Interactions between procedural fairness and outcome favorability in conflict situations

Distributive and Procedural Justice: Research and Social Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 125-140

  Müller, Markus M ^a   Kals, Elisabeth ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF EICHSTÄTT INGOLSTADT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946715632     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Adams, J.S. (1965), “Inequity in Social Exchange”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.
2. Aiken, L.S. and West, S.G. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
3. Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books).
4. Biel, A. (2000), “Factors Promoting Cooperation in the Laboratory, in Common Pool Resource Dilemmas, and in Large-Scale Dilemmas: Similarities and Differences” in Cooperation in Modern Society: Promoting the Welfare of Communities, States, and Organizations. Vugt, M.V., Snyder, M., Tyler, T.R. and Biel, A. (eds) (London: Routledge), 25-41.
5. Bies, R.J. and Moag, J.S. (1986) “Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness” in Research on negotiation in organizations, Vol. 1. Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H. and Bazerman, M. H. (eds). (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press), 43-55.
6. Blader, S.L. and Tyler, T.R. (2003), “A Four-Component Model of Procedural Justice: Defining the Meaning of a “Fair” Process”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 747-758. [PubMed 15189630] [DOI: 10.1177/0146167203029006007]
7. Cohen-Charash, Y. and Spector, P.E. (2001), “The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321. [DOI: 10.1006/obhd.2001.2958]
8. De Cremer, D. (2003), “Noneconomic Motives Predicting Cooperation in Public Good Dilemmas: The Effect of Received Respect on Contributions”, Social Justice Research, 16, 367-377. [DOI: 10.1023/A%3A1026361632114]
9. Deutsch, M. (2000), “Cooperation and Competition” in The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Deutsch, M. and Coleman, P.T. (eds) (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass), 21-39.
10. Fisher, R. and Ury, W. (1981), Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In (Boston, MA: Houghton Muffin).
11. Folger, R. (1996), “Distributive and Procedural Justice: Multifaceted Meanings and Interrelations”, Social Justice Research, 9, 395-416. [DOI: 10.1007/BF02196992]
12. Fuller, L. (1969), The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press).
13. Greenberg, J. (1987), “Reactions to Procedural Injustice in Payment Distributions: Do the Means Justify the Ends-” Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 55-61. [DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.55]
14. Hegtvedt, K.A. and Cook, K.S. (1987), “The Role of Justice in Conflict Situations”, Advances in Group Processes, 4, 109-136.
15. Krehbiel, P.J. and Cropanzano, R. (2000), “Procedural Justice, Outcome Favorability and Emotion”, Social Justice Research, 13, 339-360. [DOI: 10.1023/A%3A1007670909889]
16. Leventhal, G.S. (1980), “What Should Be Done with Equity Theory- New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships” in Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research. Gergen, K.J., Greenberg, M.S. and Willis, R.H. (eds) (New York: Plenum Press), 27-55.
17. Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R. (1988), The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (New York: Plenum Publishing).
18. Mikula, G. and Wenzel, M. (2000), “Justice and Social Conflict”, International Journal of Psychology, 35, 136-135. [DOI: 10.1080/002075900399439]
19. Montada, L. and Kals, E. (2001), Mediation (Weinheim: Beltz).
20. Montada, L. and Schneider, A. (1989), “Justice and Emotional Reactions to the Disadvantaged”, Social Justice Research, 3, 313-344. [DOI: 10.1007/BF01048081]
21. Montada, L., Kals, E. and Becker, R. (2007), “Willingness for Continued Social Commitment: A New Concept in Environmental Research”, Environment and Behavior, 39 (3), 287-316.
22. Skitka, L.J. and Crosby, F.J. (2003), “Trends in the Social Psychological Study of Justice”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 282-285. [PubMed 14633467] [DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_01]
23. Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1975), Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum).
24. Thompson, L. and Nadler, J. (2000), “Judgmental Biases in Conflict Resolution and how to Overcome Them” in The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Deutsch, M. and Coleman, P.T. (eds) (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.), 213-135.
25. Törnblom, K.Y. and Vermunt, R. (1999), “An Integrative Perspective on Social Justice: Distributive and Procedural Fairness Evaluations of Positive and Negative Outcome Allocations”, Social Justice Research, 12, 39-64. [DOI: 10.1023/A%3A1023226307252]
26. Tyler, T.R. and Blader, S.L. (2000) Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement. (Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis).
27. Tyler, T.R. and Folger, R. (1980), “Distributional and Procedural Aspects of Satisfaction with Citizen-Police Encounters”, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 281-292. [DOI: 10.1207/s15324834basp0104_1]
28. Tyler, T.R. and Smith, H.J. (1997), “Social Justice and Social Movements” in Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. and Lindzey, G. (eds) (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill), 595-629.
29. Van den Bos, K., Lind, E.A., Vermunt, R. and Wilke, H.A.M. (1997), “How do I Judge my Outcome when I do not Know the Outcome of Others- The Psychology of the Fair Process Effect”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1034-1046. [PubMed 9150583] [DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1034]
30. Walster, E., Walster, G.W. and Berscheid, E. (1978), Equity: Theory and Research (Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon).