Integrated Assessment of the European WFD Implementation in Extremely Overexploited Aquifers Through Participatory Modelling

Water Resources Management

Volumn 25, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 3343-3370

  Molina, Jose Luis ^a   García Aróstegui, Jose Luis ^b   Bromley, John ^c   Benavente, Jose ^d  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO GEOLÓGICO Y MINERO DE ESPAÑA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aquifers management; Decision support systems; Impacts assessment; Participatory modelling; Water framework directive

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORTS; ECONOMIC COSTS; EUROPEAN UNION WATER FRAMEWORK; GROUNDWATER DRAWDOWN; GROUNDWATER PUMPING; GROUNDWATER USE; HARD SCIENCE; IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; IMPACTS ASSESSMENT; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; LONG-TERM SUSTAINABILITY; NUMERICAL MODELLING; PARTICIPATORY METHODS; PARTICIPATORY MODELLING; PROBABILISTIC METHODS; SCENARIO DESIGN; SEMI ARID; WATER ASSESSMENT; WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE;

AQUIFERS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HYDROGEOLOGY; INFERENCE ENGINES; RATING; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER LEVELS;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCES;

AQUIFER; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EUROPEAN UNION; IRRIGATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PROBABILITY; SUSTAINABILITY; WATER MANAGEMENT;

SPAIN;

