The PREP pipeline: Standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis

Frontiers in Neuroinformatics

Volumn 9, Issue JUNE, 2015, Pages 1-19

  Bigdely Shamlo, Nima ^a   Mullen, Tim ^a   Kothe, Christian ^a,b   Su, Kyung Min ^c   Robbins, Kay A ^c  

^a Syntrogi   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c One UTSA Circle   (United States)

Author keywords

Artifact; BCILAB; Big data; EEG; EEGLAB; Machine learning; Preprocessing

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; EARLY STAGE PREPROCESSING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; NEUROIMAGING; NOISE REDUCTION; PREPROCESSING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 84933532771     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16625196     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2015.00016     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Acunzo, D. J., MacKenzie, G., and van Rossum, M. C. W. (2012). Systematic biases in early ERP and ERF components as a result of high-pass filtering. J. Neurosci. Methods 209, 212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.06.011
2. Barnett, L., and Seth, A. K. (2011). Behaviour of Granger causality under filtering: theoretical invariance and practical application. J. Neurosci. Methods 201, 404-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.010
3. Chuang, C.-H., Ko, L.-W., Jung, T.-P., and Lin, C.-T. (2014a). Kinesthesia in a sustained-attention driving task. Neuroimage 91, 187-202. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.015
4. Chuang, C.-H., Ko, L.-W., Lin, Y.-P., Jung, T.-P., and Lin, C.-T. (2014b). Independent component ensemble of EEG for brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22, 230-238. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2293139
5. Chuang, S.-W., Ko, L.-W., Lin, Y.-P., Huang, R.-S., Jung, T.-P., and Lin, C.-T. (2012). Co-modulatory spectral changes in independent brain processes are correlated with task performance. Neuroimage 62, 1469-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.035
6. Essl, M. M., and Rappelsberger, P. (1998). EEG cohererence and reference signals: experimental results and mathematical explanations. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 36, 399-406. doi: 10.1007/BF02523206
7. Fischler, M. A., and Bolles, R. C. (1981). Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM 24, 381-395. doi: 10.1145/358669.358692
8. Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Glass, L., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Mark, R. G., et al. (2000). PhysioBank, physiotoolkit, and physionet components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 101, e215-e220. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.23.e215
9. Gross, J., Baillet, S., Barnes, G. R., Henson, R. N., Hillebrand, A., Jensen, O., et al. (2013). Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. Neuroimage 65, 349-363. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001
10. Hairston, W. D., Whitaker, K. W., Ries, A. J., Vettel, J. M., Bradford, J. C., Kerick, S. E., et al. (2014). Usability of four commercially-oriented EEG systems. J. Neural Eng. 11, 046018. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/4/046018
11. Hatz, F., Hardmeier, M., Bousleiman, H., Rüegg, S., Schindler, C., and Fuhr, P. (2015). Reliability of fully automated versus visually controlled pre- and post-processing of resting-state EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. 126, 268-274. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.014
12. Hu, S., Stead, M., Dai, Q., and Worrell, G. A. (2010). On the recording reference contribution to EEG correlation, phase synchorony, and coherence. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern. 40, 1294-1304. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2037237
13. Keil, A., Debener, S., Gratton, G., Junghöfer, M., Kappenman, E. S., Luck, S. J., et al. (2014). Committee report: publication guidelines and recommendations for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Psychophysiology51, 1-21. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12147
14. Kerick, S. E., Hatfield, B. D., and Allender, L. E. (2007). Event-related cortical dynamics of soldiers during shooting as a function of varied task demand. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 78(Suppl. 5), B153-B164. Available online at:http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/asma/asem/2007/00000078/A00105s1/art00024?token=00571dd86a5569be709d867232d45232b6d243838425749665676553568293c62207d673f582f6bb060b80e
15. Kothe, C. A., and Makeig, S. (2013). BCILAB: a platform for brain-computer interface development. J. Neural Eng. 10, 056014. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056014
16. Lawhern, V., Hairston, W. D., and Robbins, K. (2013). DETECT: a MATLAB toolbox for event detection and identification in time series, with applications to artifact detection in eeg signals. PLoS ONE 8:e62944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062944
