Integrated rehabilitation planning of urban infrastructure systems using a street section priority model

Urban Water Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 28-40

  Tscheikner Gratl, Franz ^a   Sitzenfrei, Robert ^a   Rauch, Wolfgang ^a   Kleidorfer, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Asset management; Deterioration model; Priority model

Indexed keywords

INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; INTEGRATED APPROACH; MODELING; RANKING; URBAN PLANNING; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84946479783     PISSN: 1573062X     EISSN: 17449006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1573062X.2015.1057174     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. M.Ahmadi,,, 2013. Influence of available data on sewer inspection program efficiency. Urban Water Journal, 11 (8), 641–656.
2. M.Ahmadi,,, 2014a. Benefits of using basic, imprecise or uncertain data for elaborating sewer inspection programmes. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11 (3), 376–388.
3. M.Ahmadi,,, 2014b. From sewer inspection programmes to rehabilitation needs: Research and results related to data quality and availability with the support of numerical experiment. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 18 (10), 1145–1156.
4. H.Alegre, and S.T.Coelho, 2012. Infrastructure asset management of urban water systems. In: A.Ostfeld, ed. Water supply system analysis – selected topics. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 49–73.
5. E.V.Ana,, Jr. and W.Bauwens, 2010. Modeling the structural deterioration of urban drainage pipes: The state-of-the-art in statistical methods. Urban Water Journal, 7 (1), 47–59.
6. E.V.Ana,, Jr.,, 2009. An investigation of the factors influencing sewer structural deterioration. Urban Water Journal, 6 (4), 303–312.
7. Arbeitshilfen Abwasser 2004/242/D. 2012. Arbeitshilfen Abwasser - Planung, Bau und Betrieb von abwassertechnischen Anlagen in Liegenschaften des Bundes, 2012. Berlin/Germany: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung. Arbeitshilfe, 1–1110.
8. S.T.Ariaratnam,, A.El-Assaly,, and Y.Yang, 2001. Assessment of infrastructure inspection needs using logistic models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 7 (4), 160–165.
9. K.Arnbjerg-Nielsen, 2012. Quantification of climate change effects on extreme precipitation used for high resolution hydrologic design. Urban Water Journal, 9 (2), 57–65.
10. R.Ashley, and P.Hopkinson, 2002. Sewer systems and performance indicators—into the 21st century. Urban Water, 4 (2), 123–135.
11. R.Baur, and R.Herz, 2002. Selective inspection planning with ageing forecast for sewer types. Water Science & Technology, 46 (6–7), 389–396.
12. L.Berardi,,, 2008. Development of pipe deterioration models for water distribution systems using EPR. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 10 (2), 113–126.
13. D.Breindl, 2013. Kanalsanierung eine Herausforderung für die Zukunft. In: R.W.Rauch, ed. Österreichischer Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaftsverband,. Innsbruck, Austria, 3–6.
14. Bundeskanzleramt Österreich. 2001. Verordnung des Bundesministers für soziale Sicherheit und Generationen über die Qualität von Wasser für den menschlichen Gebrauch (Trinkwasserverordnung - TWV). Vienna, Austria: TWV.
15. B.D.Carey, and J.S.Lueke, 2013. Optimized holistic municipal right-of-way capital improvement planning. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 40 (12), 1244–1251.
16. J.P.Davies,,, 2001. The structural condition of rigid sewer pipes: a statistical investigation. Urban Water, 3 (4), 277–286.
17. M.DiSivo, and D.Ladiana, 2011. Decision-support tools for municipal infrastructure maintenance management. World Conference on Information Technology, 3, 36–41.
18. C.Egger,,, 2013. Sewer deterioration modeling with condition data lacking historical records. Water Research, 47 (17), 6762–6779.
19. EN 752. 2008. Drain and sewer systems outside buildings. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization. European Standard
20. M.Engelhardt,,, 2000. Rehabilitation strategies for water distribution networks: a literature review with a UK perspective. Urban Water, 2 (2), 153–170.
