Long-time evolution and highly dynamic satellite DNA in leptodactylid and hylodid frogs

BMC Genetics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Vittorazzi, Stenio Eder ^a   Lourenço, Luciana Bolsoni ^a   Recco Pimentel, Shirlei Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Amphibia; Chromosomes; Physalaemus; Satellite DNA

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA; SATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ANURA; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CROSSODACTYLUS GAUDICHAUDII; DNA EXTRACTION; DNA SEQUENCE; DOT HYBRIDIZATION; EVOLUTION; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENOME; HETEROCHROMATIN; KARYOTYPE; LEPTODACTYLUS; LEPTODACTYLUS LATRANS; LIVER; MOLECULAR CLONING; MUSCLE; NONHUMAN; PHYSALAEMUS CUVIERI; PHYSALAEMUS MARMORATUS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; ANURA; BASE SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOMES; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DNA, SATELLITE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; KARYOTYPE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84947489771     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-014-0111-x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Charlesworth B, Sniegowski P, Stephan W: The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature 1994, 371:215-220.
2. López-Flores I, Ramos-Garrido MA: The repetitive DNA content of eukaryotic genomes. In Repetitive DNA, Volume 7. Edited by López-Flores I. Granada: Karger; 2012:1-28.
3. Plohl M, Meštrović N, Mravinac B Satellite DNA evolution. In Repetitive DNA, Volume 7. Edited by López-Flores I. Granada: Karger; 2012:126-152.
4. Kopecna O, Kubickova S, Cernohorska H, Cabelova K, Vahala J, Rubes J: Isolation and comparison of tribe-specific centromeric repeats within Bovidae. J Appl Genet 2012, 53:193-202.
5. Tsoumani KT, Drosopoulou E, Mavragani-Tsipidou P, Mathiopoulos KD: Molecular characterization and chromosomal distribution of a species-specific transcribed centromeric satellite repeat from the olive fruit Fly, Bactrocera oleae. PLoS One 2013, 8:1-11.
6. Singer MF: Highly repeated sequences in mammalian genomes. Int Rev Cytol 1982, 76:67-112.
7. Picariello O, Feliciello I, Bellinello R, Chinali G: S1 satellite as a taxonomic marker in brown frogs: molecular evidence that Rana graeca graeca and Rana graeca italica are different species. Genome 2002, 45:63-70.
8. Martinsen L, Venanzetti F, Johnsen A, Sbordoni V, Bachmann L: Molecular evolution of the pDo500 satellite DNA family in Dolichopoda cave crickets (Rhaphidophoridae). BMC Evol Biol 2009, 9:301-314.
9. Cazaux B, Catalan J, Justy F, Escudé C, Desmarais E, Britton-Davidian J: Evolution of the structure and composition of house mouse satellite DNA sequences in the subgenus Mus (Rodentia: Muridea): a cytogenomic approach. Chromosoma 2013, 122:209-220.
10. Slamovits HC, Rossi MS: Satellite DNA: agent of chromosomal evolution in mammals. Mastozoología Neotropical 2002, 9:297-308.
11. Kogan GL, Gvozdev VA: Molecular evolution of tandem heterochromatic repeats involving a switch of their function in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Russ J Genet 2002, 38:586-593.
12. Ugarković D, Plohl M: Variation in satellite DNA profiles - causes and effects. EMBO J 2002, 21:5955-5959.
13. Plohl M, Luchetti A, Meštrović N, Mantovani B: Satellite DNAs between selfishness and functionality: structure, genomics and evolution of tandem repeats in centromeric (hetero)chromatin. Gene 2008, 409:72-82.
14. Ferree PM, Prasad M: How can satellite DNA divergence cause reproductive isolation? Let us count the chromosomal ways. Genet Res Int 2012, 2012:1-11.
15. Martins C, Ferreira IA, Oliveira C, Foresti F, Galetti PMG: A tandemly repetitive centromeric DNA sequence of the fish Hoplias malabaricus (Characiformers: Erythrinidae) is derived from 5S rDNA. Genetica 2006, 127:133-141.
16. Plohl M: Those mysterious sequences of satellite DNAs. Period Biol 2010, 112:403-410.
17. Dover GA: Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature 1982, 299:111-117.
18. Ohta T, Dover GA: The cohesive population genetics of molecular drive. Genetics 1984, 108:501-521.
19. Salser W, Bowen S, Browne D, El Adli F, FedoroffN, Fry K, Heindell H, Paddock G, Poon R, Wallace B, Whitcome P Investigation of the organization of mammalian chromosomes at the sequence level. Fed Proc 1976, 35:23-35.
