Student performance and attitudes in a collaborative and flipped linear algebra course

International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 653-673

  Murphy, Julia ^a   Chang, Jen Mei ^a   Suaray, Kagba ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

collaborative learning; flipped learning; higher education; inverted learning; linear algebra; student attitudes towards mathematics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948147170     PISSN: 0020739X     EISSN: 14645211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0020739X.2015.1102979     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. J.F.Strayer. How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learn Environ Res. 2012;15:171–193.
2. M.K.Kim, S.M.Kim, O.Khera,. The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. Internet High Educ. 2014;22:37–50.
3. R.Davies, D.Dean, N.Ball. Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2013;61:563–580.
4. G.Gannod, J.Burge, M.Helmick. Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. In: Schafer W, Dwyer M, Gruhn V, editors. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering; 2008 May 10–18; Leipzig, Germany. New York (NY): ACM.
5. B.Love, A.Hodge, N.Grandgenett,. Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2014;45:317–324.
6. J.M.Chang. A practical approach to inquiry-based learning in linear algebra. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2011;42:245–259.
7. K.V.Mattis. Flipped classroom versus traditional textbook instruction: assessing accuracy and mental effort at different levels of mathematical complexity. Technol Knowl Learn. 2015:20(2)231–248.
8. B.Bloom. Taxonomy of educational objectives book 1: cognitive domain. Boston (MA): Addison Wesley Publishing Co.; 1984.
9. A.H.Herzig, D.T.Kung. Cooperative learning in calculus reform: what have we learned? Providence (RI): American Mathematical Society; 2003.
10. N.K.Lape, R.Levy, D.H.Yong,. Probing the inverted classroom: a controlled study of teaching and learning outcomes in undergraduate engineering and mathematics. Paper presented at: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference; 2014 June 15–18; Indianapolis, Indiana USA.
11. D.Yong, R.Levy, N.Lape. Why no difference? A controlled flipped classroom study for an introductory differential equations course. PRIMUS 2015;25(9–10):907–921.
12. E.Fennema, J.Sherman Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 1976;7(5):324–326.