21. EPA. 2003. Asset management. A handbook for small water systems. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
22. F.Friedl,,, 2012. Failure propagation for large-diameter transmission water mains using dynamic failure risk index. In: E.D.Loucks, ed. Conference proceedings of the world environmental and water resources congress 2012. Albuquerque, NM: American Society of Civil Engineers, 3082–3095.
23. P.Fritsch,,, 2011. Mutschmann/Stimmelmayr - Taschenbuch der Wasserversorgung. Wiesbaden, Germany: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag / Springer Fachmedien.
24. D.Fuchs-Hanusch,,, 2014. Systematic estimation of discharge water due to transmission mains failure by the means of EPANET2. In: IWA, ed. Conference Proceedings of Water Loss 2014. Vienna, Austria: International Water Association (IWA), 75–81.
25. G.Gangl,, 2008. Rehabilitationsplanung von Trinkwassernetzen. Graz: Verl. der Techn. University.
26. J.D.Haan, J. de,, 2011. A workbench for societal transitions in water sensitive cities. In: IWA, ed. 12th International Conference on urban drainage 2011. Porto Alegre, Brazil, 1–9.
27. R.Herz, and R.Krug, 2000. Sanierungsbedarf und Sanierungsstrategien für Abwassernetze. In: Verein der Freunde der technischen Fachbereiche der Universität Leipzig e.V, ed. B.-S.LeipzigerBau-Seminar. Conference Proceeding. Thema: öffentliche und industrielle Wasserwirtschaft im Umbruch. Leipzig, Germany: Verein der Freunde der technischen Fachbereiche der Universität Leipzig e.V, 1–19.
28. S.Hörold, and R.Baur, 1999. Modelling sewer deterioration for selective inspection planning - case study Dresden. In: Technische Universität Dresden, ed. Proceedings of the 13th European junior scientist workshop. Dresden, Germany: Technische Universität Dresden, 10.
29. G.Kabir,, R.Sadiq,, and S.Tesfamariam, 2014. A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10 (9), 1176–1210.
30. M.Kleidorfer,,, 2013. Integrated planning of rehabilitation strategies for sewers. Water Science & Technology, 68 (1), 176–182.
31. Y.Kleiner,, A.Nafi,, and B.Rajani, 2010. Planning renewal of water mains while considering deterioration, economies of scale and adjacent infrastructure. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply, 10 (6), 897.
32. Y.Kleiner, and B.Rajani, 2001. Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: statistical models. Urban Water, 3 (3), 131–150.
33. D.-H.Koo, and S.T.Ariaratnam, 2008. Application of a sustainability model for assessing water main replacement options. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134 (8), 563–574.
34. LAWA 2005. Leitlinien zur Durchführung dynamischer Kostenvergleichsrechnungen (KVR-Leitlinien). 7th ed. Berlin: LAWA.
35. J.Lei, and S.Sægrov, 1998. Statistical approach for describing failures and lifetimes of water mains. Water quality international ‘98 selected proceedings of the 19th Biennial conference of the international association on water quality, 38 (6), 209–217.
36. M.Mair,,, 2012. GIS-based applications of sensitivity analysis for sewer models. Water Science & Technology, 65 (7), 1215.
37. A.Malm,,, 2012. Replacement predictions for drinking water networks through historical data. Water Research, 46 (7), 2149–2158.
38. B.Mareschal, 1988. Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research, 33 (1), 54–64.
39. C.Mikovits,, W.Rauch,, and M.Kleidorfer, 2013. Dynamics in urban development, population growth and their influences on urban water infrastructure. In: CCWI 2013 committee, ed. CCWI2013 2013. Perugia, Italy: Elsevier.1147–1156.
40. M.Möderl,,, 2009. Identifying weak points of urban drainage systems by means of VulNetUD. Water Science & Technology, 60 (10), 2507–2513.
41. A.Nafi, and Y.Kleiner, 2010. Scheduling renewal of water pipes while considering adjacency of infrastructure works and economies of scale. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 136 (5), 519–530.
42. A.Nafi, and Y.Tlili, 2014. Functional and residual capital values as criteria for water pipe renewal. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11 (2), 194–209.
