Extracting phylogenetic signal and accounting for bias in whole-genome data sets supports the Ctenophora as sister to remaining Metazoa

BMC Genomics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Borowiec, Marek L ^a   Lee, Ernest K ^b   Chiu, Joanna C ^a   Plachetzki, David C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ctenophora; Locus selection; Long branch attraction; Metazoa; Phylogenetic conflict; Phylogenomics

Indexed keywords

CNIDARIA; CTENOPHORA; GENOME; LONG BRANCH ATTRACTION; NERVE CELL; PLACOZOA; SISTER GROUP; STATISTICAL BIAS; WORKFLOW; ANIMAL; DATA MINING; GENE LOCUS; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CTENOPHORA; DATA MINING; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC LOCI; GENOMICS; HUMANS; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84947939166     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-2146-4     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Moroz LL, Kocot KM, Citarella MR, Dosung S, Norekian TP, Povolotskaya IS, et al. The ctenophore genome and the evolutionary origins of neural systems. Nature. 2014;510:109-14.
2. Bosch TC. Cnidarian-microbe interactions and the origin of innate immunity in metazoans. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2013;67:499-518. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155626.
3. Arendt D. The evolution of cell types in animals: emerging principles from molecular studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:868-82. doi: 10.1038/nrg2416.
4. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, Smith SA, et al. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature. 2008;452:745-9.
5. Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW, Edgecombe GD, et al. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc Royal Soc B. 2015;276:4261-70.
6. Philippe H, Derelle R, Lopez P, Pick K, Borchiellini C, Boury-Esnault N, et al. Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr Biol. 2009;19:706-12.
7. Pick KS, Philippe H, Schreiber F, Erpenbeck D, Jackson DJ, Wrede P, et al. Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects nonbilaterian relationships. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:1983-7.
8. Nosenko T, Schreiber F, Adamska F, Adamski M, Eitel M, Hammel J, et al. Deep metazoan phylogeny: When different genes tell different stories. Mol Phyl Evol. 2013;67:223-33.
9. Halanych KM, Whelan NV, Kocot KM, Moroz LL. Error, signal, and the placement of Ctenophora sister to all other animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112:5773-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503453112.
10. Ryan JF, Pang K, Schnitzler CE, Nguyen A-D, Moreland RT, Simmons DK, et al. NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, et al. The genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolution. Science. 2013;342:1242592.
11. Ryan JF. Did the ctenophore nervous system evolve independently? Zoology. 2013;117:225-6.
12. Dunn CW, Giribet G, Edgecombe GD, Hejnol A. Animal phylogeny and its evolutionary implications. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2014;45:371-95.
13. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Lavrov DV, Littlewood DTJ, Manuel M, Worheide G, et al. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1000602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000602.
14. Lemmon AR, Brown JM, Stanger-Hall K, Lemmon EM. The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. Syst Biol. 2009;58:130-45.
15. Roure B, Baurain D, Philippe H. Impact of missing data on phylogenies inferred from empirical phylogenomic data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:197-214.
16. Srivastava M, Simakov O, Chapman J, Fahey B, Gauthier MEA, Mitros T, et al. 2010. The Amphimedon queenslandica genome and the evolution of animal complexity. Nature. 1938;466:720-6.
17. Chiu JC, Lee EK, Egan MG, Sarkar IN, Coruzzi GM, DeSalle R. OrthologID: automation of genome-scale ortholog identification within a parsimony framework. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:699-707.
18. Lartillot N, Philippe H. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol. 2004;21:1095-109.
19. Ghedin E, Wang S, Spiro D, Caler E, Zhao Q, Crabtree J, et al. Draft genome of the filarial nematode parasite Brugia malayi. Science. 2007;317:1756-60. doi: 10.1126/science.1145406.
20. C. elegans Sequencing Consortium Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science 1998;282:2012-2018
21. Grbic M, Van Leeuwen T, Clark RM, Rombauts S, Rouze P, Grbic V, et al. The genome of Tetranychus urticae reveals herbivorous pest adaptations. Nature. 2011;479:487-92. doi: 10.1038/nature10640.
22. Denoeud F, Henriet S, Mungpakdee S, Aury JM, Da Silva C, Brinkmann H, et al. Plasticity of animal genome architecture unmasked by rapid evolution of a pelagic tunicate. Science. 2010;330:1381-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1194167.
23. Kass R. Raftery Bayes Factors. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995;90:773-95.
24. Xie W, Lewis PO, Fan Y, Kuo L, Chen MH. Improving marginal likelihood estimation for Bayesian phylogenetic model selection. Syst Biol. 2011;60:150-60.
25. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17:368-76.
26. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312-3.
27. Dayhoff MO, Schwartz RM, Orcutt BC. A model ofevolutionary change in proteins. In: Dayhoff MO, editor. Atlas of protein sequence and structure, 3. Washington,DC: National Biomedical Research Foundation; 1978. p. 345-52.
28. Le SQ, Gascuel O. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1307-20.
29. Philippe H, Lartillot N, Brinkmann H. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:1246-53.
30. Zeng L, Swalla BJ. Molecular phylogeny of the protochordates: chordate evolution. Can J Zool. 2005;83:24-33.
31. Sharma PP, Kaluziak ST, Perez-Porro AR, Gonzalez VL, Hormiga G, Wheeler WC, et al. Phylogenomic interrogation of Arachnida reveals systemic conflicts in phylogenetic signal. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31:2963-84.