17. Liao, L.-D., Lin, C.-T., McDowell, K., Wickenden, A. E., Gramann, K., Jung, T.-P., et al. (2012). Biosensor technologies for augmented brain-computer interfaces in the next decades. Proc. IEEE, 100, 1553-1566. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2184829
18. Marathe, A. R., Ries, A. J., and McDowell, K. (2014). Sliding HDCA: single-trial EEG classification to overcome and quantify temporal variability. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22, 201-211. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2304884
19. Margaux, P., Emmanuel, M., Sébastien, D., Olivier, B., and Jérémie, M. (2012). Objective and subjective evaluation of online error correction during P300-based spelling. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2012:e578295. doi: 10.1155/2012/578295
20. Mitra, P., and Bokil, H. (2007). Observed Brain Dynamics, 1st Edn. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195178081.001.0001
21. Mitra, P. P., and Pesaran, B. (1999). Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data. Biophys. J. 76, 691-708. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77236-X
22. Mognon, A., Jovicich, J., Bruzzone, L., and Buiatti, M. (2011). ADJUST: an automatic EEG artifact detector based on the joint use of spatial and temporal features. Psychophysiology 48, 229-240. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01061.x
23. Mouček, R., Ježek, P., Vařeka, L., Řondík, T., Brůha, P., Papež, V., et al. (2014). Software and hardware infrastructure for research in electrophysiology. Front. Neuroinform. 8:20. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00020
24. Mullen, T. (2012). NITRC: CleanLine: Tool/Resource Info. Available online at: http://www.nitrc.org/projects/cleanline(Accessed March 22, 2015).
25. Mullen, T., Kothe, C., Chi, Y. M., Ojeda, A., Kerth, T., Makeig, S., et al. (2013). Real-time modeling and 3D visualization of source dynamics and connectivity using wearable EEG. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2013, 2184-2187. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609968
26. Nolan, H., Whelan, R., and Reilly, R. B. (2010). FASTER: fully automated statistical thresholding for EEG artifact rejection. J. Neurosci. Methods 192, 152-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.07.015
27. Ortiz-Rosario, A., and Adeli, H. (2013). Brain-computer interface technologies: from signal to action. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 537-552. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2013-0032
28. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., and Echallier, J. F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72, 184-187. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6
29. Ries, A. J., Touryan, J., Vettel, J., McDowell, K., and Hairston, W. D. (2014). A comparison of electroencephalography signals acquired from conventional and mobile systems. J. Neurosci. Neuroeng. 3, 10-20. doi: 10.1166/jnsne.2014.1092
30. Rousselet, G. A. (2012). Does filtering preclude us from studying ERP time-courses? Front. Psychol. 3:131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00131
31. Safieddine, D., Kachenoura, A., Albera, L., Birot, G., Karfoul, A., Pasnicu, A., et al. (2012). Removal of muscle artifact from EEG data: comparison between stochastic (ICA and CCA) and deterministic (EMD and wavelet-based) approaches. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2012, 127. doi: 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-127
32. Schalk, G., McFarland, D. J., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N., and Wolpaw, J. R. (2004). BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51, 1034-1043. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2004.827072
33. Scott, A., Courtney, W., Wood, D., De la Garza, R., Lane, S., Wang, R., et al. (2011). COINS: an innovative informatics and neuroimaging tool suite built for large heterogeneous datasets. Front. Neuroinform. 5:33. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00033
34. Sobolev, A., Stoewer, A., Leonhardt, A., Rautenberg, P. L., Kellner, C. J., Garbers, C., et al. (2014). Integrated platform and API for electrophysiological data. Front. Neuroinform. 8:32. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00032
35. Tanner, D., Morgan-Short, K., and Luck, S. J. (2015). How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition. Psychophysiology. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12437. [Epub ahead of print].
36. Vanrullen, R. (2011). Four common conceptual fallacies in mapping the time course of recognition. Percept. Sci. 2:365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00365
37. Widmann, A., and Schröger, E. (2012). Filter effects and filter artifacts in the analysis of electrophysiological data. Front. Psychol. 3:233. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00233
38. Widmann, A., Schröger, E., and Maess, B. (2014). Digital filter design for electrophysiological data - a practical approach. J. Neurosci. Methods. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.08.002