Real-time neuroimaging and cognitive monitoring using wearable dry EEG

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 62, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 2553-2567

  Mullen, Tim R ^a,b   Kothe, Christian A E ^a,b   Chi, Yu Mike ^c   Ojeda, Alejandro ^a,b   Kerth, Trevor ^c,d   Makeig, Scott ^a   Jung, Tzyy Ping ^a   Cauwenberghs, Gert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Syntrogi   (United States)

^c Cognionics Inc ^*  (United States)

^d KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

adaptive systems; brain computer interfaces; connectivity analysis; dry contact electrode; EEG; neuroimaging; Wearable sensors

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; BENCHMARKING; BRAIN; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DATA VISUALIZATION; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); NEUROIMAGING; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; WEARABLE SENSORS; WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY;

CONNECTIVITY ANALYSIS; DIRECTED TRANSFER FUNCTIONS; DRY CONTACT; EFFECTIVE CONNECTIVITIES; LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; REAL TIME MEASUREMENTS; REAL-TIME SOFTWARE FRAMEWORK; SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION METHODS;

OPEN SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; COGNITION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONNECTOME; DRY ELECTRODE ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; MACHINE LEARNING; NEUROIMAGING; ONLINE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; ADULT; ALGORITHM; BRAIN; DEVICES; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TASK PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84946811116     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2481482     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. S. Ha., et al. Integrated circuits and electrode interfaces for noninvasive physiological monitoring. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1522-1537, May. 2014.
2. L. D. Liao., et al. Biosensor technologies for augmented brain-computer interfaces in the next decades. Proc. IEEE., vol. 100, pp. 1553-1566, May. 2012.
3. S.H. Fairclough, Fundamentals of physiological computing. Interacting Comput., vol. 21, nos. 1/2, pp. 133-145, Jan. 2009.
4. B. Lance, Brain-computer interaction technologies in the coming decades. Proc. IEEE., vol. 100, pp. 1585-1599, May. 2012.
5. T. Mullen, The dynamic brain: Modeling neural dynamics and interactions from human electrophysiological recordings. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, 2014.
6. S. Debener., et al. How about taking a low-cost, small, and wireless EEG for awalk? Psychophysiology., vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1617-1621, Nov. 2012.
7. A. Stopczynski., et al. The smartphone brain scanner: Aportable real-Time neuroimaging system. PloS One., vol. 9, no. 2, p. e86733, 2014.
8. F. Varela., et al. The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nature Rev. Neurosci., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 229-239, Apr. 2001.
9. G. Tononi and G.M. Edelman, Consciousness and complexity. Science., vol. 282, no. 5395, pp. 1846-1851, Dec. 4, 1998.
10. K. Friston, Beyond phrenology: What can neuroimaging tell us about distributed circuitry? Annu. Rev. Neurosci., vol. 25, pp. 221-250, 2002.
11. J. F. Kalaska., and D. J. Crammond, Cerebral cortical mechanisms of reaching movements. Science., vol. 255, no. 5051, pp. 1517-1523, Mar. 20, 1992.
12. M. Hassan., et al. EEG source connectivity analysis: From dense array recordings to brain networks. PloS One., vol. 9, no. 8, p. e105041, Aug. 12, 2014.
13. J. M. Schoffelen., and J. Gross, Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Hum. BrainMapping., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1857-1865, Jun. 2009.
14. S. Haufe., et al. A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: A simulation study. NeuroImage., vol. 64, pp. 120-133, Jan. 1, 2013.
15. S. Makeig., et al. Evolving signal processing for brain-computer interfaces. Proc. IEEE., vol. 100, pp. 1567-1584, May. 2012.
16. B. He., et al. Electrophysiological imaging of brain activity and connectivity-challenges and opportunities. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1918-1931, Jul. 2011.
17. F. Babiloni., et al. Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function. NeuroImage., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 118-131, Jan. 1, 2005.
18. L. Astolfi., et al. Comparison of different cortical connectivity estimators for high-resolution EEG recordings. Hum. Brain Mapping., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 143-157, Feb. 2007.
19. M. Billinger., et al. Single-Trial connectivity estimation for classification of motor imagery data. J. Neural Eng., vol. 10, no. 4, art. no. 046006, Aug. 2013.
20. T. Mullen., et al. Real-Time modeling and 3D visualization of source dynamics and connectivity using wearable EEG. in Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Conf., 2013, pp. 2184-2187.
21. C. A. Kothe., and S. Makeig, BCILAB: A platform for brain-computer interface development. J. Neural Eng., vol. 10, no. 5, p. 056014, Oct. 2013.
22. T. Mullen, The source information flow toolbox (SIFT): An electrophysiological information flow toolbox for EEGLAB. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, 2010.
23. B. He., et al. Econnectome: AMATLABtoolbox for mapping and imaging of brain functional connectivity. J. Neurosci. Methods., vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 261-269, Feb. 15, 2011.
24. M. Billinger., et al. SCoT: A python toolbox for EEG source connectivity. Front. Neuroinformat., vol. 8, Mar. 11, 2014, doi: 10.3389/fninf. 2014.00022.
25. Q. V. Le., et al. ICA with reconstruction cost for efficient overcomplete feature learning. in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. Conf., 2011, pp. 1017-1025.
26. M. T. Akhtar., et al. Recursive independent component analysis for online blind source separation. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst., 2012., vol. 6, pp. 2813-2816.
27. S.-H. Hsu., et al. Online recursive independent component analysis for real-Time source separation of high-density EEG. in Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Conf., 2014, pp. 3845-3848.
28. H. P. Lopuhaa., and P. J. Rousseeuw, Breakdown points of affine equivariant estimators of multivariate location and covariance matrices. Ann. Statist., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 229-248, Mar. 1991.
29. N. Bigdely-Shamlo., et al. The PREP pipeline: Standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis. Front. Neuroinformat., vol. 9, p. 16, 2015.
30. A. Gramfort., et al. OpenMEEG: Opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics. Biomed. Eng. Online., vol. 9, p. 45, 2010.
31. N. Tzourio-Mazoyer., et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 273-289, Jan. 2002.
32. A. Ojeda., et al. MoBILAB: An open source toolbox for analysis and visualization of mobile brain/body imaging data. Front. Hum. Neurosci., vol. 8, no. 121, Mar. 5, 2014, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00121.
33. R. D. Pascual-Marqui, Discrete, 3D distributed, linear imaging methods of electric neuronal activity. Part 1: Exact, zero error localization. arXiv: 0710.3341 [math-ph]. 2007a.
34. G. H. Golub., et al. Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 215-223, 1979.
35. B. D. VanVeen., et al. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 867-880, Sep. 1997.
36. A. Delorme., et al. EEGLAB, SIFT, NFT, BCILAB, and ERICA: New tools for advanced EEG processing. Comput. Intel. Neurosci., vol. 2011, pp. 130-714, 2011.
37. W. Hesse., et al. The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. J. Neurosci. Methods., vol. 124, pp. 27-44, 2003.
38. M. Dhamala., et al. Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality. NeuroImage., vol. 41, pp. 354-362, 2008.
39. C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition Machine Learning. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2006.
40. Z. L. Zhang., and B. D. Rao, Extension of SBL algorithms for the recovery of block sparse signals with intra-block correlation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 2009-2015, Apr. 2013.
41. P. A. Valdes-Sosa., et al. Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., vol. 360, no. 1457, pp. 969-981, May 29, 2005.
42. S. Hauf K. R.Müller, G. Nolte, ., and N. Krämer. Sparse Causal Discovery in Multivariate Time Series in Causality: Objectives and Assessment, I. Guyon, D. Janzing, ., and B. Schölkopf, Eds., JMLR W&CP. vol. 6, pp. 97-106.
43. M. Yuan., and Y. Lin, Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B. Stat. Method., vol. 68, pp. 49-67, 2006.
44. E. Bullmore., and O. Sporns, Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Rev. Neurosci., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 186-198, Mar. 2009.
45. O. Sporns, The non-random brain: Efficiency, economy, and complex dynamics. Front. Comput. Neurosci., vol. 5, p. 5, 2011.
46. O. Sporns., and C. J. Honey, Small worlds inside big brains. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA., vol. 103, no. 51, pp. 19219-19220, Dec. 19, 2006.
