborg C., Möllmann C. Making the ecosystem approach operational-can regime shifts in ecological- and governance systems facilitate the transition?. Mar. Policy 2010, 34:1290-1299.
53. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
54. Pitcher Kalikoski D., Short K., Varkey D., Pramod G., T J. An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries. Mar. Policy 2009, 33:223-232.
55. Qiu W., Jones P.J.S. The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe. Mar. Policy 2013, 39:182-190.
56. Raakjær J., Degnbol P., Hegland T., Symes D. Regionalization - what will the future bring?. Marit. Stud. 2012, 11:1-10.
57. Raakjaer J., Leeuwen J.Van, Tatenhove J.Van, Hadjimichael M. Ecosystem-based marine management in European regional seas calls for nested governance structures and coordination-a policy brief. Mar. Policy 2014, 50:373-381.
58. Ramos J., Soma K., Bergh Ø., Schulze T., Gimpel A., Fabi G., Grati F., Gault J., Ma T. Multiple interests across European coastal waters: the important of a common language. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2014, 1-12.
59. Renn O. Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy 2006, 25:34-45.
60. Röckmann C., van Leeuwen J., Goldsborough D., Kraan M., Piet G. The interaction triangle as a tool for understanding stakeholder interactions in marine ecosystem based management. Mar. Policy 2015, 52:155-162.
61. Rommetvedt H. Norway: resources count, but votes decide? from neo-corporatist representation to neo-pluralist parliamentarism. West Eur. Polit. 2005, 28:740-763.
62. Soma K. Framing participation with multicriterion evaluations to support the management of complex environmental issues. Environ. Policy Gov. 2010, 106:89-106.
63. Soma K., Ramos J., Bergh Ø., Schulze T., Oostenbrugge H.Van, Duijn A.P.Van, Kopke K., Stelzenmu V., Grati F., Ma T., Stenberg C., Buisman E. The "mapping out" approach: effectiveness of marine spatial management options in European coastal waters. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2013, 29:1-13.
64. Soma K., Vatn A. Representing the common goods - stakeholders vs. citizens. Land Use Policy 2014, 41:325-333.
65. Suárez de Vivero J.L., Rodríguez Mateos J.C. The spanish approach to marine spatial planning. Marine Strategy Framework Directive vs. EU integrated maritime policy. Mar. Policy 2012, 36:18-27.
66. Tallis H., Levin P.S., Ruckelshaus M., Lester S.E., McLeod K.L., Fluharty D.L., Halpern B.S. The many faces of ecosystem-based management: making the process work today in real places. Mar. Policy 2010, 34:340-348.
67. Thaler R.H. From Homo economicus to Homo sapiens. J. Econ. Perspect. 2000, 14:133-141.
68. van de Kerkhof M., Wieczorek A. Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: methodological considerations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2005, 72:733-747.
69. van den Hove S. Participatory approaches to environmental policy-making: the European Commission Climate Policy Process as a case study. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 33:457-472.
70. van Hoof L., van Leeuwen J., van Tatenhove J. All at sea; regionalisation and integration of marine policy in Europe. Marit. Stud 2012, 11:1-14.
71. van Leeuwen J. Who greens the waves?. Changing Authority in the Environmental Governance of Shipping and Offshore Oil and Gas Production 2010, Wageningen Academic Publisher, Wageningen.
72. van Leeuwen J., Raakjaer J., van Hoof L., van Tatenhove J., Long R., Ounanian K. Implementing the Marine Strategy Framework Directive: a policy perspective on regulatory, institutional and stakeholder impediments to effective implementation. Mar. Policy 2014, 50:325-330.
73. van Leeuwen J., van Hoof L., van Tatenhove J. Institutional ambiguity in implementing the European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Mar. Policy 2012, 36:636-643.
74. van Leeuwen J., van Tatenhove J. The triangle of Marine Governance in the environmental governance of Dutch offshore platforms. Mar. Policy 2010, 34:590-597.
75. van Tatenhove J.P.M. How to turn the tide: developing legitimate Marine Governance arrangements at the level of the regional seas. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2013, 71:296-304.
76. van Tatenhove J.P.M., van Leeuwen J. Marine governance of the North Sea: patterns of regioinalization. Governing Europe's Marine Environment: Europeanization of Regional Seas or Regionalization of EU Policies? 2015, 264. Ashgate.
77. Varjopuro R., Gray T., Hatchard J., Rauschmayer F., Wittmer H. Introduction: interaction between environment and fisheries-the role of stakeholder participation. Mar. Policy 2008, 32:147-157.
78. Vatn A. Rationality, institutions and environmental policy. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 55:203-217.
79. Vatn A. Cooperative behavior and institutions. J. Socio. Econ. 2009, 38:188-196.