Aphasia and age of acquisition: are early-learned words more resilient?

Aphasiology

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 1240-1263

  Brysbaert, Marc ^a   Ellis, Andrew W ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

age of acquisition; Aphasia; word frequency; word production; word retrieval

Indexed keywords

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; AMNESIA; APHASIA; ARTICLE; ATROPHY; BOSTON NAMING TEST; BRAIN DAMAGE; COGNITION ASSESSMENT; COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; DEMENTIA; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LEARNING DISORDER; MEMORY TEST; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; SELF CONCEPT; SEMANTIC MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84947752908     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: 14645041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1106439     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. J.S.Adelman, S.J.Marquis, M.G.Sabatos-DeVito, & Z.Estes, (2013). The unexplained nature of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1037–1053. doi:10.1037/a0031829
2. F.X.Alario, L.Ferrand, M.Laganaro, B.New, U.H.Frauenfelder, & J.Segui, (2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 140–155. doi:10.3758/BF03195559
3. B.Álvarez, & F.Cuetos, (2007). Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 328 words in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 377–383. doi:10.3758/BF03193006
4. R.H.Baayen, (2013). Multivariate statistics. In R.Podesva & D.Sharma (Eds.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 337–372). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
5. R.H.Baayen, L.B.Feldman, & R.Schreuder, (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 290–313. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.008
6. R.Bastiaanse, M.Wieling, & N.Wolthuis, (in press). The role of frequency in the retrieval of nouns and verbs in aphasia. Aphasiology.
7. P.J.Bauer, & M.Larkina, (2013). Childhood amnesia in the making:Different distributions of autobiographical memories in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 143, 597–611. doi:10.1037/a0033307
8. E.Belke, M.Brysbaert, A.S.Meyer, & M.Ghyselinck, (2005). Age of acquisition effects in picture naming:Evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis. Cognition, 96, B45–B54. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.006
9. B.D.Bell, K.G.Davies, B.P.Hermann, & G.Walters, (2000). Confrontation naming after anterior temporal lobectomy is related to age of acquisition of the object names. Neuropsychologia, 38, 83–92. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00047-0
10. M.Brysbaert, & M.J.Cortese, (2011). Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms? TheQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 545–559. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.503374
11. M.Brysbaert, & M.Ghyselinck, (2006). The effect of age of acquisition:Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent. Visual Cognition, 13, 992–1011. doi:10.1080/13506280544000165
12. M.Brysbaert, & B.New, (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis:A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
13. M.Brysbaert, B.New, & E.Keuleers, (2012). Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 991–997. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0190-4
14. M.Brysbaert, I.Van Wijnendaele, & S.De Deyne, (2000). Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychologica, 104, 215–226. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00021-4
15. J.C.Catling, K.Dent, & S.Williamson, (2008). Age of acquisition, not word frequency affects object recognition:Evidence from the effects of visual degradation. Acta Psychologica, 129, 130–137. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.05.005
16. J.C.Catling, & R.A.Johnston, (2005). Age of acquisition effects on word generation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 161–177. doi:10.1080/09541440440000078
17. J.C.Catling, & R.A.Johnston, (2006). Age of acquisition effects on an object-name verification task. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 1–18. doi:10.1348/000712605X53515
18. J.C.Catling, & R.A.Johnston, (2009). The varying effects of age of acquisition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 50–62. doi:10.1080/17470210701814352
19. M.Chalard, P.Bonin, A.Méot, B.Boyer, & M.Fayol, (2003). Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French:Relationships with psycholinguistic variables, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997), and naming latencies. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 209–245. doi:10.1080/09541440244000076
20. M.J.Cortese, M.M.Khanna, & S.D.Hacker, (2010). Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words. Memory, 18, 595–609. doi:10.1080/09658211.2010.493892
21. M.J.Cortese, D.P.McCarty, & J.Schock, (2015). A mega recognition memory study of 2897 disyllabic words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1489–1501. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.945096
22. F.Cuetos, G.Aguado, C.Izura, & A.W.Ellis, (2002). Aphasic naming in Spanish:Predictors and errors. Brain and Language, 82, 344–365. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00038-X
23. F.Cuetos, N.Arce, C.Martínez, & A.W.Ellis, (in press). Visual word recognition in Alzheimer’s disease:Effects of semantic degeneration. Journal of Neuropsychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/jnp.12077
24. F.Cuetos, E.Herrera, & A.W.Ellis, (2010). Impaired word recognition in Alzheimer’s disease:The role of age of acquisition. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3329–3334. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.017
25. F.Cuetos, J.Rodríguez-Ferreiro, K.Sage, & A.W.Ellis, (2012). A fresh look at the predictors of naming accuracy and errors in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Neuropsychology, 6, 242–256. doi:10.1111/jnp.2012.6.issue-2
26. S.De Deyne, & G.Storms, (2007). Age-of-acquisition differences in young and older adults affect latencies in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Acta Psychologica, 124, 274–295. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.007
27. G.I.de Zubicaray, M.Miozzo, K.Johnson, N.O.Schiller, & K.L.McMahon, (2012). Independent distractor frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in picture–word interference:FMRI evidence for post-lexical and lexical accounts according to distractor type. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 482–495. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00141
28. K.Dent, J.C.Catling, & R.A.Johnston, (2007). Age of acquisition affects object recognition:Evidence from visual duration thresholds. Acta Psychologica, 125, 301–318. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.08.004
29. K.Dent, R.A.Johnston, & G.W.Humphreys, (2008). Age of acquisition and word frequency effects in picture naming:A dual-task investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 282–301.
