Addiction as a computational process gone awry

Science

Volumn 306, Issue 5703, 2004, Pages 1944-1947

  Redish, A David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; COMPUTATIONAL PROCESSES; DOPAMINE; TEMPORAL-DIFFERENCE REINFORCEMENT LEARNING (TDRL);

DRUG DOSAGE;

DOPAMINE;

LEARNING;

ARTICLE; DOPAMINE RELEASE; DRUG ABUSE PATTERN; LEARNING; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; REWARD; SIGNAL DETECTION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CUES; DOPAMINE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEURONS; PROBABILITY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REWARD;

EID: 10344225664     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1102384     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, J. G. Langrod Eds., Substance Abuse: A Comprehensive Textbook (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, ed. 3, 1997).
2. M. E. Wolf, S. Mangiavacchi, X. Sun, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1003, 241 (2003).
3. B. J. Everitt, A. Dickinson, T. W. Robbins, Brain Res. Rev. 36, 129 (2001).
4. P. R. Montague, P. Dayan, T. J. Sejnowski, J. Neurosci. 16, 1936 (1996).
5. W. Schultz, P. Dayan, P. R. Montague, Science 275, 1593 (1997).
6. R. S. Sutton, A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998).
7. N. D. Daw, thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2003).
8. M. C. Ritz, R. J. Lamb, S. R. Goldberg, M. J. Kuhar, Science 237, 1219 (1987).
9. M. R. Picciotto, Drug Alcohol Depend. 51, 165 (1998).
10. V. I. Pidoplichko, M. DeBiasi, J. T. Williams, J. A. Dani, Nature 390, 401 (1997).
11. S. R. Laviolette, R. A. Gallegos, S. J. Henriksen, D. van der Kooy, Nature Neurosci. 7, 160 (2004).
12. J. E. Mazur, Psychol. Rev. 108, 96 (2001).
13. G. Ainslie, Picoeconomics (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1992).
14. See materials and methods on Science Online.
15. S. M. McClure, N. D. Daw, P. R. Montague, Trends Neurosci. 26, 423 (2003).
16. W. Schultz, J. Neurophysiol. 80, 1 (1998).
17. P. Waelti, A. Dickinson, W. Schultz, Nature 412, 43 (2001).
18. S. C. Tanaka et al., Nature Neurosci. 7, 887 (2004).
19. G. Di Chiara, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 375, 13 (1999).
20. G. F. Koob, M. L. Moal, Neuropsychopharmacology 24, 97 (2001).
21. L. J. M. J. Vanderschuren, B. J. Everitt, Science 305, 1017 (2004).
22. T. E. Robinson, K. C. Berridge, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54, 25 (2003).
23. M. E. Carroll, S. T. Lac, S. L. Nygaard, Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 97, 23 (1989).
24. M. A. Nader, W. L. Woolverton, Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 105, 169 (1991).
25. S. T. Higgins, S. H. Heil, J. P. Lussier, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 431 (2004).
26. M. E. Carroll, Drug Alcohol Depend. 33, 201 (1993).
27. M. Grossman, F. J. Chaloupka, J. Health Econ. 17, 427 (1998).
28. W. K. Bickel, L. A. Marsch, Addiction 96, 73 (2001).
29. R. A. Rescorla, A. R. Wagner, in Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory, A. H. Black, W. F. Prokesy, Eds. (Appleton Century Crofts, New York, 1972), pp. 64-99.
30. A. Dickinson, Contemporary Animal Learning Theory (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1980).
31. P. E. M. Phillips, G. D. Stuber, M. L. A. V. Heien, R. M. Wightman, R. M. Carelli, Nature 422, 614 (2003).
32. G. S. Becker, K. M. Murphy, J. Polit. Econ. 96, 675 (1988).
33. M. Woodward, H. Tunstall-Pedoe, Addiction 88, 821 (1993).
34. C. W. Bradberry, Neuroscientist 8, 315 (2002).
35. S. R. Letchworth, M. A. Nader, H. R. Smith, D. P. Friedman, L. J. Porrino, J. Neurosci. 21, 2799 (2001).
36. F. J. White, P. W. Kalivas, Drug Alcohol Depend. 51, 141 (1998).
37. N. Volkow, J. Fowler, G.-J. Wang, Behav. Pharmacol. 13, 355 (2002).
38. V. Deroche-Gamonet, D. Belin, P. V. Piazza, Science 305, 1014 (2004).
39. R. E. Suri, W. Schultz, Neuroscience 91, 871 (1999).
40. M. E. Bouton, Biol. Psychiatry 52, 976 (2002).
41. This work was supported by an Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship. I thank M. Thomas, E. Larson, M. Carroll, D. Hatsukami, J. Jackson, A. Johnson, N. Schmitzer-Torbert, and Z. Kurth-Nelson for comments on the manuscript and helpful discussions.