A functional-dynamic reflection on participatory processes in modeling projects

Ambio

Volumn 44, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 750-765

  Seidl, Roman ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Functions of participation; Interdisciplinarity; Modeling; Review; Stakeholders; Transdisciplinarity

Indexed keywords

INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PLANNING METHOD; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER;

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84947494667     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: 16547209     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0670-8     Document Type: Review

References (121)

1. Alcamo, J. 2002. Three issues for improving integrated models: Uncertainty, social science, and legitimacy. In Integrative modellierung zum globalen wandel, ed. C.F. Gethmann, and S. Lingner, 3–14. Berlin: Springer.
2. Armitage, D.R., R. Plummer, F. Berkes, R.I. Arthur, A.T. Charles, I.J. Davidson-Hunt, A.P. Diduck, N.C. Doubleday, et al. 2008. Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 95–102. doi:10.1890/070089.
3. Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners 35: 216–224.
4. Bammer, G. 2014. From toolbox to big science project: A bold proposal. In Enhancing communication & collaboration in interdisciplinary research, ed. M. O’Rourke, S. Crowley, S.D. Eigenbrode, and J.D. Wulfhorst, 385–403. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
5. Barnaud, C., C. Le Page, P. Dumrongrojwatthana, and G. Trébuil. 2013. Spatial representations are not neutral: Lessons from a participatory agent-based modelling process in a land-use conflict. Environmental Modelling and Software 45: 150–159. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.016.
6. Barreteau, O., P.W.G. Bots, and K.A. Daniell. 2010. A framework for clarifying “participation” in participatory research to prevent its rejection for the wrong reasons. Ecology and Society 15: 1. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art1/.
7. Barreteau, O., P. Bots, K. Daniell, M. Etienne, P. Perez, C. Barnaud, D. Bazile, N. Becu, et al. 2013. Participatory approaches. In Simulating social complexity, ed. B. Edmonds, and R. Meyer, 197–234. Berlin: Springer.
8. Barthel, R., S. Janisch, D. Nickel, A. Trifkovic, and T. Horhan. 2010. Using the multiactor-approach in glowa-danube to simulate decisions for the water supply sector under conditions of global climate change. Water Resources Management 24: 239–275. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9445-y.
9. Batten, D.F. 2009. Fostering industrial symbiosis with agent-based simulation and participatory modeling. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13: 197–213. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00115.x.
10. Borowski, I., and M. Hare. 2007. Exploring the gap between water managers and researchers: difficulties of model-based tools to support practical water management. Water Resources Management 21: 1049–1074. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9098-z.
11. Bots, P.W., and C.E. van Daalen. 2008. Participatory model construction and model use in natural resource management: a framework for reflection. Systemic Practice and Action Research 21: 389–407.
12. Bradshaw, G.A., and M. Bekoff. 2001. Ecology and social responsibility: the re-embodiment of science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 460–465.
13. Cabrera, V.E., N.E. Breuer, and P.E. Hildebrand. 2008. Participatory modeling in dairy farm systems: a method for building consensual environmental sustainability using seasonal climate forecasts. Climatic Change 89: 395–409. doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9371-z.
14. Campo, P.C., F. Bousquet, and T.R. Villanueva. 2010. Modelling with stakeholders within a development project. Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1302–1321. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.005.
15. Cundill, G., and R. Rodela. 2012. A review of assertions about the processes and outcomes of social learning in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 113: 7–14. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.021.
16. de Mey, K., K. D’Haene, F. Marchand, M. Meul, and L. Lauwers. 2011. Learning through stakeholder involvement in the implementation of MOTIFS: an integrated assessment model for sustainable farming in Flanders. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9: 350–363. doi:10.1080/14735903.2011.582355.
17. deReynier, Y.L., P.S. Levin, and N.L. Shoji. 2010. Bringing stakeholders, scientists, and managers together through an integrated ecosystem assessment process. Marine Policy 34: 534–540. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2009.10.010.
18. Díez, E., and B.S. McIntosh. 2009. A review of the factors which influence the use and usefulness of information systems. Environmental Modelling and Software 24: 588–602. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.10.009.
