Pyvolve: A flexible python module for simulating sequences along phylogenies

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Spielman, Stephanie J ^a   Wilke, Claus O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CODON; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; MARKOV CHAIN; PROCEDURES;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84946924605     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139047     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Cock PJ, Antao T, Chang JT, Chapman BA, Cox CJ, Dalke A, et al. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:1422-1423. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 PMID: 19304878
2. Sukumaran J, Holder MT. DendroPy: A Python library for phylogenetic computing. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26:1569-1571. PMID: 20421198
3. Arenas M. Simulation of Molecular Data under Diverse Evolutionary Scenarios. PLoS Comp Biol. 2012; 8:e1002495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002495
4. Oliphant T. Python for Scientific Computing. IEEE Comput Sci Eng. 2007; 9:10-20. doi: 10.1109/ MCSE.2007.58
5. Yang Z. Computational Molecular Evolution. Oxford University Press; 2006.
6. Lewis PO. A Likelihood Approach to Estimating Phylogeny from Discrete Morphological Character Data. Syst Biol. 2001; 50:913-925. doi: 10.1080/106351501753462876 PMID: 12116640
7. Rambaut A, Grassly N. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997; 13:235-238. PMID: 9183526
8. Strope C, Scott S, Moriyama E. indel-Seq-Gen: a new protein family simulator incorporating domains, motifs, and indels. Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 24(3):640-649. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl195 PMID: 17158778
9. Fletcher W, Yang Z. INDELible: A Flexible Simulator of Biological Sequence Evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2009; 26(8):1879-1888. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp098 PMID: 19423664
10. Halpern A, Bruno W. Evolutionary distances for protein-coding sequences: modeling site-specific residue frequencies. Mol Biol Evol. 1998; 15:910-917. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025995 PMID: 9656490
11. Arenas M, Posada D. Simulation of Genome-Wide Evolution under Heterogeneous Substitution Models and Complex Multispecies Coalescent Histories. Mol Biol Evol. 2014; 31:1295-1301. doi: 10.1093/ molbev/msu078 PMID: 24557445
12. Yang Z, Nielsen R. Mutation-Selection Models of Codon Substitution and Their Use to Estimate Selective Strengths on Codon Usage. Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Jan; 25(3):568-579. doi: 10.1093/molbev/ msm284 PMID: 18178545
13. Holder M, Zwickl D, Dessimoz C. Evaluating the robustness of phylogenetic methods to among-site variability in substitution processes. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2008; 363:4013-4021. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008. 0162 PMID: 18852108
14. Rodrigue N, Philippe H, Lartillot N. Mutation-selection models of coding sequence evolution with siteheterogeneous amino acid fitness profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107(10):4629-4634. doi:10. 1073/pnas.0910915107 PMID: 20176949
15. Tamuri AU, dos Reis M, Goldstein RA. Estimating the distribution of selection coefficients from phylogenetic data using sitewise mutation-selection models. Genetics. 2012; 190:1101-1115. doi: 10.1534/ genetics.111.136432 PMID: 22209901
16. Tamuri AU, Goldman N, dos Reis M. A penalized-likelihood method to estimate the distribution of selection coefficients from phylogenetic data. Genetics. 2014; 197:257-271. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114. 162263 PMID: 24532780
17. Rodrigue N, Lartillot N. Site-heterogeneous mutation-selection models within the PhyloBayes-MPI Package. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30:1020-1021. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt729 PMID: 24351710
18. Spielman S, Wilke C. The relationship between dN/dS and scaled selection coefficients. Mol Biol Evol. 2015; 32:1097-1108. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv003 PMID: 25576365
19. dos Reis M. How to calculate the non-synonymous to synonymous rate ratio of protein-coding genes under the Fisher-Wright mutation-selection framework. Biol Lett. 2015; 11:20141031. doi: 10.1098/ rsbl.2014.1031 PMID: 25854546
20. Tavare S. Lines of descent and genealogical processes, and their applications in population genetics models. Theor Popul Biol. 1984; 26:119-164. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(84)90027-3 PMID: 6505980
21. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. Dating of human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 1985; 22(2):160-174. doi: 10.1007/BF02101694 PMID: 3934395
22. Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993; 10:512-526. PMID: 8336541
23. Jones D, Taylor W, Thornton J. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. CABIOS. 1992; 8:275-282. PMID: 1633570
24. Whelan S, Goldman N. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol. 2001; 18:691-699. doi: 10.1093/ oxfordjournals.molbev.a003851 PMID: 11319253
25. Le S, Gascuel O. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2008; 25:1307-1320. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn067 PMID: 18367465
26. Yang N, Nielsen R, Hasegawa M. Models of Amino Acid Substitution and Applications to Mitochondrial Protein Evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 1998; 15:1600-1611. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025888 PMID: 9866196
27. Adachi J, Hasegawa M. MOLPHY version 2.3: programs for molecular phylogenetics based on maximum likelihood. Comput Sci Monogr. 19896; 28:1-150.
