Inhibitory control training for appetitive behaviour change: A meta-analytic investigation of mechanisms of action and moderators of effectiveness

Appetite

Volumn 97, Issue , 2016, Pages 16-28

  Jones, Andrew ^a,b   Di Lemma, Lisa C G ^a,b   Robinson, Eric ^a,b   Christiansen, Paul ^a,b   Nolan, Sarah ^a   Tudur Smith, Catrin ^a   Field, Matt ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UK CENTRE FOR TOBACCO AND ALCOHOL STUDIES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Associative inhibition; Calorie; Inhibitory control training; Obesity

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; APPETITE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; INHIBITORY CONTROL TRAINING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC PROCEDURES; REVIEW; STIMULUS; EATING; FACTUAL DATABASE; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LOW CALORY DIET; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY;

APPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; CUES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DIET, REDUCING; EATING; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84947967942     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.11.013     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Adams R. Training response inhibition to reduce food consumption 2014, Cardiff University.
2. Adams S., Ataya A.F., Attwood A.S., Munafò M.R. Effects of alcohol on disinhibition towards alcohol-related cues. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2013, 127(1-3):137-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.06.025.
3. Allom V., Mullan B. Two inhibitory control training interventions designed to improve eating behaviour and determine mechanisms of change. Appetite 2015, 89:282-290. 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.022.
4. Allom V., Mullan B., Hagger M.S. Does inhibitory control training improve health behaviour? A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review 2015, In press.
5. Band G.P.H., van der Molen M.W., Logan G.D. Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychologica 2003, 112(2):105-142.
6. Baumeister R.F. Self-regulation, ego depletion, and inhibition. Neuropsychologia 2014, 65:313-319. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.012.
7. Bickel W.K., Jarmolowicz D.P., Mueller E.T., Gatchalian K.M., McClure S.M. Are executive function and impulsivity antipodes? A conceptual reconstruction with special reference to addiction. Psychopharmacology 2012, 221(3):361-387.
8. Boot W.R., Simons D.J., Stothart C., Stutts C. The pervasive problem with placebos in psychology: why active control groups are not sufficient to rule out placebo effects. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2013, 8(4):445-454.
9. Bowley C., Faricy C., Hegarty B., Johnstone S.J., Smith J., Kelly P., et al. The effects of inhibitory control training on alcohol consumption, implicit alcohol-related cognitions and brain electrical activity. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2013, 89:342-348.
10. Cacioppo J.T., Priester J.R., Berntson G.G. Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65(1):5-17.
11. De Wit H. Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addiction Biology 2009, 14(1):22-31.
12. Di Lemma L. (in preparation). Overcoming disinhibition and retraining automatic approach tendencies in heavy drinkers and tobacco smokers, University of Liverpool.
13. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology 2013, 64:135-168.
14. Durlak J.A. How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2009, 34(9):917-928.
15. Duval S., Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000, 56(2):455-463.
16. Eagle D.M., Bari A., Robbins T.W. The neuropsychopharmacology of action inhibition: cross-species translation of the stop-signal and go/no-go tasks. Psychopharmacology 2008, 199(3):439-456.
17. Egger M., Smith G.D., Schneider M., Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal 1997, 315(7109):629-634.
18. Elbourne D.R., Altman D.G., Higgins J.P.T., Curtin F., Worthington H.V., Vail A. Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002, 31(1):140-149.
19. Ersche K.D., Jones P.S., Williams G.B., Turton A.J., Robbins T.W., Bullmore E.T. Abnormal brain structure implicated in stimulant drug addiction. Science 2012, 335(6068):601-604.
20. Fernie G., Peeters P., Gullo M.J., Christiansen P., Cole J., Sumnall H., et al. Multiple components of impulsivity predict prospective alcohol involvement in adolescents. Addiction 2013, 108:1916-1923.
21. Field M., Kiernan A., Eastwood B., Child R. Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2008, 39(3):209-218.
22. Freeman S.M., Razhas I., Aron A.R. Top-down response suppression mitigates action tendencies triggered by a motivating stimulus. Current Biology 2014, 24(2):212-216. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.019.
