A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 228-234

  Ceyhan, Jeffrey A ^a   Johnson, Glen H ^a   Lepe, Xavier ^a   Phillips, Keith M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM SULFATE; METAL; PLASTIC;

ACCURACY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MICROSCOPE; MICROSCOPY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0042389707     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00237-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Schwartz R.S., Davis R.D. Accuracy of second pour casts using dual-arch impressions. Am J Dent. 5:1992;192-194.
2. Burke F.J., Crisp R.J. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique. Quintessence Int. 32:2001;805-810.
3. Davis R.D., Schwartz R.S. Dual-arch and custom tray impression accuracy. Am J Dent. 4:1991;89-92.
4. Wilson E.G., Werrin S.R. Double arch impressions for simplified restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 49:1983;198-202.
5. Kaplowitz G.J. Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions II. J Am Dent Assoc. 128:1997;1277-1281.
6. Kaplowitz G.J. Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions. J Am Dent Assoc. 127:1996;234-240.
7. Imbery T.A. Simplifying dual-arch impressions. J Am Dent Assoc. 129:1998;1599-1600.
8. Bass E.V., Kafalias M.C. Dual-arch impressions. Aust Dent J. 37:1992;1-5.
9. Johnson G.H., Craig R.G. Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models. J Prosthet Dent. 53:1985;484-490.
10. Johnson G.H., Craig R.G. Accuracy of addition silicones as a function of technique. J Prosthet Dent. 55:1986;197-203.
11. Cox J.R., Brandt R.L., Hughes H.J. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 87:2002;510-515.
12. Parker M.H., Cameron S.M., Hughbanks J.C., Reid D.E. Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 78:1997;255-259.
13. Ceyhan JA, Johnson GH, Lepe X. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:143-9.
14. Breeding L.C., Dixon D.L. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 84:2000;403-407.
15. Barzilay I., Myers M.L. The dual-arch impression. Quintessence Int. 18:1987;293-295.
16. Larson T.D., Nielson M.A., Brackett W.W. The accuracy of dual-arch impressions a pilot study . J Prosthet Dent. 87:2002;625-627.
17. Rueda L.J., Sy-Munoz J.T., Naylor W.P., Goodacre C.J., Swartz M.L. The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts. Int J Prosthodont. 9:1996;367-373.
18. Wassell R.W., Ibbetson R.J. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays. J Prosthet Dent. 65:1991;748-757.
19. Nicholls J.I. The measurement of distortion theoretical considerations . J Prosthet Dent. 37:1977;578-586.
20. Campbell S.D. Comparison of conventional paint-on die spacers and those used with the all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 63:1990;151-155.
21. Eames W.B. Human elements of applying die spacer. J Prosthet Dent. 61:1989;256.