Models of amino acid substitution and applications to mitochondrial protein evolution

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 15, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1600-1611

  Yang, Ziheng ^a,b   Nielsen, Rasmus ^c   Hasegawa, Masami ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Amino acid substitution; Mammals; Maximum likelihood; Mitochondrial DNA; Protein evolution

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; GENOME; MAMMAL; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MITOCHONDRION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 0031792828     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025888     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ADACHI, J., and M. HASEGAWA. 1992. MOLPHY: programs for molecular phylogenetics, I. - PROTML: maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny. Comput. Sci. Monogr. 27:1-77.
2. _. 1996a. MOLPHY version 2.3: programs for molecular phylogenetics based on maximum likelihood. Comput. Sci. Monogr. 28:1-150.
3. _. 1996b. Model of amino acid substitution in proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 42:459-468.
4. BISHOP, M. J., and A. E. FRIDAY. 1985. Evolutionary trees from nucleic acid and protein sequences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 226:271-302.
5. _. 1987. Tetropad relationships: the molecular evidence. Pp. 123-139 in C. PATTERSON, ed. Molecules and morphology in evolution: conflict or compromise? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
6. BROWN, J. R., and W. F. DOOLITTLE. 1995. Root of the universal tree of life based on ancient aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase gene duplications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 2441-2445.
7. CAO, Y., J. ADACHI, A. JANKE, S. PAABO, and M. HASEGAWA. 1994a. Phylogenetic relationships among eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: instability of a tree based on a single gene. J. Mol. Evol. 39:519-527.
8. CAO, Y., J. ADACHI, T. YANO, and M. HASEGAWA. 1994b. Phylogenetic place of guinea pigs: no support of the rodent polyphyly hypothesis from maximum likelihood analyses of multiple protein sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:593-604.
9. CAO, Y., A. JANKE, P. J. WADDELL, M. WESTERMAN, O. TAKENAKA, S. MURATA, N. OKADA, S. PAABO, and M. HASEGAWA. 1998. Conflict amongst individual mitochondrial proteins in resolving the phylogeny of eutherian orders. J. Mol. Evol. (in press).
10. COATES, M., and S. STONE. 1981. Simulation of protein evolution by random fixation of allowed codons. J. Mol. Evol. 17:311-328.
11. DAYHOFF, M. O., R. M. SCHWARTZ, and B. C. ORCUTT. 1978. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. Pp. 345-352 in Atlas of protein sequence and structure. Vol. 5, Suppl. 3. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.
12. EPSTEIN, C. J. 1964. Relation of protein evolution to tertiary structure. Nature 203:1350-1352.
13. _. 1967. Non-randomness of amino-acid changes in the evolution of homologous proteins. Nature 215:355-359.
14. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
15. GILLESPIE, J. H. 1991. The courses of molecular evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16. GOJOBORI, T. 1983. Codon substitution in evolution and the "saturation" of synonymous changes. Genetics 105:1011-1027.
17. GOLDING, G. B. 1983. Estimates of DNA and protein sequence divergence: an examination of some assumptions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1:125-142.
18. GOLDMAN, N., and Z. YANG. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:725-736.
19. GRANTHAM, R. 1974. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. 185:862-864.
20. HASEGAWA, M., and T. HASHIMOTO. 1993. Ribosomal RNA trees misleading? Nature 361:23.
21. HASHIMOTO, T., and M. HASEGAWA. 1996. Origin and early evolution of eukaryotes inferred from the amino acid sequences of translation elongation factors 1α/Tu and 2/G. Adv. Biophys. 32:73-120.
22. IWABE, N., K. KUMA, M. HASEGAWA, S. OSAWA, and T. MIYATA. 1989. Evolutionary relationship of archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes inferred from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:9355-9359.
23. JONES, D. T., W. R. TAYLOR, and J. M. THORNTON. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:275-282.
24. JORRÉ, R. P., and N. CURNOW. 1975. A model for the evolution of the proteins. Biochemie 57:1141-1146.
25. KIMURA, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,' England.
26. KISHINO, H., T. MIYATA, and M. HASEGAWA. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J. Mol. Evol. 31:151-160.
27. KRZYWICKI, A., and P. P. SLONIMSKI. 1968. Formal analysis of protein sequences. II. Method for structural studies of homologous proteins and amino acid substitutions in cytochrome c. J. Theor. Biol. 21:305-330.
28. MACLACHLAN, A. D. 1972. Repeating sequences and gene duplication in proteins. J. Mol. Evol. 64:417-437.
29. MIYATA, T., S. MIYAZAWA, and T. YASUNAGA. 1979. Two types of amino acid substitutions in protein evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 12:219-236.
30. MUSE, S. V., and B. S. GAUT. 1994. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to chloroplast genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:715-724.
31. NEI, M., and T. GOJOBORI. 1986. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:418-426.
32. REEVES, J. H. 1992. Heterogeneity in the substitution process of amino acid sites of proteins coded for by mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 35:17-31.
33. SCHÖNIGER, M., and A. VON HAESELER. 1994. A stochastic model and the evolution of autocorrelated DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3:240-247.
34. SNEATH, P. H. A. 1966. Relations between chemical structures and biological activity in peptides. J. Theor. Biol. 12:157-195.
35. TAYLOR, W. R. 1986. The classification of amino acid conservation. J. Theor. Biol. 119:205-218.
36. THORNE, J. L., N. GOLDMAN, and D. T. JONES. 1996. Combining protein evolution and secondary structure. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:666-673.
37. UZZELL, T., and K. W. CORBIN. 1971. Fitting discrete probability distributions to evolutionary events. Science 172: 1089-1096.
38. WAKELEY, J. 1994. Substitution rate variation among sites and the estimation of transition bias. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:436-442.
39. WILBUR, W. J. 1985. On the PAM matrix model of protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2:434-447.
40. YANG, Z. 1994a. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39:105-111.
41. _. 1994b. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
42. YANG, Z., N. GOLDMAN, and A. E. FRIDAY. 1994. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11: 316-324.
43. YANG, Z., and S. KUMAR. 1996. Approximate methods for estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution and the variation of substitution rates among sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 650-659.
44. YANG, Z., and D. ROBERTS. 1995. On the use of nucleic acid sequences to infer early branchings in the tree of life. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:451-458.
45. ZHARKIKH, A. 1994. Estimation of evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 39:315-329.
46. ZUCKERKANDL, E., and L. PAULING. 1965. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. Pp. 97-116 in V. BRYSON and H. J. VOGEL, eds. Evolving genes and proteins. Academic Press, New York.