Noneconomic motives predicting cooperation in public good dilemmas: The effect of received respect on contributions

Social Justice Research

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 367-377

  De Cremer, David ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Belongingness; Economic motives; Noneconomic; Respect; Social dilemmas

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043121904     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026361632114     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baumeister, R. F., and Hutton, D. G. (1987). Self-presentation theory: Self-construction and audience pleading. In Mullen, B., and Goethals, G. R. (eds.), Theories of Group Behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. Baumeister, R. F., and Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117: 497-529.
3. Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11: 227-268.
4. De Cremer, D. (2002). Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: A matter of feeling included. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28: 1335-1341.
5. De Cremer, D., Snyder, M., and Dewitte, S. (2001). The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not?): Effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 31: 93-107.
6. De Cremer, D., and Tyler, T. R. (2003). Am I Respected or Not? Inclusion and Reputation as Issues in Group Membership, Manuscript submitted for publication.
7. Gächter, S., and Fehr, E. (1999). Collective action as a social exchange. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 39: 341-369.
8. Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., Vevea, J. L., and Luzzini, J. (2002). The "I", the "We", and the "When": A meta-analysis of motivational primacy in self-definition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83: 574-591.
9. Kerr, N. L. (1995). Norms in social dilemmas. In Schroeder, D. (ed.), Social Dilemmas: Perspectives on Individuals and Groups, Westport, CT. Praeger. pp. 31-48.
10. Komorita, S. S., and Parks, C. D. (1994). Social dilemmas, Brown & Benchmark, Dubuque, IA.
11. Komorita, S. S., Sweeney, J., and Kravitz, D. A. (1980). Cooperative choice in N-person dilemma situations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 504-516.
12. Ledyard, J. O. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In Kagel, J. A., and Roth, A. E. (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 11-194.
13. Lind, E. A. (2001a). Thinking critical about justice judgments. J. Vocat. Behav. 58: 220-226.
14. Lind, E. A. (2001b). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In Greenberg, J., and Cropanzano, R. (eds.), Advances in Organizational Justice, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 56-88.
15. Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Plenum, New York.
16. Luhtanen, R., and Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18: 302-318.
17. Messick, D. M., and Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas. In Wheeler, L., and Shaver, P. R. (eds.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Sage, Beverly Hills, Vol. 4, pp. 11-44.
18. Milinski, M., Semmann, D., and Krambeck, H.-J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the "tragedy of the commons." Nature 424-426.
19. Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Parks, C. D., Sanna, L. J., and Berel, S. R. (2001). Actions of similar others as inducements to cooperate in social dilemmas. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27: 345-354.
21. Smith, H. J., and Tyler, T. R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 33: 146-170.
22. Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. (ed.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Nelson Hall, Chicago.
23. Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Res. Organ. Behav. 21: 201-246.
25. Tyler, T. R., and Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia.
26. Tyler, T. R., and Dawes, R. M. (1993). Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives. In Melkers, B. A., and Baron, J. (eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY, pp. 87-108.
27. Tyler, T. R., and Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on supports of authorities. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69: 482-497.
28. Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 25, pp. 115-191.
29. Tyler, T. R., and Smith, H. J. (1999). Justice, social identity, and group processes. In Tyler, T. R., Kramer, R. M., and John, O. P. (eds.), The psychology of the Social Self, Erlbaum, Mahaw, NJ, pp. 223-264.
30. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77: 337-349.
31. Wit, A. P., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1990). The presentation of rewards and punishments in a simulated social dilemma. Soc. Behav. 5: 231-245.
32. Wilke, H. A. M. (1991). Greed, efficiency, and fairness in resource management situations. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 2: 165-187.
33. Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as public good. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51: 110-116.