28. Dayhoff M, Schwartz R, Orcutt B. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. 1978; 5(3):345-352.
29. Mirsky A, Kazandjian L, Anisimova M. Antibody-Specific Model of Amino Acid Substitution for Immunological Inferences from Alignments of Antibody Sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 2015; 32:806-819. doi:10. 1093/molbev/msu340 PMID: 25534034
30. Goldman N, Yang Z. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 1994; 11:725-736. PMID: 7968486
31. Nielsen R, Yang Z. Likelihood models for detecting positive selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics. 1998; 148:929-936. PMID: 9539414
32. Muse S, Gaut B. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol Biol Evol. 1994; 11:715-724. PMID: 7968485
33. Kosiol C, Holmes I, Goldman N. An empirical codon model for protein sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 24:1464-1479. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm064 PMID: 17400572
34. Yang Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007; 24:1586-1591. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm088 PMID: 17483113
35. Sipos B, Massingham T, Jordan GE, Goldman N. PhyloSim-Monte Carlo simulation of sequence evolution in the R statistical computing environment. BMC Bioinform. 2011; 12(104).
36. Jukes T, Cantor C. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro H, editor. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic Press; 1969.
37. Suzuki Y, Gojobori T. A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. Mol Biol Evol. 1999; 16:1315-1328. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026042 PMID: 10563013
38. Kosakovsky Pond S, Frost S. Not So Different After All: A Comparison of Methods for Detecting Amino Acid Sites Under Selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2005; 22:1208-1222. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi105 PMID: 15703242
39. Kosakovsky Pond S, Frost S, Muse S. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2005; 12:676-679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti079
40. Arenas M. Advances in Computer Simulation of Genome Evolution: Toward More Realistic Evolutionary Genomics Analysis by Approximate Bayesian Computation. J Mol Evol. 2015; 8:189-192. doi:10. 1007/s00239-015-9673-0
41. Dalquen D, Anisimova M, Gonnet G, Dessimoz C. ALF-a simulation framework for genome evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2012; 29:1115-1123. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr268 PMID: 22160766
42. Beiko R, Charlebois R. A simulation test bed for hypotheses of genome evolution. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23:825-831. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm024 PMID: 17267425
43. Grahnen J, Liberles D. CASS: Protein sequence simulation with explicit genotype-phenotype mapping. Trends in Evolutionary Biology; 4:e9. doi: 10.4081/eb.2012.e9
44. Arenas M, Dos Santos H, Posada D, Bastolla U. Protein evolution along phylogenetic histories under structurally constrained substitution models. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29:3020-3028. doi: 10.1093/ bioinformatics/btt530 PMID: 24037213
45. Koestler T, von Haeseler A, Ebersberger I. REvolver: modeling sequence evolution under domain constraints. Mol Biol Evol. 2012; 29:2133-2145. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss078 PMID: 22383532
46. Cartwright R. DNA assembly with gaps (Dawg): simulating sequence evolution. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21:iii31-iii38. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1200 PMID: 16306390
47. Bielejec F, Lemey P, Carvalho L, Baele G, Rambaut A, Suchard M. piBUSS: a parallel BEAST/BEAGLE utility for sequence simulation under complex evolutionary scenarios. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014; 15:133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-133 PMID: 24885610