Evaluation of breast cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) histogram analysis: comparison with malignant status, histological subtype, and molecular prognostic factors

European Radiology

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 2547-2558

  Cho, Gene Young ^a   Moy, Linda ^a   Kim, Sungheon G ^a   Baete, Steven H ^a   Moccaldi, Melanie ^b   Babb, James S ^a   Sodickson, Daniel K ^a   Sigmund, Eric E ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast MR; Diffusion weighted MRI; Intravoxel incoherent motion; Tumour heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; TUMOR MARKER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FOLLOW UP; HISTOGRAM; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BIOMARKERS, TUMOR; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84948706605     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4087-3     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Meacham CE, Morrison SJ (2013) Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity. Nature 501:328–337
2. Durrett R, Foo J, Leder K, Mayberry J, Michor F (2011) Intratumor heterogeneity in evolutionary models of tumor progression. Genetics 188:461–477
3. Fisher R, Pusztai L, Swanton C (2013) Cancer heterogeneity: implications for targeted therapeutics. Br J Cancer 108:479–485
4. Polyak K (2011) Heterogeneity in breast cancer. J Clin Invest 121:3786–3788
5. Jeh SK, Kim SH, Kim HS et al (2011) Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:102–109
6. Choi SY, Chang YW, Park HJ, Kim HJ, Hong SS, Seo DY (2012) Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer. Br J Radiol 85:e474–e479
7. Iima M, Le Bihan D, Okumura R et al (2011) Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study. Radiology 260:364–372
8. Kamitani T, Matsuo Y, Yabuuchi H et al (2013) Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and prognostic factors of breast cancer. Magn Reson Med Sci MRMS Off J Jpn Soc Magn Reson Med 12:193–199
9. Basser PJ (1995) Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images. NMR Biomed 8:333–344
10. Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102–125
11. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, DeBruhl N, Bassett LW (2002) In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:693–704
12. Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Demartini WB et al (2012) In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters. Radiology 263:374–382
13. Partridge SC, Rahbar H, Murthy R et al (2011) Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI through combined apparent diffusion coefficients and dynamic contrast-enhanced kinetics. Magn Reson Med 65:1759–1767
14. Kim SH, Cha ES, Kim HS et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:615–620
15. Iima M, Yano K, Kataoka M et al (2015) Quantitative non-gaussian diffusion and intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. Investig Radiol 50:205–211
16. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497–505
17. Luciani A, Vignaud A, Cavet M et al (2008) Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging--pilot study. Radiology 249:891–899
18. Lemke A, Laun FB, Klauss M et al (2009) Differentiation of pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters. Investig Radiol 44:769–775
19. Gaing B, Sigmund EE, Huang WC et al (2015) Subtype differentiation of renal tumors using voxel-based histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters. Investig Radiol 50:144–152
20. Lu Y, Jansen JF, Mazaheri Y, Stambuk HE, Koutcher JA, Shukla-Dave A (2012) Extension of the intravoxel incoherent motion model to non-gaussian diffusion in head and neck cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:1088–1096
21. Thoeny HC, Zumstein D, Simon-Zoula S et al (2006) Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys with diffusion-weighted and BOLD MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 241:812–821
22. Song YS, Park CM, Lee SM et al (2014) Reproducibility of histogram and texture parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI of FN13762 rat breast Carcinomas. Anticancer Res 34:2135–2144
23. Kim S, Decarlo L, Cho GY et al (2012) Interstitial fluid pressure correlates with intravoxel incoherent motion imaging metrics in a mouse mammary carcinoma model. NMR Biomed 25:787–794
24. Suo S, Lin N, Wang H et al (2014) Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast cancer at 3.0 tesla: comparison of different curve-fitting methods. J Magn Reson Imaging. doi:10.1002/jmri.24799:n/a-n/a
25. Cho GY, Moy L, Zhang JL et al (2014) Comparison of fitting methods and b-value sampling strategies for intravoxel incoherent motion in breast cancer. Magn Reson Med. doi:10.1002/mrm.25484
26. Bokacheva L, Kaplan JB, Giri DD et al (2014) Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T differentiates malignant breast lesions from benign lesions and breast parenchyma. J Magn Reson Imaging 40:813–823
27. Sigmund EE, Cho GY, Kim S et al (2011) Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer. Magn Reson Med 65:1437–1447
28. Liu C, Liang C, Liu Z, Zhang S, Huang B (2013) Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI. Eur J Radiol 82:e782–e789
29. Wiederer J, Pazahr S, Leo C, Nanz D, Boss A (2014) Quantitative breast MRI: 2D histogram analysis of diffusion tensor parameters in normal tissue. MAGMA 27:185–193
30. Chandarana H, Rosenkrantz AB, Mussi TC et al (2012) Histogram analysis of whole-lesion enhancement in differentiating clear cell from papillary subtype of renal cell cancer. Radiology 265:790–798
31. Lutz K, Wiestler B, Graf M et al (2014) Infiltrative patterns of glioblastoma: identification of tumor progress using apparent diffusion coefficient histograms. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:1096–1103
32. Emblem KE, Scheie D, Due-Tonnessen P et al (2008) Histogram analysis of MR imaging–derived cerebral blood volume maps: combined glioma grading and identification of low-grade oligodendroglial subtypes. Am J Neuroradiol 29:1664–1670
33. Baltzer PA, Renz DM, Herrmann KH et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques. Eur Radiol 19:1612–1620
