Bayesian neural adjustment of inhibitory control predicts emergence of problem stimulant use

Brain

Volumn 138, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 3413-3426

  Harlé, Katia M ^a   Stewart, Jennifer L ^b   Zhang, Shunan ^c   Tapert, Susan F ^a,d   Yu, Angela J ^c   Paulus, Martin P ^a,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^e LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

addiction; Bayesian model; inhibitory control; stimulant

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; CENTRAL STIMULANT AGENT;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ANTERIOR INSULA; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BEHAVIOR; CAUDATE NUCLEUS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE POTENTIAL; NEUROBIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYMPTOM; TASK PERFORMANCE; THALAMUS; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; AMPHETAMINE DEPENDENCE; BRAIN; BRAIN CORTEX; CANNABIS SMOKING; CINGULATE GYRUS; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; COHORT ANALYSIS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LONGITUDINAL STUDY; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMPHETAMINE-RELATED DISORDERS; BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN; CAUDATE NUCLEUS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; GYRUS CINGULI; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MARIJUANA SMOKING; NEURAL INHIBITION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; THALAMUS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84947790937     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv246     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. APA. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
2. Aarts E, Roelofs A. Attentional control in anterior cingulate cortex based on probabilistic cueing. J Cogn Neurosci 2011; 23: 716-27.
3. Aron AR. From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 69: e55-e68.
4. Aron JL, Paulus MP. Location, location: using functional magnetic resonance imaging to pinpoint brain differences relevant to stimulant use. Addiction 2007; 102(s1): 33-43.
5. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Memory Lang 2008; 59: 390-412.
6. Ball TM, Stein MB, Ramsawh HJ, Campbell-Sills L, Paulus MP. Single-subject anxiety treatment outcome prediction using functional neuroimaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014; 39: 1254-61.
7. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4: 561-71.
8. Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Walton ME, Rushworth MFS. Learning the value of information in an uncertain world. Nat Neurosci 2007; 10: 1214-21.
9. Bolla K, Ernst M, Kiehl K, Mouratidis M, Eldreth D, Contoreggi C, et al. Prefrontal cortical dysfunction in abstinent cocaine abusers. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2004; 16: 456-64.
10. Bossaerts P. Risk and risk prediction error signals in anterior insula. Brain Struct Funct 2010; 214: 645-53.
11. Braver TS. The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends Cogn Sci 2012; 16: 106-13.
12. Braver TS, Paxton JL, Locke HS, Barch DM. Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 7351-6.
13. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn 2001; 45: 5-32.
14. Büchel C, Holmes A, Rees G, Friston K. Characterizing stimulus-response functions using nonlinear regressors in parametric fMRI experiments. Neuroimage 1998; 8: 140-8.
15. Bucholz KK, Cadoret R, Cloninger CR, Dinwiddie SH, Hesselbrock VM, Nurnberger JI, et al. A new, semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies: a report on the reliability of the SSAGA. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 1994; 55: 149.
16. Bureau A, Dupuis J, Falls K, Lunetta KL, Hayward B, Keith TP, et al. Identifying SNPs predictive of phenotype using random forests. Genet Epidemiol 2005; 28: 171-82.
17. Cantoni E, Ronchetti E. A robust approach for skewed and heavytailed outcomes in the analysis of health care expenditures. J Health Econ 2006; 25: 198-213.
18. Colzato LS, Van Den Wildenberg WPM, Hommel B. Impaired inhibitory control in recreational cocaine users. PLoS One 2007; 2: e1143.
19. d'Acremont M, Lu ZL, Li X, Van der Linden M, Bechara A. Neural correlates of risk prediction error during reinforcement learning in humans. Neuroimage 2009; 47: 1929-39.
20. Delgado MR, Li J, Schiller D, Phelps EA. The role of the striatum in aversive learning and aversive prediction errors. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2008; 363: 3787-800.
21. Elkashef A, Vocci F. Biological markers of cocaine addiction: implications for medications development. Addict Biol 2003; 8: 123-39.
22. Genuer R, Poggi J-M, Tuleau-Malot C. Variable selection using random forests. Pattern Recogn Lett 2010; 31: 2225-36.
23. Harlé KM, Shenoy P, Stewart JL, Tapert SF, Angela JY, Paulus MP. Altered neural processing of the need to stop in young adults at risk for stimulant dependence. J Neurosci 2014; 34: 4567-80.
24. Herman-Stahl MA, Krebs CP, Kroutil LA, Heller DC. Risk and protective factors for nonmedical use of prescription stimulants and methamphetamine among adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2006; 39: 374-80.
25. Hester R, Garavan H. Executive dysfunction in cocaine addiction: evidence for discordant frontal, cingulate, and cerebellar activity. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 11017-22.
26. Hester R, Simoes-Franklin C, Garavan H. Post-error behavior in active cocaine users: poor awareness of errors in the presence of intact performance adjustments. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007; 32: 1974-84.
27. Ide JS, Shenoy P, Yu AJ, Li CS. Bayesian prediction and evaluation in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Neurosci 2013; 33: 2039-47.
