Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 102-109

  Jeh, Su Kyung ^a   Kim, Sung Hun ^b   Kim, Hyeon Sook ^b   Kang, Bong Joo ^b   Jeong, Seung Hee ^c   Yim, Hyeon Woo ^c   Song, Byung Joo ^c  

^a Hallym University Medical Center   (South Korea)

^b The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^c The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

breast; diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; invasive ductal carcinoma; magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; KI 67 ANTIGEN; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE DUCTAL CANCER; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 78650650992     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22400     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16: 172-178.
2. Kim SH, Cha ES, Kim HS, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 615-620.
3. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 644-649.
4. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, et al. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 1157-1165.
5. Yoshikawa MI, Ohsumi S, Sugata S, et al. Relation between cancer cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient values using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer. Radiat Med 2008; 26: 222-226.
6. Park MJ, Cha ES, Kang BJ, Ihn YK, Baik JH., The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors. Korean J Radiol 2007; 8: 390-396.
7. Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 1664-1673.
8. Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD., Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 1716-1722.
9. Partridge SC, Demartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD., Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 562-570.
10. Patridge SC, Ziadloo A, Murthy R, et al. Diffusion tensor MRI: preliminary anisotropy measures and mapping of breast tumor. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 339-347.
11. Chang YW, Kwon KH, Choi DL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer and correlation with prognostic factors. Acta Radiol 2009; 50: 990-998.
12. Lee SH, Cho N, Kim SJ, et al. Correlation between high resolution dynamic MR features and prognostic factors in breast cancer. Korean J Radiol 2008; 9: 10-18.
13. Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Tot T, Bone B., Invasive breast cancer: correlation of dynamic MR features with prognostic factors. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2425-2435.
14. Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S., Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between MR imaging and pathologic findings. Radiology 2009; 250: 638-647.
15. Coradini D, Daidone MG., Biomolecular prognostic factors in breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2004; 16: 49-55.
16. Esteva FJ, Hortobagyi GN., Prognostic molecular markers in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2004; 6: 109-118.
17. Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, Lee AH, Robertson JF, Ellis IO., Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 2007; 109: 25-32.
18. Ali SH, O'Donnell AL, Balu D, et al. Estrogen receptor-alpha in the inhibition of cancer growth and angiogenesis. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 7094-7098.
19. Makkat S, Luypaert R, Stadnik T, et al. Deconvolution-based dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast tumors: correlation of tumor blood flow with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and clinicopathologic findings - preliminary results. Radiology 2008; 249: 471-482.
20. Kumar R, Yarmand-Bagheri R., The role of HER2 in angiogenesis. Semin Oncol 2001; 28: 27-32.
21. Toi M, Inada K, Suzuki H, Tominaga T., Tumor angiogenesis in breast cancer: its importance as a prognostic indicator and the association with vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1995; 36: 193-204.
22. Tsutsui S, Kataoka A, Ohno S, Murakami S, Kinoshita J, Hachitanda Y., Prognostic and predictive value of epidermal growth factor receptor in recurrent breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 3454-3460.
23. Wang Y, Ikeda DM, Narasimhan B, et al. Estrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression. Radiology 2008; 246: 367-375.
24. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997; 202: 833-841.
25. Lo GG, Ai V, Chan JK, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: first experiences at 3 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33: 63-69.