34. Kinoshita T, Yashiro N, Ihara N, Funatu H, Fukuma E, Narita M (2002) Diffusion-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breast tumors: differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:1042–1046
35. ACR (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
36. Sharma U, Danishad KKA, Seenu V, Jagannathan NR (2009) Longitudinal study of the assessment by MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging of tumor response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. NMR Biomed 22:104–113
37. Wirestam R, Borg M, Brockstedt S, Lindgren A, Holtas S, Stahlberg F (2001) Perfusion-related parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging compared with CBV and CBF measured by dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR technique. Acta Radiol 42:123–128
38. Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2006) Evaluation of hepatic lesions and hepatic parenchyma using diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR with three values of gradient b-factor. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:637–645
39. Callot V, Bennett E, Decking UK, Balaban RS, Wen H (2003) In vivo study of microcirculation in canine myocardium using the IVIM method. Magn Reson Med 50:531–540
40. Yao L, Sinha U (2000) Imaging the microcirculatory proton fraction of muscle with diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging. Acad Radiol 7:27–32
41. Pekar J, Moonen CT, van Zijl PC (1992) On the precision of diffusion/perfusion imaging by gradient sensitization. Magn Reson Med 23:122–129
42. Guiu B, Petit JM, Capitan V et al (2012) Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion–weighted Imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 3.0–T MR study. Radiology 265:96–103
43. Sumi M, Nakamura T (2013) Head and neck tumors: assessment of perfusion–related parameters and diffusion coefficients based on the intravoxel incoherent motion model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:410–416
44. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464
45. Adams S, Chakravarthy AB, Donach M et al (2010) Preoperative concurrent paclitaxel-radiation in locally advanced breast cancer: pathologic response correlates with five-year overall survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124:723–732
46. Prat A, Perou CM (2011) Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer. Mol Oncol 5:5–23
47. Yue W, Wang JP, Li Y et al (2005) Tamoxifen versus aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer prevention. Clin Cancer Res 11:925s–930s
48. Pequeux C, Raymond-Letron I, Blacher S et al (2012) Stromal estrogen receptor-alpha promotes tumor growth by normalizing an increased angiogenesis. Cancer Res 72:3010–3019
49. Hyder SM, Murthy L, Stancel GM (1998) Progestin regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 58:392–395
50. Stendahl M, Ryden L, Nordenskjold B, Jonsson PE, Landberg G, Jirstrom K (2006) High progesterone receptor expression correlates to the effect of adjuvant tamoxifen in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 12:4614–4618
51. Zhang JL, Sigmund EE, Rusinek H et al (2012) Optimization of b-value sampling for diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney. Magn Reson Med 67:89–97
52. Dyvorne HA, Galea N, Nevers T et al (2013) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver with multiple b-values: effect of diffusion gradient polarity and breathing acquisition on image quality and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters--a pilot study. Radiology 266:920–929
53. Nilsen LB, Fangberget A, Geier O, Seierstad T (2013) Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in malignant breast lesions using different b-value combinations. Eur Radiol 23:1027–1033
54. Neil JJ, Bretthorst GL (1993) On the use of Bayesian probability theory for analysis of exponential decay data: an example taken from intravoxel incoherent motion experiments. Magn Reson Med 29:642–647
55. Barbieri S, Donati OF, Froehlich JM, Thoeny HC (2015) Impact of the calculation algorithm on biexponential fitting of diffusion-weighted MRI in upper abdominal organs. Magn Reson Med. doi:10.1002/mrm.25765
56. Orton MR, Collins DJ, Koh DM, Leach MO (2014) Improved intravoxel incoherent motion analysis of diffusion weighted imaging by data driven Bayesian modeling. Magn Reson Med 71:411–420
57. Wurnig MC, Donati OF, Ulbrich E et al (2014) Systematic analysis of the intravoxel incoherent motion threshold separating perfusion and diffusion effects: proposal of a standardized algorithm. Magn Reson Med. doi:10.1002/mrm.25506
58. Freiman M, Voss SD, Mulkern RV, Perez-Rossello JM, Callahan MJ, Warfield SK (2012) Reliable assessment of perfusivity and diffusivity from diffusion imaging of the body. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 15:1–9
59. Quentin M, Blondin D, Klasen J et al (2012) Comparison of different mathematical models of diffusion-weighted prostate MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1468–1474
60. Veraart J, Rajan J, Peeters RR, Leemans A, Sunaert S, Sijbers J (2012) Comprehensive framework for accurate diffusion MRI parameter estimation. Magn Reson Med. doi:10.1002/mrm.24529:n/a-n/a
61. Freiman M, Voss SD, Mulkern RV, Perez-Rossello JM, Callahan MJ, Warfield SK (2012) In vivo assessment of optimal b-value range for perfusion-insensitive apparent diffusion coefficient imaging. Med Phys 39:4832–4839
62. Freiman M, Perez-Rossello JM, Callahan MJ et al (2013) Reliable estimation of incoherent motion parametric maps from diffusion-weighted MRI using fusion bootstrap moves. Med Image Anal 17:325–336
63. Wu LM, Hu J, Xu JR (2012) MRI in residual tumor size measurement in patient with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy calls for caution. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135:319–320
64. Prevos R, Smidt ML, Tjan-Heijnen VC et al (2012) Pre-treatment differences and early response monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients using magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 22:2607–2616