28. Jaeger TF. Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. J Memory Lang 2008; 59: 434-46.
29. Kaufman JN, Ross TJ, Stein EA, Garavan H. Cingulate hypoactivity in cocaine users during a GO-NOGO task as revealed by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 7839-43.
30. Kennerley SW, Behrens TEJ, Wallis JD. Double dissociation of value computations in orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate neurons. Nat Neurosci 2011; 14: 1581-9.
31. Kim H, Shimojo S, O'Doherty JP. Is avoiding an aversive outcome rewarding? Neural substrates of avoidance learning in the human brain. PLoS Biol 2006; 4: e233.
32. Kim YT, Lee SW, Kwon DH, Seo JH, Ahn BC, Lee J. Dose-dependent frontal hypometabolism on FDG-PET in methamphetamine abusers. J Psychiatric Res 2009; 43: 1166-70.
33. Li CR, Huang C, Yan P, Bhagwagar Z, Milivojevic V, Sinha R. Neural correlates of impulse control during stop signal inhibition in cocainedependent men. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007; 33: 1798-806.
34. London ED, Simon SL, Berman SM, Mandelkern MA, Lichtman AM, Bramen J, et al. Mood disturbances and regional cerebral metabolic abnormalities in recently abstinent methamphetamine abusers. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61: 73.
35. Matthews SC, Simmons AN, Arce E, Paulus MP. Dissociation of inhibition from error processing using a parametric inhibitory task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroreport 2005; 16: 755-60.
36. Menon M, Jensen J, Vitcu I, Graff-Guerrero A, Crawley A, Smith MA, et al. Temporal difference modeling of the blood-oxygen level dependent response during aversive conditioning in humans: effects of dopaminergic modulation. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 62: 765-72.
37. Monterosso JR, Aron AR, Cordova X, Xu J, London ED. Deficits in response inhibition associated with chronic methamphetamine abuse. Drug Alcohol Depend 2005; 79: 273-7.
38. Murray G, Corlett P, Clark L, Pessiglione M, Blackwell A, Honey G, et al. Substantia nigra/ventral tegmental reward prediction error disruption in psychosis. Mol Psychiatry 2007; 13: 267-76.
39. Nestor LJ, Ghahremani DG, Monterosso J, London ED. Prefrontal hypoactivation during cognitive control in early abstinent methamphetamine-dependent subjects. Psychiatry Res Neuroimag 2011; 194: 287-95.
40. Patton JH, Stanford MS. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol 1995; 51: 768-74.
41. Ploghaus A, Tracey I, Clare S, Gati JS, Rawlins JNP, Matthews PM. Learning about pain: The neural substrate of the prediction error for aversive events. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2000; 97: 9281-6.
42. Preuschoff K, Quartz SR, Bossaerts P. Human insula activation reflects risk prediction errors as well as risk. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 2745-52.
43. Qi Y, Bar-Joseph Z, Klein-Seetharaman J. Evaluation of different biological data and computational classification methods for use in protein interaction prediction. Proteins 2006; 63: 490-500.
44. Redish AD. Addiction as a computational process gone awry. Science 2004; 306: 1944-7.
45. Reske M, Delis DC, Paulus MP. Evidence for subtle verbal fluency deficits in occasional stimulant users: quick to play loose with verbal rules. J Psychiatr Res 2011; 45: 361-8.
46. Rushworth MF, Behrens TE. Choice, uncertainty and value in prefrontal and cingulate cortex. Nat Neurosci 2008; 11: 389-97.
47. Salo R, Nordahl TE, Possin K, Leamon M, Gibson DR, Galloway GP, et al. Preliminary evidence of reduced cognitive inhibition in methamphetamine-dependent individuals. Psychiatry Res 2002; 111: 65-74.
48. Shenoy P, Rao RPN, Yu A. A rational decision making framework for inhibitory control. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2011; 24.
49. Shenoy P, Yu AJ. Rational decision-making in inhibitory control. Front Hum Neurosci 2011; 5: 48.
50. Singer T, Critchley HD, Preuschoff K. A common role of insula in feelings, empathy and uncertainty. Trends Cogn Sci 2009; 13: 334-40.
51. Somerville LH, Heatherton TF, Kelley WM. Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection. Nat Neurosci 2006; 9: 1007-8.
52. Stewart JL, Flagan TM, May AC, Reske M, Simmons AN, Paulus MP. Young adults at risk for stimulant dependence show reward dysfunction during reinforcement-based decision making. Biol Psychiatry 2013; 73: 235-41.
53. Strobl C, Malley J, Tutz G. An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychol Methods 2009; 14: 323.
54. Tabibnia G, Monterosso JR, Baicy K, Aron AR, Poldrack RA, Chakrapani S, et al. Different forms of self-control share a neurocognitive substrate. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 4805-10.
55. Tapert SF, Granholm E, Leedy NG, Brown SA. Substance use and withdrawal: neuropsychological functioning over 8 years in youth. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002; 8: 873-83.
56. Verdejo-Garcia AJ, Lopez-Torrecillas F, Aguilar de Arcos F, Perez-Garcia M. Differential effects of MDMA, cocaine, and cannabis use severity on distinctive components of the executive functions in polysubstance users: a multiple regression analysis. Addict Behav 2005; 30: 89-101.
57. Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ. Imaging studies on the role of dopamine in cocaine reinforcement and addiction in humans. J Psychopharmacol 1999; 13: 337-45.
58. Yu A, Cohen J. Sequential effects: superstition or rational behavior. Adv Neural Inf Proc Syst 2009; 21: 1873-80.
59. Yücel M, Lubman DI, Solowij N, Brewer WJ. Understanding drug addiction: a neuropsychological perspective. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2007; 41: 957-68.
60. Zuckerman M, Link K. Construct validity for the sensation-seeking scale. J Consult Clin Psychol 1968; 32: 420.