Local control mechanisms of implicit and explicit conflicts

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 153-160

  Zhao, Liang ^a,b   Bai, Yang ^a,b   Ma, Jie ^a   Wang, Yonghui ^a,b  

^a SHAANXI NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Behavior and Cognitive Neuroscience   (China)

Author keywords

Congruency sequence effects; Explicit simon conflict; Implicit SNARC conflict

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; CONFLICT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84941205557     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: 21905142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000281     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akçay, Ç., & Hazeltine, E. (2007). Feature-overlap and conflict monitoring: Two sources of sequential modulation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 742-748.
2. Akçay, Ç., & Hazeltine, E. (2008). Conflict adaptation depends on task structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 958-973.
3. Akçay, Ç., & Hazeltine, E. (2011). Domain-specific conflict adaptation without feature repetitions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 505-551.
4. Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365-377.
5. Bae, G. Y., Choi, J. M., Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2009). Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1506-1521.
6. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
7. Braem, S., Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2011). Conflict adaptation by means of associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1662-1666.
8. Brown, J. W., Reynolds, J. R., & Braver, T. S. (2007). A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 37-85.
9. Cohen Kadosh, R., & Henik, A. (2007). Can synaesthesia research inform cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 177-184.
10. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
11. Dehaene, S., Changeux, J. P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204-211.
12. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec'H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597-600.
13. Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 380-390.
14. Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 374-380.
15. Egner, T., Delano, M., & Hirsch, J. (2007). Separate conflictspecific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. Neuroimage, 35, 940-948.
16. Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of taskrelevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784-1790.
17. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
18. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Knight, M. (2008). Cognitive control: Dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 340-355.
19. Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555-556.
20. Fischer, R., Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2008). Contextsensitive adjustments of cognitive control: Conflictadaptation effects are modulated by processing demands of the ongoing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 712-718.
21. Freitas, A. L., Bahar, M., Yang, S., & Banai, R. (2007). Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks. Psychological Science, 18, 1040-1043.
22. Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010a). Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 147-161.
23. Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010b). Sustained versus transient cognitive control: Evidence of a behavioral dissociation. Cognition, 114, 338-347.
24. Gevers, W., & Lammertyn, J. (2005). The hunt for SNARC. Psychology Science, 47, 10-21.
25. Gevers, W., Lammertyn, J., Notebaert, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006). Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Acta Psychologica, 122, 221-233.
26. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.
27. Hazeltine, E., Lightman, E., Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2011). The boundaries of sequential modulation: Evidence for set-level control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1898-1914.
28. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A featureintegration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17.
29. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W. III, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023-1026.
30. Keus, I. M., & Schwarz, W. (2005). Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response relatedorigin. Memory & Cognition, 33, 681-695.
31. Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34, 356-367.
32. Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2003). The SNARC effect: An instance of the Simon effect? Cognition, 88, B1-B10.
33. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450-452.
34. Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verbruggen, F., & Liefooghe, B. (2006). Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 112-117.
35. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2006). Stimulus conflict predicts conflict adaptation in a numerical flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1078-1084.
36. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition, 106, 1071-1080.
37. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2011). Conflict and error adaptation in the Simon task. Acta Psychologica, 136, 212-216.
38. Pfister, R., Schroeder, P. A., & Kunde, W. (2013). SNARC struggles: Instant control over spatial-numerical associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1953-1958.
39. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1345-1363.
40. Treccani, B., Milanese, N., & Umiltà, C. (2010). Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: Between-task logical recording. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1239-1254.
41. Umiltà, C., Priftis, K., & Zorzi, M. (2009). The spatial representation of numbers: Evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect. Experimental Brain Research, 192, 561-569.
42. Verbruggen, F., Notebaert, W., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2006). Stimulus- and response-conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 328-333.
43. Wühr, P. (2005). Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 282-288.