20. Fry K, Salser W: Nucleotide sequences of HS-α satellite DNA from kangaroo rat Dipodomys ordii and characterization of similar sequences in other rodents. Cell 1977, 12:1069-1084.
21. Meštrović N, Plohl M, Mravinac B, Ugarković D.: Evolution of satellite DNAs from the genus Palorus - experimental evidence for the 'library' hypothesis. Mol Biol Evol 1998, 15:1062-1068.
22. Slamovits CH, Cook JA, Lessa EP, Rossi MS: Recurrent amplifications and deletions of satellite DNA accompanied chromosomal diversification in South American Tuco-tucos (Genus Ctenomys, Rodentia: Octodontidae): a phylogenetic approach. Mol Biol Evol 2001, 18:1708-1719.
23. Bruvo-Madaric B, Plohl M: Wide distribution of related satellite DNA families within the genus Pimelia (Tenebrionidae). Genetica 2007, 130:35-42.
24. Caraballo DA, Belluscio PM, Rossi MA: The library model for satellite DNA evolution: a case study with the rodents of the genus Ctenomys (Octodontidae) from the Ibera marsh, Argentina. Genetica 2010, 138:1201-1210.
25. Vittorazzi SE, Lourenço LB, Del-Grande ML, Recco-Pimentel SM: Satellite DNA derived from 5S rDNA in Physalaemus cuvieri (Anura, Leiuperidae). Cytogenet Genome Res 2011, 134:101-107.
26. Frost DR: Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. 2014, Version 6.0 (10 March 2014). [http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html]. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.
27. Nascimento BN, Caramashi U, Cruz CAG: Taxonomic review of the species groups of the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 with revalidation of the genera Engystomops Jiménez-De-La-Espada, 1872 and Eupemphix Steindachner, 1863 (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae). Arquivos do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro 2005, 63:297-320.
28. Lynch JD: Systematic status of the american leptodactylid frog genera Engystomops, Eupemphix, and Physalaemus. Copeia 1970, 1970:488-496.
29. Vittorazzi SE, Quinderé YRSD, Recco-Pimentel SM, Tomatis C, Baldo D, Lima JRF, Ferro JM, Lima JD, Lourenço LB: Comparative cytogenetics of Physalaemus albifrons and Physalaemus cuvieri species groups (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Comp Cytogenet 2014, 8:103-123.
30. Beçak ML, Denaro L, Beçak W: Polyploidy and mechanisms of karyotypic diversification in Amphibia. Cytogenetics 1970, 9:225-238.
31. Denaro L: Karyotypes of Leptodactylidae anurans. J Herpetol 1972, 6:71-74.
32. De Lucca EJ, Jim J, Foresti F: Chromosomal studies in twelve species of Leptodactylidae and one Brachycephalidae. Caryology 1974, 27:183-191.
33. Silva APZ, Haddad CFB, Kasahara S: Nucleolus organizer regions in Physalaemus cuvieri (Anura, Leptodactylidae), with evidence of a unique case of Ag-NOR variability. Hereditas 1999, 131:135-141.
34. Quinderé YRSD, Lourenço LB, Andrade GV, Tomatis C, Baldo D, Recco-Pimentel SM: Additional cytogenetics analyses of the widespread anuran Physalaemus cuvieri (Anura, Leiuperidae) with emphasis on NOR variability. Biol Res 2009, 42:79-92.
35. Nascimento J, Quinderé YRSD, Recco-Pimentel SM, Lima JRF, Lourenço LB: Heteromorphic Z and W sex chromosomes in Physalaemus ephippifer (Steindachner, 1864) (Anura, Leiuperidae). Genetica 2010, 138:1127-1132.
36. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edition. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989.
37. Hall TA: BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999, 41:95-98.
38. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25:4876-4882.
39. Kimura M: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980, 16:111-120.
40. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 28:2731-2739.
41. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW: NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012, 9:671-675.
42. King M, Rofe R: Karyotypic variation in the Australian gecko Phyllodactylus marmoratus (Gray) (Gekkonidae: Reptilia). Chromosoma 1976, 54:75-87.
43. Schmid M: Chromosome banding in Amphibia. I. Constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolus organizer regions in Bufo and Hyla. Chromosoma 1978, 66:361-388.