32. Salichos L, Rokas A. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature. 2013;497:327-31.
33. Misof B, Meyer B, von Reumont BM, Kück P, Misof K, Meusemann K. Selecting informative subsets of sparse supermatrices increases the chance to find correct trees. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:348. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-348.
34. Philippe H, Forterre P. The rooting of the universal tree of life is not reliable. J Mol Evol. 1999;49:509-23.
35. Struck TH. TreSpEx-detection of misleading signal in phylogenetic reconstructions based on tree information. Evol Bioinf. 2014;10:51-67.
36. Baurain D, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2007. Lack of resolution in the animal phylogeny: closely spaced cladogeneses or undetected systematic errors. Mol Biol Evol. 1995;24:6-9.
37. Caravas J, Friedrich M. Of mites and millipedes: recent progress in resolving the base of the arthropod tree. Bioessays. 2010;32:488-95. doi: 10.1002/bies.201000005.
38. Rota-Stabelli O, Campbell L, Brinkmann H, Edgecombe GD, Longhorn SJ, Peterson KJ, et al. A congruent solution to arthropod phylogeny: phylogenomics, microRNAs and morphology support monophyletic Mandibulata. Proc Royal Soc B. 2011;278(1703):298-306.
39. Snodgrass RE. Evolution of the annelida, onychophora and arthropoda, The Smithsonian Institution. 1938.
40. Nesnidal MP, Helmkampf M, Bruchhaus I, Hausdorf B. Compositional heterogeneity and phylogenomic inference of metazoan relationships. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:2095-104.
41. Foster PG. Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst Biol. 2004;53:485-95.
42. Blanquart S, Lartillot N. A site- and time-heterogeneous model of amino acid replacement. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:842-58.
43. Boussau B, Walton Z, Delgado JA, Collantes F, Beani L, Stewart IJ, et al. Strepsiptera, phylogenomics and the long branch attraction problem. PLoS One. 2014;9:e107709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107709.
44. Bergsten J. A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics. 2005;21:163-93.
45. Lartillot N, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-S1-S4.
46. Phillips MJ, Delsuc F, Penny D. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol Biol Evol. 2004;21:1455-8.
47. Ryan JF, Pang K, Comparative Sequencing Program NISC, Mulkin JC, Martindale MQ, Baxevanis AD. The homeodomain complement of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi suggests that Ctenophora and Porifera diverged prior to the ParaHoxozoa. EvoDevo. 2010;1:9. doi: 10.1186/2041-9139-1-9.
48. Ax P. Das System der Metazoa, Band I. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer; 1995.
49. Schierwater B, Eitel M, Jakob W, Osigus H-J, Hadrys H, Dellaporta SL, et al. Concatenated analysis sheds light on early metazoan evolution and fuels a modern ;Urmetazoon; hypothesis. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000020.
50. Hyman L. The invertebrates. I. Protozoa through Coelenterata. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1940.
51. Rokas A, Carroll SB. More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:1337-44.
52. The Global Invertebrate Genomics Alliance (GIGA). developing community resources to study diverse invertebrate genomes. J Hered. 2014;105:1-18.
53. Whelan N. V., Kocot K. M. & Halanych K. M. Employing phylogenomics to resolve the relationships among cnidarians, ctenophores, sponges, placozoans, and bilaterians. Integr Comp Biol. 2015;icv037. doi: 10.1093/icb/icv037
54. Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1575-84.
55. Van Dongen S. Graph clustering via a discrete uncoupling process. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl. 2008;30:121-41.
56. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792-7.
57. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. TrimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1972-3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348.
58. Conesa A, Gotz S. Blast2GO: A comprehensive suite for functional analysis in plant genomics. Int J Plant Genomics. 2008;2008:619832. doi: 10.1155/2008/619832.
59. Du Z, Zhou X, Ling Y, Zhang Z, Su Z. agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W64-70. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq310.
60. Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of Gene Ontology terms; PLoS ONE 2011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021800
61. Smith SA, Dunn CW. Phyutility: a phyloinformatics tool for trees, alignments, and molecular data. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:715-6.
62. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. v2.75 [WWW document] URL http://mesquiteproject.org/ [accessed on 1 January 2013]
63. Charif D, Lobry JR. SeqinR 1.0-2: a contributed package to the R project for statistical computing devoted to biological sequences retrieval and analysis in Structural approaches to sequence evolution: Molecules, networks, populations (U. Bastolla, M. Porto, H.E. Roman and M. Vendruscolo Eds.) Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering; 2007. pp 207-232.
64. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:289-90.
65. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Kainer D, Mayer C, Stamatakis A. Selecting optimal partitioning schemes for phylogenomic datasets. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-82.
66. Lartillot N, Rodrigue N, Stubbs D, Richer J. PhyloBayes MPI: phylogenetic reconstruction with infinite mixtures of profiles in a parallel environment. Syst Biol. 2013;62:611-5.
67. Lartillot N, Lepage T, Blanquart S. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2286-8.
68. Curtis SM. Mcmcplots: create plots from MCMC output. R package version 0.4.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mcmcplots.
69. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61:539-42.