Some common misunderstandings in chemometrics

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 24, Issue 7-8, 2010, Pages 558-564

  Kjeldahl, Karin ^a   Bro, Rasmus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Data analysis; Misunderstandings; Model interpretation; PCA; PLS

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

CHEMOMETRIC DATA ANALYSIS; CHEMOMETRICES; COMMON MODELS; COMPONENT MODELING; MISUNDERSTANDING; MODEL DIAGNOSTICS; MODEL INTERPRETATIONS; PCA; PCA MODEL; PLS;

DATA HANDLING;

EID: 77957022971     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1346     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Daszykowski M, Walczak B. Use and abuse of chemometrics in chromatography. Trends Anal. Chem. 2006; 25: 1081-1096.
2. Difoggio R. Guidelines for applying chemometrics to spectra: feasibility and error propagation. Appl. Spectrosc. 2000; 54: 94-113.
3. DiFoggio R. Examination of some misconceptions about near-infrared analysis. Appl. Spectrosc. 1995; 49: 67-75.
4. Kourti T. Multivariate statistical process control and process control, using latent variables. In Comprehensive Chemometrics, Vol. 4, Brown S, Tauler R, Walczak R (eds). Elsevier: Oxford, 2009; 21-54.
5. Kourti T. Process analysis and abnormal situation detection: from theory to practice. IEEE Contr. Syst. Mag. 2002; 22: 10-25.
6. Wise B, Ricker N, Veltkamp D, Kowalski B. A theoretical basis for the use of principal component models for monitoring multivariate processes. Process Contr. Qual. 1990; 1: 41-51.
7. Breiman L, Spector P. Submodel selection and evaluation in regression. The X-random case. Int. Stat. Rev./Revue Internationale de Statistique 1992; 60: 291-319.
8. Rubingh C, Bijlsma S, Derks E, Bobeldijk I, Verheij E, Kochhar S, Smilde A. Assessing the performance of statistical validation tools for megavariate metabolomics data. Metabolomics 2006; 2: 53-61.
9. Anderssen E, Dyrstad K, Westad F, Martens H. Reducing over-optimism in variable selection by cross-model validation. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2006; 84: 69-74.
10. Westerhuis J, Hoefsloot H, Smit S, Vis D, Smilde A, van Velzen E, van Duijnhoven J, van Dorsten F. Assessment of PLSDA cross validation. Metabolomics 2008; 4: 81-89.
11. Næs T, Isaksson T, Fearn T, Davies T (eds). A User-friendly Guide to Multivariate Calibration and Classification. NIR publications: Chichester, UK, 2002.
12. Brereton R. Consequences of sample size, variable selection, and model validation and optimisation, for predicting classification ability from analytical data. Trends Anal. Chem. 2006; 25: 1103-1111.
13. Wise B, Gallagher N, Bro R, Shaver J, Windig W, Koch R. PLS_Toolbox for Use with MATLAB, Version 5.5.1. Eigenvector Research, Inc.:Wenatchee, USA, 2009.
14. Geladi P, Manley M, Lestander T. Scatter plotting in multivariate data analysis. J. Chemom. 2003; 17: 503-511.
15. Gower J, Krzanowski WJ (eds). A general theory of biplots. In Recent Advances in Descriptive Multivariate Analysis. Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1995; 283-303.
16. West-Nørager M, Bro R, Marini F, Høgdall E, Høgdall C, Nedergaard L, Heegaard N. Feasibility of serodiagnosis of ovarian cancer by mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2009; 81: 1907-1913.
17. Seasholtz M, Kowalski B. Qualitative information from multivariate calibration models. Appl. Spectrosc. 1990; 44: 1337-1348.