44. Viegas-Pequignot E In Situ Hybridization to Chromosomes With Biotinylated Probes. In In Situ Hybridization: a Practical Approach. Edited by Willernson D. Oxford: Oxford University Press-IRL Press; 1992:137-158.
45. Howell WM, Black DA: Controlled silver staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experientia 1980, 36:1014-1015.
46. Pyron RA, Wiens JJ: A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2,800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2011, 61:543-583.
47. Fouquet A, Blotto BL, Maronna MM, Verdade VK, Juncá FA, De Sá R, Rodrigues MT: Unexpected phylogenetic positions of the genera Rupirana and Crossodactylodes reveal insights into the biogeography and reproductive evolution of leptodactylid frogs. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2013, 67:445-457.
48. Mehrotra S, Goel S, Raina SN, Rajpal VR: Significance of satellite DNA revealed by conservation of a widespread repeat DNA sequence among angiosperms. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2014, 173:1-12.
49. Teruel M, Ruíz-Ruano FJ, Marchal JA, Sánchez A, Cabrero J, Camacho JPM, Perfectti F: Disparate molecular evolution of two types of repetitive DNAs in the genome of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans. Heredity 2014, 112:531-542.
50. Choo KH, Vissel B, Nagy A, Earle E, Kalitsis P: A survey of the genomic distribution of alpha satellite DNA on all the human chromosomes, and derivation of a new consensus sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1991, 19:1179-1182.
51. Bachmann L, Sperlich D: Gradual evolution of a specific satellite DNA family in Drosophila ambigua, D. tristis, and D. obscura. Mol Biol Evol 1993, 10:647-659.
52. Heslop-Harrison JS, Murata M, Ogura Y, Schwarzacher T, Motoyoshi F: Polymorphisms and genomic organization of repetitive DNA from centromeric regions of Arabidopsis chromosomes. Plant Cell 1999, 11:31-42.
53. HenikoffS, Ahmad K, Malik HS: The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 2001, 293:1098-1102.
54. Zhang T, Talbert PB, Zhang W, Wu Y, Yang Z, HenikoffJG, HenikoffS, Jiang J: The CentO satellite confers translational and rotational phasing on cenH3 nucleosomes in rice centromeres. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2013, 110:4875-4883.
55. Meštrović N, Randig O, Abad P, Plohl M, Castagnone-Sereno F: Conserved and variable domains in satellite DNAs of mitotic parthenogenetic root-knot nematode species. Gene 2005, 362:44-50.
56. Meštrović N, Castagnone-Sereno P, Plohl M: High conservation of the differentially amplified MPA2 satellite DNA family in parthenogenetic root-knot nematodes. Gene 2006, 376:260-267.
57. Hall SE, Kettler G, Preuss D: Centromere satellites from Arabidopsis populations: maintenance of conserved and variable domains. Genome Res 2003, 13:195-205.
58. Ellingsen A, Slamovits CH, Rossi MS: Sequence evolution of the major satellite DNA of the genus Ctenomys (Octodontidae, Rodentia). Gene 2007, 392:283-290.
59. Ferree PM, Barbash DA: Species-specific heterochromatin prevents mitotic chromosome segregation to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. PLoS Biol 2009, 7:1-13.
60. Conte M, Zucchi MI, Andrade GV, Souza AP, Recco-Pimentel SM: Study of closely related species within the Physalaemus cuvieri group (Anura): contribution of microsatellite markers. Genet Mol Res 2011, 10:1434-1444.
61. Singh L, Purdom IF, Jones KW: Satellite DNA and evolution of sex chromosomes. Chromosoma 1976, 59:43-62.
62. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B, Marais G: Steps in the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes. Heredity 2005, 95:118-128.
63. Schemberger MO, Bellafronte E, Nogaroto V, Almeida MC, Schuhli GS, Artoni RF, Moreira-Filho O, Vicari MR: Differentiation of repetitive DNA sites and sex chromosome systems reveal closely related group in Parodontidae (Actinopterygii: Characiformes). Genetica 2011, 139:1499-1508.
64. Steflova P, Tokan V, Vogel I, Lexa M, Macas J, Novak P, Hobza H, Vyskot B, Kejnovsky E: Contrasting patterns of transposable element and satellite distribution on sex chromosomes (XY1Y2) in the dioecious plant Rumex acetosa. Genome Biol Evol 2013, 5:769-782.