Ability of different scanning protocols of spectral domain optical coherence tomography to diagnose preperimetric glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 54, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 7252-7257

  Rao, Harsha L ^a   Addepalli, Uday K ^a   Chaudhary, Shashikant ^a   Kumbar, Tukaram ^a   Senthil, Sirisha ^a   Choudhari, Nikhil S ^a   Garudadri, Chandra S ^a  

^a L V PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Diagnostic ability; Ganglion cell complex; Preperimetric glaucoma; Retinal nerve fiber layer; Spectral domain optical coherence tomograph

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EYE EXAMINATION; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPTIC NERVE; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PERIMETRY; PREPERIMETRIC GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL ACUITY;

DIAGNOSTIC ABILITY; GANGLION CELL COMPLEX; PREPERIMETRIC GLAUCOMA; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPH;

ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 84886999810     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12731     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Nassif N, Cense B, Park B, et al. In vivo high-resolution videorate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the human retina and optic nerve. Opt Express. 2004; 12: 367-376.
2. Wojtkowski M, Srinivasan V, Ko T, Fujimoto J, Kowalczyk A, Duker J. Ultrahigh-resolution, high-speed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation. Opt Express. 2004; 12: 2404-2422.
3. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 1257-1263.
4. Knight OJ, Chang RT, Feuer WJ, Budenz DL. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 1271-1277.
5. Sung KR, Kim DY, Park SB, Kook MS. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 1264-1270.
6. Rao HL, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Sample PA, Alencar LM, Medeiros FA. Comparison of different spectral domain optical coherence tomography scanning areas for glaucoma diagnosis. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117: 1692-1699.
7. Rao HL, Babu JG, Addepalli UK, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. Retinal nerve fiber layer and macular inner retina measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomograph in Indian eyes with early glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2012; 26: 133-139.
8. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Smith EL 3rd, Barnes G, Holt WF, Crawford ML. Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45: 3152-3160.
9. Jeoung JW, Park KH. Comparison of Cirrus OCT and Stratus OCT on the ability to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects in preperimetric glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51: 938-945.
10. Hirashima T, Hangai M, Nukada M, et al. Frequency-doubling technology and retinal measurements with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in preperimetric glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013; 251: 129-137.
11. Arintawati P, Sone T, Akita T, Tanaka J, Kiuchi Y. The applicability of ganglion cell complex parameters determined from SD-OCT images to detect glaucomatous eyes [published online ahead of print June 4, 2012]. J Glaucoma. doi: 10. 1097/IJG. 0b013e318259b2e1.
12. Nukada M, Hangai M, Mori S, et al. Imaging of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects in preperimetric glaucoma using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography [published online ahead of print October 10, 2012]. J Glaucoma. doi: 10. 1097/IJG. 0b013e3182707456.
13. Rolle T, Briamonte C, Curto D, Grignolo FM. Ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fiber layer measured by Fourierdomain optical coherence tomography for early detection of structural damage in patients with preperimetric glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011; 5: 961-969.
14. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 2305-2314.
15. Na JH, Lee K, Lee JR, Baek S, Yoo SJ, Kook MS. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in preperimetric glaucoma patients with localized retinal nerve fiber defects by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography [published online ahead of print June 18, 2013]. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. doi: 10. 1111/ceo. 12142.
16. Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1978; 299: 926-930.
17. Rao HL, Kumbar T, Addepalli UK, et al. Effect of spectrum bias on the diagnostic accuracy of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 1058-1065.
18. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999.
19. Rao HL, Kumar AU, Babu JG, Kumar A, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. Predictors of normal optic nerve head, retinal nerve fiber layer, and macular parameters measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 1103-1110.
20. Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. Comparing the accuracy of two diagnostic tests. In: Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK, eds. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002: 165-194.
21. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44: 837-845.
22. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994; 271: 703-707.
23. Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44: 763-770.
24. Nukada M, Hangai M, Mori S, et al. Detection of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects in glaucoma using enhanced spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118: 1038-1048.
25. Langlotz CP. Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: usefulness for clinical decision making and research. Radiology. 2003; 228: 3-9.
26. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122: 827-837.
27. Medeiros FA, Ng D, Zangwill LM, Sample PA, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48: 214-222.
28. Lisboa R, Paranhos A Jr, Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM, Leite MT, Medeiros FA. Comparison of different spectral domain OCT scanning protocols for diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 3417-3425.