The PLS model space: The inconsistency persists

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 76-77

  Manne, Rolf ^a   Pell, Randy J ^b   Ramos, L Scott ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY   (United States)

^c Infometrix Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Bidiagonalization; Model inconsistency; NIPALS; Partial least squares

Indexed keywords

BIDIAGONALIZATION; LATENT VARIABLE; MATRIX; MODEL INCONSISTENCY; MODEL SPACES; NIPALS; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; PLS MODELLING;

LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS;

EID: 60149094974     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1181     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Wold S, Høy M, Martens H, Trygg J, Westad F, MacGregor J, Wise B. The PLS model space revisited. J. Chemometr. 2008; DOI: 10.1002/cem.1171.
2. Pell RJ, Ramos LS, Manne R. The model space in partial least squares regression. J. Chemometr. 2007; 21: 165-172.
3. Höskuldsson A. PLS regression methods. J. Chemometr. 1988; 2: 211-228.
4. Phatak A, de Hoog F. Exploiting the connection between PLS, Lanczos methods and conjugate gradients: alternative proofs of some properties of PLS. J. Chemometr. 2002; 16: 361-367.
5. Wold S, Ruhe A, Wold H, Dunn WJ. The collinearity problem in linear regression. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to generalized inverses. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 1984; 5: 735-743.
6. Holcomb TR, Hjalmarsson H, Morari M, Tyler ML. Significance regression: a statistical approach to partial least squares. J. Chemometr. 1997; 11: 283-309.
7. Phatak A, De Jong S. The geometry of partial least squares. J. Chemometr. 1997; 11: 311-338.
8. Martens H, Næs T. Multivariate Calibration. Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1989.
9. Ergon R. Noise handling capabilities of multivariate calibration methods. Model. Ident. Control 2002; 23: 259-273.
10. Andersson M. Foss Japan, Tokyo. Private communication, June 2008.