Lexical influences in graphemic buffer disorder

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 21, Issue 2-4, 2004, Pages 381-400

  Sage, Karen ^a   Ellis, Andrew W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGED; ANALYTICAL ERROR; CASE REPORT; COMPREHENSION; DYSGRAPHIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MENTAL CAPACITY; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; REVIEW; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 1842419447     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643290342000438     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Aliminosa, D., McCloskey, M., Goodman-Schulman, R., & Sokol, S. M. (1993). Remediation of acquired dysgraphia as a technique for testing interpretations of deficits. Aphasiology, 7, 55-69.
2. Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234-254.
3. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 439-461.
4. Annoni, J.-M., Lemay, M. A., de Mattos Pimenta, M. A., & Lecours, A. R. (1998). The contribution of attentional mechanisms to an irregularity effect at the graphemic buffer level. Brain and Language, 63, 64-78.
5. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
6. Badecker, W., Hillis, A., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Lexical morphology and its role in the writing process: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 35, 205-243.
7. Beauvois, M.-F., & Dérouesné, J. (1981). Lexical or orthographic dysgraphia. Brain, 104, 21-49.
8. Bird, H., Franklin, S., & Howard, D. (2000). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 33, 73-79.
9. Bird, H., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. (2000). The rise and fall of frequency and imageability: Noun and verb production in semantic dementia. Brain and Language, 73, 17-49.
10. Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., & Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 89-114.
11. Bonin, P., Fayol, M., & Chalard, M. (2001). Age of acquisition and word frequency in written picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 469-489.
12. Borod, J. C., Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1980). Normative data on the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, Parietal Lobe Battery, and the Boston Naming Test. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2, 209-215.
13. Cantagallo, A., & Bonazzi, S. (1996). Acquired dysgraphia with selective damage to the graphemic buffer: A single case report. Italian Journal of Neurological Science, 17, 249-254.
14. Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37, 243-297.
15. Caramazza, A., Miceli, G. Villa, G., & Romani, C. (1987). The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 26, 59-85.
16. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). New York: Academic Press.
17. Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
18. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
19. Cuetos, F., Aguado, G., Izura, C., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Aphasic naming in Spanish: Predictors and errors. Brain and Language, 82, 344-365.
20. de Partz, M.-P. (1995). Deficit of the graphemic buffer: Effects of a written lexical segmentation strategy. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 5, 129-147.
21. Ellis, A. W. (1979). Slips of the pen. Visible Language, 13, 265-282.
22. Ellis, A. W. (1982). Spelling and writing (and reading and speaking). In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 113-146). London: Academic Press.
23. Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1103-1123.
24. Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorisation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 696-713.
25. Franklin, S., Turner, J. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1992). The ADA comprehension battery. London: Action for Dysphasic Adults.
26. Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 267-283.
27. Gilhooly, K. J., & Logle, R. H. (1980). Methods, & designs: Age of acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behaviour Research Methods and Instrumentation, 12, 395-427.
28. Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). Assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Febinger.
29. Goodman, R. A., & Caramazza, A. (1994). The Johns Hopkins University Dysgraphia Battery. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
30. Hanna, R. R., Hanna, J. S., Hodges, R. E., & Rudorf, E. H. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
31. Hanley, J. R., & Kay, J. (1998). Does the graphemic buffer play a role in reading? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 313-318.
32. Hatfield, F. M., & Patterson, K. E. (1983). Phonological spelling. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 451-468.
33. Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1989). The graphemic buffer and attentional mechanisms. Brain and Language, 36, 208-235.
34. Hinton, G. E., & Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review, 98, 74-95.
35. Houghton, G., Glasspool, D. W., & Shallice, T. (1994). Spelling and serial recall: Insights from a competitive queuing model. In G. D. A. Brown & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 366-404). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
36. Howard, D., & Patterson, K. E. (1992). The Pyramids and Palm Trees test. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Corporation.
37. Jónsdóttir, M. K., Shallice, T., & Wise, R. (1996). Phonological mediation and the graphemic buffer disorder in spelling: cross-language differences? Cognition, 59, 169-197.
