Participation

Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 345-359

  Elzinga, Aant ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Constructivism; Empowerment; Epistemology; Politics; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892812772     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3_22     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Bauman, Z.: 2001, The Individualized Society, Polity Press, Cambridge.
2. Beauchamp, T. L.: 1987, Ethical Theory and the Problem of Closure. In: H. T. Engelhardt and A. L. Caplan (eds), Scientific Controversies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 27-48.
3. Callon, M.: 1999, The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Knowledge, Sci Tech Hum Val 4(1), 81-94.
4. Dickson, D.: 1984, The New Politics of Science, Pantheon Books, New York.
5. Elzinga, A.: 2000, What Participation? (Rev. of Jamison, A. and Ostby, P. (eds), Public Participation and Sustainable Development), Sci Cult 9(1), 121-128.
6. Elzinga, A.: 2004, The New Production of Reductionism in Models Relating to Research Policy. In: K. Grandin, N. Worms and S. Widmalm (eds), The Science-Industry Nexus. History, Policy, Implications, Science History Publications, Sagamore Beach, pp. 277-304.
7. European Commission.: 2005, RTD info. Magazine on European Research, special issue November 2005 devoted to Science dialogues.
8. Eyerman, R. and Jamison, A.: 1989, Environmental Knowledge as an OrganizationalWeapon: The Case of Greenpeace, Soc Sci Inform 28(1), 99-119.
9. Fiorino, D. J.: 1990, Citizen Participation and EnvironmentalRisk, Sci TechHum Val 15(2), 226-243.
10. Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. R. :1992, Science for the Post-Normal Age, Futures 24(10), 963-976.
11. Gibbons, M.: 1999, Science's New Contract with Society, Nature 402, C81-C84.
12. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M.: 1994, The New Production of Knowledge, Sage, London.
13. Hård, M. and Jamison, A.: 2005, Hubris and Hybrids. A Cultural History of Technology and Science, Routledge, London
14. Irwin, A.: 1995, Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development, Routledge, London, New York.
15. Irwin, A.: 2001, Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences, Publ Understand Sci 10(1), 1-18.
16. Irwin, A.: 2004, Expertise and Experience in the Governance of Science: What is Participation For? In: G. Edman (ed. ), Expertise in Law and Regulation, Aldershot and Burlington, Ashgate, pp. 32-50.
17. Jasanoff, S.: 1990, The Fifth Branch, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
18. Jasanoff, S. and Wynne, B. :1998, Science and Decisionmaking. In: S. Rayner and E. L Malone (eds. ), Human Choice & Climate Change, Batelle Press, Columbus, pp. 1-87.
19. Laird, F. N.: 1993, Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision Making, Sci Tech Hum Val 18(3), 341-361.
20. Levidow, L. and Marris, C.: 2001, Science and Governance in Europe: Lessons from the Case of Agricultural Biotechnology, Sci Publ Pol 28(5), 345-360.
21. Lubchenko, J.: 1997, Entering the Century of Environment. A New Social Contract for Science, Science 279, 191-497.
22. McMullin, E.: 1987, Scientific Controversy and its Termination. In H. T. Engelhardt and A. L. Caplan (eds. ), Scientific Controversies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 49-91.
23. Maranta, A., Guggenheim, M., Gisler, P. and Pohl, C.: 2003, The Reality of Experts and the Imagined Lay Person, Acta Sociologica 46(2), 150-165.
24. Martin, M. and Richards, E.: 1995, Scientific Knowledge, Controversy and Public Decision Making. In: Handbook in Science and Technology Studies, Sage, London, pp. 506-526.
25. Nelkin, D.: 1995, Scientific Controversies. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen and T. Pinch (eds. ), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage, London, pp. 444-456.
26. Nowotny, H., Gibbons, M. and Scott, P.: 2001, Re-Thinking Science, Polity Press, Cambridge.
27. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. J.: 2000, Public Participation Methods: A Framework of Evaluation, Sci Tech Hum Val 25(1), 3-29.
28. Rowe, G. and Frewer L. J.: 2005, A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms, Sci Tech Hum Val 30(2), 251-290.
29. Royal Society and The Royal Academy of Engineering.: 2004, Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies, RS & REA Report of July 2004, London.
30. Salter, L.: 1988, Mandated Science, Kluwer, Dordecht Sclove, R. E.: 1998, Better Approaches to Science Policy Editorial, Science 279, 1283.
31. Service, R. F.: 2005, Calls for More Research on Toxicology of Nanomaterials, Science 310, 1609.
32. Weinberg, A.: 1972, Science and Trans-Science, Minerva 10, 209-222.
33. Weingart, P.: 1999, Scientific Expertise and Policy-Making: Paradoxes of Science in Politics, Sci Publ Pol 26(3), 151-161.
34. Wynne, B.: 1995, Public Understanding of Science. In: S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen and T. Pinch (eds. ), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage, London, pp. 361-388.
35. Ziman, J.: 1996, Post Academic Science: Constructing Knowledge with Networks and Norms, Sci Stud 9(1), 67-80.