23. Friese M., Hofmann W., Wanke M. When impulses take over. Moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology 2008, 47:397-419.
24. Gollwitzer P.M., Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes advances in experimental social psychology 2006, Vol. 38:69-119.
25. Groman S.M., James A.S., Jentsch J.D. Poor response inhibition: at the nexus between substance abuse and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2009, 33(5):690-698.
26. Guitart-Masip M., Huys Q.J.M., Fuentemilla L., Dayan P., Duzel E., Dolan R.J. Go and no-go learning in reward and punishment: interactions between affect and effect. NeuroImage 2012, 62(1):154-166.
27. Hallett P.E. Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research 1978, 18(10):1279-1296.
28. Higgins J., Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 2011.
29. Houben K., Havermans R.C., Nederkoorn C., Jansen A. Beer à no-go: learning to stop responding to alcohol cues reduces alcohol intake via reduced affective associations rather than increased response inhibition. Addiction 2012, 107(7):1280-1287.
30. Houben K., Jansen A. Training inhibitory control. A recipe for resisting sweet temptations. Appetite 2011, 56(2):345-349.
31. Houben K., Jansen A. Chocolate equals stop: chocolate-specific inhibition training reduces chocolate intake and go associations with chocolate. Appetite 2015, 87:318-323.
32. Houben K., Nederkoorn C., Wiers R.W., Jansen A. Resisting temptation: decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2011, 116(1-3):132-136.
33. Houben K., Roefs A., Jansen A. Guilty pleasures. Implicit preferences for high calorie food in restrained eating. Appetite 2010, 55(1):18-24.
34. Johnson F., Pratt M., Wardle J. Dietary restraint and self-regulation in eating behaviour. International Journal of Obesity 2012, 36:665-674.
35. Jones A., Christiansen P., Nederkoorn C., Houben K., Field M. Fluctuating Disinhibition: Implications for the understanding and treatment of alcohol and other substance use disorders. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2013, 22(4).
36. Jones A., Field M. The effects of cue-specific inhibition training on alcohol consumption in heavy social drinkers. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2013, 21:8-16.
37. Jones A., Field M. Alcohol-related and negatively-valenced cues increase motor and oculomotor disinhibition in social drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2015, 23:122-129.
38. Jones A., Guerrieri R., Fernie G., Cole J., Goudie A., Field M. The effects of priming restrained versus disinhibited behaviour on alcohol-seeking in social drinkers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2011, 113(1):55-61.
39. Jones A., McGrath E., Houben K., Nederkoorn C., Robinson E., Field M. A comparison of three types of web-based inhibition training for the reduction of alcohol consumption in problem drinkers: study protocol. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:796.
40. Kemps E., Tiggemann M., Martin R., Elliott M. Implicit approach-avoidance associations for craved food cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2013, 19(1):30-38.
41. Kooijmans R., Scheres A., Oosterlaan J. Response inhibition and measures of psychopathology: a dimensional analysis. Child Neuropsychology 2001, 6(3):175-184.
42. Kypri K., Hallett J., Howat P., McManus A., Maycock B., Bowe S., et al. Randomized controlled trial of proactive web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for university students. Archives of Internal Medicine 2009, 169(16):1508-1514. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.249.
43. Lawrence N.S., O'Sullivan J., Parslow D., Javaid M., Adams R., Chambers C., et al. Training response inhibition to food is associated with weight loss and reduced energy intake. Appetite 2015, 95:17-28.
44. Lawrence N.S., Verbruggen F., Morrison S., Adams R.C., Chambers C.D. Stopping to food can reduce intake. Effects of stimulus-specificity and individual differences in dietary restraint. Appetite 2015, 85:91-103.
45. Logan G.D., Cowan W.B., Davis K.A. On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10(2):276-291.
46. McLaren I.P.L., Verbruggen F. Association and inhibition. The Wiley Blackwell handbook on the cognitive neuroscience of learning 2014, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England. R.A. Murphy, R.C. Honey (Eds.).
47. Meule A., Lutz A.P.C., Krawietz V., Stützer J., Vögele C., Kübler A. Food-cue affected motor response inhibition and self-reported dieting success: a pictorial affective shifting task. Frontiers in Psychology 2014, 5(MAR).
48. Miyake A., Friedman N.P., Emerson M.J., Witzki A.H., Howerter A., Wager T.D. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology 2000, 41(1):49-100.
49. Nederkoorn C., Houben K., Hofmann W., Roefs A., Jansen A. Control yourself or just eat what you like? Weight gain over a year is predicted by an interactive effect of response inhibition and implicit preference for snack foods. Health Psychology 2010, 29(4):389-393. 10.1037/a0019921.