19. Durant, D. 2011. Models of democracy in social studies of science. Social Studies of Science 41: 691–714. doi:10.1177/0306312711414759.
20. Elbakidze, M., P.K. Angelstam, C. Sandström, and R. Axelsson. 2010. Multi-stakeholder collaboration in Russian and Swedish Model Forest initiatives: Adaptive governance toward sustainable forest management? Ecology and Society 15: 14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art14/.
21. Elzinga, A. 2008. Participation. In Handbook of transdisciplinary research, eds. G. Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, and E. Zemp, 345–359. Netherlands: Springer.
22. Eversole, R. 2003. Managing the pitfalls of participatory development: Some insight from Australia. World Development 31: 781–795. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00018-4.
23. Evely, A.C., M. Pinard, M.S. Reed, and I. Fazey. 2011. High levels of participation in conservation projects enhance learning. Conservation Letters 4: 116–126.
24. Fiorino, D.J. 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values 15: 226–243. doi:10.1177/016224399001500204.
25. Francis, P., and R. James. 2003. Balancing rural poverty reduction and citizen participation: The contradictions of Uganda’s decentralization program. World Development 31: 325–337.
26. Franzén, F., G. Kinell, J. Walve, R. Elmgren, and T. Söderqvist. 2011. Participatory social-ecological modeling in eutrophication management: The case of Himmerfjärden. Sweden. Ecology & Society 16: 27.
27. Funtowicz, S.O., and J.R. Ravetz. 2001. Global risk, uncertainty, and ignorance. In Global environmental risks, ed. J.X. Kasperson, and R.E. Kasperson, 173–194. London: Earthscan.
28. Gaddis, E.J.B., H.H. Falk, C. Ginger, and A. Voinov. 2010. Effectiveness of a participatory modeling effort to identify and advance community water resource goals in St. Albans, Vermont. Environmental Modelling & Software 25: 1428–1438. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.06.004.
29. Gaube, V., C. Kaiser, M. Wildenberg, H. Adensam, P. Fleissner, J. Kobler, J. Lutz, A. Schaumberger, et al. 2009. Combining agent-based and stock-flow modelling approaches in a participative analysis of the integrated land system in Reichraming, Austria. Landscape Ecology 24: 1149–1165. doi:10.1007/s10980-009-9356-6.
30. Giupponi, C., A. Jakeman, D. Karssenberg, and M. Hare (eds.). 2006. Sustainable management of water resources: An integrated approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
31. Hare, M. 2011. Forms of participatory modelling and its potential for widespread adoption in the water sector. Environmental Policy and Governance 21: 386–402. doi:10.1002/eet.590.
32. Henriksen, H.J., J.C. Refsgaard, A.L. Hojberg, N. Ferrand, P. Gijsbers, and H. Scholten. 2009. Harmonised principles for public participation in quality assurance of integrated water resources modelling. Water Resources Management 23: 2539–2554. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9395-9.
33. Hirsch Hadorn, G., H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, and E. Zemp (eds.). 2008. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
34. Huber, R., S. Briner, H. Bugmann, C. Elkin, C. Hirschi, R. Seidl, and A. Rigling. 2014. Inter- and transdisciplinary perspective on the integration of ecological processes into ecosystem services analysis in a mountain region. Ecological Processes 3: 9.
35. Jakeman, A.J., S. El Sawah, J.H.A. Guillaume, and S.A. Pierce. 2011. Making progress in integrated modelling and environmental decision support. Advances in Information and Communication Technology 359: 15–25.
36. Jakeman, A.J., R.A. Letcher, and J.P. Norton. 2006. Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models. Environmental Modelling and Software 21: 602–614. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.01.004.
37. Johnson, J., and S. Hrynkow. 2011. Funding agencies and transdisciplinary research. In Converging disciplines, ed. M. Kirst, N. Schaefer-McDaniel, S. Hwang, and P. O’Campo, 149–160. New York: Springer.