38. Katz, R. B. (1991). Limited retention of information in the graphemic buffer. Cortex, 27, 111-119.
39. Kay, J., & Hanley, R. (1994). Peripheral disorders of spelling: The role of the graphemic buffer. In G. D. A. Brown & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 295-315). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
40. Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). PALPA: Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
41. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
42. Lambon Ralph, M. A., Ellis, A. W., & Sage, K. (1998a). Word meaning blindness revisited. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 189-200.
43. Lambon Ralph, M. A., Graham, K. S., Ellis, A. W., & Hodges, J. R. (1998b). Naming in semantic dementia: What matters? Neuropsychologia, 36, 775-784.
44. Lavidor, M., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 80, 45-62.
45. Laxon, V. J., Masterson, J., & Moran, R. (1994). Are children's representations of words distributed? Effects of orthographic neighbourhood size, consistency and regularity in naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 1-27.
46. Mayzner, M. S., & Tresselt, M. E. (1965). Tables of single-letter and digrarn frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1, 13-31.
47. Mayzner, M. S., Tresselt, M. E., & Wolin, B. R. (1965). Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1, 33-78.
48. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
49. McCloskey, M., Badecker, W., Goodman-Schulman, R. A., & Aliminosa, D. (1994). The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 341-392.
50. McKenna, P., & Warrington, E. K. (1983). Graded Naming Test. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
51. Meyers, J. E., & Meyers, K. R. (1995). Rey Complex Figure test and recognition trial (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Test Corporation.
52. Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., & Caramazza, A. (1985). Cognitive analysis of a case of pure dysgraphia. Brain and Language, 25, 187-121.
53. Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1995). The roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 116-133.
54. Nelson, H. E. (1982). National Adult Reading Test (NART). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
55. Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1995). Aphasic naming: What matters? Neuropsychologia, 33, 1281-1303.
56. Parkin, A. J., & Underwood, G. (1983). Orthographic vs phonological regularity in lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 11, 351-355.
57. Patterson, K. E., &Hodges, J. R. (1992). Deterioration of word meaning: Implications for reading. Neuropsychologia, 30, 1025-1040.
58. Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2000). The effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification tasks. Psicológica, 21, 327-340.
59. Piccirilli, M., Petrillo, S., & Poli, R. (1992). Dysgraphia and selective impairment of the graphemic buffer. Italian Journal of Neurological Science, 13, 113-117.
60. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired reading: Computational principles in quasiregular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
61. Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.
62. Postararo, L., Zinelli, P., & Mazzuchi, A. (1998). Selective impairment of the graphemic buffer in acquired dysgraphia: A case study. Brain and Language, 35, 274-286.
63. Quinlan, P. T. (1992). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. London: Oxford University Press.
64. Rapcsak, S. Z. (1997). Disorders of writing. In L. J. G. Rothi & K. M. Heilman (Eds), Apraxia: The neuropsychology of action (pp. 149-172). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
65. Raven, J. C. (1985). Raven's Progressive Matrices (23rd ed.). London: H. K. Lewis.
66. Schiller, N. O., Greenhall, J. A., Shelton, J. R., & Caramazza, A. (2001). Serial order effects in spelling errors: Evidence from two dysgraphic patients. Neurocase, 7, 1-14.
67. Silveri, M. C., Cappa, A., Mariotti, P., & Puopolo, M. (2002). Naming in patients with Alzheimer's disease: Influence of age of acquisition and categorical effects. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 755-764.
68. Tainturier, M. J., & Caramazza, A. (1996). The status of double letters in graphemic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 53-73.
69. Ward, J., & Romani, C. (1998). Serial position effects and lexical activation in spelling: Evidence from a single case study. Neurocase, 4, 189-206.
70. Warrington, E. K. (1996). The Camden Memory Test Battery. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
71. Warrington, E. K. (1997). The Graded Naming Test: A restandardisation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 7, 143-146.
72. Warrington, E., & James, M. (1991). The Visual Object and Space Perception Battery (VOSP). Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
73. Warrington, E. K., McKenna, P., & Orpwood, L. (1998). Single word comprehension: A concrete and abstract word synonym test. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 8, 143-154.
74. Wing, A. M., & Baddeley, A. D. (1980). Spelling errors in handwriting: A corpus and a distributional analysis. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 117-133). London: Academic Press.
75. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1-29.