Novel unified framework for latent modeling and its interpretation

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 149, Issue , 2015, Pages 127-139

  Tran, Thanh N ^a,e   Blanchet, Lionel ^b,c   Afanador, Nelson Lee ^d,e   Buydens, Lutgarde M C ^e  

^a NV ORGANON   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c TOP INSTITUTE FOOD AND NUTRITION   (Netherlands)

^d MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

^e RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chemometrics theory; Interpretation; Multivariate analysis; Partial least squares; Principal component regression

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CHEMOMETRIC ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; KRYLOV SEQUENCE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL VARIABLE; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84949111078     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: 18733239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Macho S., Larrechi M.S. Near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate calibration for the quantitative determination of certain properties in the petrochemical industry. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2002, 21:799-806.
2. Gendrin C., Roggo Y., Collet C. Pharmaceutical applications of vibrational chemical imaging and chemometrics: a review. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2008, 48:533-553.
3. Sacré P.-Y., De Bleye C., Chavez P.-F., Netchacovitch L., Hubert P., Ziemons E. Data processing of vibrational chemical imaging for pharmaceutical applications. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2014, 101:123-140.
4. Wise B.M., Gallagher N.B. The process chemometrics approach to process monitoring and fault detection. J. Process Control 1996, 6:329-348.
5. Forina M., Casale M., Oliveri P. Application of chemometrics to food chemistry. Compr. Chemom. 2009, 75-128. Elsevier, Oxford. T.R. Stephen, W. Beata (Eds.).
6. Chemometrics in Food Chemistry 2013, Elsevier Ltd. 1st ed. F. Marini (Ed.).
7. Malinowski E.R. Factor Analysis in Chemistry 2002, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York. 3rd ed.
8. Daszykowski M., Walczak B. Use and abuse of chemometrics in chromatography. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2006, 25:1081-1096.
9. Bloemberg T.G., Gerretzen J., Lunshof A., Wehrens R., Buydens L.M.C. Warping methods for spectroscopic and chromatographic signal alignment: a tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 781:14-32.
10. Tomasi G., Van Den Berg F., Andersson C., van dern Berg F., Andersson C., Van Den Berg F., et al. Correlation optimized warping and dynamic time warping as preprocessing methods for chromatographic data. J. Chemom. 2004, 18:231-241.
11. Bro R. Review on multiway analysis in chemistry-2000-2005. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2006, 36:279-293.
12. Amigo J.M., Marini F. Multiway methods. Data Handl. Sci. Technol. 2013, 28:265-313.
13. Smolinska A., Blanchet L., Buydens L.M.C., Wijmenga S.S. NMR and pattern recognition methods in metabolomics: from data acquisition to biomarker discovery: a review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 750:82-97.
14. Trygg J., Holmes E., Lundstedt T. Chemometrics in metabonomics. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6:469-479.
15. Smolinska A., Posma J.M., Blanchet L., Ampt K.a M., Attali A., Tuinstra T., et al. Simultaneous analysis of plasma and CSF by NMR and hierarchical models fusion. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 403:947-959.
16. Aebersold R., Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003, 422:198-207.
17. Castro-Puyana M., Herrero M. Metabolomics approaches based on mass spectrometry for food safety, quality and traceability. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 52:74-87.
18. Smolinska A., Hauschild A.-C., Fijten R.R.R., Dallinga J.W., Baumbach J., van Schooten F.J. Current breathomics-a review on data pre-processing techniques and machine learning in metabolomics breath analysis. J. Breath Res. 2014, 8:027105.
19. Gowen A.A., O'Donnell C.P., Cullen P.J., Downey G., Frias J.M. Hyperspectral imaging-an emerging process analytical tool for food quality and safety control. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 18:590-598.
20. Ergon R. Informative PLS score-loading plots for process understanding and monitoring. J. Process Control 2004, 14:889-897.
21. Afanador N.L., Tran T.N., Blanchet L., Buydens L.M.C. Variable importance in PLS in the presence of autocorrelated data: case study of industrial processes. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2014, 139:139-145.
22. Brereton R.G. A short history of chemometrics: a personal view. J. Chemom. 2014, 28:749-760.
23. Buydens L.M.C. Towards tsunami-resistant chemometrics. Anal. Sci. 2013, 401.
24. Kjeldahl K., Bro R. Some common misunderstandings in chemometrics. J. Chemom. 2010, 24:558-564.