38. Jones, N.A., P. Perez, T.G. Measham, G.J. Kelly, P. d’Aquino, K.A. Daniell, A. Dray, and N. Ferrand. 2009. Evaluating participatory modeling: Developing a framework for cross-case analysis. Environmental Management 44: 1180–1195. doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9391-8.
39. Kipfer, A. (ed.). 2001. Roget’s international thesaurus, 6th ed. New York: Harper-Collins.
40. Kok, J.L., S. Kofalk, J. Berlekamp, B. Hahn, and H.G. Wind. 2009. From design to application of a decision-support system for integrated river-basin management. Water Resources Management 23: 1781–1811. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9352-7.
41. Korfmacher, K.S. 2001. The politics of participation in watershed modeling. Environmental Management 27: 161–176. doi:10.1007/s002670010141.
42. Krütli, P., M. Stauffacher, T. Flüeler, and R.W. Scholz. 2010. Functional-dynamic public participation in technological decision-making: Site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories. Journal of Risk Research 13: 861–875. doi:10.1080/13669871003703252.
43. Lagabrielle, E., A. Botta, W. Dare, D. David, S. Aubert, and C. Fabricius. 2010. Modelling with stakeholders to integrate biodiversity into land-use planning Lessons learned in Reunion Island (Western Indian Ocean). Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1413–1427. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.011.
44. Langsdale, S.M., A. Beall, J. Carmichael, S.J. Cohen, C.B. Forster, and T. Neale. 2009. Exploring the implications of climate change on water resources through participatory modeling: Case study of the Okanagan Basin, British Columbia. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management-Asce 135: 373–381. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2009)135:5(373).
45. Leclerc, G., A. Bah, B. Barbier, L. Boutinot, A. Botta, W. Dare, I.D. Gaye, C. Fourage, et al. 2009. Managing tricky decentralised competencies: case study of a participatory modelling experiment on land use in the Lake Guiers area in Northern Senegal. Sustainability Science 4: 243–261. doi:10.1007/s11625-009-0083-3.
46. Lee, N. 2006. Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26: 57–78.
47. Liu, J., T. Dietz, S.R. Carpenter, C. Folke, M. Alberti, C.L. Redman, S.H. Schneider, E. Ostrom, et al. 2007. Coupled human and natural systems. AMBIO 36: 639–649.
48. Liu, Y., H. Gupta, E. Springer, and T. Wagener. 2008. Linking science with environmental decision making: Experiences from an integrated modeling approach to supporting sustainable water resources management. Environmental Modelling and Software 23: 846–858. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.10.007.
49. Ludwig, D. 2001. The era of management is over. Ecosystems 4: 758–764.
50. MacMynowski, D.P. 2007. Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: Power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science. Ecology and Society 12: 20. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art20/.
51. Martínez-Santos, P., H.J. Henriksen, P. Zorrilla, and P.E. Martínez-Alfaro. 2010. Comparative reflections on the use of modelling tools in conflictive water management settings: The Mancha Occidental aquifer, Spain. Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1439–1449. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.11.011.
52. Matthews, K., M. Rivington, K. Blackstock, G. McCrum, K. Buchan, and D. Miller. 2011. Raising the bar?–The challenges of evaluating the outcomes of environmental modelling and software. Environmental Modelling and Software 26: 247–257.
53. Mazzorana, B., F. Comiti, C. Scherer, and S. Fuchs. 2012. Developing consistent scenarios to assess flood hazards in mountain streams. Journal of Environmental Management 94: 112–124. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.030.
54. Mashkina, O., E. Furman, H. Mela, and P. Kivimaa. 2009. Transnational research programmes on environment: Analysis of ERA-Nets’ experiences and recommendations for good practices. Helsinki: Finnish Environment Institute.
55. Mobjörk, M. 2010. Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures 42: 866–873. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.003.
56. Molina, J.L., J.L. Garcia-Arostegui, J. Bromley, and J. Benavente. 2011. Integrated assessment of the European WFD implementation in extremely overexploited aquifers through participatory modelling. Water Resources Management 25: 3343–3370. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9859-1.