50. Nederkoorn C., Smulders F.T.Y., Havermans R.C., Roefs A., Jansen A. Impulsivity in obese women. Appetite 2006, 47(2):253-256.
51. Newman J.P., Kosson D.S. Passive avoidance learning in psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1986, 95(3):252-260.
52. Parkinson J., Haggard P. Subliminal priming of intentional inhibition. Cognition 2014, 130(2):255-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.005.
53. Peters J.L., Sutton A.J., Jones D.R., Abrams K.R., Rushton L. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity. Statistics in Medicine 2007, 26(25):4544-4562. 10.1002/sim.2889.
54. Riley R.D., Higgins J.P.T., Deeks J.J. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ 2011, 342(7804):964-967. 10.1136/bmj.d549.
55. Schonberg T., Bakkour A., Hover A.M., Mumford J.A., Nagar L., Perez J., et al. Changing value through cued approach: an automatic mechanism of behavior change. Nat Neurosci 2014, 17(4):625-630. 10.1038/nn.3673.
56. Smith J., Mattick R., Jamadar S., Iredale J. Deficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: a meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2014, 145:1-33.
57. Van Deursen D.S., Salemink E., Smit F., Kramer J., Wiers R.W. Web-based cognitive bias modification for problem drinkers: protocol of a randomised controlled trial with a 2x2x2 factorial design. BMC Public Health 2013, 13(1).
58. Van Koningsbruggen G.M., Veling H., Stroebe W., Aarts H. Comparing two psychological interventions in reducing impulsive processes of eating behaviour: effects on self-selected portion size. British Journal of Health Psychology 2014, 19(4):767-782.
59. Veling H., Aarts H., Papies E.K. Using stop signals to inhibit chronic dieters' responses toward palatable foods. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2011, 49(11):771-780. 10.1016/j.brat.2011.08.005.
60. Veling H., Aarts H., Stroebe W. Stop signals decrease choices for palatable foods through decreased food evaluation. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 4(NOV).
61. Veling H., Aarts H., Stroebe W. Using stop signals to reduce impulsive choices for palatable unhealthy foods. British Journal of Health Psychology 2013, 18(2):354-368.
62. Veling H., Holland R.W., van Knippenberg A. When approach motivation and behavioral inhibition collide: behavior regulation through stimulus devaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44(4):1013-1019.
63. Veling H., van Konnigsbruggen G.M., Aarts H., Stroebe W. Targeting impulsive processes of eating behavior via the internet. Effects on body weight. Appetite 2014, 78:102-109.
64. Verbruggen F., Best M., Bowditch W.A., Stevens T., McLaren I.P.L. The inhibitory control reflex. Neuropsychologia 2014, 65:263-278. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.014.
65. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137(4):649-672.
66. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 2009, 35(5):1381-1388.
67. Verbruggen F., McLaren I.P.L., Chambers C.D. Banishing the control homunculi in studies of action control and behaviour change. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2014, 9(5):497-524.
68. Volkow N.D., Wang G.J., Fowler J.S., Telang F. Overlapping neuronal circuits in addiction and obesity: evidence of systems pathology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2008, 363(1507):3191-3200.
69. Volkow N.D., Wang G.J., Tomasi D., Baler R.D. Obesity and addiction: neurobiological overlaps. Obesity Reviews 2013, 14(1):2-18.
70. Weafer J., Fillmore M.T. Alcohol-related stimuli reduce inhibitory control of behavior in drinkers. Psychopharmacology 2012, 222(3):489-498.
71. Werthmann J., Field M., Roefs A., Nederkoorn C., Jansen A. Attentional bias for chocolate increases chocolate-consumption - an attention bias modification study. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2014, 45(1):136-143.
72. Wessel J.R., O'Doherty J.P., Berkebile M.M., Linderman D., Aron A.R. Stimulus devaluation induced by stopping action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2014, 143(6):2313-2329.
73. Wiers R.W., Eberl C., Rinck M., Becker E.S., Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological Science 2011, 22(4):490-497.
74. Wiers R.W., Gladwin T.E., Hofmann W., Salemink E., Ridderinkhof K.R. Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clinical Psychological Science 2013, 1(2):192-212. 10.1177/2167702612466547.
75. Woud M.L., Becker E.S., Rinck M. Implicit evaluation bias induced by approach and avoidance. Cognition and Emotion 2008, 22(6):1187-1197. 10.1080/02699930801906843.
76. Woud M.L., Maas J., Becker E.S., Rinck M. Make the manikin move: symbolic approach-avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2013, 25(6):738-744. 10.1080/20445911.2013.817413.