25. Frank I., Friedman J. A statistical view of some chemometrics regression tools. Technometrics 1993, 35:109-135.
26. Andersson M. A comparison of nine PLS1 algorithms. J. Chemom. 2009, 23:518-529.
27. Wold S., Johansson E., Cocchi M. PSL-partial least-squares projections to latent structures 1993, 523-550.
28. De Jong S. SIMPLS: an alternative approach to partial least squares regression. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1993, 18:251-253.
29. Martens H., Naes T. Multivariate Calibration 1989, John Wiley & sons, Chichester.
30. Golub G., Kahan W. Calculating the singular values and pseudo-inverse of a matrix. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. B Numer. Anal. 1965, 2:205-224.
31. Pell R.J., Ramos L.S., Manne R. The model space in partial least squares regression. J. Chemom. 2007, 21:165-172.
32. Manne R., Pell R.J., Ramos L.S. The PLS model space: the inconsistency persists. J. Chemom. 2009, 23:76-77.
33. Wold S., Høy M., Martens H., Trygg J., Westad F., MacGregor J., et al. The PLS model space revisited. J. Chemom. 2009, 23:67-68.
34. Bro R., Eldén L. PLS works. J. Chemom. 2009, 23:69-71.
35. Ergon R., Halstensen M., Esbensen K.H. Model choice and squared prediction errors in PLS regression. J. Chemom. 2011, 25:301-312.
36. Klaas N., Faber M. The X-residuals calculated by partial least squares are problematic for uncertainty estimation. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2009, 96:264-265.
37. Indahl U.G. The geometry of PLS1 explained properly: 10 key notes on mathematical properties of and some alternative algorithmic approaches to PLS1 modelling. J. Chemom. 2014, 28:168-180.
38. Helland I.S. On the structure of partial least squares regression. Commun. Stat. - Simul. Comput. 1988, 17:581-607.
39. Phatak A., De Jong S. The geometry of partial least squares. J. Chemom. 1997, 11:311-338.
40. Ipsen I.C.F., Meyer C.D. The idea behind Krylov methods. Am. Math. Mon. 1998, 105:889-899.
41. Krylov A.N., 1931, 7:491-539.
42. Müntz C. Solution directe de l'équation séculaire et de quelques problèmes analogues transcendants. Les Comptes Rendus l'Académie Des Sci. Paris 1913, 156:43-46. 43-46.
43. ter Braak C.J.F., de Jong S. The objective function of partial least squares regression. J. Chemom. 1998, 12:41-54.
44. Ergon R. PLS score-loading correspondence and a bi-orthogonal factorization. J. Chemom. 2002, 16:368-373.
45. Höskuldsson A. PLS regression methods. J. Chemom. 1988, 2:211-228.
46. Eldén L. Partial least-squares vs. Lanczos bidiagonalization-I: analysis of a projection method for multiple regression. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2004, 46:11-31.
47. Tran T.N., Afanador N.L., Buydens L.M.C., Blanchet L. Interpretation of variable importance in partial least squares with significance multivariate correlation (sMC). Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2014, 138:153-160.
48. Kalivas J.H. Two data sets of near infrared spectra. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 37:255-259.
49. Gower J.C., Hand D.J. Biplots 1996, Chapman & Hall, London.
50. Gower J.C. The geometry of biplot scaling. Biometrika 2004, 91:705-714.
51. Fearn T. On orthogonal signal correction. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2000, 50:47-52.
52. Trygg J., Wold S. Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS). J. Chemom. 2002, 16:119-128.
53. Kvalheim O.M., Rajalahti T., Arneberg R. X-tended target projection (XTP)-comparison with orthogonal partial least squares (OPLS) and PLS post-processing by similarity transformation (PLS+ST). J. Chemom. 2009, 23:49-55.
54. Kvalheim O.M., Karstang T.V. Interpretation of latent-variable regression models. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1989, 7:39-51.
55. Rajalahti T., Arneberg R., Berven F.S., Myhr K.-M., Ulvik R.J., Kvalheim O.M. Biomarker discovery in mass spectral profiles by means of selectivity ratio plot. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2009, 95:35-48.
56. Kvalheim O.M. Interpretation of partial least squares regression models by means of target projection and selectivity ratio plots. J. Chemom. 2010, 24:496-504.
57. Mehmood T., Liland K.H., Snipen L., Sæbø S. A review of variable selection methods in partial least squares regression. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2012, 118:62-69.
58. Rajalahti T., Arneberg R., Kroksveen A.C., Berle M., Myhr K.-M., Kvalheim O.M. Discriminating variable test and selectivity ratio plot: quantitative tools for interpretation and variable (biomarker) selection in complex spectral or chromatographic profiles. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81:2581-2590.
59. Afanador N.L., Tran T.N., Buydens L.M.C. Use of the bootstrap and permutation methods for a more robust variable importance in the projection metric for partial least squares regression. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 768:49-56.