Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Assessment of Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry to Diagnose Preperimetric Glaucoma

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2014, Pages

  Rao, Harsha L ^a   Yadav, Ravi K ^a   Addepalli, Uday K ^a   Chaudhary, Shashikant ^a   Senthil, Sirisha ^a   Choudhari, Nikhil S ^a   Garudadri, Chandra S ^a  

^a L V PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGING SOFTWARE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPTIC DISK; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY DEVICE; POLARIMETER; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; SCANNING LASER POLARIMETER; SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; CORNEA; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RETINA; RETINA NERVE CELL; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; RETINA; RETINAL NEURONS; SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84948127919     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108992     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Nassif N, Cense B, Park B, Pierce M, Yun S, et al. (2004) In vivo high-resolution video-rate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the human retina and optic nerve. Opt Express 12: 367-376.
2. Wojtkowski M, Srinivasan V, Ko T, Fujimoto J, Kowalczyk A, et al. (2004) Ultrahigh-resolution, high-speed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation. Opt Express 12: 2404-2422.
3. Weinreb RN, Shakiba S, Zangwill L (1995) Scanning laser polarimetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 119: 627-636.
4. Toth M, Hollo G (2005) Enhanced corneal compensation for scanning laser polarimetry on eyes with atypical polarisation pattern. Br J Ophthalmol 89: 1139-1142.
5. Reus NJ, Zhou Q, Lemij HG (2006) Enhanced imaging algorithm for scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47: 3870-3877.
6. Sehi M, Guaqueta DC, Greenfield DS (2006) An enhancement module to improve the atypical birefringence pattern using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. Br J Ophthalmol 90: 749-753.
7. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, Qiu Q, Liu S, et al. (2009) Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: A variability and diagnostic performance study. Ophthalmology 116: 1257-1263, 1263 e1251-1252.
8. Knight OJ, Chang RT, Feuer WJ, Budenz DL (2009) Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. Ophthalmology 116: 1271-1277.
9. Sung KR, Kim DY, Park SB, Kook MS (2009) Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 116: 1264-1270.
10. Rao HL, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Sample PA, Alencar LM, et al. (2010) Comparison of different spectral domain optical coherence tomography scanning areas for glaucoma diagnosis. Ophthalmology 117: 1692-1699.
11. Rao HL, Babu JG, Addepalli UK, Senthil S, Garudadri CS (2012) Retinal nerve fiber layer and macular inner retina measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomograph in Indian eyes with early glaucoma. Eye (Lond) 26: 133-139.
12. Medeiros FA, Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Patel C, Weinreb RN (2007) Detection of glaucoma using scanning laser polarimetry with enhanced corneal compensation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48: 3146-3153.
13. Mai TA, Reus NJ, Lemij HG (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of scanning laser polarimetry with enhanced versus variable corneal compensation. Ophthalmology 114: 1988-1993.
14. Sehi M, Guaqueta DC, FeuerWJ, Greenfield DS, Advanced Imaging in Glaucoma Study Group (2007) Scanning laser polarimetry with variable and enhanced corneal compensation in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 143: 272-279.
15. Benitez-del-Castillo J, Martinez A, Regi T (2011) Diagnostic capability of scanning laser polarimetry with and without enhanced corneal compensation and optical coherence tomography. Eur J Ophthalmol 21: 228-236.
16. Garas A, Vargha P, Hollo G (2012) Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of the RTVue Fourier-domain OCT and the GDx-VCC/ECC polarimeter to detect glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 22: 45-54.
17. Rao HL, Yadav RK, Addepalli UK, Chaudhary S, Senthil S, et al. (2014) Retinal nerve fiber layer evaluation of spectral domain optical coherence tomograph and scanning laser polarimeter to diagnose glaucoma. Eye (Lond) 28: 654-661.
18. Anderson DR, Patella VM (1999) Automated Static Perimetry. St. Louis: Mosby. 152 p.
19. Rao HL, Kumar AU, Babu JG, Kumar A, Senthil S, et al. (2011) Predictors of normal optic nerve head, retinal nerve fiber layer, and macular parameters measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52: 1103-1110.
20. Rao HL, Kumbar T, Addepalli UK, Bharti N, Senthil S, et al. (2012) Effect of spectrum bias on the diagnostic accuracy of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53: 1058-1065.
21. Glynn RJ, Rosner B (1992) Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 110: 381-387.
22. Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK (2002) Analysis of correlated ROC data. In: Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK, eds. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 274-306.
23. Alonzo TA, Pepe MS (2002) Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques. Biostatistics 3: 421-432.
24. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL (1994) Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 271: 703-707.
25. Radack KL, Rouan G, Hedges J (1986) The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results. Arch Pathol Lab Med 110: 689-693.
26. Fagan TJ (1975) Letter: Nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 293: 257.
27. Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB (1991) Likelihood ratios with confidence: Sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol 44: 763-770.
28. Pepe MS (2003) The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp.130-67.
29. Jeoung JW, Park KH (2010) Comparison of Cirrus OCT and Stratus OCT on the ability to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects in preperimetric glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51: 938-945.
30. Hirashima T, Hangai M, Nukada M, Nakano N, Morooka S, et al. (2013) Frequency-doubling technology and retinal measurements with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in preperimetric glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251: 129-137.
31. Arintawati P, Sone T, Akita T, Tanaka J, Kiuchi Y (2013) The applicability of ganglion cell complex parameters determined from SD-OCT images to detect glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma 22: 713-718.
32. Nukada M, Hangai M, Mori S, Takayama K, Nakano N, et al. (2014) Imaging of Localized Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects in Preperimetric Glaucoma Using Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography. J Glaucoma 23: 150-159.
33. Rolle T, Briamonte C, Curto D, Grignolo FM (2011) Ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fiber layer measured by fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for early detection of structural damage in patients with preperimetric glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol 5: 961-969.
34. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, Schuman JS, Ishikawa H, et al. (2009) Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 116: 2305-2314.
35. Lisboa R, Leite MT, Zangwill LM, Tafreshi A, Weinreb RN, et al. (2012) Diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 119: 2261-2269.
36. Rao HL, Addepalli UK, Chaudhary S, Kumbar T, Senthil S, et al. (2013) Ability of different scanning protocols of spectral domain optical coherence tomography to diagnose preperimetric glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54: 7252-7257.
37. Langlotz CP (2003) Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: Usefulness for clinical decision making and research. Radiology 228: 3-9.
38. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN (2004) Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 122: 827-837.
39. Zangwill LM, Jain S, Racette L, Ernstrom KB, Bowd C, et al. (2007) The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48: 2653-2660.
40. Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA (1998) Sources of bias in studies of optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer morphology. Br J Ophthalmol 82: 986.