Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI through combined apparent diffusion coefficients and dynamic contrast-enhanced kinetics

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1759-1767

  Partridge, S C ^a   Rahbar, H ^a   Murthy, R ^b   Chai, X ^c   Kurland, B F ^c   Demartini, W B ^a   Lehman, C D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

^c Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

apparent diffusion coefficient; breast cancer; diffusion weighted imaging; dynamic contrast enhanced MRI

Indexed keywords

KINETIC PARAMETERS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; SURFACE DIFFUSION;

APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; BREAST CANCER; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; QUANTITATIVE PARAMETERS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

GADODIAMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 79958276133     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22762     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, Morris E, Pisano E, Schnall M, Sener S, Smith RA, Warner E, Yaffe M, Andrews KS, Russell CA,. American cancer society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 75-89. (Pubitemid 46535708)
2. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, Manoliu RA, Kok T, Peterse H, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Muller SH, Meijer S, Oosterwijk JC, Beex LV, Tollenaar RA, de Koning HJ, Rutgers EJ, Klijn JG,. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 427-437.
3. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, Deangelis GA, Debruhl N, Harms S, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hylton N, Kuhl CK, Pisano ED, Causer P, Schnitt SJ, Smazal SF, Stelling CB, Lehman C, Weatherall PT, Gatsonis CA,. MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883. J Surg Oncol 2005; 92: 32-38. (Pubitemid 41416426)
4. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Hanna L, Peacock S, Smazal SF, Maki DD, Julian TB, DePeri ER, Bluemke DA, Schnall MD,. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1295-1303. (Pubitemid 46513295)
5. Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG, O'Dell CA, Brekke CE,. Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative locoregional staging. Am J Surg 2008; 196: 389-397.
6. Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hylton N, Kuhl CK, Lehman C, Pisano ED, Causer P, Schnitt SJ, Smazal SF, Stelling CB, Weatherall PT, Schnall MD,. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 2004; 292: 2735-2742. (Pubitemid 39628252)
7. Huang W, Fisher PR, Dulaimy K, Tudorica LA, O'Hea B, Button TM,. Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. Radiology 2004; 232: 585-591. (Pubitemid 38971303)
8. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, Barclay J, Schwerin EH, Sickles EA, Hylton NM,. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 35-43. (Pubitemid 30415534)
9. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Hochman MG, Langlotz CP, Reynolds CA, Torosian MH,. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997; 202: 833-841. (Pubitemid 27093463)
10. Warren RM, Pointon L, Thompson D, Hoff R, Gilbert FJ, Padhani A, Easton D, Lakhani SR, Leach MO,. Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Radiology 2005; 236: 779-788. (Pubitemid 41170838)
11. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schild HH,. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211: 101-110. (Pubitemid 29161739)
12. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, Gao YG, An NY, Ma L, Mahankali S, Gao JH,. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16: 172-178. (Pubitemid 34810055)
13. Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T, Oda Y, Tsuneyoshi M, Honda H,. Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008; 7: 23-29.
14. Kinoshita T, Yashiro N, Ihara N, Funatu H, Fukuma E, Narita M,. Diffusion-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breast tumors: differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002; 26: 1042-1046. (Pubitemid 36076728)
15. Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C,. Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2646-2655.
16. Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao SL, Lemort M,. Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 319-324. (Pubitemid 44188557)
17. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, DeBruhl N, Bassett LW,. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 693-704. (Pubitemid 34606504)
18. Wenkel E, Geppert C, Schulz-Wendtland R, Uder M, Kiefer B, Bautz W, Janka R,. Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. Acad Radiol 2007; 14: 1077-1083. (Pubitemid 47260686)
19. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S, Hata H, Ozaki M, Iwabuchi K, Kuranami M, Watanabe M, Hayakawa K,. ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 2005; 4: 35-42.
20. Esserman L, Hylton N, George T, Weidner N,. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to assess tumor histopathology and angiogenesis in breast carcinoma. Breast J 1999; 5: 13-21. (Pubitemid 29108803)
21. Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP, Mattern J, Junkermann H, Radeleff J, Magener A, Brix G, Delorme S, Zuna I, van Kaick G,. Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 260-266. (Pubitemid 29463108)
22. Le Bihan D, Turner R, Douek P, Patronas N,. Diffusion MR imaging: clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159: 591-599.
23. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Kamitani T, Soeda H, Setoguchi T, Sakai S, Hatakenaka M, Kubo M, Sadanaga N, Yamamoto H, Honda H,. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 1157-1165.
24. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T, Setoguchi T, Okafuji T, Soeda H, Sakai S, Hatakenaka M, Kubo M, Tokunaga E, Yamamoto H, Honda H,. Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: e126-e132.
25. El Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, Huang P, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, Bluemke DA,. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 2010; 256: 64-73.
26. Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD,. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 1716-1722.
27. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imaging reporting and data system atlas (BI-RADS Atlas). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
28. Wang LC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD,. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 826-831.
29. Partridge SC, Demartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD,. Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 562-570.
30. Levine D, Bankier AA, Halpern EF,. Submissions to radiology: our top 10 list of statistical errors. Radiology 2009; 253: 288-290.
31. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ,. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839-843. (Pubitemid 13033817)
32. Gonen M,. Analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves with SAS. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Publishing; 2008.
33. Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, Chenevert TL, Thoeny HC, Takahara T, Dzik-Jurasz A, Ross BD, Van Cauteren M, Collins D, Hammoud DA, Rustin GJ, Taouli B, Choyke PL,. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 2009; 11: 102-125.
34. Jansen SA, Fan X, Yang C, Shimauchi A, Karczmar G, Newstead GM,. Relating dose of contrast media administered to uptake and washout of malignant lesions on DCEMRI of the breast. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 24-30.
35. Veldhuis WB, Liu C, Bammer R, Daniel BL, Mosely ME,. High-resolution, fat-suppressed, diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast using a self-navigated multi-shot technique. St. Louis, MO: Mira Digital Publishing; 2009; p 2098.
36. Lin C, Geppert C, Stemmer A, Schultze-Haakh H, Majidi SS, Kipfer HD,. Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast at 3.0T with BLADE-TSE: initial experience. St. Louis, MO: Mira Digital Publishing; 2009; p 4119.
37. Yankeelov T, Gatenby JC, Welch EB, Chakravarthy B, Freehardt D, Mayer I, Kelly M, Meszoely I, Gore J,. Towards practical breast diffusion tensor imaging at 3.0T in the clinical setting. St. Louis, MO: Mira Digital Publishing; 2009; p 2131.
38. Dudink J, Larkman DJ, Kapellou O, Boardman JP, Allsop JM, Cowan FM, Hajnal JV, Edwards AD, Rutherford MA, Counsell SJ,. High b-value diffusion tensor imaging of the neonatal brain at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1966-1972.
39. Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K, Grabner G, Stadlbauer A, Weber M, Moser E, Helbich TH, Trattnig S,. Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 2009; 253: 341-351.
40. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M,. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168: 497-505.
41. Ogura A, Hayakawa K, Miyati T, Maeda F,. The effect of susceptibility of gadolinium contrast media on diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 867-872. (Pubitemid 352033541)
42. Fitzek C, Mentzel HJ, Fitzek S, Sauner D, Kaiser WA, Reichenbach JR,. Echoplanar diffusion-weighted MRI with intravenous gadolinium-DTPA. Neuroradiology 2003; 45: 592-597. (Pubitemid 37236178)
43. Chen G, Jespersen SN, Pedersen M, Pang Q, Horsman MR, Stodkilde-Jorgensen H,. Intravenous administration of Gd-DTPA prior to DWI does not affect the apparent diffusion constant. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23: 685-689. (Pubitemid 41033047)