Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T differentiates malignant breast lesions from benign lesions and breast parenchyma

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 813-823

  Bokacheva, Louisa ^a   Kaplan, Jennifer B ^a   Giri, Dilip D ^a   Patil, Sujata ^a   Gnanasigamani, Merlin ^a   Nyman, C Gregory ^a   Deasy, Joseph O ^a   Morris, Elizabeth A ^a   Thakur, Sunitha B ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Benign breast lesions; Breast cancer; Diffusion weighted imaging; Intravoxel incoherent motion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ALGORITHM; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84927796463     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24462     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: Consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 2009;11:102-125
2. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: Application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986;161:401-407
3. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988;168:497-505
4. Luciani A, Vignaud A, Cavet M, et al. Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging-pilot study. Radiology 2008;249: 891-899
5. Lemke A, Laun FB, Klauss M, et al. Differentiation of pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values: Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters. Invest Radiol 2009;44: 769-775
6. Thoeny HC, Zumstein D, Simon-Zoula S, et al. Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys with diffusion-weighted and BOLD MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2006;241:812-821
7. Morvan D. In vivo measurement of diffusion and pseudo-diffusion in skeletal muscle at rest and after exercise. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13:193-199
8. Moore RJ, Issa B, Tokarczuk P, et al. In vivo intravoxel incoherent motion measurements in the human placenta using echo-planar imaging at 0.5 T. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:295-302
9. Yamada I, Aung W, Himeno Y, Nakagawa T, Shibuya H. Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepatic lesions: Evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1999;210:617-623
10. Pang Y, Turkbey B, Bernardo M, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: An evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different bvalue combinations. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:553-562
11. Lu Y, Jansen JF, Mazaheri Y, Stambuk HE, Koutcher JA, Shukla-Dave A. Extension of the intravoxel incoherent motion model to non-Gaussian diffusion in head and neck cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:1088-1096
12. Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T, Obara M, Ichikawa Y, Nakamura T. Salivary gland tumors: Use of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Radiology 2012;263:770-777
13. Woodhams R, Ramadan S, Stanwell P, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications. Radiographics 2011;31:1059-1084
14. Zhang JL, Sigmund EE, Chandarana H, et al. Variability of renal apparent diffusion coefficients: limitations of the monoexponential model for diffusion quantification. Radiology 2010;254:783-792
15. Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 2009;253:341-351
16. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions: Correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1996;200:639-649
17. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:172-178
18. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S, et al. ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 2005;4:35-42
19. Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao SL, Lemort M. Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: A clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:319-324
20. Lo GG, Ai V, Chan JK, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: first experiences at 3 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;33:63-69
21. Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1716-1722
22. Baron P, Dorrius MD, Kappert P, Oudkerk M, Sijens PE. Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal fibroglandular breast tissue: influence of microperfusion and fat suppression technique on the apparent diffusion coefficient. NMR Biomed 2010;23:399-405
23. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, DeBruhl N, Bassett LW. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:693-704
24. Sigmund EE, Cho GY, Kim S, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:1437-1447
25. Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ. WHO Classification of Tumors of the Breast (IARC WHO Classification of Tumors). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012
26. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: Experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991;19:403-410
27. Cutler SJ, Black MM, Mork T, Harvei S, Freeman C. Further observations on prognostic factors in cancer of the female breast. Cancer 1969;24:653-667
28. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology 2003
29. Hancu I, Govenkar A, Lenkinski RE, Lee SK. On shimming approaches in 3T breast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2012;69:862-867
30. Sigmund EE, Vivier PH, Sui D, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion-tensor imaging in renal tissue under hydration and furosemide flow challenges. Radiology 2012;263:758-769
31. Metz CE. ROC software. Department of Radiology,University of Chicago Medical Center. Available at: http://metz-roc.uchicago. edu/MetzROC/. 2006. Accessed May 30, 2012
32. Pang Y, Turkbey B, Bernardo M, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: An evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different bvalue combinations. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:553-562
33. Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ, et al. MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181:619-626
34. Delille JP, Slanetz PJ, Yeh ED, Kopans DB, Garrido L. Breast cancer: regional blood flow and blood volume measured with magnetic susceptibility-based MR imaging-initial results. Radiology 2002;223:558-565
35. Kim S, Decarlo L, Cho GY, et al. Interstitial fluid pressure correlates with intravoxel incoherent motion imaging metrics in a mouse mammary carcinoma model. NMR Biomed 2012;25:787-794
36. Lemke A, Laun FB, Simon D, Stieltjes B, Schad LR. An in vivo verification of the intravoxel incoherent motion effect in diffusionweighted imaging of the abdomen. Magn Reson Med 2010;64: 1580-1585
37. Jansen SA, Fan X, Karczmar GS, et al. DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmasslike enhancement? Med Phys 2008;35:3102-3109
38. Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: Effects of lesion type and size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1664-1673
39. Lemke A, Stieltjes B, Schad LR, Laun FB. Toward an optimal distribution of b values for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29:766-776
40. Zhang JL, Sigmund EE, Rusinek H, et al. Optimization of b-value sampling for diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney. Magn Reson Med 2012;67:89-97.