EID: 80053569950     PISSN: 09204741     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-011-9859-1     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Anderson MP, Woessner WW (1992) Applied groundwater modelling. Academic, London, p 381.
2. Antunes P, Santos R, Videira N (2006) Participatory decision making for sustainable development; the use of mediated modelling techniques. L Use Policy 23: 44-52.
3. Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P (2006) Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application. Sci Total Environ 365: 105-122.
4. Borsuk ME, Stow CA, Reckhow KH (2004) A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, uncertainty analysis. Ecol Model 173: 219-239.
5. Bradley C (2002) Simulation of the annual water table dynamics of a floodplain wetl, Narborough Bog, UK. J Hydrol 261(1-4): 150-172.
6. Bromley J (2005) Guidelines for the use of Bayesian networks as a participatory tool for water resource management, based on the results of the MERIT project. Centre for Ecology Hydrology, Wallingford.
7. Bromley J, Jackson N, Clymer O, Giacomello A, Jensen F (2005) The use of Hugin to develop Bayesian network as an aid to integrated water resource planning. Environ Modell Softw 20: 231-242.
8. Cain J (2001) Planning improvements in natural resources management. Centre for Ecology Hydrology, Wallingford.
9. Carbognin L, Gatto P, Mozzi G et al (1984) Venice subsidence case history 93. In: Pol JF (ed) Guidebook to studies of l subsidence due to ground-water withdrawal. International Hydrological Programme, working group 84, Chelsea, pp 161-174. http://wwwrcamnlwrusgsgov/rgws/Unesco/PDF-Chapters/Chapter9-3pdf.
10. Carmona G, Varela C, Bromley J (2011) The use of participatory object-oriented Bayesian networks and agro-economic models for groundwater management in Spain. Water Resour Manag 25: 1509-1524. doi: 10. 1007/s11269-010-9757-y.
11. Castelletti A, Soncini-Sessa R (2007) Bayesian Networks participatory modelling in water resource management. Environ Modell Softw 22: 1075-1088.
12. Chebud YA, Melesse AM (2009) Numerical modelling of the groundwater flow system of the Gumera sub-basin in Lake Tana basin, Ethiopia. Hydrol Process 23: 3694-3704.
13. Cheng AD, Cheng T (2005) Heritage early history of the boundary element method. Eng Anal Bound Elem 29: 268-302.
14. Chiang HW (2005) 3D groundwater modelling with PMWIN, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, p 411.
15. Chiang HW, Kinzelbach W (2001) 3D-groundwater modeling with PMWIN. Springer, Berlin.
16. Custodio E (2002) Aquifer overexploitation: what does it mean? Hydrogeol J 10: 254-277. doi: 101007/s10040-002-0188-6.
17. Downs TJ, Mazari H, Domínguez-Mora M, Buffet IH (2000) Sustainability of least cost policies for meeting Mexico City's future water dem. Water Resour Res 36(8): 2321-2329. doi: 101029/1999WR900234.
18. EC 2000/60/ Directive of the European Parliament of the Council, establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal 327 European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
19. Farmani R, Henriksen HJ, Savic D (2009) An evolutionary Bayesian belief network methodology for optimum management of groundwater contamination. Environ Modell Softw 24(3): 303-310.
20. Feitelson E (2006) Impediments to the management of shared aquifers: a political economy perspective. Hydrogeol J 14(3): 319-329.
21. ganETxl (2007) Available at: http://wwwprojectsexacuk/cws/ganetxl, last visited May 2007.
22. Garrido A, Martinez-Santos P, Llamas MR (2006) Groundwater irrigation its implications for water policy in semiarid countries: the Spanish experience. Hydrog J 14(3): 340-349.
23. Gedeon M, Wemaere I, Marivoet J (2007) Regional groundwater model of northeast Belgium. J Hydrol 335(1-2): 133-139.
24. Geurts JLA, Joldersma C (2001) Methodology for participatory policy analysis. Eur J Oper Res 128: 300-310.
25. Glicken J (2000) Getting stakeholder participation "right": a discussion of participatory processes possible pitfalls. Environ Sci Policy 3: 305-310.
26. Harbaugh AW, McDonald MG (1996) Programmer's documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the U. S. Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flowmodel: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-486, p 220.
27. Hare M, Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Stakeholder categorisation in participatory integrated assessment processes. Integr Assess 3(1): 50-62.
28. Henriksen HJ, Barlebo HC (2007) Reflections on the use of Bayesian belief networks for adaptive management. J Environ Manag 88(4): 1025-1036. doi: 101016/jjenvman200705009.
29. Henriksen HJ, Rasmussen P, Brt G, Von Bülow D, Jensen F (2007) Public participation modelling using Bayesian networks in management of groundwater contamination. Environ Modell Softw 22: 1101-1113.
30. Henriksen HJ, Refsgaard JC, Holberg AL, Ferr N, Gigsbeer P, Scholten H (2009) Harmonised principles for public participation in quality assurance of integrated water resources modelling. Water Resour Manag 23: 2539-2554.
31. Ibáñez J, Martínez J, Puigdefrabregas J (2008) Assessing overexploitation in Mediterranean aquifers using system stability condition analysis. Ecol Model 218: 260-266.
32. Jakeman AJ, Letchter RA (2003) Integrated assessment modelling: features, principles examples for catchment management. Environ Modell Softw 18: 491-501.
33. Janssen W, Goldworthy P (1996) Multidisciplinary research for natural resource management: conceptual practical implications. Agric syst 51: 259-279.
34. Jensen FV (1996) An introduction to Bayesian networks. UCL, London.
35. Jensen FV (2001) Bayesian network decision graphs. Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg.
36. Koundouri P (2004) Potential for groundwater management: Gisser-Sanchez effect reconsidered. Water Resour Res 40: 6. doi: 101029/2003WR002164.
37. Lin YC, Medina M (2003) Incorporating transient storage in conjunctive stream-aquifer modelling. Adv Water Resour 26(9): 1001-1019.
38. Little LR, Kuikka S, Punt AE, Pantus F, Davies CR, Mapstone BD (2004) Information flow among fishing vessels modelled using a Bayesian network. Environ Modell Softw 19: 27-34.
39. Llamas MR, Custodio E (2003) Intensive use of groundwater: challenges opportunities AA. Balkema, Lisse, p 478.
