Operant licking for intragastric sugar infusions: Differential reinforcing actions of glucose, sucrose and fructose in mice

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 153, Issue , 2016, Pages 115-124

  Sclafani, Anthony ^a   Ackroff, Karen ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Glucose; Intragastric infusions; Operant licking; Post oral sugar sensing

Indexed keywords

FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; SUCROSE; SUGAR; WATER; SACCHARIN;

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CALORIC INTAKE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET RESTRICTION; LICKING; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; SATIETY; ANIMAL; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECTS; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; FOOD PREFERENCE; INFUSION PUMP; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FOOD PREFERENCES; FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; INFUSION PUMPS; MALE; MICE; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SACCHARIN; SELF ADMINISTRATION; SUCROSE;

EID: 84946616164     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.10.021     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Fructose conditioned flavor preferences in male and female rats: effects of sweet taste and sugar concentration. Appetite 2004, 42:287-297.
2. Davis J.D., Smith G.P. Learning to sham feed: behavioral adjustments to loss of physiological postingestive stimuli. Am. J. Physiol. 1990, 259:R1228-R1235.
3. de Araujo I.E., Oliveira-Maia A.J., Sotnikova T.D., Gainetdinov R.R., Caron M.G., Nicolelis M.A., et al. Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling. Neuron 2008, 57:930-941.
4. Ferreira J.G., Tellez L.A., Ren Z., Yeckel C.W., de Araujo I.E. Regulation of fat intake in the absence of flavor signaling. J. Physiol. 2012, 590:953-972.
5. Matsumura S., Yoneda T., Aki S., Eguchi A., Manabe Y., Tsuzuki S., et al. Intragastric infusion of glucose enhances the rewarding effect of sorbitol fatty acid ester ingestion as measured by conditioned place preference in mice. Physiol. Behav. 2010, 99:509-514.
6. Myers K.P., Sclafani A. Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose: I. Intake acceptance and preference analysis. Physiol. Behav. 2001, 74:481-493.
7. Myers K.P., Sclafani A. Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose: II. Taste reactivity analysis. Physiol. Behav. 2001, 74:495-505.
8. Nissenbaum J.W., Sclafani A. Sham-feeding response of rats to polycose and sucrose. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1987, 11:215-222.
9. Ren X., Ferreira J.G., Zhou L.H., Shammah-Lagnado S.J., Yeckel C.W., de Araujo I.E. Nutrient selection in the absence of taste receptor signaling. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:8012-8023.
10. Sclafani A., Nissenbaum J.W., Ackroff K. Learned preferences for real-fed and sham-fed polycose in rats: interaction of taste, postingestive reinforcement, and satiety. Physiol. Behav. 1994, 56:331-337.
11. Sclafani A., Glendinning J.I. Flavor preferences conditioned in C57BL/6 mice by intragastric carbohydrate self-infusion. Physiol. Behav. 2003, 79:783-788.
12. Sclafani A., Glendinning J.I. Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions. Am. J. Physiol. 2005, 289:R712-R720.
13. Sclafani A., Ackroff K. Nutrient-conditioned flavor preference and incentive value measured by progressive ratio licking in rats. Physiol. Behav. 2006, 88:88-94.
14. Sclafani A., Glass D., Margolskee R.F., Glendinning J.I. Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice. Am. J. Physiol. 2010, 299:R1643-R1650.
15. Sclafani A., Ackroff K. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice. Physiol. Behav. 2012, 106:457-461.
16. Sclafani A. Gut-brain nutrient signaling: appetition vs. satiation. Appetite 2013, 71:454-458.
17. Sclafani A., Zukerman S., Ackroff K. GPR40 and GPR120 fatty acid sensors are critical for post-oral but not oral mediation of fat preferences in the mouse. Am. J. Physiol. Reg. Integ. Physiol. 2013, 305:R1490-R1497.
18. Sclafani A., Zukerman S., Ackroff K. Fructose and glucose conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar reward. Am. J. Physiol. 2014, 307:R1448-R1457.
19. Sclafani A., Touzani K., Ackroff K. Intragastric fat self-administration is impaired in GPR40/120 double knockout mice. Physiol. Behav. 2015, 147:141-148.
20. Sclafani A., Zukerman S., Ackroff K. Post-oral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sweetener reward in C57BL/6J mice. Chem. Senses 2015, 40:245-258.
21. Steinert R.E., Feinle-Bisset C., Geary N., Beglinger C. Secretion of gastrointestinal hormones and eating control. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91:1963-1973.
22. Tellez L.A., Ferreira J.G., Medina S., Land B.B., Dileone R.J., de Araujo I.E. Flavor-independent maintenance, extinction, and reinstatement of fat self-administration in mice. Biol. Psychiatry 2013, 73:851-859.
23. Weingarten H.P., Watson S.D. Sham feeding as a procedure for assessing the influence of diet palatability on food intake. Physiol. Behav. 1982, 28:401-407.
24. Weingarten H.P., Kulikovsky O.T. Taste-to-postingestive consequence learning: is the rise in sham feeding with repeated experience a learning phenomenon?. Physiol. Behav. 1989, 45:471-476.
25. Zukerman S., Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning by glucose and fat in the mouse. Am. J. Physiol. 2011, 301:R1635-R1647.
26. Zukerman S., Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and non-metabolizable sugar analogs. Am. J. Physiol. 2013, 305:R840-R853.
27. Zukerman S., Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: a concentration-response study. Physiol. Behav. 2013, 109:33-41.