Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast cancer at 3.0 tesla: Comparison of different curve-fitting methods

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 362-370

  Suo, Shiteng ^a   Lin, Naier ^a   Wang, He ^b   Zhang, Liangbin ^a   Wang, Rui ^a   Zhang, Su ^a   Hua, Jia ^a   Xu, Jianrong ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

breast cancer; curve fitting; diffusion weighted imaging; intravoxel incoherent motion

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION DIFFUSION WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RELATIVE ENHANCEMENT RATIO; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ALGORITHM; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84937578263     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24799     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al., Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16: 172-178.
2. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K, et al., Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 644-649.
3. Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Eby PR, et al., Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 2011-2019.
4. Tan S, Rahmat K, Rozalli F, et al., Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative diffusion-weighted sequence on 3 T MRI. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: 63-71.
5. O'Flynn EA, Morgan VA, Giles SL, deSouza NM,. Diffusion weighted imaging of the normal breast: reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and variation with menstrual cycle and menopausal status. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1512-1518.
6. Paran Y, Bendel P, Margalit R, Degani H,. Water diffusion in the different microenvironments of breast cancer. NMR Biomed 2004; 17: 170-180.
7. Tamura T, Usui S, Murakami S, et al., Biexponential signal attenuation analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging of breast. Magn Reson Med Sci 2009; 9: 195-207.
8. Sigmund E, Cho G, Kim S, et al., Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 1437-1447.
9. Bokacheva L, Kaplan JB, Giri DD, et al., Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T differentiates malignant breast lesions from benign lesions and breast parenchyma. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 40: 813-823.
10. Liu C, Liang C, Liu Z, Zhang S, Huang B,. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: e782-e789.
11. Iima M, Kataoka M, Le Bihan D, et al., Potential of perfusion imaging with IVIM MRI in breast cancer. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Salt Lake City, 2013.
12. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D,. Perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168: 497-505.
13. Luciani A, Vignaud A, Cavet M, et al., Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging-pilot study. Radiology 2008; 249: 891-899.
14. Yoon JH, Lee JM, Yu MH, Kiefer B, Han JK, Choi BI,. Evaluation of hepatic focal lesions using diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 39: 276-285.
15. Nilsen LB, Fangberget A, Geier O, Seierstad T,. Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in malignant breast lesions using different b value combinations. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 1027-1033.
16. Lai V, Li X, Lee VHF, et al., Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between different tumour stages using intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 176-183.
17. Lemke A, Laun FB, Klau M, et al., Differentiation of pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters. Invest Radiol 2009; 44: 769-775.
18. Chandarana H, Kang SK, Wong S, et al., Diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of renal tumors with histopathologic correlation. Invest Radiol 2012; 47: 688-696.
19. Yamada I, Aung W, Himeno Y, Nakagawa T, Shibuya H,. Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepatic lesions: evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 210: 617-623.
20. Lu Y, Jansen JF, Mazaheri Y, Stambuk HE, Koutcher JA, Shukla-Dave A,. Extension of the intravoxel incoherent motion model to non-Gaussian diffusion in head and neck cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36: 1088-1096.
21. Lu Y, Jansen JF, Stambuk HE, et al., Comparing primary tumors and metastatic nodes in head and neck cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion imaging: a preliminary experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013; 37: 346-352.
22. Dijkstra H, Baron P, Kappert P, Oudkerk M, Sijens PE,. Effects of microperfusion in hepatic diffusion weighted imaging. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 891-899.
23. Wittsack HJ, Lanzman RS, Mathys C, Janssen H, Mödder U, Blondin D,. Statistical evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging of the human kidney. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 616-622.
24. Akaike H,. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Control 1974; 19: 716-723.
25. Freiman M, Perez-Rossello JM, Callahan MJ, et al., Reliable estimation of incoherent motion parametric maps from diffusion-weighted MRI using fusion bootstrap moves. Med Image Anal 2013; 17: 325-336.
26. Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K, et al., Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 2009; 253: 341-351.
27. Chow AM, Ai V, Cheung PS, Yu SK, Lo GG,. Diffusion MRI of malignant breast lesions using multiple B-values: monoexponential and biexponential approaches. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Melbourne, 2012.
28. Heusch P, Wittsack H-J, Pentang G, et al., Biexponential analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging: comparison of three different calculation methods in transplanted kidneys. Acta Radiol 2013; 54: 1210-1217.
29. Federau C, Meuli R, O'Brien K, Maeder P, Hagmann P,. Perfusion measurement in brain gliomas with intravoxel incoherent motion MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35: 256-262.
30. Fujima N, Yoshida D, Sakashita T, et al., Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: assessment of perfusion-related parameters compared to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2014. [Epub ahead of print].
31. Kim H, Suh C, Kim N, Choi C-G, Kim S,. Histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion for differentiating recurrent tumor from treatment effect in patients with glioblastoma: initial clinical experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35: 490-497.
32. Iima M, Reynaud O, Tsurugizawa T, et al., Characterization of glioma microcirculation and tissue features using intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in a rat brain model. Invest Radiol 2014; 49: 485-490.
33. Le Bihan D,. Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR imaging: a wake-up call. Radiology 2008; 249: 748-752.
34. Lee HJ, Rha SY, Chung YE, et al., Tumor perfusion-related parameter of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with histological microvessel density. Magn Reson Med 2014; 71: 1554-1558.
35. Le Bihan D, Turner R,. The capillary network: a link between IVIM and classical perfusion. Magn Reson Med 1992; 27: 171-178.
36. Parker GJ, Buckley DL,. Tracer kinetic modelling for T1-weighted DCE-MRI. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. New York: Springer; 2005. p 81-92.
37. Lemke A, Stieltjes B, Schad LR, Laun FB,. Toward an optimal distribution of b values for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 29: 766-776.
38. Zhang JL, Sigmund EE, Rusinek H, et al., Optimization of b-value sampling for diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67: 89-97.
39. Concia M, Sprinkart AM, Penner A-H, et al., Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas: diagnostic benefit from an intravoxel incoherent motion model-based 3 B-value analysis. Invest Radiol 2014; 49: 93-100.
40. Orton MR, Collins DJ, Koh DM, Leach MO,. Improved intravoxel incoherent motion analysis of diffusion weighted imaging by data driven Bayesian modeling. Magn Reson Med 2014; 71: 411-420.