BALDEY: A database of auditory lexical decisions

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 68, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1469-1488

  Ernestus, Mirjam ^a,c   Cutler, Anne ^b,c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Auditory lexical decision; Dutch; Frequency of occurrence; Morphologically complex words; Phonological neighbours

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DATASETS AS TOPIC; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84936847593     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.984730     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. H.Akaike, (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B.N.Petrov & B.F.Csaki (Eds.), Second international symposium of information theory (pp. 267–281). Budapest: Academiai Kiado.
2. P.Allopenna,, J.Magnuson,, & M.Tanenhaus, (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419–439. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
3. R.H.Baayen,, D.J.Davidson,, & D.M.Bates, (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
4. R.H.Baayen,, J.M.McQueen,, T.Dijkstra,, & R.Schreuder, (2003). Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: Revisiting Dutch plurals. In R.H.Baayen & R.Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 355–390). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
5. R.H.Baayen,, R.Piepenbrock,, & L.Gulikers, (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [Distributor].
6. L.W.Balling,, & R.H.Baayen, (2012). Probability and surprisal in auditory comprehension of morphologically complex words. Cognition, 125, 80–106. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.003
7. D.A.Balota,, M.J.Yap,, M.J.Cortese,, K.A.Hutchison,, B.Kessler,, B.Loftis,, … R.Treiman, (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
8. E.G.Bard,, R.C.Shillcock,, & G.Altmann, (1988). The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: Effects of subsequent context. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 395–408. doi: 10.3758/BF03210424
9. P.Boersma, (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.
10. M.Brysbaert,, & M.J.Cortese, (2011). Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 545–559. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.503374
11. R.A.Cole,, & J.Jakimik, (1978). Understanding speech: How words are heard. In G.Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 67–116). London: Academic Press.
12. C.M.Connine,, J.Mullennix,, E.Shernoff,, & J.Yelen, (1990). Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1084–1096.
13. E.Dupoux,, & J.Mehler, (1990). Monitoring the lexicon with normal and compressed speech: Frequency effects and the prelexical code. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 316–335. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90003-I
14. M.Ernestus,, & R.H.Baayen, (2011). Corpora and exemplars in phonology. In J.Goldsmith, J.Riggle, & A.Yu (Eds.), The handbook of phonological theory (2nd ed., pp. 374–400). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
15. D.E.Farrar,, & R.G.Glauber, (1967). Multicollinearity in regression analysis: The problem revisited. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49, 92–107.
16. M.G.Gaskell,, & W.D.Marslen-Wilson, (1997). Integrating form and meaning, a distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 613–656. doi: 10.1080/016909697386646
17. S.D.Goldinger, (1996). Auditory lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 559–568. doi: 10.1080/016909696386944
18. S.D.Goldinger,, P.A.Luce,, & D.B.Pisoni, (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 501–518. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90009-0
19. J.C.Goodman,, & J.Huttenlocher, (1988). Do we know how people identify spoken words?. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 684–698. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90015-0
20. F.Grosjean, (1985). The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 299–310. doi: 10.3758/BF03207159
21. T.F.Jaeger, (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
22. I.T.Jolliffe, (1982). A note on the use of principal components in regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 31, 300–303.
23. E.Keuleers,, M.Brysbaert,, & B.New, (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 643–650. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
24. P.A.Luce, (1986). A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 155–158. doi: 10.3758/BF03212485
25. P.A.Luce,, & D.B.Pisoni, (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1–36. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001
26. W.D.Marslen-Wilson, (1980). Speech understanding as a psychological process. In J.C.Simon (Ed.), Spoken language generation and understanding (pp. 39–67). Dordrecht: Reidel.
27. W.D.Marslen-Wilson,, & P.Warren, (1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review, 101, 653–675. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.653
28. W.D.Marslen-Wilson,, & A.Welsh, (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29–63. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-X
29. J.L.McClelland,, & J.L.Elman, (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0
30. C.T.McLennan,, & P.A.Luce, (2005). Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 306–321.
31. J.M.McQueen, (1996). Word spotting. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 695–699. doi: 10.1080/016909696387114
32. J.M.McQueen, (2007). Eight questions about spoken-word recognition. In M.G.Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 37–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. J.M.McQueen,, D.Norris,, & A.Cutler, (1994). Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 621–638.
34. J.M.McQueen,, D.Norris,, & A.Cutler, (1999). Lexical influence in phonetic decision making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1363–1389.
35. C.J.Merz,, & M.J.Pazzani, (1999). A principal components approach to combining regression estimates. Machine Learning, 36, 9–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1007507221352
36. D.C.Montgomery,, E.A.Peck,, & G.G.Vining, (2012). Introduction to linear regression analysis (vol. 821). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
37. D.G.Norris, (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189–234. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4
38. D.Norris,, J.M.McQueen,, & A.Cutler, (1995). Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1209–1228.
39. N.Oostdijk, (2002). The design of the spoken Dutch Corpus. In P.Peters, P.Collins, & A.Smith (Eds.), New frontiers of corpus research (pp. 105–112). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
40. S.Pinker, (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530–535. doi: 10.1126/science.1857983
41. M.Pluymaekers,, M.Ernestus,, & R.H.Baayen, (2006). Effects of word frequency on the acoustic durations of affixes. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2006—ICSLP (pp. 953–956).
42. W.Schneider,, A.Eschman,, & A.Zuccolotta, (2002). E-prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
43. R.Schreuder,, & R.H.Baayen, (1994). Prefix stripping re-revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 357–375. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1017
44. R.Schreuder,, & R.H.Baayen, (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L.B.Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. L.M.Slowiaczek,, & D.B.Pisoni, (1986). Effects of phonological similarity on priming in auditory lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 14, 230–237. doi: 10.3758/BF03197698
46. M.Taft, (1986). Lexical access codes in visual and auditory word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 297–308. doi: 10.1080/01690968608404679
47. M.Taft,, & G.Hambly, (1986). Exploring the cohort model of spoken word recognition. Cognition, 22, 259–282. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90017-X
48. M.K.Tanenhaus,, & M.J.Spivey-Knowlton, (1996). Eye-tracking. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 583–588. doi: 10.1080/016909696386971
49. J.Vroomen,, & B.de Gelder, (1995). Metrical segmentation and lexical inhibition in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 98–108.
50. L.H.Wurm,, & S.A.Fisicaro, (2014). What residualizing predictors in regression analyses does (and what it does not do). Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.003
51. S.Young,, G.Evermann,, M.Gales,, T.Hain,, D.Kershaw,, X.Liu,, … P.Woodland, (2006). The HTK book (vol. 3, 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. P.Zwitserlood, (1996). Form priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 589–596. doi: 10.1080/016909696386980