Changing value through cued approach: An automatic mechanism of behavior change

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 625-630

  Schonberg, Tom ^a   Bakkour, Akram ^a   Hover, Ashleigh M ^a   Mumford, Jeanette A ^a   Nagar, Lakshya ^a   Perez, Jacob ^a   Poldrack, Russell A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REWARD; TRAINING; VENTROMEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CUES; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FOOD; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84897080900     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: 15461726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nn.3673     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Samuelson, P.A. A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour. Economica New Ser. 5, 61-71 and addendum 353-354 (1938
2. Thorndike, E.L. Animal Intelligence: Experimental Studies (Macmillan, 1911
3. O'Doherty, J. et al. Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science 304, 452-454 (2004
4. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J. Bus. 59, S251-S278 (1986
5. Slovic, P. The construction of preference. Am. Psychol. 50, 364 (1995
6. De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B. & Dolan, R.J. Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science 313, 684-687 (2006
7. Fischhoff, B. Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? Am. Psychol. 46, 835-847 (1991
8. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. & Schkade, D.A. Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. J. Risk Uncertain. 19, 243-270 (1999
9. Brehm, J.W. Post-decision changes in the desirability of choice alternatives. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 52, 384-389 (1956
10. Sharot, T., De Martino, B. & Dolan, R.J. How choice reveals and shapes expected hedonic outcome. J. Neurosci. 29, 3760-3765 (2009
11. Izuma, K. et al. Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22014-22019 (2010
12. Zajonc, R.B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 9, 1-6 (1968
13. Zajonc, R.B. Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 10, 224-228 (2001
14. Cacioppo, J.T., Priester, J.R. & Berntson, G.G. Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65, 5-17 (1993
15. Fishbach, A. & Shah, J.Y. Self-control in action: Implicit dispositions toward goals and away from temptations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90, 820-832 (2006
16. Wiers, R.W., Eberl, C., Rinck, M., Becker, E.S. & Lindenmeyer, J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol. Sci. 22, 490-497 (2011
17. Krajbich, I. & Rangel, A. Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13852-13857 (2011
18. Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E. & Scheier, C. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 1317-1322 (2003
19. Armel, K.C., Beaumel, A. & Rangel, A. Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 3, 396-403 (2008
20. Lin, J.Y., Pype, A.D., Murray, S.O. & Boynton, G.M. Enhanced memory for scenes presented at behaviorally relevant points in time. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000337 (2010
21. Swallow, K.M. & Jiang, Y.V. The attentional boost effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task. Cognition 115, 118-132 (2010
22. Becker, G.M., Degroot, M.H. & Marschak, J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 9, 226-232 (1964
23. Plassmann, H., O'Doherty, J. & Rangel, A. Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. J. Neurosci. 27, 9984-9988 (2007
24. Sharot, T., Fleming, S.M., Yu, X., Koster, R. & Dolan, R.J. Is choice-induced preference change long lasting? Psychol. Sci. 23, 1123-1129 (2012
25. Logan, G.D. & Cowan, W.B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychol. Rev. 91, 295-327 (1984
26. Verbruggen, F. & Logan, G.D. Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 137, 649-672 (2008
27. Lenartowicz, A., Verbruggen, F., Logan, G.D. & Poldrack, R.A. Inhibition-related activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus in the absence of inhibitory cues. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 3388-3399 (2011
28. Yagi, Y., Ikoma, S. & Kikuchi, T. Attentional modulation of the mere exposure effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 35, 1403-1410 (2009
29. Huang, Y.F. & Hsieh, P.J. The mere exposure effect is modulated by selective attention but not visual awareness. Vision Res. 91, 56-61 (2013
30. Anderson, B.A., Laurent, P.A. & Yantis, S. Value-driven attentional capture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10367-10371 (2011
31. Lim, S.L., O'doherty, J.P. & Rangel, A. The decision value computations in the vmpfc and striatum use a relative value code that is guided by visual attention. J. Neurosci. 31, 13214-13223 (2011
32. Towal, R.B., Mormann, M. & Koch, C. Simultaneous modeling of visual saliency and value computation improves predictions of economic choice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E3858-E3867 (2013
33. Tom, S.M., Fox, C.R., Trepel, C. & Poldrack, R.A. The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science 315, 515-518 (2007
34. Chib, V.S., Rangel, A., Shimojo, S. & O'Doherty, J.P. Evidence for a common representation of decision values for dissimilar goods in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 29, 12315-12320 (2009
35. McNamee, D., Rangel, A. & O'Doherty, J.P. Category-dependent and category-independent goal-value codes in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 479-485 (2013
36. Kang, M.J., Rangel, A., Camus, M. & Camerer, C.F. Hypothetical and real choice differentially activate common valuation areas. J. Neurosci. 31, 461-468 (2011
37. Levy, I., Lazzaro, S.C., Rutledge, R.B. & Glimcher, P.W. Choice from non-choice: Predicting consumer preferences from blood oxygenation level-dependent signals obtained during passive viewing. J. Neurosci. 31, 118-125 (2011
38. Veling, H., Aarts, H. & Papies, E.K. Using stop signals to inhibit chronic dieters' responses toward palatable foods. Behav. Res. Ther. 49, 771-780 (2011
39. Veling, H., Aarts, H. & Stroebe, W. Using stop signals to reduce impulsive choices for palatable unhealthy foods. Br. J. Health Psychol. 18, 354-368 (2013
40. Thaler, R.H. & Sunstein, C.R. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, 2008
41. Marteau, T.M., Hollands, G.J. & Fletcher, P.C. Changing human behavior to prevent disease: The importance of targeting automatic processes. Science 337, 1492-1495 (2012
42. Shinners, P. PyGame-python game development http://www.pygame.org/ (2011
43. Brainard, D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433-436 (1997
44. Pelli, D.G.D. The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 10, 437-442 (1997
45. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., Pelli, D., Ingling, A. & Murray, R. What's new in Psychtoolbox-3. Perception 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement (2007
46. Patton, J.H., Stanford, M.S. & Barratt, E.S. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J. Clin. Psychol. 51, 768-774 (1995
47. de Boeck, P. & Wilson, M. Explanatory Item Response Models (Springer, 2004
48. Kenward, M.G. & Roger, J.H. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53, 983-997 (1997
49. Deichmann, R., Gottfried, J.A., Hutton, C. & Turner, R. Optimized EPI for fMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex. Neuroimage 19, 430-441 (2003
50. Moeller, S. et al. Multiband multislice GE-EPI at 7 tesla, with 16-fold acceleration using partial parallel imaging with application to high spatial and temporal whole-brain fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 63, 1144-1153 (2010
51. Smith, S.M. et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23 (suppl. 1), S208-S219 (2004
52. Ségonne, F. et al. A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. Neuroimage 22, 1060-1075 (2004
53. Dale, A.M., Fischl, B. & Sereno, M.I. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9, 179-194 (1999
54. Greve, D.N. & Fischl, B. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage 48, 63-72 (2009
55. Power, J.D., Barnes, K.A., Snyder, A.Z., Schlaggar, B.L. & Petersen, S.E. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59, 2142-2154 (2012
56. Siegel, J.S. et al. Statistical improvements in functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses produced by censoring high-motion data points. Hum. Brain Mapp. doi:10.1002/hbm.22307 (17 July 2013