30. S.A.Dewhurst, G.J.Hitch, & C.Barry, (1998). Separate effects of word frequency and age of acquisition in recognition and recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 284–298.
31. M.Dimitropoulou, J.A.Duñabeitia, A.Avilés, J.Corral, & M.Carreiras, (2010). Subtitle-based word frequencies as the best estimate of reading behavior:The case of Greek. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 218. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00218
32. A.W.Ellis, (2006). Word finding in the damaged brain:Probing Marshall’s caveat. Cortex, 42, 817–822. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70423-4
33. A.W.Ellis, (2012). The acquisition, retention, and loss of vocabulary in aphasia, dementia, and other neuropsychological conditions. In M.Faust (Ed.), The handbook of the neuropsychology of language (pp. 637–660). Oxford:Blackwell Publishing.
34. A.W.Ellis, C.Burani, C.Izura, A.Bromiley, & A.Venneri, (2006). Traces of vocabulary acquisition in the brain:Evidence from covert object naming. Neuroimage, 33, 958–968. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.040
35. A.W.Ellis, & M.A.Lambon Ralph, (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems:Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1103–1123.
36. A.W.Ellis, C.Lum, & M.A.L.Ralph, (1996). On the use of regression techniques for the analysis of single case aphasic data. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 9, 165–174. doi:10.1016/0911-6044(96)00008-5
37. A.W.Ellis, & J.Monaghan, (2002). Reply to Strain, Patterson, and Seidenberg (2002). Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 215–220.
38. A.W.Ellis, & C.M.Morrison, (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 515–523.
39. M.Ernestus, & A.Cutler, (2015). BALDEY:A database of auditory lexical decisions. TheQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1469–1488. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.984730
40. P.Feyereisen, V.D.Van der Borght, & X.Seron, (1988). The operativity effect in naming:A reanalysis. Neuropsychologia, 26, 401–415. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(88)90094-2
41. C.J.Fiebach, A.D.Friederici, K.Müller, D.Y.von Cramon, & A.E.Hernandez, (2003). Distinct brain representations for early and late learned words. NeuroImage, 19, 1627–1637. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00227-1
42. K.E.Forbes-McKay, A.W.Ellis, M.F.Shanks, & A.Venneri, (2005). The age of acquisition of words produced in a semantic fluency task can reliably differentiate normal from pathological age related cognitive decline. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1625–1632. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.008
43. J.C.Goodman, P.S.Dale, & P.Li, (2008). Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 35, 515–531. doi:10.1017/S0305000907008641
44. D.Y.Harvey, & T.T.Schnur, (2015). Distinct loci of lexical and semantic access deficits in aphasia:Evidence from voxel based lesion-symptom mapping and diffusion tensor imaging. Cortex, 67, 37–58. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.004
45. A.E.Hernandez, & P.Li, (2007). Age of acquisition:Its neural and computational mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 638–650. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.638
46. K.W.Hirsh, C.M.Morrison, S.Gaset, & E.Carnicer, (2003). Age of acquisition and speech production in L2. Bilingualism:Language and Cognition, 6, 117–128. doi:10.1017/S136672890300107X
47. P.Hoffman, T.T.Rogers, & M.A.Lambon Ralph, (2011). Semantic diversity accounts for the “missing” word frequency effect in stroke aphasia:Insights using a novel method to quantify contextual variability in meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2432–2446. doi:10.1162/jocn.2011.21614
48. S.J.Holmes, & A.W.Ellis, (2006). Age of acquisition and typicality effects in three object processing tasks. Visual Cognition, 13, 884–910. doi:10.1080/13506280544000093
49. S.J.Holmes, F.J.Fitch, & A.W.Ellis, (2006). Age of acquisition affects object recognition and naming in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 1010–1022. doi:10.1080/13803390591004392
50. D.Howes, (1964). Application of the word frequency concept to aphasia. In A.V.S.De Reuck & M.O’Connor (Eds.), Disorders of language (pp. 47–75). Ciba Foundation Symposium. London:Churchill.