47. R. Tomioka., and M. Sugiyama, Dual-Augmented Lagrangian method for efficient sparse reconstruction. IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1067-1070, Dec. 2009.
48. S. Boyd., et al. Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Mach. Learn., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-122, 2011.
49. A. K. Seth, Measuring autonomy and emergence via granger causality. Artif. Life., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 179-196, 2010.
50. F. D. Fallani., et al. Graph analysis of functional brain networks: Practical issues in translational neuroscience. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., vol. 369, no. 1653, Sept. 1 2014, DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0521.
51. B. Schelter., et al. Assessing the strength of directed influences among neural signals using renormalized partial directed coherence. J. Neurosci. Methods., vol. 179, pp. 121-130, 2009.
52. L. A. Baccalá., and K. Sameshima, Partial directed coherence: A new concept in neural structure determination. Biol. Cybern., vol. 84, pp. 463-474, 2001.
53. P. W. Ferrez., and R. M. J. Del, Error-related EEG potentials generated during simulated brain-computer interaction. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 923-929, Mar. 2008.
54. G. McLoughlin., et al. Performancemonitoring is altered in adult ADHD: A familial event-related potential investigation. Neuropsychologia., vol. 47, no. 14, pp. 3134-3142, Dec. 2009.
55. P. Luu., et al. Frontal midline theta and the error-related negativity: Neurophysiological mechanisms of action regulation. Clin. Neurophys., vol. 115, pp. 1821-1835, 2004.
56. C. S. Yu., et al. Functional segregation of the human cingulate cortex is confirmed by functional connectivity based neuroanatomical parcellation. NeuroImage., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 2571-2581, Feb. 14, 2011.
57. T. Mullen., et al. Analysis and visualization of theta-band information flow dynamics in an ERN-producing task. presented at the Human Brain Mapping Conf., Barcelona, Spain, 2010.
58. A. Korzeniewska., et al. Dynamics of event-related causality in brain electrical activity. Hum. Brain Mapping., vol. 29, pp. 1170-1192, 2008.
59. L. T. Trujillo., and J. J. B. Allen, Theta EEG dynamics of the error-related negativity. Clin. Neurophys., vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 645-668, Mar. 2007.
60. J. Yordanova., et al. Parallel systems of error processing in the brain. NeuroImage., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 590-602, Jun. 2004.
61. S. Lemm., et al. Introduction to machine learning for brain imaging. NeuroImage., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 387-399, May 15, 2011.
62. R. Tomioka., and K.R. Muller, Aregularized discriminative framework for EEG analysis with application to brain-computer interface. NeuroImage., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 415-432, Jan. 1, 2010.
63. T. Mullen., et al. Real-Time functional brain imaging: How GPU acceleration redefines each stage. in Proc. GPU Technol. Conf. NVIDIA Corporation, 2014.
64. T. Mullen., et al. Modeling cortical source dynamics and interactions during seizure. in Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Conf., Boston, MA, USA, 2011, pp. 1411-1414.
65. F. D. Broccard., et al. Closed-loop brain-machine-body interfaces for noninvasive rehabilitation of movement disorders. Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1573-1593, Aug. 2014.
66. C. Wilke., et al. Estimation of time-varying connectivity patterns through the use of an adaptive directed transfer function. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 2557-2564, Nov. 2008.
67. D. Schmorrow., et al. Foundations of augmented cognition neuroergonomics and operational neuroscience. presented at 5th Int. Conference, FAC. 2009, San Diego, CA, USA, Jul. 19-24, 2009.
68. P. R. Davidson., et al. EEG-based lapse detection with high temporal resolution. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 832-839, May. 2007.
69. T. M. Mitchell., et al. Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science., vol. 320, no. 5880, pp. 1191-1195, May 30, 2008.
70. S. Haufe., et al. On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging. NeuroImage., vol. 87, pp. 96-110, Feb. 15, 2014.
71. A. Mazaheri., et al. Prestimulus alpha and mu activity predicts failure to inhibit motor responses. Hum. Brain Mapping., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1791-1800, Jun. 2009.