43. R.Neunteufel,,, 2012. Technische Herausforderungen in der Siedlungswasserwirtschaft. Vienna, Austria: Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Sektion VII Wasser.
44. OECD 2001. Asset management for the roads sector. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
45. H.Osman, and K.Bainbridge, 2011. Comparison of statistical deterioration models for water distribution networks. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 25 (3), 259–266.
46. ÖVGW W 100. 2007. Wasserverteilleitungen -Betrieb und Instandhaltung, 2007. ÖVGW Österreichische Vereinigung für das Gas- und Wasserfach. Vienna, Austria: ÖVGW-Richtlinie.
47. ÖWAV-Regelblatt 40. 2010. Leitungsinformationssystem - Wasser und Abwasser, 2010. Österreichischer Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaftsverband. Vienna, Austria: ÖWAV-Regelblatt.
48. ÖWAV-Regelblatt 42. 2011. Unterirdische Kanalsanierung - Hauskanäle, 2011. Österreichischer Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaftsverband. Vienna, Austria: ÖWAV-Regelblatt.
49. M.Reidenbach,,., 2008. Investitionsrückstand und Investitionsbedarf der Kommunen. Ausmass, Ursachen, Folgen, Strategien. Berlin: Dt. Inst. für Urbanistik.
50. R.W.Saaty, 1987. The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9 (3–5), 161–176.
51. A.Scheidegger,,, 2011. Network condition simulator for benchmarking sewer deterioration models. Water Research, 45 (16), 4983–4994.
52. L.Scholten,,, 2013. Combining expert knowledge and local data for improved service life modeling of water supply networks. Environmental Modelling & Software, 42, 1–16.
53. L.Scholten,,, 2014. Strategic rehabilitation planning of piped water networks using multi-criteria decision analysis. Water Research, 49, 124–143.
54. R.Sitzenfrei, and W.Rauch, 2014. Investigating transitions of centralized water infrastructure to decentralized solutions – an integrated approach. 12th International Conference on Computing and Control for the Water Industry, CCWI2013, 70, 1549–1557.
55. C.Sorge,, T.Christen,, and H.-J.Mälzer, 2012. Maintenance strategy for trunk mains: Development and implementation of a high spatial resolution risk-based approach. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply, 13 (1), 104.
56. L.Sun, and W.Gu, 2011. Pavement condition assessment using fuzzy logic theory and analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137 (9), 648–655.
57. H.D.Tran,, B.J.C.Perera,, and A.W.M.Ng, 2010. Markov and neural network models for prediction of structural deterioration of storm-water pipe assets. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 16 (2), 167–171.
58. F.Tscheikner-Gratl,,, 2013. Integrated rehabilitation management for different infrastructure sectors. gwf-Wasser-Abwasser, Special (1/2013), 50–56.
59. F.Tscheikner-Gratl,,, 2015. Enhancement of limited water supply network data for deterioration modelling and determination of rehabilitation rate. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-cycle Design and Performance. doi:10.1080/15732479.2015.1017730.
60. G.-H.Tzeng, and J.-J.Huang, 2011. Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
61. W.van Riel,,, 2014. Intuition and information in decision-making for sewer asset management. Urban Water Journal, 11 (6), 506–518.
62. C.Werey,,, 2008. Sewer asset management tool: Dealing with experts opinions. In: E.A.CabreraJr and M.Á.Pardo, eds. Performance assessment of urban infrastructure services. London: IWA Pub, 125–134.
63. M.-D.Yang,, T.-C.Su,, and Y.-P.Chen, 2005. Priority evaluation of sewerage rehabilitation by AHP. In: C.Vipulanandan and R.Ortega ed. Proceedings of the Pipeline Division Specialty Conference. 21–24 August 2005. Houston, TX: American Society of Civil Engineers, 523–537.
64. R.Younis, and M.A.Knight, 2010. A probability model for investigating the trend of structural deterioration of wastewater pipelines. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 25 (6), 670–680.
65. J.Q.Zhao, and B.Rajani, 2002. Construction and rehabilitation costs for buried pipe with a focus on trenchless technologies. Ottawa, ON: Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council Canada.