Quantitative breast MRI: 2D histogram analysis of diffusion tensor parameters in normal tissue

Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 185-193

  Wiederer, Julia ^a   Pazahr, Shila ^a   Leo, Cornelia ^a   Nanz, Daniel ^a   Boss, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Breast MRI; DTI; Menstrual cycle

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BREAST; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898058409     PISSN: 09685243     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-013-0400-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220(1):13-30
2. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, Ioffe OB (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233(3):830-849
3. Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH (2008) Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246(1):116-124
4. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, Kuhn W, Schild HH (2007) MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370(9586):485-492
5. Kuhl CK (2009) Why do purely intraductal cancers enhance on breast MR images? Radiology 253(2):281-283
6. Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Eby PR, Demartini WB, Gutierrez RL, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2011) Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI. Eur Radiol 21(9):2011-2019
7. Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Taplin SH, Urban N, Geller BM (2002) Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(20):1546-1554
8. Yamada T, Mori N, Watanabe M, Kimijima I, Okumoto T, Seiji K, Takahashi S (2010) Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 30(5):1183-1198
9. Kwee TC, van Ufford HM, Beek FJ, Takahara T, Uiterwaal CS, Bierings MB, Ludwig I, Fijnheer R, Nievelstein RA (2009) Whole-body MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging, for the initial staging of malignant lymphoma: comparison to computed tomography. Invest Radiol 44(10):683-690
10. Heusner TA, Kuemmel S, Koeninger A, Hamami ME, Hahn S, Quinsten A, Bockisch A, Forsting M, Lauenstein T, Antoch G, Stahl A (2010) Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(6):1077-1086
11. Baltzer PA, Renz DM, Herrmann KH, Dietzel M, Krumbein I, Gajda M, Camara O, Reichenbach JR, Kaiser WA (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques. Eur Radiol 19(7):1612-1620
12. Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Demartini WB, Gutierrez RL, Allison KH, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2012) In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters. Radiology 263(2):374-382
13. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C (1996) Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 111(3):209-219
14. Tabar L, Tot T, Dean PB (2012) The basis for understanding the breast in health and disease, vol 1, 1st edn. László Tabár M.D, Sweden
15. Partridge SC, Murthy RS, Ziadloo A, White SW, Allison KH, Lehman CD (2010) Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the normal breast. Magn Reson Imaging 28(3):320-328
16. Vashi R, Hooley R, Butler R, Geisel J, Philpotts L (2013) Breast imaging of the pregnant and lactating patient: physiologic changes and common benign entities. Am J Roentgenol 200(2):329-336
17. Partridge SC, McKinnon GC, Henry RG, Hylton NM (2001) Menstrual cycle variation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured in the normal breast using MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 14(4):433-438
18. Baltzer PA, Schäfer A, Dietzel M, Grässel D, Gajda M, Camara O, Kaiser WA (2011) Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 21(1):1-10
19. Eyal E, Shapiro-Feinberg M, Furman-Haran E, Grobgeld D, Golan T, Itzchak Y, Catane R, Papa M, Degani H (2012) Parametric diffusion tensor imaging of the breast. Invest Radiol 47(5):284-291
20. O'Flynn EA, Morgan VA, Giles SL, deSouza NM (2012) Diffusion weighted imaging of the normal breast: reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and variation with menstrual cycle and menopausal status. Eur Radiol 22(7):1512-1518
21. Tabar L, Dean PB, Lindhe N, Ingvarsson M (2012) The ongoing revolution in breast imaging calls for a similar revolution in breast pathology. Int J Breast Cancer 2012:489345
22. Tabar L, Tot T, Dean PB (2005) Breast cancer: the art of science of early detection with mammography. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
23. Muller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhauser K, Stoll P, Dietz K, Claussen CD (1997) Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 203(1):145-149
24. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J, Kreft BP, Sommer T, Lutterbey G, Schild HH (1997) Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 203(1):137-144