51. D.H.Howes, & R.L.Solomon, (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401–410. doi:10.1037/h0056020
52. C.Izura, & A.W.Ellis, (2004). Age of acquisition effects in translation judgement tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 165–181. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.09.004
53. R.A.Johnston, & C.Barry, (2006). Age of acquisition and lexical processing:A review. Visual Cognition, 13, 789–845. doi:10.1080/13506280544000066
54. B.J.Juhasz, (2005). Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 684–712. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.684
55. J.Kay, & A.W.Ellis, (1987). A cognitive neuropsychological case study of anomia. Brain, 110, 613–629. doi:10.1093/brain/110.3.613
56. A.K.Kittredge, G.S.Dell, J.Verkuilen, & M.F.Schwartz, (2008). Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture – naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 463–492. doi:10.1080/02643290701674851
57. H.Kucera, & W.N.Francis, (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI:Brown University Press.
58. V.Kuperman, Z.Estes, M.Brysbaert, & A.B.Warriner, (2014). Emotion and language:Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 143, 1065–1081. doi:10.1037/a0035669
59. V.Kuperman, H.Stadthagen-Gonzalez, & M.Brysbaert, (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30 thousand English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 978–990. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
60. M.Laganaro, M.Di Pietro, & A.Schnider, (2006). What does recovery from anomia tell us about the underlying impairment:The case of similar anomic patterns and different recovery. Neuropsychologia, 44, 534–545. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.005
61. M.Laganaro, A.Valente, & C.Perret, (2012). Time course of word production in fast and slow speakers:A high density ERP topographic study. NeuroImage, 59, 3881–3888. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.082
62. M.A.Lambon Ralph, & S.Ehsan, (2006). Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence:Empirical and computational evidence. Visual Cognition, 13, 928–948. doi:10.1080/13506280544000110
63. M.A.Lambon Ralph, K.S.Graham, A.W.Ellis, & J.R.Hodges, (1998). Naming in semantic dementia—What matters? Neuropsychologia, 36, 775–784. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00169-3
64. M.B.Lewis, & M.Vladeanu, (2006). What do we know about psycholinguistic effects? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 977–986. doi:10.1080/17470210600638076
65. L.Lotto, L.Surian, & R.Job, (2010). Objective age of acquisition for 223 Italian words:Norms and effects on picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 126–133. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.126
66. P.Mandera, E.Keuleers, Z.Wodniecka, & M.Brysbaert, (2015). Subtlex-pl:Subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Polish. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 471–483. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0489-4
67. L.Menenti, & C.Burani, (2007). What causes the effect of age of acquisition in lexical processing? TheQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 652–660. doi:10.1080/17470210601100126
68. J.Monaghan, & A.W.Ellis, (2002). What exactly interacts with spelling–sound consistency in word naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 183–206.
69. P.Monaghan, & A.W.Ellis, (2010). Modeling reading development:Cumulative, incremental learning in a computational model of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 506–525. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.003
70. C.M.Morrison, T.D.Chappell, & A.W.Ellis, (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50, 528–559. doi:10.1080/027249897392017
71. J.Morton, (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–178. doi:10.1037/h0027366
72. E.Navarrete, M.Pastore, R.Valentini, & F.Peressotti, (2015). First learned words are not forgotten:Age-of-acquisition effects in the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Memory & Cognition, 43, 1085–1103. Advance electronic publication, doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0525-3
73. E.Navarrete, M.Scaltritti, C.Mulatti, & F.Peressotti, (2013). Age-of-acquisition effects in delayed picture-naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 148–153. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0310-2
74. B.New, M.Brysbaert, J.Veronis, & C.Pallier, (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 661–677. doi:10.1017/S014271640707035X
75. F.Newcombe, R.C.Oldfield, & A.R.Wingfield, (1965). Object naming by dysphasic patients. Nature, 207, 1217–1218. doi:10.1038/2071217a0
76. L.Nickels, & D.Howard, (1995). Aphasic naming:What matters? Neuropsychologia, 33, 1281–1303. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(95)00102-9
77. K.Patterson, P.J.Nestor, & T.T.Rogers, (2007). Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 976–987. doi:10.1038/nrn2277
78. M.A.Pérez, & C.Navalón, (2005). Objective-AoA norms for 175 names in Spanish:Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables, estimated AoA, and data from other languages. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 179–206. doi:10.1080/09541440340000547
79. C.Perret, P.Bonin, & M.Laganaro, (2014). Exploring the multiple-level hypothesis of AoA effects in spoken and written object naming using a topographic ERP analysis. Brain and Language, 135, 20–31. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.04.006