57. Mostert, E. 2006. Participation for sustainable water management. In Sustainable management of water resources: An integrated approach, ed. C. Giupponi, A.J. Jakeman, D. Karssenberg, and M. Hare, 153–176. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
58. Müller, B., F. Bohn, G. Dreßler, J. Groeneveld, C. Klassert, R. Martin, M. Schlüter, J. Schulze, et al. 2013. Describing human decisions in agent-based models—ODD + D, an extension of the ODD protocol. Environmental Modelling and Software 48: 37–48. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.003.
59. Naivinit, W., C. Le Page, G. Trebuil, and N. Gajaseni. 2010. Participatory agent-based modeling and simulation of rice production and labor migrations in Northeast Thailand. Environmental Modelling & Software 25: 1345–1358. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.012.
60. Nowotny, H. 2003. Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Science and Public Policy 30: 151–156. doi:10.3152/147154303781780461.
61. Olsson, J.A., and L. Andersson. 2007. Possibilities and problems with the use of models as a communication tool in water resource management. Water Resources Management 21: 97–110. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9043-1.
62. Olusanya, O. 2013. A macro-micro integrated theoretical model of mass participation in genocide. British Journal of Criminology. doi:10.1093/bjc/azt027.
63. Pahl-Wostl, C., and M. Hare. 2004. Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 14: 193–206. doi:10.1002/casp.774.
64. Pahl-Wostl, C., M. Craps, A. Dewulf, E. Mostert, D. Tabara, and T. Taillieu. 2007. Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society 12: 5.
65. Parker, P., R. Letcher, A. Jakeman, M.B. Beck, G. Harris, R.M. Argent, M. Hare, C. Pahl-Wostl, et al. 2002. Progress in integrated assessment and modelling. Environmental Modelling and Software 17: 209–217. doi:10.1016/s1364-8152(01)00059-7.
66. Pennington, D.D. 2008. Cross-disciplinary collaboration and learning. Ecology and Society 13: 8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art8/.
67. Pohl, C. 2011. What is progress in transdisciplinary research? Futures 43: 618–626. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.03.001.
68. Pohl, C., and G.H. Hadorn. 2007. Principles for designing transdisciplinary research—proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Science. Munich: Oekom.
69. Pohl, C., S. Rist, A. Zimmermann, P. Fry, G.S. Gurung, F. Schneider, C.I. Speranza, B. Kiteme, et al. 2010. Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: Experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Science and Public Policy 37: 267–281.
70. Polk, M. 2014. Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: A critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving. Sustainability Science 9: 439–451. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0247-7.
71. Prell, C., K. Hubacek, M. Reed, C. Quinn, N. Jin, J. Holden, T. Burt, M. Kirby, et al. 2007. If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail: traditional versus participatory model building. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 32: 263–282. doi:10.1179/030801807x211720.
72. Reed, M.S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141: 2417–2431.
73. Reed, M.S., A.C. Evely, G. Cundill, I. Fazey, J. Glass, A. Laing, J. Newig, B. Parrish, et al. 2010. What is social learning? Ecology and Society 15: r1.
74. Rittel, H.W., and M.M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.
75. Röckmann, C., C. Ulrich, M. Dreyer, E. Bell, E. Borodzicz, P. Haapasaari, K.H. Hauge, D. Howell, et al. 2012. The added value of participatory modelling in fisheries management—What has been learnt? Marine Policy 36: 1072–1085. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.027.
76. Rosendahl, J., M.A. Zanella, S. Rist, and J. Weigelt. 2014. Scientists’ situated knowledge: strong objectivity in transdisciplinarity. Futures. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.011.
77. Rosener, J.B. 1975. A cafeteria of techniques and critiques. Public Management 57: 16–19.
78. Rosenfield, P.L. 1992. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science and Medicine 35: 1343–1357. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90038-R.
79. Rowe, G., and L.J. Frewer. 2005. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values 30: 251–290. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724.
80. Ruankaew, N., C. Le Page, P. Dumrongrojwattana, C. Barnaud, N. Gajaseni, A. van Paassen, and G. Trebuil. 2010. Companion modelling for integrated renewable resource management: a new collaborative approach to create common values for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 17: 15–23. doi:10.1080/13504500903481474.