40. Malekmohammadi B, Kerachian R, Zahraie B (2009) Developing monthly operating rules for a cascade system of reservoirs: application of Bayesian networks. Environ Modell Softw 24(12): 1420-1432.
41. Martínez-Cortina L, Cruces J (2005) The analysis of the intensive use of groundwater in the Upper Guadiana basin, central Spain by using a numerical model. In: Sauquillo A, Capilla J, Martinez-Cortina L, Sanchez- Villa X (eds) Groundwater intensive use. Balkema, Leiden, pp 285-294.
42. Martinez-Santos P, Martinez-Alfaro PE, Murillo JM (2004) A method to estimate the artificial recharge capacity of the Crestatx aquifer (Majorca, Spain). Env Geol 47(8): 1155-1161.
43. Martínez-Santos P, Llamas R, Martínez-Alfaro P (2008) Environ Modell Softw 23: 1145-1162.
44. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. Technical report, US Geol Survey, Reston, VA.
45. Molina JL (2009) Integrated aquifers management in semiarid regions, altiplano water system case study (Murcia, SE Spain). Thesis dissertation. ISBN 978-84-692-3851-6.
46. Molina JL, García-Aróstegui JL (2006) Intensive aquifers exploitation its impacts: a case study in Serral-Salinas (Murcia-Alicante). Boletín Geológico y Minero 117: 597-599.
47. Molina JL, García-Aróstegui JL (2007) Identificación preliminar de impactos del uso intensivo del agua subterránea en el sureste español: Acuífero Serral-Salinas (Murcia-Alicante). Boletín Geológico y Minero 118: 597-599.
48. Molina JL, García-Aróstegui JL, Benavente J, Varela C, De la Hera A, López-Geta JA (2009) Aquifers overexploitation in SE Spain: a proposal for the integrated analysis of water management. Water Resour Manage 23: 2737-2760.
49. Moore JE (2002) Effects of groundwater mining on aquiferscase histories Denver CO, Tucson AZ, Chicago IL, Central Valley CA Las Vegas NV, Groundwater Human Development. In: Bocanegra E, Martínez D, Massone H (Eds) Red book. IAH, Mar del Plata, pp 419-422.
50. Morgan MG, Dowlatabadi H (1996) Learning from integrated assessment of climate change. Clim Chang 34: 337-368.
51. Mostert E (2003) The challenge of public participation. Water Policy 5(2): 179-197.
52. Newton AC, Stewart GB, Diaz A, Golicher D, Pullin AS (2007) Bayesian Belief Networks as a tool for evidence based conservation management. J Nat Conserv 15(2): 144-160.
53. Ortiz-Zamora D, Ortega-Guerrero A (2010) Evolution of long-term l subsidence near Mexico City: review, field investigations, predictive simulations. Water Resour Res 46: W01513. doi: 10. 1029/2008WR007398.
54. Park J, Seaton RAF (1996) Integrative research sustainable agriculture. Agric Syst 50: 81-100.
55. Parker P, Letcher R, Jakeman AJ (2002) Progress in integrated assessment modelling. Environ Modell Softw 17: 209-217.
56. Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
57. Praveena SM, Aris A (2010) Groundwater resources assessment using numerical model: a case study in low-lying coastal area. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7: 135-146.
58. Prommer H, Barry DA, Davis GB (2002) Modelling of physical reactive processes during biodegradation of a hydrocarbon plume under transient groundwater flow conditions. J Contam Hydrol 59(1-2): 113-131.
59. Refsgaard JC, van Der Sluijs JP, Hojberg AL, Vanrolleghem PA (2007) Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process framework guidance. Environ Modell Softw 22(11): 1543-1556.
60. Risbey J, Klikar MA, Patwardhan A (1996) Assessing integrated assessments. Clim Change 34: 369-395.
61. Rogers P, Llamas MR, Martinez-Cortina L (2006) Water crisis: myth or reality? Taylor & Francis, London, p 331.
62. Rothman DS, Robinson JB (1997) Growing pains: a conceptual framework for considering integrated assessments. Environ Monit Assess 46: 23-43.
63. Rotmans J, van Asselt M (1996) Integrated assessment: growing child on its way to maturity. An editorial essay. Clim Chang 34: 327-336.
64. Sadoddin A, Letcher R, Jakeman A, Newham LTH (2005) A Bayesian decision network approach for assessing the ecological impacts of salinity management. Math Comput Simul 69(1-2): 162-176.
65. Said A (2006) The implementation of a Bayesian network for watershed management decisions. Water Resour Manag 20: 591-605.
66. Salem OA (2005) Aquifer overexploitation in Libya-the Gefara plain case. Groundw Intensive Use 7: 127-136. IAH (ed).
67. Samper J, Huguet LL, Ares J (1999) Visual Balan Tutorial V 20 Interactive code to making hydrological balances recharge estimation. ENRESA, Madrid.
68. Schlager E (2006) Challenges of governing groundwater in US western states. Hydrog J 14(3): 350-360.
69. Scibek J, Allen DM (2006) Comparing modelled responses of two high-permeability, unconfined aquifers to predicted climate change. Global Planet Change 50(1-2): 50-62.
70. Ticehurst JL, Newham LTH, Rissik D, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2006) A Bayesian network approach for assessing the sustainability of coastal lakes in New South Wales, Australia. Environ Modell Softw 22(8): 1129-1139.
71. Tsur Y, Zemel A (2004) Endangered aquifers: groundwater management under threats of catastrophic events. Water Resour Res 40: 6. doi: 101029/2003WR002168.
72. van den Belt M (2004) Mediated modeling. A system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Island Press, Washington.
73. Varela C, Blanco I, Carmona G, Esteve P (2007) Field work report in the Upper Guadiana basin (Spain). In: Varela C (ed) Report of the NeWater project, New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management Under Uncertainty. Available at www. newaterinfo.
74. Varis O, Fraboulet-Jussila S (2002) Water resources development in the Lower Senegal River Basin: conflicting interests, environmental concerns policy options. Water Res Dev 18: 245-260.
75. Videira N, Antunes P, Santos R, Gamito S (2003) Participatory modelling in environmental decision-making: the ria Formosa natural park case study. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 5(3): 421-447.
76. World Commission on Environment Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
77. Xepapadeas A, Koundouri P (2004) Introduction to special section on Groundwater Economics Policy. Water Resour Res 40: 6. doi: 101029/2003WR002158.