80. J.Pind, H.Jónsdóttir, H.Gissurardóttir, & F.Jónsson, (2000). Icelandic norms for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) pictures:Name and image agreement, familiarity, and age of acquisition. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 41–48. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00169
81. J.Pind, & H.B.Tryggvadottir, (2002). Determinants of picture naming times in Icelandic. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 221–226. doi:10.1111/sjop.2002.43.issue-3
82. K.A.Preston, (1935). The speed of word perception and its relation to reading ability. TheJournal of General Psychology, 13, 199–203. doi:10.1080/00221309.1935.9917878
83. R.Räling, J.Holzgrefe-Lang, A.Schröder, & I.Wartenburger, (2015). On the influence of typicality and age of acquisition on semantic processing:Diverging evidence from behavioural and ERP responses. Neuropsychologia, 75, 186–200. Advance publication, doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.031
84. G.Rochford, & M.Williams, (1962). Studies in the development and breakdown of the use of names. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 25, 222–228. doi:10.1136/jnnp.25.3.222
85. G.Rochford, & M.Williams, (1965). Studies in the development and breakdown of the use of names. IV. The effects of word frequency. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 28, 407–413. doi:10.1136/jnnp.28.5.407
86. B.Rossion, & G.Pourtois, (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object pictorial set:The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217–236. doi:10.1068/p5117
87. C.Rossiter, & W.Best, (2013). “Penguins don’t fly”:An investigation into the effect of typicality on picture naming in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 27, 784–798. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.751579
88. I.M.Ruff, S.J.Swanson, T.A.Hammeke, D.Sabsevitz, W.M.Mueller, & G.L.Morris, (2007). Predictors of naming decline after dominant temporal lobectomy:Age at onset of epilepsy and age of word acquisition. Epilepsy & Behavior, 10, 272–277. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.12.002
89. K.Sage, & A.W.Ellis, (2004). Lexical influences in graphemic buffer disorder. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 381–400. doi:10.1080/02643290342000438
90. K.M.Sailor, M.E.Zimmerman, & A.E.Sanders, (2011). Differential impacts of age of acquisition on letter and semantic fluency in Alzheimer’s disease patients and healthy older adults. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2383–2391. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.596660
91. E.Severens, S.Van Lommel, E.Ratinckx, & R.J.Hartsuiker, (2005). Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychologica, 119, 159–187. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.01.002
92. A.P.Soares, J.Machado, A.Costa, Á.Iriarte, A.Simões, J.J.Almeida, … M.Perea, (2015). On the advantages of word frequency and contextual diversity measures extracted from subtitles:The case of Portuguese. TheQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 680–696. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.964271
93. M.Steyvers, & J.B.Tenenbaum, (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks:Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41–78. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2901_3
94. G.Storms, P.De Boeck, & W.Ruts, (2000). Prototype and exemplar-based information in natural language categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 51–73. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2669
95. A.Szekely, S.D’Amico, A.Devescovi, K.Federmeier, D.Herron, G.Iyer, & E.Bates, (2005). Timed action and object naming. Cortex, 41, 7–25. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70174-6
96. K.Tustin, & H.Hayne, (2010). Defining the boundary:Age-related changes in childhood amnesia. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1049–1061. doi:10.1037/a0020105
97. U.Urooj, P.L.Cornelissen, M.I.Simpson, K.L.Wheat, W.Woods, L.Barca, & A.W.Ellis, (2014). Interactions between visual and semantic processing during object recognition revealed by modulatory effects of age of acquisition. NeuroImage, 87, 252–264. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.058
98. W.J.B.van Heuven, P.Mandera, E.Keuleers, & M.Brysbaert, (2014). SUBTLEX-UK:A new and improved word frequency database for British English. TheQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1176–1190. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
99. W.A.Van Loon-Vervoorn, (1989). Eigenschappen van basiswoorden. Lisse:Swets and Zeitlinger.
100. M.Visser, K.V.Embleton, E.Jefferies, G.J.Parker, & M.A.Lambon Ralph, (2010). The inferior, anterior temporal lobes and semantic memory clarified:Novel evidence from distortion-corrected fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1689–1696. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.016
101. A.M.Woollams, (2012). Apples are not the only fruit:The effects of concept typicality on semantic representation in the anterior temporal lobe. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 85. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00085
102. A.M.Woollams, E.Cooper-Pye, J.R.Hodges, & K.Patterson, (2008). Anomia:A doubly typical signature of semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2503–2514. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.04.005
103. J.D.Zevin, & M.S.Seidenberg, (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1–29. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2834
104. X.Zhou, H.Liang, M.Xu, & B.Luo, (2009). Determinants of lexical access in pure anomic recovery:A longitudinal study. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 10, 341–347. doi:10.1631/jzus.B0820310