81. Salerno, F., E. Cuccillato, P. Caroli, B. Bajracharya, E.C. Manfredi, G. Viviano, S. Thakuri, B. Flury, et al. 2010. Experience with a hard and soft participatory modeling framework for social-ecological system management in Mount Everest (Nepal) and K2 (Pakistan) Protected Areas. Mountain Research and Development 30: 80–93. doi:10.1659/mrd-journal-d-10-00014.1.
82. Sandker, M., B.M. Campbell, M. Ruiz-Pérez, J.A. Sayer, R. Cowling, H. Kassa, and A.T. Knight. 2010. The role of participatory modeling in landscape approaches to reconcile conservation and development. Ecology and Society 15: 13. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art13/.
83. Schmitt Olabisi, L., S. Blythe, A. Ligmann-Zielinska, and S. Marquart-Pyatt. 2014. Modeling as a tool for cross-disciplinary communication in solving environmental problems. In Enhancing communication & collaboration in interdisciplinary research, ed. S.C. O’Rourke, S.D. Eigenbrode, and J.D. Wulfhorst, 271–290. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
84. Scholz, R.W. 2011. Environmental literacy in science and society: From knowledge to decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Scholz, R.W., D.J. Lang, A. Wiek, A.I. Walter, and M. Stauffacher. 2006. Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 7: 226–251.
86. Schröter, D., L. Acosta-Michlik, A. Arnell, M. Araújo, F. Badeck, M. Bakker, A. Bondeau, H. Bugmann, et al. 2004. The ATEAM final report 2004—Detailed report related to overall project duration. Advanced terrestrial ecosystem analysis and modelling, a project funded under the 5th framework Programme of the European Union. Potsdam, Germany: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
87. Schröter, D., W. Cramer, R. Leemans, I.C. Prentice, M.B. Araújo, N.W. Arnell, A. Bondeau, H. Bugmann, et al. 2005. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310: 1333–1337.
88. Seidl, R., F.S. Brand, M. Stauffacher, P. Krütli, Q.B. Le, A. Spörri, G. Meylan, C. Moser, et al. 2013a. Science with society in the anthropocene. AMBIO 42: 5–12. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0363-5.
89. Seidl, R., P. Krütli, C. Moser, and M. Stauffacher. 2013b. Values in the siting of contested infrastructure: the case of repositories for nuclear waste. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 10: 107–125. doi:10.1080/1943815x.2013.824486.
90. Sievanen, L., L.M. Campbell, and H.M. Leslie. 2012. Challenges to interdisciplinary research in ecosystem-based management. Conservation Biology 26: 315–323. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01808.x.
91. Simon, C., and M. Etienne. 2010. A companion modelling approach applied to forest management planning. Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1371–1384. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.09.004.
92. Smajgl, A. 2010. Challenging beliefs through multi-level participatory modelling in Indonesia. Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1470–1476.
93. Snow, C.P. 1959. The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94. Squires, H., and O. Renn. 2011. Can participatory modelling support social learning in marine fisheries? Reflections from the invest in fish South West Project. Environmental Policy and Governance 21: 403–416. doi:10.1002/eet.588.
95. Stauffacher, M. 2011. Umweltsoziologie und Transdisziplinarität. In Handbuch Umweltsoziologie, ed. M. Groß, 259–276. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
96. Stauffacher, M., T. Flüeler, P. Krütli, and R.W. Scholz. 2008. Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: A transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a Swiss prealpine region. Systemic Practice and Action Research 21: 409–422. doi:10.1007/s11213-008-9107-7.
97. Stauffacher, M., A. Walter, D.J. Lang, A. Wiek, and R.W. Scholz. 2006. Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: the transdisciplinary case study approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 7: 252–275.
98. Sterk, B., M.K. van Ittersum, and C. Leeuwis. 2011. How, when, and for what reasons does land use modelling contribute to societal problem solving? Environmental Modelling and Software 26: 310–316.
99. Stirling, A. 2006. Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis. Land Use Policy 23: 95–107. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.010.
100. Stirling, A. 2008. “Opening Up” and “Closing Down”: Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology and Human Values 33: 262–294. doi:10.1177/0162243907311265.
101. Stokols, D. 2006. Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology 38: 63–77.
102. Stokols, D., S. Misra, R.P. Moser, K.L. Hall, and B.K. Taylor. 2008. The ecology of team science—Understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35: S96–S115. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.
103. Stringer, L.C., A.J. Dougill, E. Fraser, K. Hubacek, C. Prell, and M.S. Reed. 2006. Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society 11: 39.
104. Thompson, J.L., C.B. Forster, C. Werner, and T.R. Peterson. 2010. Mediated modeling: Using collaborative processes to integrate scientist and stakeholder knowledge about greenhouse gas emissions in an urban ecosystem. Society & Natural Resources 23: 742–757. doi:10.1080/08941920802102032.
105. Thompson Klein, J. 2010. A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity, ed. R. Frodeman, J. Thompson Klein, and C. Mitcham, 15–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
106. Vayssières, J., F. Bocquier, and P. Lecomte. 2009. GAMEDE: A global activity model for evaluating the sustainability of dairy enterprises. Part II—Interactive simulation of various management strategies with diverse stakeholders. Agricultural Systems 101: 139–151. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2009.05.006.
107. Vayssieres, J., M. Vigne, V. Alary, and P. Lecomte. 2011. Integrated participatory modelling of actual farms to support policy making on sustainable intensification. Agricultural Systems 104: 146–161. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.05.008.
108. Videira, N., P. Antunes, and R. Santos. 2009. Scoping river basin management issues with participatory modelling: The Baixo Guadiana experience. Ecological Economics 68: 965–978. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.008.
109. Videira, N., P. Antunes, R. Santos, and R. Lopes. 2010. A Participatory Modelling Approach to Support Integrated Sustainability Assessment Processes. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 27: 446–460. doi:10.1002/sres.1041.
110. Voinov, A., and F. Bousquet. 2010. Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1268–1281.
111. Voinov, A., and E.J.B. Gaddis. 2008. Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: A perspective from modeling practitioners. Ecological Modelling 216: 197–207.
112. Voinov, A., R. Seppelt, S. Reis, J.E.M.S. Nabel, and S. Shokravi. 2014. Values in socio-environmental modelling: Persuasion for action or excuse for inaction. Environmental Modelling and Software 53: 207–212. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.005.
113. Volk, M., S. Lautenbach, H. Van Delden, L.T.H. Newham, and R. Seppelt. 2010. How can we make progress with decision support systems in landscape and river basin management? Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of four different decision support systems. Environmental Management 46: 834–849.
114. Wäger, P., O. Ejderyan, F. Schmid, M. Stauffacher, and C. Zingerli. 2014. The role of social sciences and humanities in integrative research on natural resources. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 23: 142–144.
115. Walter, A.I., S. Helgenberger, A. Wiek, and R.W. Scholz. 2007. Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: Design and application of an evaluation method. Evaluation and Program Planning 30: 325–338. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.08.002.
116. Walters, L.C., J. Aydelotte, and J. Miller. 2000. Putting more public in policy analysis. Public Administration Review 60: 349–359. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00097.
117. Webler, T., and S. Tuler. 2006. Four perspectives on public participation process in environmental assessment and decision making: Combined results from 10 case studies. Policy Studies Journal 34: 699–722. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00198.x.
118. Weichselgartner, J., and R. Kasperson. 2010. Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 20: 266–277. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.006.
119. Welp, M., A. de la Vega-Leinert, S. Stoll-Kleemann, and C.C. Jaeger. 2006. Science-based stakeholder dialogues: Theories and tools. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 16: 170–181. doi:10.1016/j.gloenveha.2005.12.002.
120. Wiek, A., and A.I. Walter. 2009. A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems. European Journal of Operational Research 197: 360–370. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.013.
121. Worrapimphong, K., N. Gajaseni, C. Le Page, and F. Bousquet. 2010. A companion modeling approach applied to fishery management. Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1334–1344. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.012.